test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

the feddie BoP

tehbubbalootehbubbaloo Member Posts: 2,003 Arc User
edited October 2014 in Klingon Discussion
We will be bringing down the Tribble server for maintenance to apply a new update: ST.45.20140928a.1

Ships:
  • Renamed Aquarius Destroyer to Aquarius Light Escort.
    • Improved its base hull value from 24,000 to 25,500.
    • Improved its shield modifier from 0.85 to 0.9.
    • Improved its turn rate from 17 to 20.
    • Improved its impulse speed from 0.15 to 0.22.
    • Added Raider Flanking, allowing it to gain a damage bonus when attacking a targets' rear arc.
      • +25% Damage vs. NPCs, +8.33% Damage vs. Players.
    • Can now equip Console - Universal - Cloaking Device.
    • All seats, except Commander Tactical, have been upgraded to be Universal.
  • Renamed Fleet Aquarius Destroyer to Fleet Aquarius Light Escort.
    • Improved its base hull value from 26,400 to 28,050.
    • Improved its shield modifier from 0.935 to 0.99.
    • Improved its turn rate from 17 to 20.
    • Improved its impulse speed from 0.15 to 0.22.
    • Added Raider Flanking, allowing it to gain a damage bonus when attacking a targets' rear arc.
      • +25% Damage vs. NPCs, +8.33% Damage vs. Players.
    • Can now equip Starfleet Cloaking Device.
    • All seats, except Commander Tactical, have been upgraded to be Universal.
    • T5-U versions of this starship will benefit from the improvements above.
    • Fleet Aquarius Light Escort [T5-U].
      • This starship now has the Raider Starship Mastery package:
        • Level 1: Precise Weapon Systems (+Accuracy)
        • Level 2: Tactical Maneuver (+Defense)
        • Level 3: Enhanced Weapon Systems (+Damage)
        • Level 4: Enhanced Weapon Banks (+Crit Severity)

so now we dont even have the BoP to ourselves anymore. is there anything left to give?
Post edited by Unknown User on
«134

Comments

  • wilbor2wilbor2 Member Posts: 1,684 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    I remember devs saying they would be no raider for feds why am i not shocked that they broken there word again.
    gs9kwcxytstg.jpg
  • potasssiumpotasssium Member Posts: 1,226 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Console based Cloaking Device, which I do admit finding odd that it can equip that.

    Otherwise that ship needed to be revisited, and the changes do make sense.
    Thanks for the Advanced Light Cruiser, Allied Escort Bundles, Jem-Hadar Light Battlecruiser, and Mek'leth
    New Content Wishlist
    T6 updates for the Kamarag & Vor'Cha
    Heavy Cruiser & a Movie Era Style AoY Utility Cruiser
    Dahar Master Jacket

  • cbrjwrrcbrjwrr Member Posts: 2,782 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    FFS.


    Still, feds being feds 99% of them wont have any idea how to fly it.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    cbrjwrr wrote: »
    FFS.


    Still, feds being feds 99% of them wont have any idea how to fly it.

    Well, some will know how to use it. But eventually, the Honeymoon of being married to a "Raider" will end for the majority out there.

    Case in point: Breen Raider.

    During the Winter Event, these things were everywhere. Then people realized how flimsy they are. Now? When was the last time you saw a Breen Raider? Statistically, it is a very fine "Raider" and better in that role than the KDF BOPs, IMHO. But nobody flies it anymore. The same will happen with the Aquarius Raider, though you may see them more than you did the Breen ship simply because it's easier to get the Aquarius than the much more limited access to the Breen one.

    Consider that most players' idea of doing proper DPS is parking their ship in front of the enemy and blaze away, they will find their lives very short in a Raider. The funny thing is, a Raider's ideal play is in Hit & Run tactics, which does NOT necessarily mean good DPS :cool:

    Edit to add: For once, I'm not bothered with this.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • cbrjwrrcbrjwrr Member Posts: 2,782 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Raiders: http://sto.gamepedia.com/Raider#Overview

    So, the Aquarius features better hull, better shields, and better impulse mod, better crew than every BoP except B'rels, an extra ens. Boff slot, 2 extra devices, better or equal inertia...

    Essentially it is better in every way that matters to how BoPs actually work. That is annoying.


    ETA - and it isn't just the Aquarius, the Vesta, Nebula and D'Kyr are getting buffs as well. FFS.
  • seriousdaveseriousdave Member Posts: 2,777 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    While it still lacks the inegrated cloak the T5U is a 11 console ship, so that more or less makes up for the cloak console. Wouldn't be surprised anymore to see fed raptors and warbirds flying around next year.
  • wilbor2wilbor2 Member Posts: 1,684 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    While it still lacks the inegrated cloak the T5U is a 11 console ship, so that more or less makes up for the cloak console. Wouldn't be surprised anymore to see fed raptors and warbirds flying around next year.

    I give it 2 years tops
    gs9kwcxytstg.jpg
  • seriousdaveseriousdave Member Posts: 2,777 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    wilbor2 wrote: »
    I give it 2 years tops

    Any news on the valdore-console-for-feds lockbox yet? :D
  • smeeinn1tsmeeinn1t Member Posts: 618 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Feds will probably get a Mek'leth before the KDF gets any love.
    V9BQ6SM.gif
    "A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects." — Lazarus Long --->Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    so now we dont even have the BoP to ourselves anymore. is there anything left to give?

    Can you say that you're really suprised by this OP? I know I'm not and I assume you're not either. What else would you expect from the clowns running this circus? No, I'm not suprised. I knew this would happen some 4 to 6 months ago, if you dig through threads around here you'll even find a post of me discussing it.

    This doesn't mean squat to me anyway, besides Cryptic failing yet again to provide a quality gaming experience. Trully as a KDF I couldn't care less anymore. PvP is more dead to me that it has ever been, especially since the removal of blue vs. red and it's only Ker'rat left....and well, with all the lockbox TRIBBLE going on in Ker'rat anyway this won't change my hunting approach on the rare ocassions I decide to PvP.
    I couldn't care less what Feds have anymore, it's evident that they have to have everything since greed is running the game now. Like others, I fully expect Federation singularity cores next year. The silver lining here being that we have nothing left to give, so in the future we won't be annoyed with boneheaded moves like this one. Feel sorry for the Romulans though, their "stripping" has only begun with the last lockbox.
    For me this is actually influencing the Fed. faction in a more negative way than the KDF to be honest. With cloakng raiders, spiky black hull TRON ships, missions given by S31, etc. the faction doesn't even resemble anything like Starfleet from ST anymore. Not that STO was really much of a ST game anyway.

    It's painfully obvious that Cryptic is incompetent to provide a full and engaging gaming experience in a Star Trek environment. This game is nothing more than CoH/CO with a Star Trek skin. It's a one faction game pretendng to have 3 factions.
    Decisions like these are the reason why I don't spend a dime of my own money on STO anymore, except KDF items because of this damned attachment to the faction and wanting to help the KDF get some more stuff in the future. Besides KDF gets stuff to buy like what, 1 per year? So it's not that big of a deal. With several much better space sci-fi titles around the corner, I wonder how long even that will hold on. And I used to invest in STO, I had a sub running, bought stuff. That ended with the S8 fiasco and will probably not happen ever again, especially under the current management.

    The saddest thing of all is just how much potential is wasted on Cryptic. They had the opportunity to have a goldmine with this IP. To have a big engaging game with strong fanatical support. Not a WoW killer, since WoW seems to be in a league of it's own, but surely enough to beat the next best thing. And what do they do? Waste it out of sheer incompetence.
    The engine is not STO's problem. The interafce is not STO's problem. The basic gameplay mechanics are not STO's problem. The terrible decision making is what is where the game fails. Not that I could expect much more from them, Cryptic are after all the experts in failiure. They create the image they want to have for their company and if they're satisfied to be the joke of the industry, then.....*shrugs*
    cbrjwrr wrote: »
    ETA - and it isn't just the Aquarius, the Vesta, Nebula and D'Kyr are getting buffs as well. FFS.

    Do you by any chance have a link (about Vesta/Nebula/D'Kyr) for those of us that are too lazy to dig themselves? :o
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • cbrjwrrcbrjwrr Member Posts: 2,782 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    shpoks wrote: »
    Do you by any chance have a link (about Vesta/Nebula/D'Kyr) for those of us that are too lazy to dig themselves? :o

    Yep: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1238751

    Right under the bit where Feds get a ship similar to a Fleet Hegh'ta, but before the bit where all uni consoles of 3 minute or longer cooldowns are reduced to 2 minutes. (which is even more frakking broken)
  • variant37variant37 Member Posts: 867 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    As a non-PvPer, I assume this will make life more exciting (for better or worse) for all those who KDF actually do PvP?

    The Aquarius was a laughable joke before, inferior to just about every other Fed escort in the game. Now at least it's interesting and unique.
  • cbrjwrrcbrjwrr Member Posts: 2,782 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    variant37 wrote: »
    As a non-PvPer, I assume this will make life more exciting (for better or worse) for all those who KDF actually do PvP?

    The Aquarius was a laughable joke before, inferior to just about every other Fed escort in the game. Now at least it's interesting and unique.

    Very bad assumption.

    At Fleet T5-U, an Aquarius will be superior to every BoP at being a BoP.
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    cbrjwrr wrote: »
    Yep: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1238751

    Right under the bit where Feds get a ship similar to a Fleet Hegh'ta,

    Thanks. :) Meh not much to see here, except the best sci. ship getting even better for some reason. Saying that as someone owning and activelly using the 3-pack. I'm happy for the D'Kyr though, Surak knows that ship needed some love.
    cbrjwrr wrote: »
    but before the bit where all uni consoles of 3 minute or longer cooldowns are reduced to 2 minutes. (which is even more frakking broken)

    Oh, that's no gauda! LOL :D
    Officially wellcome to the age of cheese!
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Fleet Aquarius Light Escort vs. Fleet HoH'SuS Bird-of-Prey

    +0.03 Hull Mod
    +0.11 Shield Mod
    -25 Crew (yes, with the borked crew system lesser is better)
    +1 Eng Console
    -1 Sci Console
    -1 Turn
    +0.02 Impulse Mod
    +10 Inertia
    +Slottable Federation Cloaking Device (uses console slot, separate purchase)
    -Battle Cloak
    -Improved Ambush? (assumption)

    X, X, X, X
    X, X, X
    X, X
    X, X
    X


    vs.

    X, X, X, X
    X, X, X
    X, X
    X, X


    Fleet Aquarius Light Escort vs. Fleet Norgh Bird-of-Prey

    +0.03 Hull Mod
    +0.11 Shield Mod
    -25 Crew (yes, with the borked crew system lesser is better)
    +1 Tac Console
    +1 Eng Console
    -1 Sci Console
    -2 Turn
    +0.02 Impulse Mod
    +10 Inertia
    +Slottable Federation Cloaking Device (uses console slot, separate purchase)
    -Battle Cloak
    -Improved Ambush? (assumption)

    X, X, X, X
    X, X, X
    X, X
    X, X
    X


    vs.

    X, X, X, X
    X, X, X
    X, X, X
    X, X


    Fleet Aquarius Light Destroyer vs. Fleet B'rel Bird-of-Prey Retrofit

    +0.03 Hull Mod
    +0.11 Shield Mod
    +20 Crew (yes, with the borked crew system more is a bad thing)
    +1 Tac Console
    -1 Sci Console
    -3 Turn
    +0.02 Impulse Mod
    +Slottable Federation Cloaking Device (uses console slot, separate purchase)
    -Enhanced Battle Cloak
    -Improved Ambush? (assumption)

    X, X, X, X
    X, X, X
    X, X
    X, X
    X


    vs.

    X, X, X, X
    X, X, X
    X, X
    X, X


    Fleet Aquarius Light Escort vs. Breen Plesh Brek Heavy Raider

    -0.055 Hull Mod
    +0.11 Shield Mod
    -1 Tac Console
    +2 Eng Console
    -1 Sci Console
    +1 Turn
    +0.01 Impulse Mod
    +5 Inertia
    +Slottable Federation Cloaking Device (uses console slot, separate purchase)
    -Breen Sensor Disruption Field Console

    (same BOFF layout)

    I'd be all rawr and whatnot, but Cryptic beat me back with the T6 ship stuff...2-3 weeks back I deleted all my KDF and rolled a Fed Klingon.
  • dova25dova25 Member Posts: 475
    edited October 2014
    -Improved Ambush? (assumption)


    Yes it has that too :

    "Added Raider Flanking, allowing it to gain a damage bonus when attacking a targets' rear arc.

    +25% Damage vs. NPCs, +8.33% Damage vs. Players." values are similar to bop flanking


    The fact that it has a fixed tac commander slot means nothing since 99% of bop have to use anyway a tac commander if they want to have spike damage.


    New aquarius will be a interesting ship that has the potential to hit hard and run swiftly

    About giving to Fed a cloaked raider ............................
    "There already is a Borg faction, its called the Federation. They assimilate everyone else's technology and remove any biological or technical distinctiveness and add it to their own."
    I refuse to be content https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwI0u9L4R8U
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    dova25 wrote: »
    Yes it has that too :

    "Added Raider Flanking, allowing it to gain a damage bonus when attacking a targets' rear arc.

    +25% Damage vs. NPCs, +8.33% Damage vs. Players." values are similar to bop flanking


    The fact that it has a fixed tac commander slot means nothing since 99% of bop have to use anyway a tac commander if they want to have spike damage.


    New aquarius will be a interesting ship that has the potential to hit hard and run swiftly

    About giving to Fed a cloaked raider ............................

    No, Improved Ambush is not the Raider Flanking. KDF Raiders have better Ambush damage than other vessels.

    Standard Ambush: +15%
    Subterfuge Ambush: +25%
    Improved Ambush: +25%
    Superior Subterfuge Improved Ambush: +40%
  • oakland4lifeoakland4life Member Posts: 545 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    patrickngo wrote: »
    When you're out of Bird of Prey, you're out of ships

    We're out of ships... Thx Captain Geko and his Cryptic goons...
  • oakland4lifeoakland4life Member Posts: 545 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    cbrjwrr wrote: »
    Very bad assumption.

    At Fleet T5-U, an Aquarius will be superior to every BoP at being a BoP.

    In First Strikes from cloak BoP's have an advantage...

    But just about everything else the Aquarius is superior to BoP's in open combat conditions statistically...

    BoP's slight Turn Rate advantage does not mean nothing with all the Turn Rate consoles and traits buff's that is out in STO now and into the near future.

    What matters in pvp for defense is Shields and Speed... Which the Aquarius is superior to BoP's in both area's...
  • jaguarskxjaguarskx Member Posts: 5,945 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Ah...

    Another opportunity for the KDF faction to bend over and get shafted.

    At least this is being done on Tribble first, which means KDF players will have a chance to apply some lube.
  • greendragon527greendragon527 Member Posts: 386 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Excuse? Why is this being done before KDF BOPs when Feds are already getting more T6 ships at launch?

    EDIT: Just saw it's getting 5th tac console too wtf....
  • zarxidejackozarxidejacko Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    No BC-No Good.
    2010 is my join date.
  • rodentmasterrodentmaster Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    This is deplorable.

    On the one hand, yes the Aquarius needed some kind of upgrade. It was obsolete when introduced because of the pathetic hull rating. Almost nobody used it. Its main claim was uni boff seats, back before there were uni boff seats in every other ship. It needed a fix.

    However this is redonkulous! They gave it the admittedly OP boff seating of the Plesh Brek and a major stats boost on top.

    I mean... WOW. Just... WOW. The only way to top it would be make the cloak integrated, or make it a BC, or give it 2x LtCDRs like the FPER.


    On the other hand... as far as PvP goes? Meh. Battlecloaks make the ship, IMO. Roms all have them. Intel T6 ships will have them. This?

    I'll be honest. I have the Gal-X. I have the Defiant. I have the Avenger. I use the cloaking module on all of them at different times. It's nice in PvE for manuevering, for tactical placement of yourself as you decloak. It avoids certain situations and makes you life easier.

    HOWEVER, I've also flown my KDF's Hegh'Ta for quite a while and that BC makes a massively different style of combat. Without a BC the Aquarius will just be another OP escort. It's not going to replace any BoPs just yet.
  • hyefatherhyefather Member Posts: 1,286 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Yes, a Quantum Torpedo up their shaft.

    I also remember them swearing on a stack of bibles that the Bridge officer layout and console layout on the Galaxy could not be changed because of programming. Remember everyone said it was just to underpowered for its class and people wanted the Lt Comm boff station changed from Eng to Tac. Cryptic said it was impossible to do. Now look, they have change the boff layout and Console layout of every ship in the game.

    Bottom Line... YOU Can't trust anything they say. They will look you right in the eye and lie without cracking a smile. In the words of good old Garak...thier insidious.
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    On the other hand... as far as PvP goes? Meh. Battlecloaks make the ship, IMO. Roms all have them. Intel T6 ships will have them.

    Phantom - Cloak
    Eclipse - Cloak
    Scryer - Cloak
    Qib - Battle Cloak
    Faeht - Enhanced Battle Cloak

    As for the Roms, neither the R'Mor nor Talvath even have a cloak (copypasta Temporal Sci/Destroyer stuff)...but yeah, everything else.
  • sinn74sinn74 Member Posts: 1,149 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    There should be a stock, unchanging answer from the devs when people playing only feds ask for KDF stuff:

    "Of course you can have x. It's available KDF side, by doing x."

    Since it's not happening now, it never will. Sad.
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    sinn74 wrote: »
    There should be a stock, unchanging answer from the devs when people playing only feds ask for KDF stuff:

    "Of course you can have x. It's available KDF side, by doing x."

    Since it's not happening now, it never will. Sad.

    If the Feds were to surrender already, then none of this would be a problem! ;)
  • mimey2mimey2 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    I give this thing just a couple days while people rush to buy it or use it if they already have it before they drop it and/or start complaining about how it is 'too weak' and wanting it further buffed.

    On the plus side, with nothing left to give up, aside from the junkier consoles we have left (except maybe Magnetometric Overload, that one isn't bad), there's not much really.

    Time to sit back and watch the whinier Feds scramble to find things to try and take from us (and now as well the Romulans) along with making up more reasons why they feel it's justified for KDF to get nothing, claiming superiority, etc etc.
    I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
    I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
  • oakland4lifeoakland4life Member Posts: 545 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    Phantom - Cloak
    Eclipse - Cloak
    Scryer - Cloak
    Qib - Battle Cloak
    Faeht - Enhanced Battle Cloak

    As for the Roms, neither the R'Mor nor Talvath even have a cloak (copypasta Temporal Sci/Destroyer stuff)...but yeah, everything else.

    The intel concept makes no sense...

    Intel Tactical Ships, Intel Cruisers and maybe future Intel Sci ships would make non-Intel ships obsolete... a poor understanding on Cryptic's part... the cloak arrangements depending on faction is just plain stupid.
  • rodentmasterrodentmaster Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited October 2014
    You know what I hate? They're not giving the KDF any good consoles from the fed side, in return. Or the rom side, even. My KDF would love to have a TDS, a nadion saturation bomb, an NX-style grappler hook (aka tractor beam), a wide angle quantum, or worker bees that follow you or a friend around and heal you, a nadeon detonator console, or a sympathetic fermion transceiver, an ablative armor console.


    Instead, they take plasmonic from KDF and give us..... a tier1 recycle-fodder "have some power for a short time" battery-wannabe console?

    Blah. TRIBBLE that.

    It's not a problem of taking from the KDF. It's taking ALL and giving NOTHING in return. That's the problem.
Sign In or Register to comment.