test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Andorian Escort: Kumari Line

13

Comments

  • buddha1369buddha1369 Member Posts: 386 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Yes, I was deeply dissapointed by the Kumari Variant. It has even less heals than the Defiant.

    Seriously, what would you do with all those tac boff slots? My Fleet Definat runs
    Com: TacT / CRF / BO3 / APO
    Lt Com: TacT / CRF / APB
    Esn: ? Dont remember, never use it.

    If I didnt run one DBB it would be even worse. I wouldnt know what to do with the extra Lt tac powers. Unless you run a torp or mine there is nothing left to use.

    I will most likely get the Khyzon (sci) and put an engineer in the uni slot. Less DPS but I might actually live.

    What would you put in all those tac slots?
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    rosebloome wrote: »
    Still either way, 5th tact console slot won't matter much if the BOFF layout is setup to the point that when the Elite Cubes turn and look at you, you're pretty much boned outside of a pocket healer.

    So basically run an all human BOFF team?

    Anyways, I'm currently running an escort with Polarons. But this ship has me thinking I'm going to have to switch to phasers?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • rosebloomerosebloome Member Posts: 63 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    So basically run an all human BOFF team?

    Anyways, I'm currently running an escort with Polarons. But this ship has me thinking I'm going to have to switch to phasers?


    With just an ensign Engie and a lt. universal on the Tact. Version... yeeaahh.. not even sure al lhuman is gonig to help you. I was meaning the stations when I said BOFF layout.

    As for switching to phasers. It depends on if the console abilities are boosted by damage consoles like the Gal-X spinal lance is. If it is, well, might want to to get the most bang for buck if you intend to use all of the ship's gimmicks. I highly doubt theres any other type of Wing Cannon than andorian phaser after all. ;p
  • aurigas7aurigas7 Member Posts: 488 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    I'm quite excited the ship I waited for so long finally arrived.

    Kumari version is a strange beast. The ensign on fleet defiant was already more of a waste than an asset.

    Phasers on it. Andorian phasers- remains to be seen if they are any good. If they are just blue phasers weaker than fleet versions I guess I will stick to plasma armament.
    Vorcha_forward.jpg
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    I like the Kumari Class. Hope they sell them separate. As I would love to have that one. That screen shot it firing the cannons did it for me. I can use this on my Tactical Captain.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    rosebloome wrote: »
    With just an ensign Engie and a lt. universal on the Tact. Version... yeeaahh.. not even sure al lhuman is gonig to help you. I was meaning the stations when I said BOFF layout.

    That combined with the DOFF selections will probably make the Engineering or Science version extremely playable.

    And the Tactical version kind of fun to goof around in.

    I'm not a hardcore PVPer. I'm not a hardcore PVE-er. Though I guess I do more hardcore PVE than PVP. I think this ship will fit what I want to do with my character very well.

    As for switching to phasers. It depends on if the console abilities are boosted by damage consoles like the Gal-X spinal lance is. If it is, well, might want to to get the most bang for buck if you intend to use all of the ship's gimmicks. I highly doubt theres any other type of Wing Cannon than andorian phaser after all. ;p

    Yeah, that's what I was pondering. If they do boost the gimmicks, then I really ought to invest in +Phaser tactical consoles and Phaser weapons just to keep things streamlined. But damn, I've grown to love the purple splatter of polarons.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • pegasussgcpegasussgc Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Looks good, I'll buy it. Honestly, I think the boff layout on the Tac version is necessary, otherwise it would be too OP. I do hope the KDF gets a comparable ship, not cut and paste, something unique for KDF would be nice.

    I'm just happy to see a Z-store ship instead of a lockbox ship.


    Edit: I can already tell the cannon platforms will be TRIBBLE.
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    farmallm wrote: »
    I like the Kumari Class. Hope they sell them separate. As I would love to have that one. That screen shot it firing the cannons did it for me. I can use this on my Tactical Captain.

    According to the last blog post, they will sell them individually for 2500 zen. And the three pack for 5000 zen. And they go on sale on the 21st.

    As with all things Cryptic, this is still probably subject to change.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • dabelgravedabelgrave Member Posts: 979 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    5 DHCs with 4 tac consoles will give me better damage/dps than my current 4 DHCs with 5 tac consoles. Even if I don't use the wing cannons or set consoles, I'm expecting to do better in the science variant then in my current Jem'Hadar Attack Ship (although the reduced turn rate might affect it somewhat).

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Asc_VtvL64z4dHNGNzhYaDRScVpFV0dMeS1BVnQ5V3c&usp=sharing
  • duaths1duaths1 Member Posts: 1,232 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Base Stats (for all Andorian Escorts):

    Required Rank: Vice Admiral
    Faction: Federation
    Hull Strength: 32,200
    Shield Modifier: .9
    Crew: 85
    Weapons: 5 Fore*, 2 Aft

    in light of this stats - please equip the fleet B'Rel (which requires T5 shipyard) also with 5 fore and 2 aft weapon slots!
  • helixsunbringerhelixsunbringer Member Posts: 249 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    duaths1 wrote: »
    Base Stats (for all Andorian Escorts):

    Required Rank: Vice Admiral
    Faction: Federation
    Hull Strength: 32,200
    Shield Modifier: .9
    Crew: 85
    Weapons: 5 Fore*, 2 Aft

    in light of this stats - please equip the fleet B'Rel (which requires T5 shipyard) also with 5 fore and 2 aft weapon slots!

    yeah I think its safe to say that the Andorian Escort just became the Federation's first Bird of Prey equivalent...
  • fovrelfovrel Member Posts: 1,448 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    yeah I think its safe to say that the Andorian Escort just became the Federation's first Bird of Prey equivalent...

    I don't know. 4/2, battle cloak, universal Boff's it is still a class of its own. However I am seriously thinking of buying the Andorian package. 75 crew, it is a small ship. I love small ships. It is the right thing for my characters. If they look big alongside other vessels, I will be dissappointed and the deal is off.
  • hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Well. The stats have been released. And I can safely say that I will now only be seeing Kumari variants in ESTFs. 5 forward facing weapons. That's 4 DHCs (including that special Andorian cannon), and a hyper plasma torp.

    The KDF got shafted. Again. They were given NOTHING equivalent, just like with the Vesta. What gives Cryptic??? They release the Steamrunner (fed only with NOTHING given to the KDF), the Vesta (fed only again... KDF gets... wait for it... NOTHING), the Fleet Failcelsior and Fleet Assault Cruiser (fed only... KDF gets... oh look, they actually got something, a fleet B'rel and Fleet Varanus... AMAZING), and now this Kumari 3 pack. That's 9 ships that the feds have gotten, and only 2 for the KDF. Whaaaaa....

    Anyways, that rant over with, this escort is basically quite nice, even though the base hull is a little lacking, but with it's shield mod that's not that big of a deal. The Tactical one is a little... um... inefficient with it's BOff layout, the Engineering one is VERY nice, and the Science one is a little... interesting. All those science consoles with such limited science BOffs. Very interested to see builds on that thing.

    Be that as it may, I am slightly disappointed with all but one of the variants, but will probably buy the 3 pack just to see what each one can do.

    Other than the blatant disregard for the KDF, well done Cryptic. Nice ship.
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
  • lasoniolasonio Member Posts: 490 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Lol, should be playable.... should be playable? Should be... hmmm

    Kumari, beautiful ship, totally worthless. Can't do much with all that tac. It's as the old saying goes, "You can have so many options that you have no options."

    But as far as the Charal and Khyzon goes these ships don't look familiar at all in their boff layout?

    Hmm lets see what they are to me.

    1 Patrol Escort
    2 Fleet Patrol Escort
    3 Chimera
    4 Jem'hadar Attack ships

    They are just slightly better then the Patrol escort so that slots them in the 4-5 spot above the patrol escort with the Kumari being a far far distant 14 or something it's set up is just god awful, it's basically death on wings. you can alpha strike someone with limited skills in early pvp and then afterwards you're pretty much going to be the reason your team will lose.

    The only thing I am not liking is that it's a DHC TRIBBLE child, it's beginning to become kinda irksome since players believe that DHC's are the hear all be all of ship builds and you can throw the most convalesced TRIBBLE together put dhc's on it and some how it's viable.

    I think someone said it earlier on that this is just a careful distraction to take away from the fact that this game is moving away from beams and on to dhc's. More and more each upgrade I am expecting to see Tie Fighters and such in game since it's beginning to seem more like star wars and less and less like star trek and the fix is so easy, just make beams more playable. you'll get 3/4 of the community who play with sci and eng capts to stop complaining and I'll actually see some interesting pvp battles instead of the Ace Combat Space version we are having atm.

    But anywho, that's my two cents from the kittymomo brigade and now we shall raid the kitchen for cookies and milk.
    Even god rested. No work ethic.
  • notapwefannotapwefan Member Posts: 1,138 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Perfect. It surely is going to be a flying coffin and fresh juicy target straight out of the production line for KDF bops.
    Grinding for MkIV epic gear?
    Ain't Nobody Got Time for That


    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • sunfranckssunfrancks Member Posts: 3,925 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    If I do get one of these ships, it will be either the eng or sci ship.

    Even the squishiest Fleet escort (Defiant) can out tank this thing....

    Anyone who decides to pilot the the Tac version, might get one shot off before certain death, glass cannon indeed.

    Especially in elite stf's lol
    Fed: Eng Lib Borg (Five) Tac Andorian (Shen) Sci Alien/Klingon (Maelrock) KDF:Tac Romulan KDF (Sasha) Tac Klingon (K'dopis)
    Founder, member and former leader to Pride Of The Federation Fleet.
    What I feel after I hear about every decision made since Andre "Mobile Games Generalisimo" Emerson arrived...
    3oz8xC9gn8Fh4DK9Q4.gif





  • edited February 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • wirtddwirtdd Member Posts: 211 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    patrickngo wrote: »
    Please, all you FEDS out there-BUY THIS SHIP!!! Please buy it. I need something out there I can actually kill...

    We are, don't worry.
    Bastet
  • sunfranckssunfrancks Member Posts: 3,925 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    patrickngo wrote: »
    Please, all you FEDS out there-BUY THIS SHIP!!! Please buy it. I need something out there I can actually kill...

    If you are having trouble killing current escorts in pvp, I very much doubt you will succeed with the Kumari either.... ;)
    Fed: Eng Lib Borg (Five) Tac Andorian (Shen) Sci Alien/Klingon (Maelrock) KDF:Tac Romulan KDF (Sasha) Tac Klingon (K'dopis)
    Founder, member and former leader to Pride Of The Federation Fleet.
    What I feel after I hear about every decision made since Andre "Mobile Games Generalisimo" Emerson arrived...
    3oz8xC9gn8Fh4DK9Q4.gif





  • edited February 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • aspartan1aspartan1 Member Posts: 1,054 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Now about efficient Andorian BOffs....
    If you are looking for an excellent PvE fleet consider: Omega Combat Division today.
    Former member of the Cryptic Family & Friends Testing Team. Sadly, one day, it simply vanished - without a word or trace...
    Obscurea Chaotica Fleet (KDF), Commander
    ingame: @.Spartan
    Romulan_Republic_logo.png
    Former Alpha & Beta Tester
    Original Cryptic Forum Name: Spartan (member #124)
    The Glorious, Kirk’s Protegè
  • hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    lasonio wrote: »
    I think someone said it earlier on that this is just a careful distraction to take away from the fact that this game is moving away from beams and on to dhc's. More and more each upgrade I am expecting to see Tie Fighters and such in game since it's beginning to seem more like star wars and less and less like star trek and the fix is so easy, just make beams more playable. you'll get 3/4 of the community who play with sci and eng capts to stop complaining and I'll actually see some interesting pvp battles instead of the Ace Combat Space version we are having atm.
    Heh... and the irony of this thing being a flying gun means that they will try to distract us from the obvious short-falls of the other two ship classes by baiting us with this new escort. And they have stressed it's wing-mounted cannons to the point where they will try to distract us from the fact that beams are not nearly as good as they should be.

    I see this ship as two things.

    1) A distraction away from the problems with cruisers and science ships.

    2) A beautifully designed (at least as it's in-game sprite goes) escort/heavy escort/destroyer based off of a nice (albeit ancient) ship design.

    I will reserve further judgment until it's stats come out. Hopefully it's not as much of a disappointment as the JHEC and JDC were.

    Hm... Yeah I think someone did post about it being a distraction away from the game's obvious and disgusting favoritism being shown towards escorts. And it is. Now that the stats have come out, it just completely and irrevocably reinforces my post. This is one of those times where I really hate being right.
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
  • alonthegreatalonthegreat Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    put mask energy sig. and rev shield polarity, creep on a player uload everything then run like hell
  • thumpyechothumpyecho Member Posts: 298 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    put mask energy sig. and rev shield polarity, creep on a player uload everything then run like hell

    ....on that note, seems like the Adapted MACO is what is called for.........just from looking back on the stats......

    ....I'm going to laugh if this is such a long term play - as in create a "really glassy" glass cannon(Kumari), make an even bigger, tank (Odyssey), and even more surgical Sci(Vesta)........anyone remember the circle of death?.............man I crack myself up......
  • sjokruhlicasjokruhlica Member Posts: 434 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    I don't know if I can warehouse my beloved Jem Attack Ship. I worked too hard to get it. But in the unlikely event I do, I'll fly the engineering variant. That tac variant is going to go boom. A lot.
  • f8explorer#7814 f8explorer Member Posts: 1,328 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    I don't know if I can warehouse my beloved Jem Attack Ship. I worked too hard to get it. But in the unlikely event I do, I'll fly the engineering variant. That tac variant is going to go boom. A lot.

    That's why I put my lock box ships on KDF toons .... Feds have more ships coming out on a regular basis.

    That way I get to play with the FED toys but still have uber toys for my KDF characters as well.
    Joint Forces Commander ... / ... proud member of ... boq botlhra'ghom / AllianceCenCom!
    " We stand TOGETHER and fight with HONOR!"

    U.S.S. Maelstrom, NCC-71417 (Constitution III-class/flagship) --- Fleet Admiral Hauk' --|-- Dahar Master Hauk --- I.K.S. qu'In 'an bortaS (D7-class / flagship)
  • kimmymkimmym Member Posts: 1,317 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    I wanted to be excited... but I'm not.

    I'm sure she will be fine, but that boff layout... on the tac version at least... Even using a DBB or a Torp I'm hard pressed to fill the slots well instead of tossing something in to fill it. The other 2 variants lose the 5th tac console. 5th forward weapon slot is nice, but it comes at the expense of a rear one and a decent boff layout or 5th tac console... She might just break even. The console set seems nice, but like all console sets eat up space... Tho the burst dps cooldown at least should be worthy if it conforms to previous "lances." I don't figure they will rule the skies, at least not once the initial wave of newness wears off.

    My wallet is pretty happy, tho. I'll wait and see on this one. My tac is KDF anyway, and my sci is pretty happy in the ships she owns.
    I once again match my character. Behold the power of PINK!
    kimmym_5664.jpg
    Fleet Admiral Space Orphidian Possiblities Wizard
  • fxadbfxadb Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Slightly borked. It'd be nicer if the engineering variant had:

    cmdr tac
    ltcdr tac
    lt eng
    ens SCI (instead of ens eng)
    lt uni
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    kimmym wrote: »
    5th forward weapon slot is nice, but it comes at the expense of a rear one

    That third turret was making all the difference in the world when shooting outside of the frontal firing arc? I don't think so.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • mrgrocer56mrgrocer56 Member Posts: 370 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Mine are bought and waiting for me to get home. Damn you, RL Job!
Sign In or Register to comment.