TWs this Weekend %%

The problem Chu would appear to be your numbers - summer has that affect every year etc. as Zero said charm costs add to attendance issues. That being said, as his screenshot showed, there was no challenge in A - a few of your uber DD could have taken care of them with a couple of barbs leaving the rest of you to be holding out in the Regen attack - at the very least if things then looked problematic in A war you could pull forces from those defending Regen but you would never have been at risk in A war and given yourself a chance in the Regen war but it isnt my place to critique your strategy only to suggest that your inference is clouded by undeniable facts based on reports from your own members as to how few were in the A war. (I use the term "war" loosely as I agree with Zero in that my interpretation of the TW bidding rules would suggest the A bid could easily constitute a fake bid.)

Back on topic. I know we used to have to defend 2 and 3 way attacks regularly in Cala - early on we had to make adjustments to strategies but only once did we no show entirely to a faction - that was EQ and it pained me to tell faction we had to due to numbers. So please if you want to make an argument that it is about land and not having a good fight come up with something that has a little more substance behind it - we had no clue your attendance was off to the extent that it was or that your strategy against a sparsely populated faction like A would consist of your full force - at least Zero was open with regard to the real issue and I honestly hope as summer passes and charm costs drop that your numbers pick up as, lets face it, IT vs Regen are damn fun fights.

As an aside was nice to have you guys attack us on Saturday, thus ensuring a good IT vs Regen war; and for the record, please never wait for our other wars to be concluded that's the fun and the challenge of the 2 and 3 way attacks.

b:thanks BB

Yeah like zero stated our attendance is our biggest issue. Damn this summer time XD jk jk, lol! Anyways, like I mentioned earlier, we didn't know what to expect from A which was why we chose to defend that attack. It really sucks how it turned out because we could have had a much more fun and interesting TW with my favorite faction, Regen b:dirty Had A's TW begun before Regen's TW we for sure would have went into the Regen TW but it just didn't work out that way. Anyways, there is always next week, I have never missed 1 TW since joining InTandem so I'm sure you will see me there b:chuckle Let's make this upcoming TW's worth our summer weekend time ^^

I hate to say this but I'm beginning to feel sorry for you. I don't know you or why you are the way you are but if you are like this on a game that's ment to be played for fun and to meet people I really hate to imagine what your real life must be like. This is just a game. b:shutup Everyone does things differently that's what makes a person an individual. Just because things don't happen the way you believe they should doesn't make the other person wrong. I hope that eventually you can actually enjoy yourself doing something that's ment to be fun and not bring other people down on a daily basis as well as spread hate around, it's very pathetic.

Ds, A's attack on InTandem was indeed considered a fake bid. You had no chance at winning. I'm too lazy to go back and find the post by Frankie, but it was indeed described as what A's attack clearly was. So before you go around bidding on factions that you clearly have no chance at winning, do your research.

As Willow said quite wisely, "Grow up, get a life, move on, get laid, something."

BaldwinBoy - Dreamweaver wrote: »

Ds - You have a beef with Aubree - we get it. The fact you address her in a thread she has had the good sense to avoid is comical. But your personal vendetta though once an irrelevance is of conseqence when A are clearly trying to interfere in the TW arena - maybe you had what 30 people bail out last minute and couldnt field 40-50 - i doubt it. If your faction wants to TW, and I dont think anyone is saying you shouldnt, then by all means bid on a suitable opponent - your choice of target suggests that TW was the last thing on your mind.

As always, wise words from my fearless leader. You could learn a thing or two here, Ds.

BB b:heart

Dsholder - Dreamweaver wrote: »

I believe how I act in real life doesn't affect much of how I act in a game. I will say this though, I was right two weeks ago. Every prediction I have had has come true. A was strong enough to hold off over 40 Warmonger members for over an hour without all of our members online so, with supporting evidence we believed we where strong enough to affect a two vs. one war against Intandem.

Regenesis didn't pay us any coin, this was all decided independently by statistics based off of Intandem's leadership past. You can't claim it's a fake bid and then no-show the other competition.

We did have enough force to scare the leader of Intandem into focusing purely onto our TW field, therefore we are not eligible to be considered a fake bid. Anyone remember what happened when Aubree was leader of Equinox and [no-showed] against Calamity to TW vs. Inversion and try farm them to show them, "hey if you gank us we'll farm you."


Also, if Frankie is reading this, can you please tell the other readers that A bidding on Intandem isn't a fake bid? I find it childish they'd try to mass submit tickets because they lost a land.

For members of Intandem: Stop preaching that you do TW for fun or play for fun, then falsely try to report other players, kill still in CoA, try to pk low lvls then get yourself farmed by their lv. 103+ mains and their main's friends; or threaten to report when we follow the TW rule system. You say you play for fun when your members disrupt players cube runs by killing them for -fun-. I say this, I don't allow Anyone, not even an employer to have fun at my expense. You call it QQ, I call it change.

You need this more than I do buddy... http://www.brainphysics.com/online-psychiatry.php

I think they can help you.

Graviora - Dreamweaver wrote: »

Ds, EVERYONE plays this game for fun. Its a game. Thus why we play it. Do you know why people play games? To have fun. If someone has fun doing something you disagree with, you suck it up like a big boy and get over it.

You're not making any "change." If you want "change" then you're executing it badly and coming off as a childish and spoiled brat.

Just curious, If you see a member of your faction being a jerk and farming a lv. 30 repeatedly, and let's say that level 30 was asking them to stop. Would you encourage your faction member to continue farming because they're having fun, or would you ask them to stop because they're annoying the level 30?

Graviora - Dreamweaver wrote: »

Ds, A's attack on InTandem was indeed considered a fake bid. You had no chance at winning. I'm too lazy to go back and find the post by Frankie, but it was indeed described as what A's attack clearly was. So before you go around bidding on factions that you clearly have no chance at winning, do your research.

As Willow said quite wisely, "Grow up, get a life, move on, get laid, something."

Interesting philosophy you have there too, If you truly believed we "A" had no chance of winning, why weren't you able to defend both "A" and "Regenesis"? You completey no-showed Regenesis. So, are you admitting you used the "A" Territory War as an excuse to not show up to the Regenesis Territory War, like some of your fellow faction members. Also I don't need people to tell me to get laid, I don't treat other humans as objects as I don't allow me to treat as an object. I highly don't expect you to reply here much more, your leader will tell you to stop replying and you'll say, "yes master."

This thread makes my foot itch.

Dsholder - Dreamweaver wrote: »

Click Below:

Aubree Tws for Pay

According to that, I also TW for pay

Shame on me! b:surrender

I'm not QQing, TW is purely voluntary, and TW ganking is part of the game. I was just responding to Willowgirls post about not having a challenge. If Regen wanted a challenge then they would have one by simply waiting a few minutes. I don't care if Calamity could defend multiple factions, IT is not Calamity. However its more likely that Willowgirl was speaking for Willowgirl, not for all of Regen.

Answer: No we would not, because Regen is arguably the strongest faction on the server, so a gank just levels the playing field. Also if Regen did not exist and IT only had targets like EQ, I wouldn't put it past us to wait for a 1v1, because spending so much coin/$$$ for gear just to have a no show really does suck, and a good TW is one thing keeping our player base around. Lastly, Armagedon used to do that kind of thing all the time.

Once again all my posts are my own opinion and not a reflection of IT.

BaldwinBoy - Dreamweaver wrote: »

Apologies to the OP but this thread has officially been derailed by commonsense. b:laugh

Rejection and hate blinds people unfortunately b:chuckle

+1 post count




also... -eats popcorn-




But seriously, I think the ganks making TWing more fun. I for one am not complaining if Regen gets ganked. It gives the opportunity for all the people who signed up for TW to enjoy that aspect of the game. Ganking also encourages the faction to apply tactics they wouldn't normally do in a regular 1 v 1. Its interesting to see what the faction that is being ganked will do.

BaldwinBoy - Dreamweaver wrote: »

Vis!!! no padding your post count.....! b:avoid

Oh thats right Vis add something now to make the post appear meaningful :P Although, I totally agree with what you said.

BB grats to 3rd post b:chuckle