test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Comments

  • And its people like you who F-up the game so much! Whine whine Im getting owned in pvp... please nerf this class ability or that. A) stop playing pvp or B) Lobby to have pvp separated from pve so there are two skill sets/skill effects depending on which mode you are in. Then it will be much easier to balance the game
  • Gotta agree with you. I set aside today (Sunday) to explore this new zone to find as you did that it was just a bunch of daily quests and 2 mini instances that took and hour (in between the newly introduced zone crashes). Highly disappointed.
  • I agree with the current state of game being poor. I disagree with the xpack being good. (A) the nerfs were over the top and mostly based on pvp (B) After this wait the Feywild is a huge disappointment. Its not a new zone, its a bunch of daily quests lasting an hour. And no new classes or paragon paths. No repeat missions…
  • That doesnt work. I have been running with Disable on demand patching almost since the game started and still crash regularly in Protectors Enclave, but luckily no other zones until now. And for the most part I was able to stay out of Protectors Enclave. But how super of Cryptic to create a new zone to play in and manage…
  • State of the Game: 1) About to pi$$ off 2/3 of the player base with balance issues using a wildly swung nerfbat all because they have no idea how to separate pve and pvp and listen far to much to whinging crybabies who lose pvp. 2) About to lose the trust of players in their financial model i.e. changing item sets that…
  • There is one way. As you say this set is used by many in the Conqueror build to try to achieve some damage which lets face it is sadly lacking in the GF without the Stalwart set. SO one solution is give GF's a damage set. Keep the Stalwart bonus (or reduce it to say 3 stacks) but put a caveat on the bonus e.g. you have…
  • Exactly...yet we now see Lurkers Assault being nerfed deep into the ground because pvpers dont like it. But this will totally screw with the balance of pve. I think rogues are in a good place in pve but this will upset the applecart.
  • The beauty of their existing system is you dont have to have 2 sets of powers per se but rather they change the power values depending on which type of game play e.g. a stun for 10 seconds in pve might only be 5 secs in pvp or one that does 50% extra damage in pve does 25% extra instead in pvp. I understand what you are…
  • THIS They already did it with Stalwart Bulwark gear that was lvl38 and wouldnt match with the lvl60 version. So just replace the set altogether with a newly named set. Either dont change the existing Stalwart set and retire it OR reduce it to say 3 stacks. But DONT PI$$ around with what people have paid good time or money…
  • I can see your point of view. And I would agree to this change if it were a persistent stack instead of a one hit wonder. HOWEVER...being an experienced players of many MMO's over the last 10 years I have to disagree with a number of major facts. (A) This is not beta. We are in LIVE. There was plenty of time to change this…
  • THS! Considering the customisation on STO and CO from cryptic its like they took 2 steps forward and 10 steps back. Trying to use the dyes as a money making exercise totally fubar-ed the customisation potential. It would make far more sense to have a costume designer like STO or CO and charge for costume tokens in the zen…
  • Really? Ive seen this complaint here and in other threads about the Zen Market. How naive are some of you? The "open beta" wasnt really open beta. It was a label to put out a game live but with development still needed (i.e. debugging). So rather than say the game is live it gave them time to fix stuff under a fake beta…
  • You know its happening again on Dragon today?
  • Except I am pretty sure I have bought games and purchases in the past using the same USD conversions without being taxed. Surely for us EU customers you should remove the US sales tax on your product first before applying the VAT otherwise we are being charged twice?