test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

What would you like to see added to the C-store?

mneme0mneme0 Member Posts: 498 Arc User
The purpose of this thread is to promote discussion on what would inspire each of us to make further purchases in the Zen store.

My wife, son, and I are LTS players and the remainder of our post is just to describe our situation and what we are interested in seeing; I am sure other players have their own lists. You have our money and loyalty. We make additional purchases on a regular basis. We play all three factions. Our opinions are no more nor less important than any of those who might add to this discussion. That being said, I consider the C-store to be tapped out and do not intend to make any purchases besides an occasional lockbox pack for S&G. I have little interest in lockboxes and no interest whatever in R&D promos. My last purchase was a Reliant. Thank you for your excellent work on that. I consider your ship offerings to be quite good overall if a little faction-inconsistent, but we simply have too many for it to be worthwhile to acquire any more without a substantial reason.

The following things, added to existing categories, would potentially open our wallets:

Attractive T6 sub-faction ships, including additional Vulcan and Orion options and (future) Romulan sub-factions. I am aware this may carry a heavy development cost.
New BOFFs. Development cost of this item has to be negligible.
New DOFF packs. Development cost of this item has to be even more negligible.
Additional Romulan, KDF, or cross-faction outfits. I am aware this may carry a heavy development cost.

Additional types of items would almost certainly open my wallet if they were found in the C-store (I realize some of these may carry heavy development costs):

Specialization fleshing out such that Commando or Strategist ships are created.
Species reset token, especially if additional species with racial traits are created.
Ship paints.
Ship prefixes.
Unique weapons or kit modules.
Emotes.
Lobi/lockbox ship > account-bind token.
Transwarp delay remover.

Generally, I think the C-store would be more desirable to most users and make you more money if some development time was put into revamping and expanding it, and especially if more creative and interesting items were put in it. Please, give us a reason to give you our money. :)
Post edited by mneme0 on
«13456789

Comments

  • duncanidaho11duncanidaho11 Member Posts: 7,867 Arc User
    edited May 2017
    Any player can decide to withhold their money if the game isn't giving them what they want. That's normal consumer practice. It doesn't provide more weight to a suggestion list. Rather, grand gestures serve to undermine whatever reason you may have in wanting these particular things. So does the attempt to guess what the development costs should be. Cryptic knows what the development costs are. How far off your guess is can serve as a handy benchmark for evaluating your other ideas. If it's way off, then suggesting T6 Vulcan ships looks a lot less reasonable by association.

    We all have our own wishlist and we all have the choice to continue spending money. We could all say "give us what we want cryptic or else!" but if we all did that then who'd really want to come to a forum and participate in community discourse? That's a pretty hostile atmosphere, and one that would be difficult to pull actionable feedback from (given the reliance on assumed power.)

    Remember that the devs are both professionals and are people. If you want to change their minds on a subject, approach it from a point of reasoned discussion that understands the limits of your own point of view in the community. Don't demand and try to extort, simply ask and explain why.
    Bipedal mammal and senior Foundry author.
    Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
    Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
  • ltminnsltminns Member Posts: 12,569 Arc User
    This will not end well.
    'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
    Judge Dan Haywood
    'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
    l don't know.
    l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
    That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
    Lt. Philip J. Minns
  • risian4risian4 Member Posts: 3,711 Arc User
    I would also like to see more non-ship things in the C-store.

    It's been a while since new uniforms, playable species/Boffs, pets and tribbles or even shuttles were added.
  • hanover2hanover2 Member Posts: 1,053 Arc User
    Look out, we got a big spender over here. Be sure to pass that inflamed sense of entitlement on to the children.
  • duncanidaho11duncanidaho11 Member Posts: 7,867 Arc User
    edited May 2017
    risian4 wrote: »
    I would also like to see more non-ship things in the C-store.

    It's been a while since new uniforms, playable species/Boffs, pets and tribbles or even shuttles were added.
    Pets and tribbles were pretty much shifted over to the seasonal events. Charging for them individually presumably wasn't a huge gain (so, put the content where it has more impact.) It's worth noting though that we got new sets of C-store uniforms with Agents of Yesterday. More would be better, but credit where it's due too.
    Bipedal mammal and senior Foundry author.
    Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
    Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,825 Arc User
    There are things I want...but Cryptic is going to do what Cryptic is going to do...doesn't matter what one or three people say.

    Pretty much anything these days is either going to be Federation exclusive or cross faction...we pretty much wont see anything that is exclusive to a single faction that isn't Fed. Also pretty much the only time they seem to justify making new costume packs on the c-store is when they coincide with a new expansion.

    Commando and Strategist weren't meant to be full fledged paths and were made to be exclusively secondary.

    Race respec tokens have been asked for years and probably will never come...I think they gave some kind of explanation as to why but if they did I don't recall what it was.

    I doubt we will ever see hull skins for sale...it's another customization that would probably cost more than they'd make to develop. (Why they stopped making new bridges for the c-store)

    I doubt we'll ever see lock box/lobi ships account bound...just would be a loss for them


  • davefenestratordavefenestrator Member Posts: 10,512 Arc User
    I just bought the science super-bundle so they have a fresh 9600 zen from me :)

    I'd be tempted by:
    - A T6 Andorian escort or bundle
    - T6 Vulcan ships
    - Costumes, must be usable by boffs (Space Barbie is the real endgame)
  • duncanidaho11duncanidaho11 Member Posts: 7,867 Arc User
    edited May 2017
    - Costumes, must be usable by boffs (Space Barbie is the real endgame)

    There's actually two it seems were overlooked with Delta Rising
    -Ocampa (male and female)
    -Hazari (male only)

    They were added to the Foundry and are perfectly functional, but never found a way in-game. As a supplement to the existing DR pack, or as a new item, these would seem like a good candidate for more C-store goodness.
    Bipedal mammal and senior Foundry author.
    Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
    Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
  • postagepaidpostagepaid Member Posts: 2,899 Arc User
    Weapons or kit modules would have to be on par with ingame options otherwise there'd be all sorts of P2W accusations flung about even though pvp barely exists in game anymore.

    Once upon a time they had ship cosmetics but removed them so we're not likely to see those as they're now rolled into alternative ships.

    Colours would mean ripping them out of the ship tailor so bad idea

    Only good idea I'm seeing is a lobi/lockbox ship unlock token to allow it to be account claimed, would offset the crazy amount of lobi thats being asked for a single ship. Although as its around 4 lobi per lockbox an overall price drop on lobi ships would maybe be much better for them in the long run as it'd mean more ships sold and more keys bought to get those ships.
  • rattler2rattler2 Member Posts: 58,018 Community Moderator
    You know... I never understand the urge to declare "my wallet is closed unless" to the public as if its some form of protest or drive for change. The forums only handle a SMALL PERCENTAGE of the playerbase so these kinds of pushes never work.

    Generally... my response when I see a thread like this is:
    pePma.gif
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
  • ltminnsltminns Member Posts: 12,569 Arc User
    Need to be consistent here. Stating that others don't speak for you when they make global assertions, but then you make a global assertion. :)
    'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
    Judge Dan Haywood
    'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
    l don't know.
    l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
    That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
    Lt. Philip J. Minns
  • tyler002tyler002 Member Posts: 1,586 Arc User
    edited May 2017
    Wouldn't adding a space-side to the Commando path kinda miss the point of an infantry special forces specialization?
    tumblr_p7auh1JPC61qfr6udo4_500.gif
  • lopequillopequil Member Posts: 1,226 Arc User
    rattler2 wrote: »
    The forums only handle a SMALL PERCENTAGE of the playerbase so these kinds of pushes never work.

    Isn't that just because the devs are all over at reddit?
    Q9BWcdD.png
  • meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    I love it how ppl start off by saying the amount they spend has no bearing on their requests, and then use said spending as the main argument to try and get what they want. :)

    Having said that, there have been moments I've withheld spending money on STO: customer's prerogative. But a think a thread like this, OP, would go a lot better if you simply asked what people would be willing to pay for (sans the veiled 'threats'). Personally, I'd pay good money for more Barbie in Space. :) (Ranging from more clothing, interiors, and ant kind of player housing).
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • silverlobes#2676 silverlobes Member Posts: 1,953 Arc User
    rattler2 wrote: »
    You know... I never understand the urge to declare "my wallet is closed unless" to the public as if its some form of protest or drive for change. The forums only handle a SMALL PERCENTAGE of the playerbase so these kinds of pushes never work.

    Generally... my response when I see a thread like this is:
    pePma.gif
    Well, when people are brought up to believe that voting with their wallet is place of empowerment, and that it's a perfectly legit opinion, and throw in belief in that 'the customer is king' slogan, this is the result, and folks may not even realize they're doing it.

    If I had to name things which would make me part with hard cash, I would say:
    -I'd like to see a wider range of BOFFS
    -I'd like to see a wider range of ships, and more possibilities for ship upgrades. For example, rather than purchasing a new ship, a player could buy an upgrade token which would bump their existing ship up one tier. Cumulatively, that could mean the same, or even more, $$ than the cost of buying a T6 ship outright, so it's a win-win situation: Cryptic gets player $$s, player gets to keep the ship they become attached to and invested in.
    -I'd like to see a more varied approach for purchasing Zen. I believe this should include making one of the 'price packs', enough to buy a T6 ship, rather having to buy the first two 'price packs' and then ending up with a surplus remainder of Zen which isn't really much use for anything else in the C-Store, and I think it would also be nice to have a lower 'price pack' option where people could purchase Zen by the cents, not just by the dollar, for greater flexibility in Zen acquisition.
    "I fight for the Users!" - Tron

    "I was here before you, I will be here after you are gone. I am here, regardless of your acknowledgement or acceptance..." - The Truth
  • mikoto8472mikoto8472 Member Posts: 607 Arc User
    Nobody cares.

    About the only ship I want to see is T6 Wells. It'd be nice, but if I see something I want and can afford until then I won't withhold just because there isn't a T6 Wells yet.
  • lopequillopequil Member Posts: 1,226 Arc User
    azrael605 wrote: »
    @lopequil

    Where the Devs post has no bearing on it. The majority of players do not post on or visit forums in any game, most don't even read patch notes.

    I didn't say post, I said read. For a long time it's seemed like complaining about anything here is only really good for venting steam.
    Q9BWcdD.png
  • mneme0mneme0 Member Posts: 498 Arc User
    *sighs* Tough crowd. How many disclaimers and weaselwords do I need to put in a (I thought) friendly and reasonable post to start a discussion instead of getting mobbed by people acting like I'm saying something out of line? I'm making no threats to keep my wallet closed nor doing so in a fit of pique, just stating I don't currently have anything that interests me. I'm not entitled to anything, only making suggestions. I'm not speaking for anyone else, only trying to get other people's opinions and foster discussion and brainstorming. Why so serious?

  • duncanidaho11duncanidaho11 Member Posts: 7,867 Arc User
    edited May 2017
    mneme0 wrote: »
    *sighs* Tough crowd. How many disclaimers and weaselwords do I need to put in a (I thought) friendly and reasonable post to start a discussion instead of getting mobbed by people acting like I'm saying something out of line? I'm making no threats to keep my wallet closed nor doing so in a fit of pique, just stating I don't currently have anything that interests me. I'm not entitled to anything, only making suggestions. I'm not speaking for anyone else, only trying to get other people's opinions and foster discussion and brainstorming. Why so serious?

    You may not have intended it that way but there are several components of OP that can be read in a very different way (be careful with how you phrase an argument.) I'll go into some detail about the impression the OP gave (as I can interpret it), so we might see where people are coming from and hopefully move onto productive discussion.
    1. "My wallet is closed, unless..." Taken by itself, that's a threat. You may not have intended it as such, given later qualifications, but by the time those arrive you've already made an impression on your reader. Your intention is overshadowed by the immediate appearance of coercion (ie. do this or that won't happen). To other players, this seems at once underhanded and self-important since many of us have made suggestions to the effect of "hey, here's some things we want!" without a preface on our status or an explanation of how we hope to lead cryptic. This is what can lead to negative responses.
    2. "...are LTS players. You have our money and loyalty. We make additional purchases on a regular basis." This is claiming entitlement. You may say that your opinions are no more important than others but that's easily read as disingenuous after focusing first on how much you've spend on the game and how much you might continue to spend (a carrot for your stick, invoking past loyalty and future rewards should Cryptic curry your favor.) To arrive at the point "I'm just a player, like any of you" you could have jumped to a list of suggestions. It doesn't need long elaboration. It's not even a point that needs to be made (the simple fact of posting here carries the same message.)
    3. "...would potentially change our stance:" This introduces your list of suggestions by focusing on how it would change your stance. There is no mention here that these items would benefit other players, it's simply about what you want. That reads badly after 1 and 2. Rather than inviting other people to join in with your suggestion, you exclude them by so firmly establishing that this is about changing your mind and opening your wallet. There may be other implications, but they're lost to immediate impressions.

    And the rest is pretty much complication free.

    Some general advice: just focus on suggestions and don't spend time elaborating on yourself (since that becomes a feature of your argument and a target of discussion) except when things are nice and chummy and the point of discussion is to talk about personal experiences (there's threads for that, but general feedback isn't often helped by getting personal.) Game design is a tricky business and even really good (and seemingly practical) suggestions might not be worked into the dev's schedule. Be prepared for "no," which means that you should not set conditions for a no or non-answer. Even if you have a good idea, stating what will or will not happen becomes entwined with the argument you're making. It can give the appearance of coercion (when its a question of what you'll do) or prophesizing (if it ever becomes a question of what the community will do.)

    Anyway, just take this as a learning experience. No, not all of the negative comments to your post are justified but there's things you can do in making suggestions on a forum to minimize friction with people. Just know that we're all in the same boat and we understand both boredom and wanting new/different things in STO. If you want particular things, simply say so. We can relate without an introduction.
    Post edited by duncanidaho11 on
    Bipedal mammal and senior Foundry author.
    Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
    Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
  • echattyechatty Member Posts: 5,914 Arc User
    Species reset token? No thanks. I carefully choose each and every species when I create a new alt. If it isn't what I want, I clean out their stuffs and delete them and try again. Easy as pie.
    Now a LTS and loving it.
    Just because you spend money on this game, it does not entitle you to be a jerk if things don't go your way.
    I have come to the conclusion that I have a memory like Etch-A-Sketch. I shake my head and forget everything. :D
  • rattler2rattler2 Member Posts: 58,018 Community Moderator
    duncanidaho is correct. While you may have not intended a particular tone, your choice in words has made it for you. Everything he said is true. So... food for thought for the future.
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
  • starswordcstarswordc Member Posts: 10,963 Arc User
    Kill the godawful time war plot dead.
    "Great War! / And I cannot take more! / Great tour! / I keep on marching on / I play the great score / There will be no encore / Great War! / The War to End All Wars"
    — Sabaton, "Great War"
    VZ9ASdg.png

    Check out https://unitedfederationofpla.net/s/
  • rattler2rattler2 Member Posts: 58,018 Community Moderator
    starswordc wrote: »
    Kill the godawful time war plot dead.

    Uh... what's that got to do with anything? *confuzzled*
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
  • echattyechatty Member Posts: 5,914 Arc User
    rattler2 wrote: »
    starswordc wrote: »
    Kill the godawful time war plot dead.

    Uh... what's that got to do with anything? *confuzzled*

    I was thinking the same thing when I read it.
    Now a LTS and loving it.
    Just because you spend money on this game, it does not entitle you to be a jerk if things don't go your way.
    I have come to the conclusion that I have a memory like Etch-A-Sketch. I shake my head and forget everything. :D
  • saurializardsaurializard Member Posts: 4,390 Arc User
    Aren't "Unless you do X, no more money" threads a FCT, anyway?
    #TASforSTO
    Iconian_Trio_sign.jpg?raw=1
  • rattler2rattler2 Member Posts: 58,018 Community Moderator
    I believe so.
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
  • meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    mneme0 wrote: »
    *sighs* Tough crowd. How many disclaimers and weaselwords do I need to put in a (I thought) friendly and reasonable post to start a discussion instead of getting mobbed by people acting like I'm saying something out of line? I'm making no threats to keep my wallet closed nor doing so in a fit of pique, just stating I don't currently have anything that interests me. I'm not entitled to anything, only making suggestions. I'm not speaking for anyone else, only trying to get other people's opinions and foster discussion and brainstorming. Why so serious?

    You may not have intended it that way but there are several components of OP that can be read in a very different way (be careful with how you phrase an argument.) I'll go into some detail about the impression the OP gave (as I can interpret it), so we might see where people are coming from and hopefully move onto productive discussion.
    1. "My wallet is closed, unless..." Taken by itself, that's a threat. You may not have intended it as such, given later qualifications, but by the time those arrive you've already made an impression on your reader. Your intention is overshadowed by the immediate appearance of coercion (ie. do this or that won't happen). To other players, this seems at once underhanded and self-important since many of us have made suggestions to the effect of "hey, here's some things we want!" without a preface on our status or an explanation of how we hope to lead cryptic. This is what can lead to negative responses.
    2. "...are LTS players. You have our money and loyalty. We make additional purchases on a regular basis." This is claiming entitlement. You may say that your opinions are no more important than others but that's easily read as disingenuous after focusing first on how much you've spend on the game and how much you might continue to spend (a carrot for your stick, invoking past loyalty and future rewards should Cryptic curry your favor.) To arrive at the point "I'm just a player, like any of you" you could have jumped to a list of suggestions. It doesn't need long elaboration. It's not even a point that needs to be made (the simple fact of posting here carries the same message.)
    3. "...would potentially change our stance:" This introduces your list of suggestions by focusing on how it would change your stance. There is no mention here that these items would benefit other players, it's simply about what you want. That reads badly after 1 and 2. Rather than inviting other people to join in with your suggestion, you exclude them by so firmly establishing that this is about changing your mind and opening your wallet. There may be other implications, but they're lost to immediate impressions.

    And the rest is pretty much complication free.

    Some general advice: just focus on suggestions and don't spend time elaborating on yourself (since that becomes a feature of your argument and a target of discussion) except when things are nice and chummy and the point of discussion is to talk about personal experiences (there's threads for that, but general feedback isn't often helped by getting personal.) Game design is a tricky business and even really good (and seemingly practical) suggestions might not be worked into the dev's schedule. Be prepared for "no," which means that you should not set conditions for a no or non-answer. Even if you have a good idea, stating what will or will not happen becomes entwined with the argument you're making. It can give the appearance of coercion (when its a question of what you'll do) or prophesizing (if it ever becomes a question of what the community will do.)

    Anyway, just take this as a learning experience. No, not all of the negative comments to your post are justified but there's things you can do in making suggestions on a forum to minimize friction with people. Just know that we're all in the same boat and we understand both boredom and wanting new/different things in STO. If you want particular things, simply say so. We can relate without an introduction.


    ^^ This was a very good post!
    3lsZz0w.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.