it was from the last audio interview with Al - Captain Geko - First they talked about him increasing the Artmitage hull - then the interviewer asked if any BoPs would get a hull increase
Al :" Ha Ha Ha, yeah well - NO!"
Will We see any more C-store KDF ships:
Al: 'Well they will get another c-store ship, perhaps some time next year" (kinda, maybe, sorta, We'll see - ha ha ha)
That was pretty much the interview. I did a thread about it way back.
it was from the last audio interview with Al - Captain Geko - First they talked about him increasing the Artmitage hull - then the interviewer asked if any BoPs would get a hull increase
Al :" Ha Ha Ha, yeah well - NO!"
Will We see any more C-store KDF ships:
Al: 'Well they will get another c-store ship, perhaps some time next year" (kinda, maybe, sorta, We'll see - ha ha ha)
That was pretty much the interview. I did a thread about it way back.
They have pretty much said the next c-store ship will be the Ambassador or the Andorian Broadsider. .
Could you show the links to those statements?
[SIGPIC]Handle: @kirian_darkstar
Registered: Oct/2009 , LTS : Feb/2011
Fleets: Warriors of the Phoenix, Kirian Industries[/SIGPIC] Three years and still no Captain Klaa hair...
At least the Regent has a good turn rate in addition to fighters.
When I heard the "Perfect Shield" thing I died a little inside.
But the Regent doesn't get fighters. All we got with her is gas and a Wide Arc Quantum Torpedo (which won't be surprised becomes available in other variations).
The Galaxy-X, man she got royally....... you know.
Vesta has 2x the turn rate, can carry DHCs, plus it has the Phaser Lance, which was only unique to the G-X (for Federation that is). Even if they did go through with the Saucer Seperation for her and the Shotgun, I'm not sure if it would put her back in a positive light.
The Galaxy-X needs at least a fourth Tactical Console and Fighter Capability.
Same audio interview he talk about Vesta, Ambassador,Andorian ships as being the next ships - but was not going to say in what order - except probably Vesta first and the Ambassabor after a story mission. So that leaves Andorian Broadsider as the next best guess for sometime around the 3rd Aniversary. It is also highly probable they could put out a KDF ship at the 3rd anniversary as well, but I think they would keep that a surprize till almost launch time.
at least when that shields up you cant shoot
if you could i think i may have thrown up in my mouth a little
They really should re-think this as it is a similar concept to the Intrepids Ablative armor generator which will let you launch torps while active. That would make sense in this case as they don't really use much ship power to launch.
Unless you're a fan of the design, don't bother buying the ship for it's stats.
If the current trend continues (and there's absolutely 0 indication to believe that it's going to change any time soon), the Vesta will soon be yesterday's news, outclassed by an even more OP ship within the next few weeks.
no , i think its plenty powerful enough , besides , thats physical armour with a port that opens up for the torps to fire through , this is an energy shield
no , i think its plenty powerful enough , besides , thats physical armour with a port that opens up for the torps to fire through , this is an energy shield
I thought torps were always fired through shields - they just match the shield frequency. I can see the no energy weapons issue as the shield would already be a heavy drain.
T-10 minutes till we get the first real info - so is everyone buying a Vesta? Everyone should - heck if you are KDF only - re-roll a Fed and get a Vesta to!
So will you get a Vesta?
I am getting mine as soon as the Update patch launches.
But the Regent doesn't get fighters. All we got with her is gas and a Wide Arc Quantum Torpedo (which won't be surprised becomes available in other variations).
The Galaxy-X, man she got royally....... you know.
Vesta has 2x the turn rate, can carry DHCs, plus it has the Phaser Lance, which was only unique to the G-X (for Federation that is). Even if they did go through with the Saucer Seperation for her and the Shotgun, I'm not sure if it would put her back in a positive light.
The Galaxy-X needs at least a fourth Tactical Console and Fighter Capability.
Oh yeah, I was thinking of the Armitage.
Unless you could use the lance while separated. Which I doubt. We need a Fourth Tactical Console or at least a kick TRIBBLE fleet variant STAT.
i might get the vesta i dunno from the specs of it the oddy dominates it has twice as more hull as the vesta so im still torn between it coz im not looking for a tac ship im loooking for an engineers ship that the other thing
Dev's - Adding some more Hull will bring in more Engineering Captains.
yeah if that happens i would be on it but way i see it is the oddy dominates it at the moment im sorry to say even though the other bits are good but that hull is a bit disappointing if i might say so i might or might not i don't no
the hulls is fine as it is , otherwise it'd be an absolute monster , hell its powerful as it is , but remember this is a science ship , not a cruiser
as strong as it seems to be however , i cant see it being the raw tank that the odyssey is , it has the OMGWTFBBQ shield , but once that goes , its still a science ship , and unless its specced and equipped for a pure cannon build it wont do massive ammounts of dps ( be 4 beam broadsiding for me , but then i have a peculiar build im fond of )
All Three Ships Aint All Science Vessels You No They Have An Eng One To And There The Same Specs As To Tactical Science And The Science Vessel That What Im Saying I Dont Want A Science Ship And That Ship Is Good For And Engineer And I Was Say They Should Add Mor Hull To It So It The Almost The Same As The Oddy
the hulls is fine as it is , otherwise it'd be an absolute monster , hell its powerful as it is , but remember this is a science ship , not a cruiser
as strong as it seems to be however , i cant see it being the raw tank that the odyssey is , it has the OMGWTFBBQ shield , but once that goes , its still a science ship , and unless its specced and equipped for a pure cannon build it wont do massive ammounts of dps ( be 4 beam broadsiding for me , but then i have a peculiar build im fond of )
There is NO ship of this size with that little hull - lock-boxes have more - I think the Dev's should at min make it on par with the Wells at 30k - which is much smaller and a sci shp!
There is NO ship of this size with that little hull
there is now :P
All Three Ships Aint All Science Vessels You No .They Have An Eng One To And There The Same Specs As To Tactical Science And The Science Vessel ,That What Im Saying.
I Dont Want A Science Ship And That Ship Is Good For And Engineer And I Was Say They Should Add Mor Hull To It So It The Almost The Same As The Oddy
it still has 3/3 weapons , weak hull and strong shields. its a science ship no matter how you look at it they may be orientated differently with consoles and such , but still science ships
the odyssey tactical cruiser , is still a cruiser , not an escort
For all those saying it doesn't have enough Hull. Think about this: They have to pack all the OP TRIBBLE it has in somewhere. This ship has up to 6 Extra Features (3 Consoles, A hangar, and 2 bonus pieces of equipment from the console set) that are sensitive equipment and not reinforced bulkheads.
Its big, but doesn't have a lot of space for solid bulkheads.
Just plunked down $50 with the extra Zen added and my 6000+ zen will be waiting for S7 to take delivery of my three new Ferraris ERRRRRRR Vesta Line ships.
STO: @AGNT009 Since Dec 2010
Capt. Will Conquest of the U.S.S. Crusader
Comments
it was from the last audio interview with Al - Captain Geko - First they talked about him increasing the Artmitage hull - then the interviewer asked if any BoPs would get a hull increase
Al :" Ha Ha Ha, yeah well - NO!"
Will We see any more C-store KDF ships:
Al: 'Well they will get another c-store ship, perhaps some time next year" (kinda, maybe, sorta, We'll see - ha ha ha)
That was pretty much the interview. I did a thread about it way back.
/console
I know how you feel. The only thing left for the Galaxy-X is the cloak.
And the Regent isn't in a good spot either
Thank you.
At least the Regent has a good turn rate in addition to fighters.
When I heard the "Perfect Shield" thing I died a little inside.
Not what I asked.
Registered: Oct/2009 , LTS : Feb/2011
Fleets: Warriors of the Phoenix, Kirian Industries[/SIGPIC]
Three years and still no Captain Klaa hair...
if you could i think i may have thrown up in my mouth a little
Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016
But the Regent doesn't get fighters. All we got with her is gas and a Wide Arc Quantum Torpedo (which won't be surprised becomes available in other variations).
The Galaxy-X, man she got royally....... you know.
Vesta has 2x the turn rate, can carry DHCs, plus it has the Phaser Lance, which was only unique to the G-X (for Federation that is). Even if they did go through with the Saucer Seperation for her and the Shotgun, I'm not sure if it would put her back in a positive light.
The Galaxy-X needs at least a fourth Tactical Console and Fighter Capability.
Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016
Same audio interview he talk about Vesta, Ambassador,Andorian ships as being the next ships - but was not going to say in what order - except probably Vesta first and the Ambassabor after a story mission. So that leaves Andorian Broadsider as the next best guess for sometime around the 3rd Aniversary. It is also highly probable they could put out a KDF ship at the 3rd anniversary as well, but I think they would keep that a surprize till almost launch time.
They really should re-think this as it is a similar concept to the Intrepids Ablative armor generator which will let you launch torps while active. That would make sense in this case as they don't really use much ship power to launch.
If the current trend continues (and there's absolutely 0 indication to believe that it's going to change any time soon), the Vesta will soon be yesterday's news, outclassed by an even more OP ship within the next few weeks.
Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016
I thought torps were always fired through shields - they just match the shield frequency. I can see the no energy weapons issue as the shield would already be a heavy drain.
I'm getting the 5k pack.
I wish the Odyssey would get 2 alternate ship skins.
Oh yeah, I was thinking of the Armitage.
Unless you could use the lance while separated. Which I doubt. We need a Fourth Tactical Console or at least a kick TRIBBLE fleet variant STAT.
Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016
To the Vesta? Please....
And everyone was worried about the Oddy being a special snowflake ubership.
yeah if that happens i would be on it but way i see it is the oddy dominates it at the moment im sorry to say even though the other bits are good but that hull is a bit disappointing if i might say so i might or might not i don't no
as strong as it seems to be however , i cant see it being the raw tank that the odyssey is , it has the OMGWTFBBQ shield , but once that goes , its still a science ship , and unless its specced and equipped for a pure cannon build it wont do massive ammounts of dps ( be 4 beam broadsiding for me , but then i have a peculiar build im fond of )
Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016
There is NO ship of this size with that little hull - lock-boxes have more - I think the Dev's should at min make it on par with the Wells at 30k - which is much smaller and a sci shp!
there is now :P
it still has 3/3 weapons , weak hull and strong shields. its a science ship no matter how you look at it they may be orientated differently with consoles and such , but still science ships
the odyssey tactical cruiser , is still a cruiser , not an escort
Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016
Its big, but doesn't have a lot of space for solid bulkheads.
Capt. Will Conquest of the U.S.S. Crusader
Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016