test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Options

Tier 6 Command Ships!

1246711

Comments

  • Options
    worffan101worffan101 Member Posts: 9,518 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Pros:

    Nice blog, ships are balanced across factions.

    Rom ships do R-rated things to me. In a good way. Think I'll name one the Harpagornis. Those are really sweet ships.

    Fed ships--most are OK.

    Cons:

    Klingon ships, let's face it, are blocky and ugly. My advice would've been to say "Feds get 3 command battlecruisers, Rommies get 3 command battlecruisers, and KDF gets a command carrier, a command BOP, and a command hybrid battle carrier." That shuts up the KDF whiners, and if you give 'em some nice elegant lines like the Mat'Ha, they'd look really cool. Unlike these...space bricks.

    New mechanic looks cool but adds a lot of hassle. My skill bars are already full.
  • Options
    captyoung01captyoung01 Member Posts: 311 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Okay. . . So how is this going to reflect on those whom have already bought the T6 ship pack for over $100 (USD)? Back when that package was being introduced and up for pre-order there was also a small hint about the Romulan and Klingon Factions getting one or more T6 ships in the future. . .
  • Options
    virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    The pricing was also a bit of a surprise...means things are going to be more expensive because they're cheaper. ie, these aren't going to be FT6 ships - they're T6 ships - so when it comes time to FT6 them, each character will have to Fleet them...which will cost more in the long run than if they had been more expensive now and FT6 ships. Thinking back to the previous 3packs which were FT5 boats...hrmmm, oh well.
  • Options
    sunfranckssunfrancks Member Posts: 3,925 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Love the look of the fed ships, just a hint of Fuzzyprize in there! ;)

    Not a fan of another bundle, though. Never have done for the ability to customize ships; I saw the flaw/waste way back when I got the Andorian Escorts...

    Hangar bays again..... kind of a waste since the DR pet nerf. I don't use pets any more because of it..

    The only thing that could redeem the hangar, would have been faction specific Frigate pets, and these command cruisers could have been the perfect moment to release them...
    Fed: Eng Lib Borg (Five) Tac Andorian (Shen) Sci Alien/Klingon (Maelrock) KDF:Tac Romulan KDF (Sasha) Tac Klingon (K'dopis)
    Founder, member and former leader to Pride Of The Federation Fleet.
    What I feel after I hear about every decision made since Andre "Mobile Games Generalisimo" Emerson arrived...
    3oz8xC9gn8Fh4DK9Q4.gif





  • Options
    cyckathcyckath Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I like that they properly look like Star Trek ships unlike the Intel ones, but seeing any significant reason to swap over from canon designs.
  • Options
    freakshow046freakshow046 Member Posts: 44 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Technically, Fuzzy Modem did as part of the Design the next Enterprise competition. Here is his entry. A YT vid of his if you need.

    There's a list somewhere of other entrants' designs being turned into STO ships.

    Edit:
    2nd place became the Avenger.

    4th place became the Chimera.

    Are you talking about this? when the Odyssey became the next enterprise?
    http://trekmovie.com/2011/05/05/sto-update-design-new-enterprise-winner-revealed-section-31-uniforms/

    4th place became the Chimera? looks more like the Pathfinder, but the top down view is more Avenger.


    -
    signature-03.png
  • Options
    mhirtescmhirtesc Member Posts: 581 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    One day, my dream of a T6 Science ship with Hangar will be realized.
  • Options
    captsolcaptsol Member Posts: 921 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    So, when do we get a T6 Command Galaxy class? :D
  • Options
    captwilhelmcaptwilhelm Member Posts: 99 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    trelane87 wrote: »
    I'd rather pay 12,000 zen to upgrade my T5U ship to have specializations than to fly those things :rolleyes:

    Plus Commander Engi... gross

    I do not think I would pay or grind that much when there is T6 ships for much less. But I would definetely pay a reasonable amount for a T5U -> T6 upgrade. The state it is, I do not think it is worth upgrading the ship at all.
    Pre-forum change name: Captain Wilhelm
    Join Date: March 2009

    Thanks Cryptic for introducing the Kelvin Timeline. It remembered why I decided to never more put any money on this game.
  • Options
    mhirtescmhirtesc Member Posts: 581 Arc User
    edited February 2015

    I have no idea who this new Lead Designer is. ... or what happened to the last :D

    Executed for Incompetence
  • Options
    mikeflmikefl Member Posts: 861 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    As far as being unable to train BOFFs in Intelligence (and Command), that's false.

    For around 300k on the exchange, you can buy a Specialization token under the Intel tab to traind any Boff into Intel (they all come with the same basic Intel set). Then you just search for and pay for the Rank III abilities you want/need.

    Command also already has some Rank III skills and the Specialization token available on the exchange as well. Those were going for 1M or so for the Command Spec and more than that for Rank III skills.

    It's really just a matter of how badly you need those Rank III skills and the Specialization PADD. The Specialization tokens are Ultra Rare in color and rarity, if you need help searching them up.

    So if you really want Intel SROs, you can now do so if you don't already have the DR bundle BOFFs (or if you want more in any case).

    It's not false... you can buy all the manuals you want but if you don't have that specialization qualification as a captain... meaning you have spent 10 spec points or 1.5 million skill points in that specialization tree you can't train in those abilities --manual or not.
    Gold Sub since March 2010
    Lifetime Sub since June 2010
  • Options
    azpatraoazpatrao Member Posts: 22 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Visually, the ships look awesome! I'm marveled with the Romulan variants, beautiful!
  • Options
    johngazmanjohngazman Member Posts: 2,826 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    mhirtesc wrote: »
    Executed for Incompetence

    I mean, it'd be poor form to execute someone for being competent.
    You're just a machine. And machines can be broken.
    StarTrekFirstContactBorgBattleonetumblr_lln3v6QoT31qzrtqe.gif
  • Options
    theanothernametheanothername Member Posts: 1,504 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    .
    .
    Check out the new ships here.
    .
    .

    ~LaughingTrendy

    Oh well. New ships... Does the captains quarter have some customization options & will they come with Boff quarters where I can hang out with my staff for some poker or maybe just to get to know them better?

    ... bored of even more mobile gun platforms. Why not release something different? A crew deck! A whole crew deck level of a big sized starfleet/klingon/romulan cruiser applicable to all "true" fraction ships replacing the one we have with the new cooler one. That would be something new! :) But noonoonoo, just another thing that shoots beams/cannons again.
  • Options
    freakshow046freakshow046 Member Posts: 44 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I'm sorry, but that one version of the KDF head makes it look like an Ice Scraper... It's very off putting.

    :confused:
    signature-03.png
  • Options
    kngorkngor Member Posts: 23 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    The new ship's look nice, that's right...
    But i think we all can wait a few month to buy this ships but we cannot wait for Fixing bugs with the old ones and the rest of the game.

    So please make a new priority list on developement and establish a functioning Quality Management because if you don't do that, there would be nobody left to by those ships.
    =/\= 58. Geschwader - Fleet Admiral =/\=
    =/\= Vice Admiral |□|□|□| Andreas@Motzi =/\=
    =/\= Yan Isleth - yo' 'ai =/\=
    =/\= Lieutenant General |₳|₳|₳| K'ratak@Motzi =/\=
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Options
    trek21trek21 Member Posts: 2,246 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    peter1z9 wrote: »
    Woohoo, this is just what we need: more $30 ships! It's not like this game needs any bug fixes or stability fixes. :rolleyes:
    The ones who work on bug fixes and stability issues aren't the same as the ones who design ships - that should be fairly obvious
    Was named Trek17.

    Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
  • Options
    omgbamf00omgbamf00 Member Posts: 97 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    trek21 wrote: »
    The ones who work on bug fixes and stability issues aren't the same as the ones who design ships - that should be fairly obvious

    True, but the money Cryptic spent on developing these new ships could have been redirected to the dept that does handle bug fixes and instability.
  • Options
    cryptkeeper0cryptkeeper0 Member Posts: 989 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    :( what is wrong with that kdf design, I have a few idea's first of all the textures very much do not help the ship they aren't hiding at all that the ship is merely a bunch of intersecting planes. This is really disheartening. The other problems are just too many very flat long and wide surfaces.

    I don't usually complian or critic cryptic designs, some simply arn't my cup of tea but, most do at least adhere to a good art standards the game has put forth so far. But these kdf ships are step backwards in terms of quality.

    I look forward to the fed and romulan ships. But I really was hoping for Teir 6 flagship command ships.
  • Options
    antonine3258antonine3258 Member Posts: 2,391 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I really like the Romulan ones on this - and knowing we got customization and seeing the options up front is really nice after the intel ships and it wasn't obvious.
    Fate - protects fools, small children, and ships named Enterprise Will Riker

    Member Access Denied Armada!

    My forum single-issue of rage: Make the Proton Experimental Weapon go for subsystem targetting!
  • Options
    gavinrunebladegavinruneblade Member Posts: 3,894 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Love the customization options and thanks for remembering all three factions this time. A bit "meh" on the across the board commander engineer boff seat. I was hoping for science or tactical for one of three at least.

    ROM looks amazing, fed looks fed,but I agree with so many others, kdf not so hot. Again, its been said before, what's wrong with the classic Klingon D7 style? Can't we get a cruiser like that please?
  • Options
    rmy1081rmy1081 Member Posts: 2,840 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    omgbamf00 wrote: »
    True, but the money Cryptic spent on developing these new ships could have been redirected to the dept that does handle bug fixes and instability.

    that doesn't make sense at all... so you want one department to stop all work and not get paid so another completely different department can work extra? These people get salary, they're not contractors...

    As for the ship? IDK yet, I'll need more info before I think about buying. One thing though, these will be the first flight deck cruisers for the feds.
  • Options
    johngazmanjohngazman Member Posts: 2,826 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    :( what is wrong with that kdf design, I have a few idea's first of all the textures very much do not help the ship they aren't hiding at all that the ship is merely a bunch of intersecting planes. This is really disheartening.

    I don't usually complian or critic cryptic designs, some simply arn't my cup of tea but, most do at least adhere to a good art standards the game has put forth so far. But these kdf ships are step backwards in terms of quality.

    I look forward to the fed and romulan ships. But I really was hoping for Teir 6 flagship command ships.

    I see a lot of complaints about the way the KDF ships look. With the exception of the Ice-Scraper head piece, I think they don't look too bad. Reminiscent of the Orion Flight-Deck carriers...which makes sense, since they're flight deck carriers.

    Frankly, they look considerably more Klingon than the Qib does. Sorry, but that thing is not Klingon-looking enough.
    You're just a machine. And machines can be broken.
    StarTrekFirstContactBorgBattleonetumblr_lln3v6QoT31qzrtqe.gif
  • Options
    xstarhammerxxstarhammerx Member Posts: 50 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    They're cool and all, but like many others, I'd much prefer the ability to upgrade existing ships. My main is a Ferengi, and no matter what snazy new ships you come out with, there's going to be a need to stick with my D'kora. Now if you wanted to get me excited about throwing some money at goods and services, you'd give me the means to further upgrade my D'kora, from T5U to T6, adding Intelligence and/or Command support, and while you're at it, some new material skins for appearance customization to make it match some of the other Fed styles (or KDF styles, to go along with making Ferengi available to the Klingons). While I'm on that subject, I'd really love if my Klingon Fed Captain had access to a Fed-skinned B'rolth. Yeah, the KDF might be offended, but what are they gonna do, go to war with us?
  • Options
    organicmanfredorganicmanfred Member Posts: 3,236 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    mhirtesc wrote: »
    Executed for Incompetence
    johngazman wrote: »
    I mean, it'd be poor form to execute someone for being competent.

    Thats not nice. I just asked because I didnt know about the recent changes in the team.

    :(
  • Options
    helmsmn2helmsmn2 Member Posts: 34 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I play all three factions but KDF is my favorite so I concur with the opinion of my fellow players that say' "Wow those KDF command ships are ugly." I don't have tons of money to spend - when I spent it on a ship, I gotta love it, not only for abilities but looks are also important. I just don't love these.

    Please make us a T6 Bird of Prey and a real T6 Science ship for KDF. A variation on a proven, current design is fine.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Cleverly disguised as myself - Helmsmn2
  • Options
    kngorkngor Member Posts: 23 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    johngazman wrote: »
    I see a lot of complaints about the way the KDF ships look. With the exception of the Ice-Scraper head piece, I think they don't look too bad. Reminiscent of the Orion Flight-Deck carriers...which makes sense, since they're flight deck carriers.

    Frankly, they look considerably more Klingon than the Qib does. Sorry, but that thing is not Klingon-looking enough.

    They all are developers, the one Group for the ships the other for functionaly code.
    Mather of fact is that there are many bugs in the game so the Design Grou could fix their bugs befor designing new ships with new bugs.
    And all together they should test the things they develop ingame and not only in their mind.

    It is easy to develop some code, compile it and think, that should work at all...
    But you see the result. There are bugs in the game which Shows that this is the Standard procedure by Cryptic.
    And if it is not worse enough there is nobody left in the developers team who knows the original code.
    =/\= 58. Geschwader - Fleet Admiral =/\=
    =/\= Vice Admiral |□|□|□| Andreas@Motzi =/\=
    =/\= Yan Isleth - yo' 'ai =/\=
    =/\= Lieutenant General |₳|₳|₳| K'ratak@Motzi =/\=
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Options
    dontdrunkimshootdontdrunkimshoot Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    The pricing was also a bit of a surprise...means things are going to be more expensive because they're cheaper. ie, these aren't going to be FT6 ships - they're T6 ships - so when it comes time to FT6 them, each character will have to Fleet them...which will cost more in the long run than if they had been more expensive now and FT6 ships. Thinking back to the previous 3packs which were FT5 boats...hrmmm, oh well.

    they would have to be fleet level, with 11 console. no 3 pack/9 pack ship has been sold thats less then fleet level.


    im starting to wonder if fleet tier6 is ever even going to happen though
  • Options
    atlmyklatlmykl Member Posts: 305 Arc User1
    edited February 2015

    ROM looks amazing, fed looks fed,but I agree with so many others, kdf not so hot. Again, its been said before, what's wrong with the classic Klingon D7 style? Can't we get a cruiser like that please?

    I wish they would look to some of the old fasa designs for inspiration for all 3 factions. I would pay 200 USD for a 9 ship pack with designs based off Klingon L-20 and D-10 , romulan winged defender and whitwind, fed chanley and thufir classes. I can dream can't I?
  • Options
    johngazmanjohngazman Member Posts: 2,826 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    kngor wrote: »
    They all are developers, the one Group for the ships the other for functionaly code.
    Mather of fact is that there are many bugs in the game so the Design Grou could fix their bugs befor designing new ships with new bugs.
    And all together they should test the things they develop ingame and not only in their mind.

    It is easy to develop some code, compile it and think, that should work at all...
    But you see the result. There are bugs in the game which Shows that this is the Standard procedure by Cryptic.
    And if it is not worse enough there is nobody left in the developers team who knows the original code.

    O...kay.
    Thats not nice. I just asked because I didnt know about the recent changes in the team.

    :(

    He made a joke, I made a joke, we all laugh and then share an awkward silence. Fun all round!
    You're just a machine. And machines can be broken.
    StarTrekFirstContactBorgBattleonetumblr_lln3v6QoT31qzrtqe.gif
Sign In or Register to comment.