test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

How about the U.S.S. Reliant Vice admiral class ship?

2

Comments

  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited March 2014

    And yet we have ENT era ships at endgame, Dykr and the Andorian Escorts, the latter of which mount an insane amount of firepower.

    Yet we have playable Ferengi D'Koras, Cardassian Galors, Tholian ships, Dominion ships, Hirogen ships, Elachi ships, etc, playable for the Feds & KDF, blurring the lines between the factions instead of more faction ships, forcing the KDF & Feds to... LOOK like Starfleet and Klingon Empire respectively.

    You have endgame the T'Varo, which is really a heavily updated T'Liss, the ones from way back in TOS.

    The Klingons have at endgame the playable B'Rel and D-7/K'T'Ingas to play with. Yes, in canon, they were being still used in the Dominion War. But so was the Miranda.

    But most importantly, in STO's own setting, Mirandas are operating all over the place. No fleet is heavily composed of the heaviest warships in existence. Smaller destroyers, frigates, etc. play vital roles because you can't have 300,000 Sovereigns patrolling the entirety of Federation space as well as exploring.

    Playable endgame Mirandas make sense. They make more sense than most of the ships added to this game over the years. They could do the TWOK-era skin as well as the modern skins in STO. Refitted, again for more years of service.

    The B'Rel has done it. The Miranda could be a "Light Cruiser" of sorts, capable for varied support across the board, faster, nimbler than the big Fed Cruisers. The price however is that it is an old and small ship... hullpoints can reflect that. Maybe spread its BOFF layout to nothing higher than LtCdr, but capable of doing anything as a support vessel that needs to move. Anyways, just an idea to make the Miranda viable at endgame but not on the same footing as the Fed Cruisers and its younger sister, the Nebulas.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    You have endgame the T'Varo, which is really a heavily updated T'Liss, the ones from way back in TOS.

    Oh, it's even worse than that. The T'Varo is the Romulan ship from Enterprise.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    Oh, it's even worse than that. The T'Varo is the Romulan ship from Enterprise.

    I stand corrected! Considering how deadly effective at endgame the T'Varo is.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • gpgtxgpgtx Member Posts: 1,579 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    the only way i would except a T5 miranda is if it had the genesis device as the console that when fired turned the enemy into a planet


    or have a super auto destruct sense the blew up all the time


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynrXKI3EJFU


    really in TNG they where the redshirt of starships to show how bad it was as the miranda was on par with the constitution refit in star trek 2 so they used it as a way to show that the old ship would not have stood a chance in that situation and the D was much more advanced and powerful

    similar to how the writers used the odyssey as a stand in for the enterprise-d
    victoriasig_zps23c45368.jpg
  • hawke89305092hawke89305092 Member Posts: 237 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    gpgtx wrote: »
    the only way i would except a T5 miranda is if it had the genesis device as the console that when fired turned the enemy into a planet


    or have a super auto destruct sense the blew up all the time


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynrXKI3EJFU


    really in TNG they where the redshirt of starships to show how bad it was as the miranda was on par with the constitution refit in star trek 2 so they used it as a way to show that the old ship would not have stood a chance in that situation and the D was much more advanced and powerful

    similar to how the writers used the odyssey as a stand in for the enterprise-d
    True.

    On the other hand, the Jem'Hadar Attack Ship was more or less a Dominion's version of a Miranda, and look what STO did to that...

    Personally, looking at the current bizarre amalgamation of ships in Starfleet, I don't see much reason to deny any ship T5 status other than legal and/or practical issues.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • gpgtxgpgtx Member Posts: 1,579 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    true especially with the excelsior being one of the best tac cruisers and the bug being the best escort


    i still want the planet gun though
    victoriasig_zps23c45368.jpg
  • talonxvtalonxv Member Posts: 4,257 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    Instead of the miranda, I'd like to see this as a tier 5 ship.

    It's a refit NX class.

    http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2010/144/9/f/NX_Refit_Forward_View_by_thequestionmark.jpg

    That would make a fun tier 5 ship i'd drop dime for.
    afMSv4g.jpg
    Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!

    http://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1145998/star-trek-battles-channel-got-canon/p1
  • revandarklighterrevandarklighter Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    talonxv wrote: »
    Instead of the miranda, I'd like to see this as a tier 5 ship.

    It's a refit NX class.

    http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2010/144/9/f/NX_Refit_Forward_View_by_thequestionmark.jpg

    That would make a fun tier 5 ship i'd drop dime for.

    I'd rather want the original nx if anything. That refit is kind of funny but I woundnt to fly it.

    But concerning the nx I'd be pleased it I could use some upwards struts on the Akira. Then I could give it an nx-like shape without the ship looking 300 years dated...

    For the Miranda... I'd say she should be something like a federation raider ship.... You know with flanking and universals and stuff.
    That's not klingon exclusive any more anyway with the breen ship.
  • decroniadecronia Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    scififan78 wrote: »
    T5 Mirandas? hehe, watch the various Dominion War battles from DS9....the pop like balloons. :D :P

    Take a look at the mirror invasion event. The Mirandas in that certainly don't pop like a balloon, it shows it is possible to do.
  • redsnake721redsnake721 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    talonxv wrote: »
    Instead of the miranda, I'd like to see this as a tier 5 ship.

    It's a refit NX class.

    http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2010/144/9/f/NX_Refit_Forward_View_by_thequestionmark.jpg

    That would make a fun tier 5 ship i'd drop dime for.

    I have a model of that. Polar lights makes a NX-01 refit kit.
  • tinkerstormtinkerstorm Member Posts: 853 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    jarfaru wrote: »
    Heck why not make a t5 version of all the ships in the game. The game has no balance anyways so let players fly VA versions of ships they like. Just think of all the money PW could make off of that. The games feels less like Trek with just about every update anyways. I find it really funny now that some players are against this but have no problem a t5 excelsior. I say give the players what they want and be done with it.
    This.

    /thread
  • ghyudtghyudt Member Posts: 1,112 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    The reliant was a Miranda class ship. It will not go above tier 1.
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    jarfaru wrote: »
    Heck why not make a t5 version of all the ships in the game. The game has no balance anyways so let players fly VA versions of ships they like. Just think of all the money PW could make off of that. The games feels less like Trek with just about every update anyways. I find it really funny now that some players are against this but have no problem a t5 excelsior. I say give the players what they want and be done with it.

    Then I want a Tier 5 Phoenix and Canoe.
  • revandarklighterrevandarklighter Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    starkaos wrote: »
    Then I want a Tier 5 Phoenix and Canoe.

    As a shuttle why not?
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    As a shuttle why not?

    Shuttles don't have Tiers. So a Tier 5 Phoenix and Canoe would have 6 to 8 weapons, 9 consoles, and a bunch of Bridge Officers.
  • rinksterrinkster Member Posts: 3,549 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    As a shuttle why not?

    I think the canoe should be a land vehicle.

    We'll be able to spot the owner in the voth battlezone as he tries to paddle along the ground.
  • edited March 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • collegepark2151collegepark2151 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    I want a Death Star.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    Porthos is not amused.
  • stardestroyer001stardestroyer001 Member Posts: 2,615 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    starkaos wrote: »
    Then I want a Tier 5 Phoenix and Canoe.

    Where's my Tier 5 Space Shuttle. Oh and an Apollo rocket too. Must have a secondary engine.
    stardestroyer001, Admiral, Explorers Fury PvE/PvP Fleet | Retired PvP Player
    Missing the good ol' days of PvP: Legacy of Romulus to Season 9
    My List of Useful Links, Recently Updated November 25 2017!
  • phoeniciusphoenicius Member Posts: 762 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    why can't people just stop asking for ridiculously old ships? its kinda silly to have the excelsior in STO at t5 already(but its canon, so whatever).

    i'm a fan of TMP-era ships but really, they have no place at t5 in STO.

    it would be cool to have similar but clearly more advanced ships in the game though, like the rademaker merian, its an awesome looking ship.

    http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120528082103/startrek/images/8/87/Uss_planck.jpg
    https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-JF6c0A5DbgE/ThHtNgHi3KI/AAAAAAAACgM/Va9GLG6PJpA/w1598-h799-no/planckupdate.jpg
  • edited March 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    phoenicius wrote: »
    why can't people just stop asking for ridiculously old ships? its kinda silly to have the excelsior in STO at t5 already(but its canon, so whatever).

    i'm a fan of TMP-era ships but really, they have no place at t5 in STO.

    it would be cool to have similar but clearly more advanced ships in the game though, like the rademaker merian, its an awesome looking ship.

    http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120528082103/startrek/images/8/87/Uss_planck.jpg
    https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-JF6c0A5DbgE/ThHtNgHi3KI/AAAAAAAACgM/Va9GLG6PJpA/w1598-h799-no/planckupdate.jpg

    Would make sense to go this way. There is a clear logical progression between the Constitution to the Odyssey in terms of look so it makes sense that other ships would have a similar progression as well. So no to a Tier 5 Miranda, but yes to a Tier 5 ship that is a 25th Century ship that looks similar to the Miranda just like the Sovereign looks similar to the Constitution.
  • talonxvtalonxv Member Posts: 4,257 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    starkaos wrote: »
    Would make sense to go this way. There is a clear logical progression between the Constitution to the Odyssey in terms of look so it makes sense that other ships would have a similar progression as well. So no to a Tier 5 Miranda, but yes to a Tier 5 ship that is a 25th Century ship that looks similar to the Miranda just like the Sovereign looks similar to the Constitution.

    Gee wouldn't we call that -gasp- the tactical carrier aka akira refit. I mean if you look at it logically it looks like -gasp- a 25th century miranda! And we already have it out! Amazing how it works eh?
    afMSv4g.jpg
    Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!

    http://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1145998/star-trek-battles-channel-got-canon/p1
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    edalgo wrote: »
    But Excelsiors and Ambassadors are from TNG and DS9.

    So are Mirandas, Centaurs and Constellations.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    phoenicius wrote: »
    why can't people just stop asking for ridiculously old ships? its kinda silly to have the excelsior in STO at t5 already(but its canon, so whatever).

    Because the T5 Excelsior opened that door. And so fans of other ships, like the Miranda, should probably get a chance to fly their favorite ship at T5 too.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • talonxvtalonxv Member Posts: 4,257 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    So are Mirandas, Centaurs and Constellations.

    but they were old and dated ships. Hell most constellations were being phased out by DS9. As were mirandas. Now centaurs were replacing the mirandas because of all the spare Excelisor parts lying around.
    afMSv4g.jpg
    Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!

    http://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1145998/star-trek-battles-channel-got-canon/p1
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    talonxv wrote: »
    but they were old and dated ships. Hell most constellations were being phased out by DS9. As were mirandas. Now centaurs were replacing the mirandas because of all the spare Excelisor parts lying around.

    The Centaur was neither old nor dated. In fact, the Centaur seemed to fight Bug Ships way better than Galaxies and Excelsiors
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • eldarion79eldarion79 Member Posts: 1,679 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    The Centaur was neither old nor dated. In fact, the Centaur seemed to fight Bug Ships way better than Galaxies and Excelsiors

    Well at least against a Starfleet-controlled Bug ship who was pulling their punches.
  • phoeniciusphoenicius Member Posts: 762 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    The Centaur was neither old nor dated. In fact, the Centaur seemed to fight Bug Ships way better than Galaxies and Excelsiors

    the centaur was basically a destroyer-type ship according to memory alpha, so it makes sense it would be able to fight a jem'hadar bug, and according to memory beta, in the "Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Technical Manual" the centaur was a ship equivalent in terms of power to the galor(although the manual also says the miranda is on the same level of the galor so welp).

    http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/USS_Centaur

    i suppose you could make the argument that the miranda should be T5, since the bug and the galor are T5 and are arguably the best ships in their current categories(which is especially absurd in the case of the galor, a ship which was specifically showed as a weaker ship compared to new(at the time) federation vessels like the galaxy and nebula.

    it would still be ridiculous to see T5 mirandas flying around, specially since they were so horribly weak onscreen, but i guess it could be "acceptable" if they released the merian as a T5 with the option of the centaur/shi'kahr/miranda as skins, on the other hand that would likely increase the amount of requests for a T5 connie by 2000%, are you sure you want that? :p
  • rinksterrinkster Member Posts: 3,549 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    I rather thought we were playing a game where Starfleet engineers, apparently more or less for fun, built a replica of the NX Enterprise, which could nevertheless support modern tech.

    All this talk of age of ships is, to me, irrelevant.

    Starfleet engineers can build replicas to modern standards of just about anything.

    A T5 miranda is far from out of the questions.....


    ...and i do belive Shpoks has a link to an excellent reimagining of the miranda which would fit the bill admirably.
Sign In or Register to comment.