Should it be possible in the upcoming Armada system for fleets to group together in spite of faction/alliance?
How about fleets which have a single RRF character in the top fleet rank?
Should the coming Armada system allow cross-faction groupings of fleets? 291 votes
No! Separatism all the way!
Yes! We're all allied now anyway!
Yes! But only if all fleets involved in an Armada have a single RRF character in the top fleet rank.
0
Comments
I don't understand what you mean by "only if a RRF character is amongst the top fleet ranks". Why should this have any impact?
As far as wether we'll see it, though, it is unlikely. On STOs reddit it was stated by a dev (not sure who) that cross-faction armadas aren't possible the way the game is coded and they probably won't revisit that state. Also, fleet store access is not being worked on (which would have been important for fed characters wanting to use kdf stores).
EDIT: Forgot a word
Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
We're all officially under the same banner as the Delta Alliance, so the old divide is completely gone.
If you've been keeping up with the discussion in this thread, you'll know that some of us in Romulan fleets (yes, there is such a thing, game mechanic stupidity notwithstanding) have fleets of both alliances and would like to be able to hold meetings of all our fleets regardless of alliance. At the moment, the only way we can do that is to go to someone's warbird, which is far from ideal. We would also like to bring our members from both sides closer together and have some means of interaction beyond private channels. And we have an unique situation; not only can an RRF character who is KDF-allied not even team with another RRF character if that one is Fed-allied, but we're forced into this artificial division by the unwillingness (not inability) of the Devs to give us a full faction in the first place. There are several other considerations involved, but you can read them for yourself in the thread I linked.
The way I understood it was that cross-faction would not go live with the Armada system, but they would still be looking at how they might do it given certain limitations.
Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
That's what the article said, yes.
I think many fleets are small BECAUSE they're Klingon fleets so it undercuts the point of helping out small fleets if you can't have a larger Fed fleet mentor them.
I see, I wasn't thinking in Romulan exclusive terms here because cross-faction Armada would also make sense and benefit "regular" fleets. I know there are Romulan RP fleets out there (I was looking for one for my Garidian but the RP ones would probably not acknowledge my non-canon character background so I ended up in a default open for all casual fleet) but unfortunately I think we'll never see a "promotion" of Romulans over the current state of merely being a cross-faction character choice. In-lore it is actually quite shameful that Romulans will without a second thought fight amongst themselves over the "allegiance" one chose but as far as the game is concerned there are only Red and Blue players.
The faction debate is as old as STO is, last info I recognized was a very, very definite stance that STO will never, ever get a third faction. Maybe we'll see a kind of STO II one day which will rectify a lot of the mistakes the original game made...
Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
Devs have said no to things in the past and we later got them anyway. It's not impossible; it would require a lot of work, but it's not impossible. I've presented a number of ways to facilitate it; this is another, but even if they're not willing to do all that work, at least this would ameliorate the RRF situation to some extent and give us more of a sense of being an actual faction.
1. Practicality. You only limit the field of candidates for any given armada by splitting the population. Nothing is gained.
2. Story telling. We are all allied now.
3. Story telling (again.) Even from the point of view of a new player contributing to an enemy faction's starbase can simply be viewed as politics.
Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
want a t5 kdf starbase? log in and play kdf. its that simple.
free jkname
Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
That's total TRIBBLE. You don't loose diversity just by having FED characters supply dilithium to a KDF starbase. They don't get KDF content. They just share resources.
How can mutual cooperation be against the principles of TRIBBLE Star Trek?
Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
Stop assuming that people don't actually play on both sides. We do. You do as well, or at least you have a Fed-side fleet which you were hawking along with your KDF-side fleet in the thread about lining up for armada alliances. Yeah, they're both T5 Starbases. That's not relevant. Apparently even in your own experience there are other people who actually play on both sides. THE WHOLE POINT OF THE ARMADA SYSTEM is to help other fleets, not to insulate elite fleets.
Which is an attitude that you can apply reflexively to anything you didn't "earn".
Take weapons. No, you can't have mutually provisioned Mk XII fleet weapons. Go grind Starbase 24 until you've "earned" them! No, you can't have a XII tactical console from a shared fleet spire. Go infuse alien artifacts until you get yours the "right" way!
Basically what you have there is a tautology, no one should have anything unless they have it. It means NOTHING to how the game might be better designed.
Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
a t5 kdf starbase is the very essence of kdf content. its the fruit of an active kdf fleet
free jkname
Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
free jkname
Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
Are you accusing me of that? Best reevaluate things before you continue down this path.
I now suspect:
Your issue isn't so much hysterical panic as it is the desire to maintain your elite status by keeping others down as much as possible. You don't want the competition. You don't want other fleets to share in the limelight of Fleet Eliteness.
How does a T5 KDF starbase factor into the KDF story arc?
It doesn't, its just something you can earn on the side with a lot of shared effort. In no way is it required or even made (through definite development decisions) to be a significant focus of the game at any level. Its just nice to have, and its a shame right now that because of the relatively low population of the KDF faction that not all that many people have access to one (without the NoP help channel.)
Armadas are almost explicitly designed to help overcome that problem but only by dealing with it at the level of big fleets and small fleets. There's still the higher-order population bias, which will still make KDF starbases arbitrarily more difficult to level even with this new system. Cross-faction armadas would easily eliminate that (while providing FED fleets with more potential armada candidates), thus making the game work better.
Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
Could be also that one of the reasons few fleets KDF-side have a T5 starbase is precisely because of those "Free T5 Starbase access for all!" things ...
for two years i have been inviting members of small fleets to t5 holdings and giving them free fleet ship access. i do this for the good of the faction. i do this to keep small fleets viable, rather than poaching all their members and trying to operate some sort multi-fleet fiefdom. lots of people will talk about how helping smaller fleets is such a noble duty, yet i am one of the few people that has actually gone out of my way to do much about it.
free jkname
Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
I have no idea how cross-faction equipment would work.
My thinking is more that, for fleets with separare KDF and Fed wings (be they big open fleets, cross-faction gaming networks, Romulan fleets, or whatever), being able to at least be connected under the same armada banner would be nice.
My Fed fleet Strike Team Alpha already does cross-faction partnerships unofficially: we share membership and a private chat channel with House of Tlhap-Jen (KDF), Gar'fon's Renegades (Fed), Vice Squad (Fed), and I think Vice Squad has a KDF counterpart called House of Vice, and STA just started its own KDF counterpart fleet, House of Alphas, that I moved both my KDF toons to from Tlhap-Jen.
So guess what, tehbubbaloo? Multifaction fleet networks are already a thing. Cross-faction armadas would just give us an extra feature to use. My Feds and Fed Rom in Strike Team Alpha have all kinds of stuff they could donate to House of Alphas to help the currently T1 fleet make rent, stuff I can barely use in STA because we've got 400-some-odd members all competing to earn fleet credits.
What are you afraid is going to happen? It's not like we're asking to put elite fleet disruptors on our Feds.
Additionally, if possible, I think it might be a good idea to make the Romulan Embassy, Spire, and Dilithium Mine maps cross-faction as well, while leaving the FED and KDF Starbase maps and equipment faction specific.
Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
How, exactly, does that help small fleets? It helps members of small fleets, yes (I myself have benefitted from personal friendship with members of maxed-out fleets, not the "Free T5 Starbase access for all!" fleets). But if they don't have to work to help build their own fleets, and can simply go to someone in a maxed-out fleet to get the stuff they want, what incentive do they have to contribute to their own fleet?
it helps small fleets by disincentivizing their members from leaving the fleet. small fleet members are able to kit themselves out without needing to abandon the fleet in search of higher tiered holdings. they contribute to their own small fleet in order to generate fleet credit to be spent in higher tiered stores. its a huge win for small fleets.
free jkname
Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!