test content
Logo
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Enterprise F ????
mcghiey13
Member Posts: 22 Arc User
coming to, or is it in game???
Post edited by baddmoonrizin on
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
The F has been in game for a a long long time already. under the command of Captain Shon, an Andorian.
https://sto.fandom.com/wiki/U.S.S._Enterprise_(NCC-1701-F)
That is The G that was only introduced in the finale. So it will be dependant on CBS to allow it in STO.
Well is Legacy get the greenlight I bet it will be. I think the Constitution III could part of the bundle to start the borg story arc.
And hopefully she has options for the Shangri-La class as well. I mean while that class started as a fan design too, by the same guy who designed the Connie-III, I think it was backdoor canonized by the fact that there's a gold model of the first Titan, that looks like a TMP version of the Titan-A.
normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
colored text = mod mode
I just reread my post. I didn't she be story espiodes although i could see if Legacy happens. I was talking the ship of the line events they have
Personally, I am not a big fan of the design, it is way too busy and industrial looking for elegance, a look that plagued the movies a lot when it came to Federation ships, (though the style worked for the Klingon ships rather well). So, it is not a ship I would go for from a lockbox or promo box unless there was some RP theme I really, really wanted to use it for (and so far that is not happening) though it is not exactly the worst looking Fed ship either.
Not really, they would've just called it the F and completely ignored STO if they were hostile, or even neutral, to STO. They canonized the F, on top of many STO ships this season, and while the G is... an odd choice on many fronts for the next Enterprise, I think it's more they under-estimated the love STO fans have for the Oddy than malice towards either the F, STO, or it's fans. It messes up the timeline a bit, and Cryptic would have to deal with the G somehow, but doesn't seem to me to be a 'FU' to the devs or us.
Also, they already built a stage for the Titan and probably want to get more use out of it rather than tearing it down for a Yorktown interior (even if they teardown would only be the bridge itself). Why they feel that the fans prefer the hero ship to be named "Enterprise" all the time I don't know, but they seem to be retreating from originality again going to what they consider safer ground.
Not really. The Devs are not going to bend over backwards to change STO to line up with Canon. We are set in our own timeline, so Cryptic is free to tell stories. They already said on many occasions that if the timeline deviates too much from established STO lore, they'll just branch off into their own timeline rather than remake the whole game to line up with canon. The Ent-G will not be making an appearance herself, however the Connie-III class will make its way into the game eventually.
normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
colored text = mod mode
The Picard ship (Titan A) had a torpedo armament section removed from the front of the saucer and replaced with more sensors and such. They tried to make it into an explorer vessel, but it still has the speed from its past.
As for it being the next enterprise, I personally refuse to believe it. The ship is not designed to take on the role the enterprise fills. It is a scout cruiser at best.
The devs and kale have already come out and said that Picard's events do not change STO, sti is to be considered its own timeline and will continue doing its own thing
where do you get that nonsense from? novels are not canon and that sounds awfully bookish to me. I notice a few posters around here post stuff and everyone is expected to take it as canon. the Constitution III or Neoconstitution is new. no one really knows the capabilities yet. I think they should have left it at Titan. The writers clearly do not know their fan base and severely underestimated the Titan's popularity.
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Constitution_III_class
The Sangri-La class was a fan design created by Bill Krause, and was refined into the Connie-III. However I think this also backdoor canonized the Shangri-La as the three gold Titan models we see in the Observation Lounge include the current Connie-III, the Luna, and what looks like an older Connie-III.
normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
colored text = mod mode
So it would probably be more fitting to say that the Shangri-La class and the Constitution-III class have similarities but aren't the same class the same way the NX-class and the Akira class have similarities but they're not the same class. One is clearly based on the other but isn't 100% copy.
The Shangri-La wasn't from a book (though it may have been used in one later), it appeared in the Ships of The Line calendar which a lot of people do think is canon though it really isn't. The thing is, after all the years people have been designing fan stuff for Trek it is inevitable that any new ship that uses any kind of Trek aesthetics is going to look like something a third party made before it you dig around enough.
In the case of NuTrek, Kurtzman stated in an interview that he didn't understand classic Trek, that it was too cerebral. Also, in the behind the scenes feature from first season DSC a lot of people interviewed said that they never watched Trek, didn't like it, only watched the movies, and things like that.
It isn't necessarily still like that of course, but the new Trek is still constrained by a lot of the changes made by that first team.
#LegalizeAwoo
A normie goes "Oh, what's this?"
An otaku goes "UwU, what's this?"
A furry goes "OwO, what's this?"
A werewolf goes "Awoo, what's this?"
"It's nothing personal, I just don't feel like I've gotten to know a person until I've sniffed their crotch."
"We said 'no' to Mr. Curiosity. We're not home. Curiosity is not welcome, it is not to be invited in. Curiosity...is bad. It gets you in trouble, it gets you killed, and more importantly...it makes you poor!"
Actually, both did though Abrams said it a few years before Kurtzman. It is not unusual, they seem to agree on a lot of things (and use a lot of the same techniques too, such as "the magic box" and "steal from the best" that Abrams talks about in his TED talk). Both of them have that same rather shallow-but-obfuscated style that depends on eyecandy, action, and SFX to carry the story rather than deep plotting and drama.
And don't get me wrong, I don't hate the new stuff, and that is a perfectly valid style that works in a lot of shows and has for a long time, but it is more appropriate for something like the original Flash Gordon and other low-budget space operas rather than a spinoff of a show that was firmly in the soft sci-fi category.