test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Will we be getting the California class as a playable ship?

lordgyorlordgyor Member Posts: 2,820 Arc User
Will we be getting the California class as a playable ship?
Post edited by baddmoonrizin on
«134

Comments

  • thegrandnagus1thegrandnagus1 Member Posts: 5,166 Arc User
    Honestly, I can't believe you even feel the need to ask this question. Let me answer it with another question:

    Do you think Cryptic likes money?

    If you can answer that question, then you can probably figure out the answer to your question too :p

    The-Grand-Nagus
    Join Date: Sep 2008

    og9Zoh0.jpg
  • psiameesepsiameese Member Posts: 1,650 Arc User
    http://blog.trekcore.com/2020/08/star-trek-lower-decks-roundup-cerritos-design-new-posters-ready-room/
    The ship is in great condition. It’s a California-class ship, which has always existed in Starfleet — [this is] what we’re saying — that they’re the utility support ships. In the California-class [line], there are three types of hull painting: there’s blue, red, and yellow.

    We’ve extended the visual metaphor of the uniforms to the ships, and the Cerritos has yellow on the hull because it’s primarily a second contact engineering ship. They show up to planets that need engineering stuff done on them in order to be able to communicate with the Federation.

    There’s also, you’ll see in the show, blue-hulled California class ships, which are usually deployed to places where there has to be more medical expertise, and red-hulled ships that are like for moving around ambassadors and doing more command-level stuff.
    Three-ship Bundle confirmed! ;)
    (/\) Exploring Star Trek Online Since July 2008 (/\)
  • vengefuldjinnvengefuldjinn Member Posts: 1,521 Arc User
    The question is how the ship would be obtained.
    But honestly, I already know the answer to that. ;)
    tumblr_o2aau3b7nh1rkvl19o1_400.gif








  • foppotee#4552 foppotee Member Posts: 1,704 Arc User
    The title: Lower Decks Lock Box just rolls off the tongue.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • theanothernametheanothername Member Posts: 1,511 Arc User
    Its current Trek, its official Trek, it will get attention and will have a lot of people interested in it just because of its bad rep. So yeah, expect it in some way or form in the game. Probably even with some goofy tie in missions with the voice cast from the show that really show your crew how things are not done.

    ... hmm... could actually be fun.

    *lazyselfquote* ;)
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    westmetals wrote: »
    To throw a little bit of "devil's advocate" here... we don't know for certain that the general STO license would include it. If it doesn't then they have to make special arrangements. Which has been done in several cases, but is not automatic.
    Given that we have doffs, they probably can.
    coldnapalm wrote: »
    reyan01 wrote: »
    Yeah, it'll appear in-game. And it'll happen before we get a quality pass/T6 Nova too.
    But that applies to EVERYTHING.
    We'll probably get Kukulkan's ship before a T6 Nova. :p
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • theanothernametheanothername Member Posts: 1,511 Arc User
    westmetals wrote: »
    To throw a little bit of "devil's advocate" here... we don't know for certain that the general STO license would include it. If it doesn't then they have to make special arrangements. Which has been done in several cases, but is not automatic.
    Given that we have doffs, they probably can.
    coldnapalm wrote: »
    reyan01 wrote: »
    Yeah, it'll appear in-game. And it'll happen before we get a quality pass/T6 Nova too.
    But that applies to EVERYTHING.
    We'll probably get Kukulkan's ship before a T6 Nova. :p

    Not to forget about the Omega Class Cruiser from the big STO / B5 crossover

    EASAgammemnon.jpg

    >:)
  • thegrandnagus1thegrandnagus1 Member Posts: 5,166 Arc User
    edited August 2020
    westmetals wrote: »
    To throw a little bit of "devil's advocate" here... we don't know for certain that the general STO license would include it. If it doesn't then they have to make special arrangements. Which has been done in several cases, but is not automatic.

    When the new Trek shows started the devs said their license applies to all the new shows. And as others have pointed out, the free doffs they are giving away makes this obvious in this case as well.

    The-Grand-Nagus
    Join Date: Sep 2008

    og9Zoh0.jpg
  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,561 Community Moderator
    She'll be coming to STO. Just not sure in what capacity. We may get a T6 version with the show version as customization parts to justify having her in game despite being a support ship rather than a frontline one.
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
  • questeriusquesterius Member Posts: 8,481 Arc User
    lordgyor wrote: »
    Will we be getting the California class as a playable ship?

    The only reference i can find with California and star trek is an Excelsior Class which is already in the game.
    If you mean another class then providing a link might be useful.
    This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Questerius 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
  • thegrandnagus1thegrandnagus1 Member Posts: 5,166 Arc User
    questerius wrote: »
    lordgyor wrote: »
    Will we be getting the California class as a playable ship?

    The only reference i can find with California and star trek is an Excelsior Class which is already in the game.
    If you mean another class then providing a link might be useful.

    It is the ship from the new show Lower Decks.

    The-Grand-Nagus
    Join Date: Sep 2008

    og9Zoh0.jpg
  • questeriusquesterius Member Posts: 8,481 Arc User
    questerius wrote: »
    lordgyor wrote: »
    Will we be getting the California class as a playable ship?

    The only reference i can find with California and star trek is an Excelsior Class which is already in the game.
    If you mean another class then providing a link might be useful.

    It is the ship from the new show Lower Decks.

    You mean the trashed miranda design someone, for some reason, saved from the trash bin?
    Cannot imagine anyone spending a proverbial penny on something that hideous.
    This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Questerius 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,561 Community Moderator
    questerius wrote: »
    You mean the trashed miranda design someone, for some reason, saved from the trash bin?
    Cannot imagine anyone spending a proverbial penny on something that hideous.

    One man's trash is another man's treasure.

    The Cali is a workhorse ship. She's not the plum assignment like a Sovy. If people are willing to fly freighters in STO, people will fly a Cali.
    Me personally... if people want it they want it. *shrug*
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
  • thegrandnagus1thegrandnagus1 Member Posts: 5,166 Arc User
    questerius wrote: »
    questerius wrote: »
    lordgyor wrote: »
    Will we be getting the California class as a playable ship?

    The only reference i can find with California and star trek is an Excelsior Class which is already in the game.
    If you mean another class then providing a link might be useful.

    It is the ship from the new show Lower Decks.

    You mean

    I mean what I said. It doesn't actually matter if you like it or not, I was telling you what the OP was talking about.

    The-Grand-Nagus
    Join Date: Sep 2008

    og9Zoh0.jpg
  • tymerstotymersto Member Posts: 433 Arc User
    lordgyor wrote: »
    Will we be getting the California class as a playable ship?

    Personally: Dear Gawd! I hope not! It's but-fudge ugly. Only the Crossfield is worst!

    Realistically: The Devs'll throw it to us. Most likely it'll be a T6 lockbox, but... I could see it as another scalable T1-T4 CStore ship or grind-ship. That would seem to fit the scope of the ship class anyways...
    STO CBT Player - 400 day+ Vet, Currently Silver
    Cryptic, would you actulaly like me to spend actual Money? It's Simple:
    • Full, Story-driven, select from start 1-50 Klingon Side
    • Scrap current Lock Box & Lobi system for something more reasonable
    • Expand Dil and Rep/Fleet Marks to regular story content
  • vetteguy904vetteguy904 Member Posts: 3,923 Arc User
    unless they are giving ti a way with and exceptionally fun grind, hard pass for me
    sig.jpg
  • phoenixc#0738 phoenixc Member Posts: 5,828 Arc User
    edited August 2020
    It would not necessarily have to be a T1-T4 like the Maru, it is essentially an engineering/planetary science ship, and that toughness and versatility would lend itself very well to a Q-ship role which would be an interesting T6 ship. In fact, I could see it as a miracle worker light cruiser quite easily.

    And yes, it does look rather dumb but that is true of most of the CBS Trek ships anyway (don't get me started on the DSC Klingon ships) so it is nothing out of the ordinary nowadays. CBS would have done better to canonize STO or FASA original designs, or at least hire some people that are not stuck on that art deco derived dross, but it is what it is.

    The funny thing is, a ship almost exactly like the California class appeared in TAS, a flattish saucer with that squarish hoop arrangement of engines underneath the saucer, though it just had four rather short nacelles down there on the crossbar instead of two normally proportioned ones and the engineering pod like the California has, so there is actually a bit of precedent for the design.

    There was another wicket style ship in TAS too, a rectangular main hull, two normal nacelles, and that same hoop only that one had it on top with some kind of square modules on it, possibly cargo containers. Those wicket arrangements seem to be an animation favorite in Trek.
  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,561 Community Moderator
    I think the Odyssey class might be on its way to canon status, considering its appearance in the Picard prequel comic.
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
  • foppotee#4552 foppotee Member Posts: 1,704 Arc User
    Well the 3 versions: Engineering, Medical, & Command have already been discussed so they could go the route of making 3 slightly different versions probably differentiated by: modified console slotting, BOFF seating, ship abilities, &/or give the Medical a secondary-deflector, or the easier route of just 1 ship with 3 different paint-jobs.

    I think Cryptic should make the ship as close to looking animated/cartoonish as possible for distinction & humor.
  • jonsillsjonsills Member Posts: 10,458 Arc User
    Nobody gets to complain about ugly ships as long as those Breen office blocks are polluting the skies.
    Lorna-Wing-sig.png
  • This content has been removed.
  • edited August 2020
    This content has been removed.
  • smokebaileysmokebailey Member Posts: 4,668 Arc User
    jonsills wrote: »
    Nobody gets to complain about ugly ships as long as those Breen office blocks are polluting the skies.

    *coughdiscoshipscough* :D
    dvZq2Aj.jpg
  • This content has been removed.
  • chastity1337chastity1337 Member Posts: 1,607 Arc User
    coldnapalm wrote: »
    jonsills wrote: »
    Nobody gets to complain about ugly ships as long as those Breen office blocks are polluting the skies.

    I'm sorry...but the breen ships are down right smexy compared to some of those Michael Burnham show klingon ships.

    QFT, quoted for truth! I have been re-watching old episodes of ST Disco recently, and as always when I watch something for a second time, I am noticing a lot more of the background stuff like ship designs. The overall thing I am reminded in watching this show again is how mixed it is; sometimes quite good and sometimes really bad.

    Style and design are two things I find most repugnant. I hate what they did with the Klingons, (as I did with JJ Trek), and some of the ship designs are, (stops and thinks how to say this without getting "jailed"), not to my taste.

  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
This discussion has been closed.