test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Odyssey re-imagined by Colourbrand (I WANT THAT!!!)

2456

Comments

  • jexsamxjexsamx Member Posts: 2,803 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    The "warp arch" thing is an interesting idea that could be played with, but the execution on this ship is sloppy and unattractive. Its lines are pretty ungraceful, too, and not in the sharp utilitarian way the Connie's or Excelsior's are, so it can't even draw on that. It's just... not very good.
  • xlocutusofborgxxlocutusofborgx Member Posts: 1,376 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    sorry but "to me" thats just ugly.
    borgsignaturecopy2-zpse8618517.png
    R E S I S T A N C E - I S - F U T I L E
  • azurianstarazurianstar Member Posts: 6,985 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I do not like this design.
  • leviathan99#2867 leviathan99 Member Posts: 7,747 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I really like it.

    Not so much for 2409.

    But Kestrel said forever ago she wanted to do a dark future after 2409.

    I think it would be cool if this appeared as a heavily modded Enterprise-F from an alternate future, kinda like the 3-nacelled Dreadnaught Enterprise-D.

    Maybe unlock a costume LIKE this for Odyssey owners who complete that content.
  • sekritagentsekritagent Member Posts: 510 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    It's a no from me too, I was good from the front angle and then saw the rest and was turned off.

    With a few modifications it might be an interesting idea as the ship of a new alien species though. Maybe a Scoodian cruiser, lol. :D

    I love saying Scoodian.
    Delta Rising is the best expansion ever and the players love it! No, seriously! ...Why are you laughing so hard? :(
  • meeheemeehee Member Posts: 85
    edited January 2013
    that ship is one of the most horrific fan fiction ships i have ever seen, and im sure it will haunt my dreams tonight....

    *shudder*
  • icegavelicegavel Member Posts: 991 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    No. Nononononononononononononononono. Just NO.
  • aelfwin1aelfwin1 Member Posts: 2,896 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Anything that get's rid of those pansy "artistic" nacelle's & pylons on the Oddy gets my vote !
  • silverashes1silverashes1 Member Posts: 192 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    cool i would like to see this in game just for the options for the oddy
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • xigbargxigbarg Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Now you guys are just over reacting.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • synthscanner#2101 synthscanner Member Posts: 470 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Love this alternate design, definitely agree, it would make a great 25th century dreadnought! Add an additional 3rd nacelle on the centre aft, dorsal engineering section, a Phaser Spinal Lance to the centre forward, ventral saucer section and a standard cloaking device with a science focused BOff station set up. Resulting in all good things... Right?
  • centersolacecentersolace Member Posts: 11,178 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    kalecto wrote: »
    Love this alternate design, definitely agree, it would make a great 25th century dreadnought! Add an additional 3rd nacelle on the centre aft, dorsal engineering section, a Phaser Spinal Lance to the centre forward, ventral saucer section and a standard cloaking device with a science focused BOff station set up. Resulting in all good things... Right?

    Not sure if bad troll, or really really good one.
  • theroyalfamilytheroyalfamily Member Posts: 300 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I could definitely see this as a Starfleet cruiser, especially if cleaned up a bit. Not an Oddy variant, but a whole 'nother ship. (Would make for an interesting Frankenship, though :D)
  • ferowsiferowsi Member Posts: 21 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    If cruisers were actually fun to play, I might have played it. I have an odyssey, among other items I've bought, because I didn't just want to play the game without paying.
  • r37r37 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Interesting, though I'd need to see it in 3D to truly get a feel for all the dimensions. The hardest part of making a good looking space ship is getting it looking right from every angle. So many fan designs look interesting from the base 2D prospective, but they just fall apart when you see them as a whole in 3D.

    Still, the concept on this one it interesting enough. It's hardly as bad as many people are stating, though it's different enough that many won't see the appeal. Witch is perfectly fine.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • captainbmoneycaptainbmoney Member Posts: 1,323 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I support this coming to STO.

    Like my fanpage!
    https://www.facebook.com/CaptainBMoney913
    Join Date: August 29th 2010
  • kyuui13kyuui13 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    thay8472 wrote: »
    hmmmm i can't see the attraction.

    I hate to say it, but its down right fugly to me. Just no.
    Next time you log in, ask yourself this.
    dastahl wrote: »
    If you can't have fun, then what is the point?
  • trek21trek21 Member Posts: 2,246 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Well, I'd definitely want the saucer section, neck design, and engineering hull + deflector parts as options for the Odyssey :D

    The rest? Definitely the most unique take I've seen on a Starfleet ship, I'll admit that, but it just doesn't fit really. So I'll have to say no to the nacelle/pylon design thing going on there
    Was named Trek17.

    Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
  • tymerstotymersto Member Posts: 433 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    The Saucer and front hull look interesting, but the back...

    Ugly as Sin. No thanks at all...

    Thank you for the time...
    STO CBT Player - 400 day+ Vet, Currently Silver
    Cryptic, would you actulaly like me to spend actual Money? It's Simple:
    • Full, Story-driven, select from start 1-50 Klingon Side
    • Scrap current Lock Box & Lobi system for something more reasonable
    • Expand Dil and Rep/Fleet Marks to regular story content
  • rustiswordzrustiswordz Member Posts: 824 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    This reimagining of the Oddessy is sorry to say just plain ugly. The in game version is beautiful and elegant. The fan one lumpy awkward and just not nice. Sorry.
    Monkey see, Monkey do. Monkey flings Feathered Monkey poo... :D
  • pwstolemynamepwstolemyname Member Posts: 1,417 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    uck. I havnt anything nice to say so i shouldnt say anything at all... But I realy dont like this design.
  • wenom4wenom4 Member Posts: 123 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    i dont like ody as ship but this is jus WOW if they put this skin or re.mastered edition of ship i will buy full pack :) great design
  • lindalefflindaleff Member Posts: 3,734 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    You design is a much needed improvement. Well done. If this were added in place of the current Odyssey, I would really be appreciative.
    I completed a 2-man CSE, ISE, and KASE, Optionals included. And I soloed Winter Invasion.
    My Ship Builds: USS Conqueror, HMS Victorious, HMS Concord, ISS Queen Elizabeth, Black Widow III
    Click here to view my DeviantArt.
  • ussdelphin2ussdelphin2 Member Posts: 525 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I love how people say "Its not a Star fleet vessel", that's a rather narrow minded way of looking at it, The Defiant class does not conform with typical Star fleet design (No neck, no pylons, no separate nacelles) but it exists because Star fleet advance their technology and ship designs. Its about time this game started moving forward with its ship designs, This game is not set in the Star Wars universe where they use basically the same technology and designs for hundreds if not thousands of years.
    How I picture a lot of the forumites :P
  • azurianstarazurianstar Member Posts: 6,985 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I love how people say "Its not a Star fleet vessel", that's a rather narrow minded way of looking at it, The Defiant class does not conform with typical Star fleet design (No neck, no pylons, no separate nacelles) but it exists because Star fleet advance their technology and ship designs. Its about time this game started moving forward with its ship designs, This game is not set in the Star Wars universe where they use basically the same technology and designs for hundreds if not thousands of years.

    Pretty arrogant thing to say when the Defiant is a standard Starfleet Design. It was basically inspired off the Miranda as a modified Saucer with Warp Nacelles hinged on the sides, than off pylons.

    But this Mod-Odyssey uses Ringed Warp Nacelles that are not standared with any Starfleet Vessel from the beginning all the way to the 26th Century. Even the Relativity did not use a Ring-Design, but more or less an intergrated Warp Nacelle. And let's not forget that the creator himself gave design rules that Federation ships had to follow, which this idea does not.


    IMHO, there are better fan-made designs that Cryptic can put to use.
  • lindalefflindaleff Member Posts: 3,734 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I agree with ship designs never changing. Seems like Starfleet is forever stuck on this tradition of "flying spoons." A change is not only needed, but long overdue. The Defiant Class, and the resulting subfamilies, are a great start indeed. Now the progress needs to continue on with the larger ships as well.
    I completed a 2-man CSE, ISE, and KASE, Optionals included. And I soloed Winter Invasion.
    My Ship Builds: USS Conqueror, HMS Victorious, HMS Concord, ISS Queen Elizabeth, Black Widow III
    Click here to view my DeviantArt.
  • commanderkassycommanderkassy Member Posts: 1,005 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    zerobang wrote: »

    Just no. I don't even...
    ♪ I'm going around not in circles but in spirographs.
    It's pretty much this hard to keep just one timeline intact. ♪
  • captaindjm15captaindjm15 Member Posts: 34 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I kinda agree with people the oddy now its just to big to ugly plus i think it should have a more streamlines design like the one this persons done as its supposed to be a slipstream type ship yh voyagers kinda similar to the oddy except its smaller but hasnt got a like weird split in the middle of it and voyager couldnt handle slipstream as it wasnt streamlined to handle the stress plus the oddys similar plus theres nothing wrong with a ultra modern design as how do you think they did the enterprise J and it makes starfleet ships more futuristic
  • twg042370twg042370 Member Posts: 2,312 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I can't wait to see the better designs from the naysayers.
    <3
  • squidheadjaxsquidheadjax Member Posts: 54 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Pretty arrogant thing to say when the Defiant is a standard Starfleet Design. It was basically inspired off the Miranda as a modified Saucer with Warp Nacelles hinged on the sides, than off pylons.

    *scratches chin*

    Huh, you're right. Never really saw it that way.
    twg042370 wrote: »
    I can't wait to see the better designs from the naysayers.

    Better designs? Well, there's the abomination that Cryptic modeled, and the original artist's continued improvement of the design to something that doesn't have borderline edritch geometry.

    I'm actually somewhat impressed that the artist cited by the OP managed to make it look worse. I'm not going to buy the Odyssey because I think it looks awful, but I'd actually pay for the ability to unsee that.
    SQUIRREL!
Sign In or Register to comment.