test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

***SPOILER***Can we get this new design from last night's episode?

13567

Comments

  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,669 Community Moderator
    ssbn655 wrote: »

    LMAO Sorry LOYAL Trekkies ignore KT...

    Stopping you right there. Liking the Kelvin Timeline doesn't make anyone any less of a Trek fan.
    I think you're forgetting something that was introduced in Star Trek. IDIC. So please stop trying to beat people over the head with the "True Fan" shtick. If you don't like it, that is your opinion. Not a measuring stick for franchise loyalty.
    And if Klingons weren't "cannibals" then why did Kang, Kor, and Koloth, eath another Klingon's heart after beating him in battle?

    May have been adapted from some Earth hunting cultures where eating the heart of your kill instills the strength of that animal into the hunter. *shrug*
    we still don't know that the albino was a klingon because that was never established - unless something in discovery did so​​

    Well... I think The Albino may have been Klingon. Discovery did kinda establish that Klingons seem to look down on albinos as less than Klingon. I mean look how Voq was treated. Like he was dirt.
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
    normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
    colored text = mod mode
  • fakemirage#8763 fakemirage Member Posts: 24 Arc User
    ssbn655 wrote: »
    If they put the TRIBBLE Connie in the C-Store, I'd buy it. It's closer to the real thing than the JJprise is, after all.

    They better put the TOS T-6 in there as well or there will be much grief poured unto the Devs considering the fiasco the TOS T-6 ships release was.

    What "fiasco" are you talking about? Although they haven't said it, I have absolutely no doubt that the T6 connie was the all time greatest money-maker this game has ever had. Just because some people were whining about it on the forums doesn't actually matter if they are making money hand over first.

    And on that note, of course they won't be putting it in the C-store when they can make people gamble for it. They also know other people will just spend a couple hundred in zen to buy keys to sell for EC to buy the ship from other players, which means they will still be getting a couple hundred bucks for a ship. They aren't going to pass up on that money.
  • smokebaileysmokebailey Member Posts: 4,668 Arc User
    artan42 wrote: »
    flash525 wrote: »
    Have you seen the TRIBBLE version of the D-7?? I doubt fans of the K't'inga/D-7 will want that
    There hasn't been a D7 shown on Discovery yet, so I don't know quite what you're on about.

    One episode had a "D7" appear, that snagged the shuttle, but it looked anything BUT a D7. It looks more like one of the Romulan miracle worker ships. |>_>\;;

    Go on then. What's a D7 Prison ship supposed to look like? I eagerly await your canon source for this previously unseen ship type.​​

    Since when do they take prisoners?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jldnOkg16f8

    closest I could find... but the computer's audio is not edited and clearly says 'D-7 Battlecruiser'

    Yep. TY's did a better version. B)
    dvZq2Aj.jpg
  • This content has been removed.
  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,669 Community Moderator

    When I saw this, I died inside. So no you can't have it.

    * shakes fist at JJFanboys *

    Its ok Crash... here... have an epohh friend. *pats back*
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
    normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
    colored text = mod mode
  • This content has been removed.
  • jexsamxjexsamx Member Posts: 2,803 Arc User
    rattler2 wrote: »

    When I saw this, I died inside. So no you can't have it.

    * shakes fist at JJFanboys *

    Its ok Crash... here... have an epohh friend. *pats back*

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAct7Ynxty8

    BuTvWOk.gif
  • dracounguisdracounguis Member Posts: 5,358 Arc User
    edited February 2018
    flash525 wrote: »
    One would hope that a skin option would become available for anyone that already owns the Temporal Cruiser

    So would say someone that has that ship! :#
    But everyone else would say: One would hope it wouldn't just be another skin for the space-rich STO players.
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    edited February 2018
    ssbn655 wrote: »
    LMAO Sorry LOYAL Trekkies ignore KT as it is a alt universe and non canonical to the TV and numerous TOS based films. These include TOS/TNG/DS9/VOY/ENT/TRIBBLE. KT is it's own thing and has it's own canon which is fine but to be 100% honest has more then enough of it in this game. Seriously look at whats in the works Tarentino Trek so when that happens are we going to get that here as well? I hope not as the enitre Trek universe is starting to be like the Marvel Universe a mixed bag that can be just god awful.

    There's one canon it includes all films and TV shows.
    Since when do they take prisoners?

    The whole planet Organia. But if you can't answer the simple question then don't deflect, just say so. You don't have a clue what a D7 Prison Ship is supposed to look like.


    The Star Trek: Discovery The Official Starships Collection gives a complete list of all Federation and Klingon ships (other than shuttles and fighters) from the show. Now I don't see the words 'K't'inga Class' there. Meaning the evidence of onscreen dialogue and the official position suggests the D7 Prison Ship is a different class.

    It's never even been suggested 'D' is a Klingon designation in the first place.​​
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • salazarrazesalazarraze Member Posts: 3,794 Arc User
    edited February 2018
    The Discovery take on the Constitution was the one good part of that episode. I fully expect it to be added to the existing Promo Constitutions at some point. I also hope that the JJprise gets an in-game update to include the new JJprise-A look seen in "Beyond."
    When you see "TRIBBLE" in my posts, it's because I manually typed "TRIBBLE" and censored myself.
  • peterconnorfirstpeterconnorfirst Member Posts: 6,225 Arc User
    The Discovery take on the Constitution was the one good part of that episode. I fully expect it to be added to the existing Promo Constitutions at some point. I also hope that the JJprise gets an in-game update to include the new JJprise-A look seen in "Beyond."

    Both would be great! :)
    animated.gif
    Looking for a fun PvE fleet? Join us at Omega Combat Division today.
    felisean wrote: »
    teamwork to reach a goal is awesome and highly appreciated
  • ikonn#1068 ikonn Member Posts: 1,450 Arc User
    edited February 2018
    An option they could release is Kronos One from The Undiscovered Country... It doesn’t fit the current lockbox “theme” but it could be released individually.

    The DSC Enterprise does look sweet!
    -AoP- Warrior's Blood (KDF Armada) / -AoP- Qu' raD qulbo'Degh / -AoP- Project Phoenix
    Join Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2010
  • seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,919 Arc User
    reyan01 wrote: »
    As our esteemed friend @mustrumridcully0 once said, it's sad that the hallmark of a 'real Star Trek fan' seems to now be their ability and authority to declare others to not be Star Trek fans based on the kind of Star Trek material they enjoy.

    Man, I could not agree more.

    Unfortunately, the Kelvin Timeline Movies and the Discovery show have really shined a light on what a huge bunch of cry babies Trek fans really are. I get it, not everyone will like every series.. and that's totally cool.. but man.. the judgment that they cast on those of differing opinions is just insane.

    I for one no longer call myself a Trek Fan, I'm just a guy that likes Star Trek. The last thing I want is to be associated with such an entitled and whiny fan base. Like what you like.. enjoy what you want and let others do the same. You would think this would be a fundamental principal of people that like such a diverse show as Star Trek, but apparently the bulk of the 'fan base' missed the point entirely.
    Insert witty signature line here.
  • jordan3550jordan3550 Member Posts: 328 Arc User
    > @seaofsorrows said:
    > reyan01 wrote: »
    >
    > As our esteemed friend @mustrumridcully0 once said, it's sad that the hallmark of a 'real Star Trek fan' seems to now be their ability and authority to declare others to not be Star Trek fans based on the kind of Star Trek material they enjoy.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Man, I could not agree more.
    >
    > Unfortunately, the Kelvin Timeline Movies and the Discovery show have really shined a light on what a huge bunch of cry babies Trek fans really are. I get it, not everyone will like every series.. and that's totally cool.. but man.. the judgment that they cast on those of differing opinions is just insane.
    >
    > I for one no longer call myself a Trek Fan, I'm just a guy that likes Star Trek. The last thing I want is to be associated with such an entitled and whiny fan base. Like what you like.. enjoy what you want and let others do the same. You would think this would be a fundamental principal of people that like such a diverse show as Star Trek, but apparently the bulk of the 'fan base' missed the point entirely.


    Totally agree with ya
  • centurian821centurian821 Member Posts: 274 Arc User
    reyan01 wrote: »
    As our esteemed friend @mustrumridcully0 once said, it's sad that the hallmark of a 'real Star Trek fan' seems to now be their ability and authority to declare others to not be Star Trek fans based on the kind of Star Trek material they enjoy.

    Man, I could not agree more.

    Unfortunately, the Kelvin Timeline Movies and the Discovery show have really shined a light on what a huge bunch of cry babies Trek fans really are. I get it, not everyone will like every series.. and that's totally cool.. but man.. the judgment that they cast on those of differing opinions is just insane.

    I for one no longer call myself a Trek Fan, I'm just a guy that likes Star Trek. The last thing I want is to be associated with such an entitled and whiny fan base. Like what you like.. enjoy what you want and let others do the same. You would think this would be a fundamental principal of people that like such a diverse show as Star Trek, but apparently the bulk of the 'fan base' missed the point entirely.

    That is indeed sad. But just remember that you both, as well as others, are living proof that not all fans are like that. The internet has an unfortunate tendency to give the least civil members of any group some of the largest megaphones with which to voice their grievances, no matter how petty they may be. It took me a long time before I could get past the existence of the Kelvin timeline and I had a lot of the same problems with it as those 'purists' among us, I just needed to take a step back and look at it from a different perspective. Discovery will have a harder time of that as they've been telling us this is Prime timeline. But I'm getting away from the topic at hand.

    The Enterprise from the finale, I tend to like. I've a little problem with the nacelle struts, but the change in aesthetic I've got down to this being what I call a "War-Time Refit." I'd have no problem with this version appearing in STO, but I'd rather it be C-Store than anything else, though that may be a vain hope.
  • flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    rattler2 wrote: »
    flash525 wrote: »
    I would theorise that a D7 Prison Ship is a different ship to the D7 Battlecruiser we're all familiar with.

    I think so too. I mean we've already seen 2 Klingon ships in Enterprise that had the same designation but different types.

    D5 Battlecruiser
    latest?cb=20081006224452&path-prefix=en

    D5 Tanker
    latest?cb=20061214161910
    Thanks for this! :smile:
    I wasn't talking about the Albino, I was talking about T'nag. He told the story of him, Koloth, and Kor, beating T'nag's army, and then eating his heart, in the episode where they go and recover the sword of Kahless.
    Klingon's are known all too well for exaggerating their stories, so it's quite plausible that the heart of their Klingon enemy wasn't actually eaten.

    Even if it was though, the entire Klingon culture isn't going to reform to one set of rules. That would be like expecting every Human to be a Vegan, Vegetarian, Cannibal or Omnivore.
    flash525 wrote: »
    One would hope that a skin option would become available for anyone that already owns the Temporal Cruiser

    So would say someone that has that ship! :#
    But everyone else would say: One would hope it wouldn't just be another skin for the space-rich STO players.
    I would no doubt surprise you then to know that I don't own a single Lock Box, Lobi, or Promotional ship. :wink:
    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
  • flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    edited February 2018
    Unfortunately, the Kelvin Timeline Movies and the Discovery show have really shined a light on what a huge bunch of cry babies Trek fans really are. I get it, not everyone will like every series.. and that's totally cool.. but man.. the judgment that they cast on those of differing opinions is just insane.

    I for one no longer call myself a Trek Fan, I'm just a guy that likes Star Trek. The last thing I want is to be associated with such an entitled and whiny fan base. Like what you like.. enjoy what you want and let others do the same. You would think this would be a fundamental principal of people that like such a diverse show as Star Trek, but apparently the bulk of the 'fan base' missed the point entirely.
    That is indeed sad. But just remember that you both, as well as others, are living proof that not all fans are like that. The internet has an unfortunate tendency to give the least civil members of any group some of the largest megaphones with which to voice their grievances, no matter how petty they may be. It took me a long time before I could get past the existence of the Kelvin timeline and I had a lot of the same problems with it as those 'purists' among us, I just needed to take a step back and look at it from a different perspective. Discovery will have a harder time of that as they've been telling us this is Prime timeline. But I'm getting away from the topic at hand.
    I think fakemirage summed this up with a post on another topic (see here, page 8, post 5). There's no reason for anyone to actually be complaining other than the mere sake of having the ability to complain about seemingly, nothing.
    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
  • centurian821centurian821 Member Posts: 274 Arc User
    edited February 2018
    flash525 wrote: »
    I think fakemirage summed this up with a post on another topic (see here, page 8, post 5). There's no reason for anyone to actually be complaining other than the mere sake of having the ability to complain about seemingly, nothing.
    That's, that's not the same thing though. It's reasonable to assume they are both refits of the original (which I hope was what was being said in that Tweet), and in that case they are indeed the same ship. But the Enterprise getting refit in TMP was part of the plot, not an absurd notion. Change has to have a reason behind it that is in-universe. That's part of good story telling. Cause and Effect. If the change is small enough, like the uniforms from TMP to TWoK, then it can be overlooked. But changes that are so many and so frequent need addressing or credibility is lost. Other shows and films get away with a kind of "drop you into the world" storytelling that doesn't address any specifics because they are still setting up their universes. Star Trek's universe has been set up for more than fifty years now. These things can't go unquestioned.

    I'm sorry. If it's a refit, fine. If the tech needs to be phased out, fine. Just explain it. Don't make so many changes to something that has such a long and established history and expect to be accepted. That's absurd. If Star Wars can be visually consistent with it's prequels than so can Star Trek.

    It took forty years until Enterprise answered the Klingon ridges question. I sincerely hope they get around to answering the questions Discovery is bringing up before another forty go by. I won't bash Discovery, there's no point in it, but I will ask questions that I feel need to be addressed for it to fit into the larger universe of Star Trek with the least amount of resistance. I want to share Star Trek in all it's forms with my children and if I'm lucky with their children. I want new shows to crop up over the years and to point up at the screen and say "That's cool! Look at that!" not "Why did they change that?"

    /OffTopic
  • meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User

    Someone posted this on reddit, which isn't bad:

    https://imgur.com/a/KyMN9

    Still, it would be awesome to get the real thing.


    Dude, it's the Enterprise. Somebody changes the shape of a nacelle and you go apeshit :)
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    I'm sorry. If it's a refit, fine. If the tech needs to be phased out, fine. Just explain it. Don't make so many changes to something that has such a long and established history and expect to be accepted. That's absurd. If Star Wars can be visually consistent with it's prequels than so can Star Trek.
    Star Wars has a very different theme, and attracts a different core audience (that's why there are Trek fans and Wars fans; the hardcore of both generally prefer one over the other. Casual fans, like myself, don't get caught up in ... semantics.

    Had they of used the TOS Constitution, and (if) they use TOS interfaces, weapons and sets in Discovery's Season 2, it'll just look out of place, especially when the crew of Discovery are using touchscreen rather than buttons. I guess a lot of it comes down to personal preference. At the end of the day, Discovery, even though it's a prequel show, is also a modern show; it's going to look shinier, and I'm more than satisfied with that. I genuinely don't think I'd have stuck with it had it been as tacky looking as TOS - just so that it would otherwise satisfy a few people that can't move with the times.
    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
  • smokebaileysmokebailey Member Posts: 4,668 Arc User
    flash525 wrote: »
    I think fakemirage summed this up with a post on another topic (see here, page 8, post 5). There's no reason for anyone to actually be complaining other than the mere sake of having the ability to complain about seemingly, nothing.
    That's, that's not the same thing though. It's reasonable to assume they are both refits of the original (which I hope was what was being said in that Tweet), and in that case they are indeed the same ship. But the Enterprise getting refit in TMP was part of the plot, not an absurd notion. Change has to have a reason behind it that is in-universe. That's part of good story telling. Cause and Effect. If the change is small enough, like the uniforms from TMP to TWoK, then it can be overlooked. But changes that are so many and so frequent need addressing or credibility is lost. Other shows and films get away with a kind of "drop you into the world" storytelling that doesn't address any specifics because they are still setting up their universes. Star Trek's universe has been set up for more than fifty years now. These things can't go unquestioned.

    I'm sorry. If it's a refit, fine. If the tech needs to be phased out, fine. Just explain it. Don't make so many changes to something that has such a long and established history and expect to be accepted. That's absurd. If Star Wars can be visually consistent with it's prequels than so can Star Trek.

    It took forty years until Enterprise answered the Klingon ridges question. I sincerely hope they get around to answering the questions Discovery is bringing up before another forty go by. I won't bash Discovery, there's no point in it, but I will ask questions that I feel need to be addressed for it to fit into the larger universe of Star Trek with the least amount of resistance. I want to share Star Trek in all it's forms with my children and if I'm lucky with their children. I want new shows to crop up over the years and to point up at the screen and say "That's cool! Look at that!" not "Why did they change that?"

    /OffTopic

    Wu1Ooju.jpg
    dvZq2Aj.jpg
  • smokebaileysmokebailey Member Posts: 4,668 Arc User
    meimeitoo wrote: »

    Someone posted this on reddit, which isn't bad:

    https://imgur.com/a/KyMN9

    Still, it would be awesome to get the real thing.


    Dude, it's the Enterprise. Somebody changes the shape of a nacelle and you go apeshit :)

    I can handle the engine pods, it's the pylons that make me go, "eh? o.o"
    dvZq2Aj.jpg
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    I want to remind the person behind that twittard post that the Enterprise was stripped down to her superstructure and rebuilt into an entirely new class of vessel. So different that Kirk nearly blew the ship up from ignorace of major systems
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,896 Arc User
    I want to remind the person behind that twittard post that the Enterprise was stripped down to her superstructure and rebuilt into an entirely new class of vessel. So different that Kirk nearly blew the ship up from ignorace of major systems

    Amazes me how some people can just ignore logic to try and prove their point lol...yeah because a rebuild of a ship decades in the future is the exact same thing as changing it in the present.
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • saurializardsaurializard Member Posts: 4,404 Arc User
    edited February 2018
    If the change is small enough, like the uniforms from TMP to TWoK, then it can be overlooked.
    Also, another thing about this change is that it made the uniforms better for everyone, both in and out of universe. Let's face it, the TMP uniform looked like impractical and bland pajamas compared to the more practical and prettier TWoK ones that really looked like uniforms.

    So it was practically a NECESSARY change to make things better.

    The out-of-universe original intent was to have bland outfits so viewers would focus on the facial expressions of the crew. But we all know how sooooo intense the facial expressions of everyone were in this movie and it pretty much backfired.

    #TASforSTO
    Iconian_Trio_sign.jpg?raw=1
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    I think roddenberry just had a pajama fetish, he went right back to em for TNG
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • smokebaileysmokebailey Member Posts: 4,668 Arc User
    I think roddenberry just had a pajama fetish, he went right back to em for TNG

    they looked fine to me. it's the Khan uniforms I never liked....too military for my tastes, and dress uniform at that.
    I like the TOS/TMP/TNG stuff fine, because they don't look like something from the army or navy.
    dvZq2Aj.jpg
  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,669 Community Moderator
    The enlisted uniforms used in WoK to TUC were recolored TMP uniforms. They actually looked BETTER than they did in the TMP (not)colors.
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
    normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
    colored text = mod mode
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    lianthelia wrote: »
    I want to remind the person behind that twittard post that the Enterprise was stripped down to her superstructure and rebuilt into an entirely new class of vessel. So different that Kirk nearly blew the ship up from ignorace of major systems
    Amazes me how some people can just ignore logic to try and prove their point lol...yeah because a rebuild of a ship decades in the future is the exact same thing as changing it in the present.
    Is it? One read on that post is that he finds it amazing that people accept that the TMP Enterprise as beign the same ship at all.

    I mean seriously, Mr. Scott said they basically dismantled the whole thing and built a new ship.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.