test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

A T6 Sovereign Request

warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
edited July 2015 in Federation Discussion
So. Canon ship-wise, the Galaxy, Intrepid, now Excelsior has made it to T6. It's been months since I put a ship request thread up, even for the KDF. Well, okay, that's probably a lie (BOPs, anyone?).

It's high time however to put up a request for a T6 Sovereign with a few extras.

- Increase Lt ENG to LtCdr ENG with a Hybrid Station update. It would be nice if you made the Lt Universal a LtCdr Universal/Hybrid but I think I'm reaching a bit far in the bag for that.

- New Console to go with the old T5 Regent stuff: The Metreon Gas Canister Console and Wide Angle Quantum Torp Launcher, making a new 3 piece set with 2 and 3 piece bonuses.

I also ask this:

Redo the standard Sovereign-class skin. It's one of the original STO models and I'll be honest. It looks heinous now. It just doesn't stack up anymore, like a lot of the original STO ship models (Link).
Give it "The Galaxy-class Treatment" that was so well done with the T6 version of that ship. Also enable fans of the Sovereign to replicate the 2 general movie appearance types of the Enterprise-E. Generally shown as is in "First Contact" as well as "Nemesis."

http://en.memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/File:ENT-E_ILM1.jpg
http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/scans/sovereign1.htm
http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/sovereign.htm

The game can somewhat replicate the general white & black pattern from First Contact with the Type 6. It can use some tweaking in that pattern still. Also, it would be nice if the Escape Pods are replicated. It would also be nice if the decals on the fuselage sides and nacelles were in also. The STO Sovereign model lacks these.

A Sovereign model with the Nemesis look would be very nice also. As a person that's built plastic models, that pattern looks like hell to replicate. But it's a striking contrast to the clean-looking white & black of the First Contact ENT-E. Clean, large screenshots of the ENT-E in Nemesis is kind of hard to come by but here's an example someone made of a 1:650 scale model of that version.
http://www.modelermagic.com/?p=8920
Some Nemesis pics are also with the previous links.

It's by far the most complicated looking pattern on any Starfleet vessel shown in any TV show, movie of the franchise. Not even the Constitution-class Refit with its fancy Aztec pattern looks as sophisticated to make (at least physically). This version is just not anywhere possible with the current model and textures that are in STO.

Last thing is one of the original issues of STO's Sovereign model. Registry numbering and name is wrong compared to the canon sources. It's lined up differently and on a much smaller scale on the canon Enterprise-E. Here's John Eaves' drawing on the Enterprise-E, the guy who designed the ship for the franchise.
https://johneaves.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/the-enterprise-e-and-the-aztec-paint-job/
In contrast is the default Sovereign version (Link again).
XzRTofz.gif
«134567

Comments

  • cmdrscarletcmdrscarlet Member Posts: 5,137 Arc User
    edited July 2015
  • seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,918 Arc User
    edited July 2015
    I have always felt that the Excelsior and the Sovereign were the 2 best Cannon Federation ships. I love the Sovereign, I still own a T5U Fleet Assault Cruiser Refit, but I don't fly it much for the reasons outlined in this thread. It's not because it's 'only' T5U, I have plenty of star ship traits unlocked, the only reason I don't fly it is because the model design is terrible.

    There is no Fed ship in this game that needs an update more then the Sovereign. Not to mention, it would probably sell pretty well.. I know I would have to give it some serious consideration.​​
    Insert witty signature line here.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    You can't deny the likes of a T6 Sovereign and Defiant won't sell. I said it before and I'll say it again: Canon ships hold a lot of weight in popularity. The ship was "the other star" of all but 1 of the TNG crew movies. Only the Constitution Refit has more movie appearances.

    The Connie-Refit is my all time favorite Star Trek ship. But the Sovereign-class is a very close second by a few hairs.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,918 Arc User
    What will ultimately determine it's sales potential is it's ship trait and to a much lesser extent.. the console.

    People have pretty much settled into their T6 ships at this point, and the game doesn't seem to be a magnet to new players right now. The big challenge in making a T6 Sovereign will be making it worth while for people to buy it and change over from their current ship.

    Ultimately, I believe that will be the problem with the 'Resolute' (T6 Excelsior.) The trait is terrible, and there isn't much there to convince people flying a T5U Excelsior or another T6 ship to jump into this new ship. The T6 Sovereign will have the same problem if they don't come up with a useful ship trait.

    My suggestion would be a trait that adds a small buff on activation of attack patterns. Maybe something that reduces weapon power drain and gives a small chance for a subsystem power boost. Something like that would appeal to the DPS crowds and help push sales. I just hope they don't repeat the mistakes made on the Resolute.​​
    Insert witty signature line here.
  • freakiumfreakium Member Posts: 439 Arc User
    I'm definitely in for a T6 Sovereign. This is a ship I wouldn't mind paying for a 3-pack. Perhaps they can add the ability to deploy the Captain's Yacht and also sell that as a shuttle.

    Not too sure on what special console or trait it'll have though. The Ent-E shooting 360° to find cloaked ships was nice but it's too similar to FAW.

    I don't know but a T6 Sovereign or at the very least a Sovereign visual update would definitely be nice.
    m12Pkoj.png
  • narthaisnarthais Member Posts: 452 Arc User
    freakium wrote: »
    Perhaps they can add the ability to deploy the Captain's Yacht and also sell that as a shuttle.

    It already is a shuttle, its either lifetime perk or one of the veteran milestones, I don't recall which. But is been in the game since the first shuttles were released.
  • adamkafeiadamkafei Member Posts: 6,539 Arc User
    I'd like to see a T6 Sovi, I'd also like it if it handled better than the T5 one. Though I think that can be achieved by making it shorter.
    ZiOfChe.png?1
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    narthais wrote: »
    freakium wrote: »
    Perhaps they can add the ability to deploy the Captain's Yacht and also sell that as a shuttle.

    It already is a shuttle, its either lifetime perk or one of the veteran milestones, I don't recall which. But is been in the game since the first shuttles were released.

    Correct, the Captain's Yacht is already in the game as a LTS perk.
    http://sto.gamepedia.com/Captain's_Yacht
    http://en.memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Cousteau_(yacht)
    XzRTofz.gif
  • sovereign47sovereign47 Member Posts: 399 Arc User
    Yes, as a ultimate Sovereign class fan, I support this idea all the way!

    Here are my thoughts on her T6 version(s):

    Sovereign class T6 command assault cruiser:

    - type: cruiser (tier 6)
    - hull: 46547 at lvl 50, 56000 at lvl 60
    - shield modifier: 1.12 at lvl 50 and 1.13 at lvl 60
    - turn rate: 8
    - crew: 800
    - 4 fore weapons slots and 4 aft weapon slots
    - 4 eng, 4 tac and 3 sci consoles
    - saucer separation ability
    - captain's yacht
    - hangar bay - argo or type 11 shuttles (argo shuttles would fit better for this variant)
    - a special slot for point-defense phaser turret
    - universal console: metreon gas canisters

    Boff slots: commander eng/command, lieutenant commander tac, lieutenant sci/command, lieutenant eng and ensign universal

    Sovereign class T6 intelligence assault cruiser:

    - type: cruiser (tier 6)
    - hull: 46547 at lvl 50, 56000 at lvl 60
    - shield modifier: 1.12 at lvl 50 and 1.13 at lvl 60
    - turn rate: 8
    - crew: 800
    - 4 fore weapons slots and 4 aft weapon slots
    - 3 eng, 4 tac and 4 sci consoles
    - saucer separation ability
    - captain's yacht
    - hangar bay - argo or type 11 shuttles (type 11 shuttles would be better suited for this variant)
    - a special slot for secondary deflector dish
    - universal console: cloaking device

    Boff slots: commander eng/intel, lieutenant command tac, lieutenant sci/intel, lieutenant eng and ensign universal

    Sovereign class T6 pilot assault cruiser:

    - type: cruiser (tier 6)
    - hull: 46547 at lvl 50, 56000 at lvl 60
    - shield modifier: 1.12 at lvl 50 and 1.13 at lvl 60
    - turn rate: 8
    - crew: 800
    - 4 fore weapons slots and 4 aft weapon slots
    - 5 eng, 3 tac and 3 sci consoles
    - saucer separation ability
    - captain's yacht
    - hangar bay - Federation mission scoutships (Venture class scoutship)
    - universal console: I don't know, maybe something that would improve maneuverability and impulse engines even more

    Boff slots: commander eng/pilot, lieutenant command tac, lieutenant sci/pilot, lieutenant eng and ensign universal

    As for fleet version it should have an additional console slot (additional eng console for command variant, additional sci console for intelligence variant or additional tac console for pilot variant), increased max. hull points, shield modifier and shield for 10 percent, and ensign universal boff slot replaced with lieutenant universal boff slot.
    FED ENG: FA Sirius Verax (USS Leviathan) , FED TAC (Delta): FA Adria Tyllex (USS Thunderblade) , ROM TAC: ADM Kill'ina (IRW Imperix Thrai) , KLING ENG (Delta): LT. GEN Ghol'Vaq Martok (IKS Qeh'Ral II) - 44th Fleet member
    SZ1RgUL.jpg
    SUPPORTING PLAYABLE CARDASSIAN AND DOMINION FACTIONS!
  • adamkafeiadamkafei Member Posts: 6,539 Arc User
    Nah, swap the console layouts for the command and pilot versions there as it fits better and and swap the Lt eng for Lt Uni and make the ensign eng as that give it more flexibility, it also gives those who like the Excel boff layout a reason to buy it.
    ZiOfChe.png?1
  • martakurillmartakurill Member Posts: 456 Arc User
    I keep throwing fistfuls of cash at the screen for this, but it still isn't showing up.

    This is seriously the only other ship I would consider buying at this point, and I'm sure it'll happen someday. However, we'll likely have to wade through about a year of other ships, maybe longer, before we see it. Which is a real drag..
  • cmdrscarletcmdrscarlet Member Posts: 5,137 Arc User
    I keep throwing fistfuls of cash at the screen for this, but it still isn't showing up.

    This is seriously the only other ship I would consider buying at this point, and I'm sure it'll happen someday. However, we'll likely have to wade through about a year of other ships, maybe longer, before we see it. Which is a real drag..

    That's what was said about the Excelsior. Dreams can come true faster than you think.

    Also, I'm sure the sales for this ship (even the Regent) is strong enough to tell them the Sovy has got to get some T6 love pronto.
  • martakurillmartakurill Member Posts: 456 Arc User

    That's what was said about the Excelsior. Dreams can come true faster than you think.

    Also, I'm sure the sales for this ship (even the Regent) is strong enough to tell them the Sovy has got to get some T6 love pronto.

    Hmmm...I do hope you are right Scarlet.

    I'm going to try my hand at a deduction here in the meantime. Let's look at the release pattern so far:

    Intel Ships (Cryptic original)
    T6 Intrepid
    Command Ships (Cryptic original)
    T6 Galaxy
    Pilot Ships (Cryptic original)
    T6 Veteran (Cryptic original)
    T6 Avenger (Cryptic original)
    T6 Excelsior (canon, but not featured)

    Don't think I forgot anything there. What this seems to indicate is that Cryptic is trying to space out "canon & featured" cash cow ships with their own original designs...and that big ship releases coincide with specializations. So we'll probably see another new set of Cryptic specialization ships before the T6 Sov. Which also means a new specialization, which likely means season 11. We're also probably due to see a T6 Defiant before the T6 Sov, though I don't think the Defiant will pull in as much as the Sov (FYI, DS9's my favorite Trek...just don't see it being as in demand.) So here's my best guess...

    T6 Defiant (August)
    T6 canon but not featured ship(s) (Best guess...2 of these, one for September and one for October)
    Season 11& new specialization ships (November)
    T6 Sovereign (December)

    The T6 Sov will possibly release about Christmas at the earliest then. Maybe November if it shares a specialization with the Season 11 ships, but I'm not going to hold my breath there...Sov screams Pilot or Command.

    On the bright side, I usually can justify a ship purchase for myself that time of year, so maybe the wait won't be so bad. ;)

    Of course, if a Dev would come to this thread and contradict me, I totally wouldn't mind.

  • cmdrscarletcmdrscarlet Member Posts: 5,137 Arc User
    I can see your point about the demand for Defiants being low. I think the reasons are:
    • Better performing escorts available
    • We are currently playing so-called "Cruiser's Online"
    • Overall fan-base is bigger for the Sovereign compared to the Defiant

    If Cryptic puts the Defiant out first, then they are appealing to a reasonably small player-base. Then again, they did it for the Galaxy-lovers (but that had a very actively vocal minority to help).
  • adamkafeiadamkafei Member Posts: 6,539 Arc User
    If Cryptic puts the Defiant out first, then they are appealing to a reasonably small player-base. Then again, they did it for the Galaxy-lovers (but that had a very actively vocal minority to help).

    There's also the matter that in my experience the Defiant community are absolute perfectionists and will complain if even one thing is slightly out of place. Then again, they gave us a T6 Excel so...
    ZiOfChe.png?1
  • cmdrscarletcmdrscarlet Member Posts: 5,137 Arc User
    So, Cryptic should take the feedback they can see on the forums: applause for the Galaxy redesign, shock to the lack of Excelsior redesign; mild appreciation to the Galaxy stats, mild disappointment to the Excelsior stats.

    I may be over/under-stating things but that's been my perception.

    SO - it would seem to me that the Sovereign deserves attention commiserate to the player-base that not only vocally appreciates the ship, but also proves it with their wallets.
  • adamkafeiadamkafei Member Posts: 6,539 Arc User
    Agreed, they should probably make a thread where they show various concepts, with the poll system these forums have they can get a good feel for where the community sits, they can also take boff seating suggestions. Although I think the majority will say they want the Regent seating with Lt tac rather than ensign.
    ZiOfChe.png?1
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    I can see your point about the demand for Defiants being low. I think the reasons are:
    • Better performing escorts available
    • We are currently playing so-called "Cruiser's Online"
    • Overall fan-base is bigger for the Sovereign compared to the Defiant

    If Cryptic puts the Defiant out first, then they are appealing to a reasonably small player-base. Then again, they did it for the Galaxy-lovers (but that had a very actively vocal minority to help).

    Well, Cryptic DID convert the Negh'Var, D'Deridex, Mogai for the KDF & Roms, and from "the source" the T'Varo and B'Rel will get the treatment also, and the KDF & Roms are decidedly small in comparison to the Feds, even if we're talking specific ships. I think it's just Cryptic knowing they can make some easy money with canon ships being put out for T6.

    That's the thing about a T6 Defiant, isn't it? Even sticking to Fed Escorts alone, there are fabulous options. The Pilot Ships are very hard to top and make survival in an Escort almost trivially easy yet still retain the punch needed. The Fleet T5U Tempest is still a rock solid, flexible performer. The T6 Phantom, which I've long called the unofficial T6 Defiant, fixes the old complaints of the T5 Defiant and has the built in cloak. Not only that, but has Full Intel Access.

    We can predict with fair certainty what the BOFF layout for a T6 Defiant will have. The Console layout and the rest of the stats will be guaranteed to get right. But what the T6 Defiant will never have is Full Specialization Access. Not like the Phantom with its powerful Full Intel Access (especially for single target focus), the Pilot Ships with Pilot Spec, etc. No lower tier ship converted to T6 has ever gotten Full Specialization Access (Cmdr BOFF slot level for those unaware).
    XzRTofz.gif
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    It seems to me that Cryptic build itself a bit of a trap in terms of Tier 6 ships.

    The Specialization ships basically have all the perks of a "regular" Tier 6 ship, but also get a specialization extra ability.
    That means every non-Spec ship has to compete with these ships.

    Worse - the Pilot Specialization is pretty much the perfect fit for Escorts. Mechanically, there seems to be no need for another Escort after them. They even got a 5/2 layout, which most Tier 6 Escorts probably will not get.​​
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited July 2015
    It seems to me that Cryptic build itself a bit of a trap in terms of Tier 6 ships.

    The Specialization ships basically have all the perks of a "regular" Tier 6 ship, but also get a specialization extra ability.
    That means every non-Spec ship has to compete with these ships.

    Worse - the Pilot Specialization is pretty much the perfect fit for Escorts. Mechanically, there seems to be no need for another Escort after them. They even got a 5/2 layout, which most Tier 6 Escorts probably will not get.​​

    Distribution of 5/2 loadouts for Escorts is a bit more even at T6. Not like T5 where the history of ships is much longer, stretching back to a time when 5/2 Escorts didn't exist. As OP as the JHAS was years ago, it was "only" a 4/3 Escort but it had 5 TAC as well as other nice factors compared to other ships.

    When the Pilot Ships came out, reading the stats alone made them instantly among the top-tier Escorts of the game. Their mechanics, firepower, handling is an unsurpassed combo. The lower hull issue isn't an issue when a player knows when to use Pilot Maneuvers and grant Immunity after barely a handful of seconds to recharge. That's a powerful tool and gimmick. Nothing else in the game is like that and it's built into the ships with zero console slot sacrificing. Better yet, they're not a Lockbox / Promo ship that a player may gamble for. When I started flying them, I had a hard time justifying a switch to another Escort other than for Starship Mastery Collecting.

    If Cryptic isn't going to grant Full Spec Access to all the T6 ships, they could at least do Dual Spec Access like the JHSS. But Dual Spec you'll see is only on Lobi/Lockbox/Promo ships. The "Premium Ships."
    XzRTofz.gif
  • cmdrscarletcmdrscarlet Member Posts: 5,137 Arc User
    Then again, Full Spec Access may be reserved for some criteria? The Resolute didn't get full or dual access as an example.

    For the Sovereign, it's going to get Command seating. I'll buy a LTS if it doesn't get a Command seat.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    Then again, Full Spec Access may be reserved for some criteria? The Resolute didn't get full or dual access as an example.

    For the Sovereign, it's going to get Command seating. I'll buy a LTS if it doesn't get a Command seat.

    I pray that it's not Command. Please, anything but Command LOL!
    XzRTofz.gif
  • adamkafeiadamkafei Member Posts: 6,539 Arc User
    Well with the grinders probably running out of specs to buy I should imagine S11 will have a new one which a T6 Sovi will probably get.
    ZiOfChe.png?1
  • cmdrscarletcmdrscarlet Member Posts: 5,137 Arc User
    I pray that it's not Command. Please, anything but Command LOL!

    Haha! I understand that sentiment. After I posted above I started thinking about the Sovereign as portrayed in the movies.

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Ent-E was actually pretty nimbly-pimbly. Ever since the Pilot Spec was introduced, I 've never imagined it fitting on a Cruiser. Ever. So if the Sovi were to get it, then it should not go into LtC or higher. Thus, it would not get Full Access. Now, if they gave it ... Pilot and Intel ... *that* would be nuts.

  • adamkafeiadamkafei Member Posts: 6,539 Arc User
    The Sovi is far more nimble on screen than in game, if in game it were as nimble as on screen I'd likely fly it more.
    ZiOfChe.png?1
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    adamkafei wrote: »
    The Sovi is far more nimble on screen than in game, if in game it were as nimble as on screen I'd likely fly it more.

    Yes. Even the Galaxy could put a bit of "pep" in its step in some situations. The D'Deridex on the other hand, LOL! There has never been any instance of that ship maneuvering decently under its own power.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • sovereign47sovereign47 Member Posts: 399 Arc User
    I think that Sovereign should be able to come with all 3 specializations, because she's maneuverable, powerful and multi-purpouse ship. And if huge Galaxy X can have cloak, I don't really think Sovereign couldn't. Yes, I understand it does not have cloaking device in canon, but stranger things already happened.
    FED ENG: FA Sirius Verax (USS Leviathan) , FED TAC (Delta): FA Adria Tyllex (USS Thunderblade) , ROM TAC: ADM Kill'ina (IRW Imperix Thrai) , KLING ENG (Delta): LT. GEN Ghol'Vaq Martok (IKS Qeh'Ral II) - 44th Fleet member
    SZ1RgUL.jpg
    SUPPORTING PLAYABLE CARDASSIAN AND DOMINION FACTIONS!
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    You're asking for a lot there. All 3 specializations AND a Cloak despite no canon example of the Sovereign-class being outfitted with one? Think about what you're saying.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • adamkafeiadamkafei Member Posts: 6,539 Arc User
    The idea of a cloak isn't totally unreasonable at this point in the storyline, most new ships have one and the resistance will need large amounts of firepower and the ability to hide it, the Sovereign seems to me the perfect candidate. Hey, it need not be a cloak, it could just be a temporal projection device of some sort with a side effect that it extends boff skill cooldowns while active, countered by high sensors skill and reduces resistance to chroniton effects while active.

    As for specs, no, you can't have all three.
    ZiOfChe.png?1
  • cmdrscarletcmdrscarlet Member Posts: 5,137 Arc User
    Asking for the moon dilutes legit suggestions, in my humble opinion.
Sign In or Register to comment.