test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Which Federation Dreadnought T6 ship would you like see?

245

Comments

  • gradiigradii Member Posts: 2,824 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    All of the above but a Dreadnought sovereign takes the cake.

    "He shall be my finest warrior, this generic man who was forced upon me.
    Like a badass I shall make him look, and in the furnace of war I shall forge him.
    he shall be of iron will and steely sinew.
    In great armour I shall clad him and with the mightiest weapons he shall be armed.
    He will be untouched by plague or disease; no sickness shall blight him.
    He shall have such tactics, strategies and machines that no foe will best him in battle.
    He is my answer to cryptic logic, he is the Defender of my Romulan Crew.
    He is Tovan Khev... and he shall know no fear."
  • farshorefarshore Member Posts: 353 Arc User
    The Galaxy X is an eyesore.
  • nostalgiamannostalgiaman Member Posts: 43 Arc User
    kirimuffin wrote: »
    None. I want to see more KDF and Rom ships before I see another Fed ship.
    This. Oh so this. Especially science ships for them.

  • omegasprimeomegasprime Member Posts: 289 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    We likely will see a T6 Galaxy Dreadnaught, and don't see the Odyssey becoming a Dreadnaught since a third nacelle would really throw off the design. But I seen some Sovereign Dreadnaught designs and it works well. Though personally I like to see the Typhoon and Jupiter Dreadnaughts.
    How about a Federation Class Starship A.K.A. the TOS Dreadnought.


    Unfortunately, that one isn't going to happen. From what I hear CBS doesn't own it and in a legal limbo.

    Dreadnought can have four nacelles.


    bioixi wrote: »
    We likely will see a T6 Galaxy Dreadnaught, and don't see the Odyssey becoming a Dreadnaught since a third nacelle would really throw off the design. But I seen some Sovereign Dreadnaught designs and it works well. Though personally I like to see the Typhoon and Jupiter Dreadnaughts.
    How about a Federation Class Starship A.K.A. the TOS Dreadnought.

    Unfortunately, that one isn't going to happen. From what I hear CBS doesn't own it and in a legal limbo.

    The Odyssey is already a dreadnought.

    http://sto.gamepedia.com/Odyssey_Dreadnought_Cruiser

    Only NPCs are Dreadnoughts not player ships.
    sto.gamepedia.com/Odyssey_Star_Cruiser
    ​​
    Post edited by omegasprime on
    AKA Primus01, Lifetime member since January 16, 2010
    ***********************************************************
    Windows 10 Pro
    Intel Core i7-5700
    RAM 32 GB
    2 Titan GTX 980M GDDR5 8 GB
    ***********************************************************
  • omegasprimeomegasprime Member Posts: 289 Arc User
    hyefather wrote: »
    I don't care if I ever see another ship. I want a game first. It feels like for the first 5 years now all we players have been doing is pre-ordering ships for a STO game that suppose to come out. I mean we've been getting these audiobook minigames to hold us over but WTF is the real game. No open world, no PVP, no exploration. We deserve a good Star Trek game after all these damn preorders. So wheres it at?

    This is a topic for another thread.​​
    AKA Primus01, Lifetime member since January 16, 2010
    ***********************************************************
    Windows 10 Pro
    Intel Core i7-5700
    RAM 32 GB
    2 Titan GTX 980M GDDR5 8 GB
    ***********************************************************
  • lordmalak1lordmalak1 Member Posts: 4,681 Arc User
    Why not another oddy or galaxy ? Keep selling the same ships to the feds, over and over and over and over and over again. It's good for the game. Mo' money, mo money, mo money.

    Went back to a T5 KDF ship today, cause the T6's are so pathetic.
    KBF Lord MalaK
    Awoken Dead
    giphy.gif

    Now shaddup about the queues, it's a BUG
  • delerouxdeleroux Member Posts: 478 Arc User
    kirimuffin wrote: »
    None. I want to see more KDF and Rom ships before I see another Fed ship.

    ^^^ Can't be said enough.

  • omegasprimeomegasprime Member Posts: 289 Arc User
    lordmalak1 wrote: »
    Why not another oddy or galaxy ? Keep selling the same ships to the feds, over and over and over and over and over again. It's good for the game. Mo' money, mo money, mo money.

    Went back to a T5 KDF ship today, cause the T6's are so pathetic.
    deleroux wrote: »
    kirimuffin wrote: »
    None. I want to see more KDF and Rom ships before I see another Fed ship.

    ^^^ Can't be said enough.

    Why don't you make a poll of KDF Ships you would like to see? or even Romulan Ships?​​
    AKA Primus01, Lifetime member since January 16, 2010
    ***********************************************************
    Windows 10 Pro
    Intel Core i7-5700
    RAM 32 GB
    2 Titan GTX 980M GDDR5 8 GB
    ***********************************************************
  • lordmalak1lordmalak1 Member Posts: 4,681 Arc User
    lordmalak1 wrote: »
    Why not another oddy or galaxy ? Keep selling the same ships to the feds, over and over and over and over and over again. It's good for the game. Mo' money, mo money, mo money.

    Went back to a T5 KDF ship today, cause the T6's are so pathetic.
    deleroux wrote: »
    kirimuffin wrote: »
    None. I want to see more KDF and Rom ships before I see another Fed ship.

    ^^^ Can't be said enough.

    Why don't you make a poll of KDF Ships you would like to see? or even Romulan Ships?​​

    ROFL
    Wait, you're serious ?
    KBF Lord MalaK
    Awoken Dead
    giphy.gif

    Now shaddup about the queues, it's a BUG
  • helmerhelmer Member Posts: 21 Arc User
    Galaxy dreadnought with a built in cloak and a spinal lance that is actually worth having.
  • sovereign47sovereign47 Member Posts: 399 Arc User
    helmer wrote: »
    Galaxy dreadnought with a built in cloak and a spinal lance that is actually worth having.

    I agree about built in cloak and lance. Especially the lance, since this current one is pretty crappy and nowhere near powerful like it's canon counterpart. It should be a devastating weapon and not a slightly improved beam array overload.

    As for the Sovereign dreadnought I want it with hangar bay containing Argo's, type 11 shuttles and/or Federation mission scoutships; with captain's yacht of course and corbomite reflector shields just like it is in Armada 2 B)
    FED ENG: FA Sirius Verax (USS Leviathan) , FED TAC (Delta): FA Adria Tyllex (USS Thunderblade) , ROM TAC: ADM Kill'ina (IRW Imperix Thrai) , KLING ENG (Delta): LT. GEN Ghol'Vaq Martok (IKS Qeh'Ral II) - 44th Fleet member
    SZ1RgUL.jpg
    SUPPORTING PLAYABLE CARDASSIAN AND DOMINION FACTIONS!
  • nobadeenobadee Member Posts: 34 Arc User
    Only the Galaxy-X is classified as a dreadnought. Why it is classified as one is beyond me? Historically battleships (particularly during WWII) were bigger, faster and had more firepower than their outdated predecessors, the dreadnought class battleships. Though I have often seen the terms battleship and dreadnought used synonymously when describing ships like the Missouri and Yamato. It seems in STO, it is used to describe capital ships in general, regardless of their class and type. I've seen on many occasions carriers labeled as dreadnoughts and we know they aren't technically battleships. Would be nice if they had some consistency in their labeling. Not every capital ship is a dreadnought.
  • azurianstarazurianstar Member Posts: 6,985 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    Dreadnought can have four nacelles.

    Where in my quote did I say that Dreadnaughts only have 3 Nacelles?
    Only NPCs are Dreadnoughts not player ships.
    sto.gamepedia.com/Odyssey_Star_Cruiser
    ​​

    The Scimitar and a couple of other ships disagrees with your comment. :p

    bioixi wrote: »
    The Odyssey is already a dreadnought.

    http://sto.gamepedia.com/Odyssey_Dreadnought_Cruiser

    Sorry, but you're source is wrong. (It's a Wiki, go figure).

    In Star Trek Online's Ship Stores and Fleet Stores, it's regarded as a "Cruiser" or "Star Cruiser".

  • sunfranckssunfrancks Member Posts: 3,925 Arc User
    Galaxy-X.

    I have the Zen ready and waiting!
    Fed: Eng Lib Borg (Five) Tac Andorian (Shen) Sci Alien/Klingon (Maelrock) KDF:Tac Romulan KDF (Sasha) Tac Klingon (K'dopis)
    Founder, member and former leader to Pride Of The Federation Fleet.
    What I feel after I hear about every decision made since Andre "Mobile Games Generalisimo" Emerson arrived...
    3oz8xC9gn8Fh4DK9Q4.gif





  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,652 Community Moderator
    Sorry, but you're source is wrong. (It's a Wiki, go figure).

    In Star Trek Online's Ship Stores and Fleet Stores, it's regarded as a "Cruiser" or "Star Cruiser".

    Actually... it is correct, as it is referring to the NPC version and not the Player version.
    Also... while the Galaxy-X is considered a Dreadnaught, the player version is considered a Dreadnaught CRUISER.
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
    normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
    colored text = mod mode
  • leviathan99#2867 leviathan99 Member Posts: 7,747 Arc User
    I'd like to see something different. Maybe a 3 Nacelle Intrepid Dreadnought with a few cues from Warship Voyager.

    Or as I've suggested before, take the 2409 T1 Connie variants minus the Connie itself. Add a third nacelle and side mounted cannon hardpoints on the saucer. Create a new set of options to replace the Connie. Introduce as a Light Dreadnought.

    You could even say that the Connie-cross-compatibility of the design had to be ditched for Dreadnought functionality by Utopia Planetia Engineers. DHC-like side-mounted Pulse Lance with AoE damage.

    Make the Light Dreadnought a 3 Pack with a 2409-ized version of the Connie interior.

    Another thing I'd like to see: Fleet Capital Ship as a fleet holding. Instead of transwarping there, we summon it like the Azura. Introduced along with a new class of ship. Multiple costume options, fleet leader picks the holding costume from the same interface that fleet uniforms are set from. Dreadnought Capital Ship. Because it's a holding, the interior could get more fleshed out.

    My preference would be for the interior to be an updated version of the Galaxy interior for Feds and what we saw TNG era for Klingons and Romulans so that the 24th century interiors could be developed by Taco simultaneously. Ie. retextured Galaxy interior with about 5 decks worth of amenities developed and designed as a redress of a simultaneously developed Galaxy interior. Maybe bigger halls and more rooms on the Fleet holding interior.
  • azurianstarazurianstar Member Posts: 6,985 Arc User
    rattler2 wrote: »
    Actually... it is correct, as it is referring to the NPC version and not the Player version.
    Also... while the Galaxy-X is considered a Dreadnaught, the player version is considered a Dreadnaught CRUISER.

    Which is a stupid inconsistancy. How can NPC ships be a Dreadnaught and the players not when it's the same exact ship?

    And calling the Galaxy-X a "Dreadnaught cruiser" is another thing stupid. You don't mix two hull classificaitons as one.
  • tacticalrooktacticalrook Member Posts: 810 Arc User
    T6 Connie Dread?
    /channel_join grind
  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,652 Community Moderator
    I guess for gameplay purposes they consider certain classes like the Vo'Quv and Odyssey to be Dreadnaughts when referring to NPCs, but can't do that for classification for Player ships as there is no straight "Dreadnaught" category. Feds only have Escort, Science Vessel, and Cruiser, so a player ship has to fall within these three categories. While the Cruiser category does have subcategories such as Battlecruiser, they don't have anything specific for Dreads. Since they are generally big, tanky ships they are put in the Cruiser category.

    I believe that calling the Galaxy-X a Dreadnaught Cruiser is because people see the Galaxy-X as a Dreadnaught, but it is categorized as a Cruiser for Gameplay purposes. Just like the Player Miranda is categorized as a Lt. Cruiser when the NPC is a Frigate.

    Its a little messy but that's my take on it. If we ever get a Dev to explain this, it might be easier.

    So... Short version

    Player Classes
    1. Cruiser
    2. Science Vessel
    3. Escort

    NPC Classes
    1. Fighter
    2. Frigate
    3. Cruiser
    4. Battleship
    5. Dreadnought
    6. Science Vessel
    7. Escort
    8. Capital
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
    normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
    colored text = mod mode
  • grayfoxjamesgrayfoxjames Member Posts: 1,516 Arc User
    Now that the war is over we need a new Federation flag ship to lead the way to Season 11 exploration...we need a new beautiful T6 Odyssey with another epic interior and I'll even take the same Boff layout...love the Oddy's Boff layout, they can make some more universals though.
    Fleet Admiral Thomas Winston James a.k.a. The Grayfox
    Fleet Leader of:
    Liberty Task Force/Liberty Honor Guard
    Pride of the Federation/Pride of the Empire
    Liberty Guardians
    U.S.S. Liberty, NX-42813-L, T-6 Legendary Odyssey Class

    Game Handle: Grayfox@GrayfoxJames
    Website: https://www.libertytaskforce.com
    Armada (STOFA Member Fleet): https://www.libertytaskforce.com/stofa
    Discord: https://discord.gg/bGp9N7z
    Twitter: STOFA@LTFGrayfox
    Email: CSDynamix@Hotmail.com
  • cptstark1cptstark1 Member Posts: 51 Arc User
    Definatelly Jupiter class starship! It would be so coooooool
  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,652 Community Moderator
    I STILL fail to see the allure of the Jupiter class...
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
    normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
    colored text = mod mode
  • legendarylycan#5411 legendarylycan Member Posts: 37,284 Arc User
    i fail to see the allure of the yamato and ulysses classes from SFC, but i'm sure there are thousands out there who love the designs​​
    Like special weapons from other Star Trek games? Wondering if they can be replicated in STO even a little bit? Check this out: https://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1262277/a-mostly-comprehensive-guide-to-star-trek-videogame-special-weapons-and-their-sto-equivalents

    #LegalizeAwoo

    A normie goes "Oh, what's this?"
    An otaku goes "UwU, what's this?"
    A furry goes "OwO, what's this?"
    A werewolf goes "Awoo, what's this?"


    "It's nothing personal, I just don't feel like I've gotten to know a person until I've sniffed their crotch."
    "We said 'no' to Mr. Curiosity. We're not home. Curiosity is not welcome, it is not to be invited in. Curiosity...is bad. It gets you in trouble, it gets you killed, and more importantly...it makes you poor!"
    Passion and Serenity are one.
    I gain power by understanding both.
    In the chaos of their battle, I bring order.
    I am a shadow, darkness born from light.
    The Force is united within me.
  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,652 Community Moderator
    At least the Yamato and Ulysses look like Federation ships. The Jupiter looks like a flying toilet seat with wonky nacelles.
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
    normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
    colored text = mod mode
  • legendarylycan#5411 legendarylycan Member Posts: 37,284 Arc User
    and the bulwark looks like a flying sex toy; there's no accounting for taste​​
    Like special weapons from other Star Trek games? Wondering if they can be replicated in STO even a little bit? Check this out: https://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1262277/a-mostly-comprehensive-guide-to-star-trek-videogame-special-weapons-and-their-sto-equivalents

    #LegalizeAwoo

    A normie goes "Oh, what's this?"
    An otaku goes "UwU, what's this?"
    A furry goes "OwO, what's this?"
    A werewolf goes "Awoo, what's this?"


    "It's nothing personal, I just don't feel like I've gotten to know a person until I've sniffed their crotch."
    "We said 'no' to Mr. Curiosity. We're not home. Curiosity is not welcome, it is not to be invited in. Curiosity...is bad. It gets you in trouble, it gets you killed, and more importantly...it makes you poor!"
    Passion and Serenity are one.
    I gain power by understanding both.
    In the chaos of their battle, I bring order.
    I am a shadow, darkness born from light.
    The Force is united within me.
  • azurianstarazurianstar Member Posts: 6,985 Arc User
    rattler2 wrote: »
    I STILL fail to see the allure of the Jupiter class...
    rattler2 wrote: »
    At least the Yamato and Ulysses look like Federation ships. The Jupiter looks like a flying toilet seat with wonky nacelles.

    Sure she was ugly and an admitted kitbash, but the Jupiter was different and gave the impression of being a real warship. Especially in the early days before power creep, when Dreadnaught NPC ships were a thing to be feared. And that Jupiter took on that Scimitar and won.

    But that ship disappeared with all the temporal shenanigans. Even the Typhoon's been replaced by the Command Cruisers. I'll never understand why Cryptic has to rebuild the game than adding to it like normal MMOs.
  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,652 Community Moderator
    Well in the case of the Typhoon, I think the Command Cruisers are a good replacement. They share a similar design, which made the transition easier. The Jupiter however... I just don't get that ship.
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
    normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
    colored text = mod mode
  • scrooge69scrooge69 Member Posts: 1,108 Arc User
    T6 galaxy X is already comming
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • omegasprimeomegasprime Member Posts: 289 Arc User
    I'd like to see something different. Maybe a 3 Nacelle Intrepid Dreadnought with a few cues from Warship Voyager.

    Or as I've suggested before, take the 2409 T1 Connie variants minus the Connie itself. Add a third nacelle and side mounted cannon hardpoints on the saucer. Create a new set of options to replace the Connie. Introduce as a Light Dreadnought.

    You could even say that the Connie-cross-compatibility of the design had to be ditched for Dreadnought functionality by Utopia Planetia Engineers. DHC-like side-mounted Pulse Lance with AoE damage.

    Make the Light Dreadnought a 3 Pack with a 2409-ized version of the Connie interior.

    Another thing I'd like to see: Fleet Capital Ship as a fleet holding. Instead of transwarping there, we summon it like the Azura. Introduced along with a new class of ship. Multiple costume options, fleet leader picks the holding costume from the same interface that fleet uniforms are set from. Dreadnought Capital Ship. Because it's a holding, the interior could get more fleshed out.

    My preference would be for the interior to be an updated version of the Galaxy interior for Feds and what we saw TNG era for Klingons and Romulans so that the 24th century interiors could be developed by Taco simultaneously. Ie. retextured Galaxy interior with about 5 decks worth of amenities developed and designed as a redress of a simultaneously developed Galaxy interior. Maybe bigger halls and more rooms on the Fleet holding interior.

    These are some great ideas that PWE/Cryptic should take into consideration.​​
    AKA Primus01, Lifetime member since January 16, 2010
    ***********************************************************
    Windows 10 Pro
    Intel Core i7-5700
    RAM 32 GB
    2 Titan GTX 980M GDDR5 8 GB
    ***********************************************************
  • asuran14asuran14 Member Posts: 2,335 Arc User
    Like i have suggested afew times, i would rather see them release a multi-ship class bundle that would allow them to customize the indivigual ship-class to different styles or carrears. Like having a bundle of a typhoon, Jupiter, and the gal-x, or even maybe a Oddy in placement of one of them. Than having the same done for the kdf/romulan factions which would help fill out thier ship yards.
Sign In or Register to comment.