test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

3rd party sale and chat spam

This is defintly something to think about, the 3rd party sellers are being allowed to sell Zen and Astral diamonds and out it in chat and then when a gamer buys they are banned, how do they have access to these, Cryptic Studios, Arc, and Perfect world have the access, are they giving the 3rd party sellers these codes. Something to think about when you question them on the issue, they respond by saying that they yare aware of the problem, if so why do they spam the chat in the game? How do they get the codes or are they hacking? People are spending real money on these... Sound like a fraud market scam. Seems they do not care about the gamers!
«13

Comments

  • omegarealities#7219 omegarealities Member Posts: 1,004 Arc User
    Read the ban/suspension thread pinned at the top of the forum. They talk about the sites.
  • manyvengeancemanyvengeance Member Posts: 172 Arc User
    I think those guys just farm it out for a living, do you know you can share your Live with all the accounts on the same Xbox? They have only one Xbox Live Gold account and create multiple accounts on the same Xbox, so they enter, spam, get banned, delete account, create new account, repeat... And they have an army of ppl doing this, I also think that the items on those websites are from users...? Like the ppl selling rare stuff on E-Bay for Runescape and WoW.

    If my job were to play NW to sell my stuff I would be playing at all times, not like we normal players that play for a couple of hours a day, also they have multiple people farming the stuff. But that's my guess, it's not a conspiracy of Cryptic and those websites.
  • mrroofer#2455 mrroofer Member Posts: 101 Arc User
    Well I'm a legit gamer so those sites don't matter to me but I think if they lowered the price of zen in game maybe less people would go to 3rd party sites less people buying 3rd party stuff less 3rd party sites try but come on don't you think $200 is a little much for 23000 zen? 3rd party sites offer 23000 zen for way over half less then that just something to think about 2. How often do we have half price sales? Twice a year?
  • mrsbloodred#6192 mrsbloodred Member Posts: 75 Arc User
    I hear what you are saying, My point is that they are allowing 3rd party to spam the chat in the game then when a players buys they ban them from the game.

  • mrsbloodred#6192 mrsbloodred Member Posts: 75 Arc User
    It is realy money we are spending some one has to be responsible for this.
  • mrroofer#2455 mrroofer Member Posts: 101 Arc User
    True but there really is nothing they can do b c like the person said ahead of me they have a army of people and when one gets banned another takes their place. That's why you see different names every day spamming 3rd party
  • mrsbloodred#6192 mrsbloodred Member Posts: 75 Arc User
    What is perfect world doing with all the money they are making on the game... obviously they are not investing it wisely if they are allowing 3rd party's in chat... they can ban this and they refuse to.
  • mrroofer#2455 mrroofer Member Posts: 101 Arc User
    The only possible way they can do that is to get rid of chat all together. Besides they only spam in protectors enclave along side hundreds of other people spamming stuff
  • mordekai#1901 mordekai Member Posts: 1,598 Arc User
    They can't ban someone before they do it... when they find them, they ban them.. they then open a new account and do it again..
    Rinse and repeat.
    This isn't a kid in his bedroom, it's pros who know all the tricks.

    This is another case of players needing to take responsibility for their own behaviour and at the risk of going through some sort of Groundhog day.... the best Cryptic could do is to have something on the zen trade section saying "buy from 3rd parties and you WILL be banned..."
    As with the discussion over people managing their expectations over the RNG Lottery... this shouldn't NEED to be said. Common sense should tell anyone that.

    But... untill common sense becomes more... common... maybe the rules need reiterating through a mass email, or notice on the log in news bar?

    Till then maybe real life rules need to apply...
    If a total stranger approaches you in the streets and offers you a deäl that seems odd that it isn't more well known, and seems a bit "iffy". DON'T buy that HAMSTER...

  • mrroofer#2455 mrroofer Member Posts: 101 Arc User
    That's what I've been trying to explain to mrsbloodred there gonna keep doing it untI'll perfect world or arc or cryptic do something to deter people from going to 3rd party other then ban that's why I suggested lowering price of zen
  • asjohnson#4476 asjohnson Member Posts: 172 Arc User
    3rd party sites are just as bad as the people spamming ZONE and LFG channels for TRADES. ffs there is a TRADE channel for a reason
  • omegarealities#7219 omegarealities Member Posts: 1,004 Arc User

    What is perfect world doing with all the money they are making on the game... obviously they are not investing it wisely if they are allowing 3rd party's in chat... they can ban this and they refuse to.

    They ban people all the time. Hundreds of people work for these sites. All they have to do create a new ID and start again. I guess they ban chat all together.
  • mordekai#1901 mordekai Member Posts: 1,598 Arc User

    That's what I've been trying to explain to mrsbloodred there gonna keep doing it untI'll perfect world or arc or cryptic do something to deter people from going to 3rd party other then ban that's why I suggested lowering price of zen

    They could, but that would literally guarantee a loss of revenue, which is exactly what they are trying to avoid by banning people.

    Besides, there will always be someone looking to shave a percentage, just to feel like they are smarter than everyone else and getting a better deal. Most of those getting bans know they are breaching terms of use, but they think they won't get caught.

    I don't imagine it is too great a problem in the pockets of the owners, or there would already have been more public action taken.

    The owners know that the chances of completely stopping the 3rd parties and/or succeeding in any subsequent legal action are slim to bugger-all, so they punish the players in the hope that WE all get the message.
  • mrroofer#2455 mrroofer Member Posts: 101 Arc User
    Very nicely put completely agree
  • mrsbloodred#6192 mrsbloodred Member Posts: 75 Arc User
    That is why I put this up because they need to find a way to make it stop no matter how many people do it. It is unfair to all of us.

  • mordekai#1901 mordekai Member Posts: 1,598 Arc User
    They can't stop people opening new XBL accts linked through Gold, and creating a new NWO profile that immediately starts spamming chat. It would require clairvoyance, or some IT systems to back track through associated Live accts that would probably contravene all manner of civil privacy legislation.

    They *CAN* target and ban those who go to these people and buy from them.

    One solution might be to include a warning in the In Character welcome email,saying that "This is your warning... buy from 3rd parties and you'll get banned" (though probably couched in softer terms).
    Send a similar mass mail to all players, and bingo. Everyone has been warned,and told of the consequences.

    That way the banning should come as no surprise. As long as they follow through on the threat, people will eventually realise, and those who don't... will probably get banned, thereby increasing the average IQ of the Neverwinter player base.
  • manyvengeancemanyvengeance Member Posts: 172 Arc User

    Well I'm a legit gamer so those sites don't matter to me but I think if they lowered the price of zen in game maybe less people would go to 3rd party sites less people buying 3rd party stuff less 3rd party sites try but come on don't you think $200 is a little much for 23000 zen? 3rd party sites offer 23000 zen for way over half less then that just something to think about 2. How often do we have half price sales? Twice a year?

    I can agree with this, you don't get enough out of your money when you go to the Zen Market, if you think about it you can't even buy a companion if you put $10, how much a mount costs? $35...? All of it is way overpriced in hopes you grind as well as spend money, what happens if you invest the full price of another new game, what could you get with $60 that can make you feel like you got a real head-start? A mount and a companion, that's it! Really? You can't even buy the Dragonborne pack with $60...

    This is like the main reason very few spend real money in the game, it doesn't feel like Zen is really worth it.
  • sundance777sundance777 Member Posts: 1,097 Arc User
    The found a way in the vulgarity filter to block the English words, got, it is, and Roger, I would think a smart coder could block m.o.m.txxx or whatever their pattern is
    TR - Sun: 16000 IL
    OP - Sunshine: 16000 IL

    Casual Dailies
  • omegarealities#7219 omegarealities Member Posts: 1,004 Arc User

    The found a way in the vulgarity filter to block the English words, got, it is, and Roger, I would think a smart coder could block m.o.m.txxx or whatever their pattern is

    Then they just change to a>a>a> or b*b*b* or many other variations.
  • enicegeoenicegeo Member Posts: 88 Arc User

    They can't stop people opening new XBL accts linked through Gold, and creating a new NWO profile that immediately starts spamming chat. It would require clairvoyance, or some IT systems to back track through associated Live accts that would probably contravene all manner of civil privacy legislation.

    We have privacy when logging onto the Microsoft Xbox Live servers? Can they not just ask Microsoft to brick these systems, after they're verified to be problem account creaters?
  • armadeonxarmadeonx Member Posts: 4,952 Arc User
    enicegeo said:

    They can't stop people opening new XBL accts linked through Gold, and creating a new NWO profile that immediately starts spamming chat. It would require clairvoyance, or some IT systems to back track through associated Live accts that would probably contravene all manner of civil privacy legislation.

    We have privacy when logging onto the Microsoft Xbox Live servers? Can they not just ask Microsoft to brick these systems, after they're verified to be problem account creaters?
    That's what really needs to happen but Microsoft isn't picking up the ball on this - they will continue until they are forced to purchase a new xbox every time they are busted.
    Please Do Not Feed The Trolls

    Xael De Armadeon: DC
    Xane De Armadeon: CW
    Zen De Armadeon: OP
    Zohar De Armadeon: TR
    Chrion De Armadeon: SW
    Gosti Big Belly: GWF
    Barney McRustbucket: GF
    Lt. Thackeray: HR
    Lucius De Armadeon: BD


    Member of Casual Dailies - XBox
  • mahburgmahburg Member Posts: 598 Arc User
    armadeonx said:

    enicegeo said:

    They can't stop people opening new XBL accts linked through Gold, and creating a new NWO profile that immediately starts spamming chat. It would require clairvoyance, or some IT systems to back track through associated Live accts that would probably contravene all manner of civil privacy legislation.

    We have privacy when logging onto the Microsoft Xbox Live servers? Can they not just ask Microsoft to brick these systems, after they're verified to be problem account creaters?
    That's what really needs to happen but Microsoft isn't picking up the ball on this - they will continue until they are forced to purchase a new xbox every time they are busted.
    ^^^^^^ This^^^^ is the only real solution, they may be doing this, however Live closed the forums relating to bans down, so we cant see what is being done anymore, that was a shortsighted decision imho, plus they were immensely entertaining :)
  • mordekai#1901 mordekai Member Posts: 1,598 Arc User
    edited September 2016
    enicegeo said:

    They can't stop people opening new XBL accts linked through Gold, and creating a new NWO profile that immediately starts spamming chat. It would require clairvoyance, or some IT systems to back track through associated Live accts that would probably contravene all manner of civil privacy legislation.

    We have privacy when logging onto the Microsoft Xbox Live servers? Can they not just ask Microsoft to brick these systems, after they're verified to be problem account creaters?
    Each Xblive account is seperate. MS simply offer multiple users of the same unit to share access to Gold.
    Tracking back an account to an Xbox and banning all accounts is a place MS will NOT want to go, as they would be risking a lot of bad press.

    Imagine a student hall of residence where one XB is shared by 5 or 6 guys and one of them is a HAMSTER.
    MS reply to PWE's request to ban him and all accounts on his XB...

    Apart from the enormous amount of bad press this would generate, what if one of the other guys opens a new Gold account? Does the unit remain banned from Gold in perpetuity? What's to stop them getting a second hand XB and setting up new accounts?

    It would be both impractical and leave them open to both harsh criticism and potential legal action. (Imagine your reaction if your account was banned because your neighbour wäs being a HAMSTER...)

    If PWE made such a request of MS I imagine the response would be not dissimilar to the US govt's request to Apple to write a code to crack the iPhone security... "HAMSTER off and sort your own security issues out."
  • mordekai#1901 mordekai Member Posts: 1,598 Arc User
    edited September 2016
    It's simply not Microsoft's problem.

    Almost every online game with in game purchases has someone somewhere being a HAMSTER and breaking the ToS.
    If MS ban every XB that a game developer says has a pirate playing on it they would set a precedent that basically tells any game dev "don't worry about security... we'll sort it".
    And then the practicalities of how they confirm that the devs got it right, whether there's a burden of proof, what form that proof takes and whether or not there is an appeals process.
    This would COST Microsoft.
    Who makes up that money? The game devs? Cos if so, they'll just take the hit at their end. MS? Never, ever, going to happen.

    Should the xbox be perma banned from Gold?

    Seriously?

    Game devs can't deal with their own security so Microsoft are going to just cut off their OWN income?

    Yeah...

    Oh by the way... who would compensate the other games companies who lose income because MS have banned a bunch of their players because another game had one of the users on the same box banned?
  • mahburgmahburg Member Posts: 598 Arc User

    It's simply not Microsoft's problem.

    Almost every online game with in game purchases has someone somewhere being a **** and breaking the ToS.
    If MS ban every XB that a game developer says has a pirate playing on it they would set a precedent that basically tells any game dev "don't worry about security... we'll sort it".
    And then the practicalities of how they confirm that the devs got it right, whether there's a burden of proof, what form that proof takes and whether or not there is an appeals process.
    This would COST Microsoft.
    Who makes up that money? The game devs? Cos if so, they'll just take the hit at their end. MS? Never, ever, going to happen.

    Should the xbox be perma banned from Gold?

    Seriously?

    Game devs can't deal with their own security so Microsoft are going to just cut off their OWN income?

    Yeah...

    Oh by the way... who would compensate the other games companies who lose income because MS have banned a bunch of their players because another game had one of the users on the same box banned?

    They have done so before, don't make the mistake of thinking they wont act, because they will if they see benefit to them.
    Typically they will save the bricking up until a new Xbox has been released and then do a blitz bricking, that benefits their distribution chain as people have to buy new consoles to get back online.

    Whether they would incorporate these activities in such an exercise is of course debatable. Enough complaints to Live would raise it above the parapet though!
  • mordekai#1901 mordekai Member Posts: 1,598 Arc User
    mahburg said:

    It's simply not Microsoft's problem.

    Almost every online game with in game purchases has someone somewhere being a **** and breaking the ToS.
    If MS ban every XB that a game developer says has a pirate playing on it they would set a precedent that basically tells any game dev "don't worry about security... we'll sort it".
    And then the practicalities of how they confirm that the devs got it right, whether there's a burden of proof, what form that proof takes and whether or not there is an appeals process.
    This would COST Microsoft.
    Who makes up that money? The game devs? Cos if so, they'll just take the hit at their end. MS? Never, ever, going to happen.

    Should the xbox be perma banned from Gold?

    Seriously?

    Game devs can't deal with their own security so Microsoft are going to just cut off their OWN income?

    Yeah...

    Oh by the way... who would compensate the other games companies who lose income because MS have banned a bunch of their players because another game had one of the users on the same box banned?

    They have done so before, don't make the mistake of thinking they wont act, because they will if they see benefit to them.
    Typically they will save the bricking up until a new Xbox has been released and then do a blitz bricking, that benefits their distribution chain as people have to buy new consoles to get back online.

    Whether they would incorporate these activities in such an exercise is of course debatable. Enough complaints to Live would raise it above the parapet though!
    IF that were a built in protocol of the R & D for a new platform, they would probably talk to the major game developers about increased security for THAT unit.
    But responding to game devs requests to lockout current boxes to solve their own security issues that can dealt with just as effectively by banning individual players who breach ToS?
    I may be totally wrong, but I don't see how that does anything but cost them money.
    No one who got "box locked" would simply buy another X Box to overcome the problem... they'd go PS4 out of anger and spite.

    Hell... they'd probably even go Wii U before buying another XB.

    Besides, when you can get a free XBO with a mobile phone, it wouldn't be hard for the dicks to just replace the unit and carry on.

    It's far easier to disincentivise a stupid player from buying 3rd party for a second time than it is to disincentivise criminals from corrupt behaviour.

    Banned user has to open new Live account and start again at L1. There options are not play again, or learn their lesson. Either way they aren't buying 3rd party again.
  • mahburgmahburg Member Posts: 598 Arc User

    mahburg said:

    It's simply not Microsoft's problem.

    Almost every online game with in game purchases has someone somewhere being a **** and breaking the ToS.
    If MS ban every XB that a game developer says has a pirate playing on it they would set a precedent that basically tells any game dev "don't worry about security... we'll sort it".
    And then the practicalities of how they confirm that the devs got it right, whether there's a burden of proof, what form that proof takes and whether or not there is an appeals process.
    This would COST Microsoft.
    Who makes up that money? The game devs? Cos if so, they'll just take the hit at their end. MS? Never, ever, going to happen.

    Should the xbox be perma banned from Gold?

    Seriously?

    Game devs can't deal with their own security so Microsoft are going to just cut off their OWN income?

    Yeah...

    Oh by the way... who would compensate the other games companies who lose income because MS have banned a bunch of their players because another game had one of the users on the same box banned?

    They have done so before, don't make the mistake of thinking they wont act, because they will if they see benefit to them.
    Typically they will save the bricking up until a new Xbox has been released and then do a blitz bricking, that benefits their distribution chain as people have to buy new consoles to get back online.

    Whether they would incorporate these activities in such an exercise is of course debatable. Enough complaints to Live would raise it above the parapet though!
    IF that were a built in protocol of the R & D for a new platform, they would probably talk to the major game developers about increased security for THAT unit.
    But responding to game devs requests to lockout current boxes to solve their own security issues that can dealt with just as effectively by banning individual players who breach ToS?
    I may be totally wrong, but I don't see how that does anything but cost them money.
    No one who got "box locked" would simply buy another X Box to overcome the problem... they'd go PS4 out of anger and spite.

    Hell... they'd probably even go Wii U before buying another XB.

    Besides, when you can get a free XBO with a mobile phone, it wouldn't be hard for the dicks to just replace the unit and carry on.

    It's far easier to disincentivise a stupid player from buying 3rd party for a second time than it is to disincentivise criminals from corrupt behaviour.

    Banned user has to open new Live account and start again at L1. There options are not play again, or learn their lesson. Either way they aren't buying 3rd party again.
    You would be surprised lol, lots of folk did just what you say they wouldn't and went out and bought new Xboxes the last twice they did this.

    The bottom line is selling in the real world Live Game components is breach of their TOC (selling or transferring accounts is the same).

    As I said it depends on MS seeing a return for pushing that button, here they are being deprived of their cut through the Store.
    If they feel they are losing too much money due to these activities they would certainly act aggressively.
    Points to the FIFA duplication glitch which got lots of 360's bricked.

  • mordekai#1901 mordekai Member Posts: 1,598 Arc User
    On the subject of which, EA have a two tier sanction policy for FIFA 16, employing the football terms of yellow and red card.
    The system is clear and you would have to be a serious dumbass to not get the message.

    Buying FUT coins gets you a yellow card... you get your coins wiped out and a warning.
    A further infraction is a life ban.

    Selling, advertising, farming, and acct trading is a straight red card.

    They ban thousands of player accts every week and they say they it has a positive effect.
    It allows banned players to launch new XBL acct and start from scratch, one assumes having learned not do it again, with no need to resort to the nuclear option of hard blocking XBs from Live.

    Bans are always reactive. With the hard core professional con men, a ban isn't a deterrent. By the time the procedure of identifying and verifying by PWE followed by the submission, and eventual action by MS has all gone through, they have made enough to buy 100+ new units to start afresh It won't stop THEM. With players, who effectively get booted and are forced to start from scratch, it can be a deterrent, and the gradual education of players is probably the only real way this problem can be reduced.

  • mordekai#1901 mordekai Member Posts: 1,598 Arc User
    Actually...
    There is a possible way a compromise from MS might help...
    NOW tv have an acct process which allows 4 devices to be active on any one acct at any time. You can swap one a month. This stops lots of people sharing one acct.

    If MS limit the number of Live accts on one XB, and when that limit is reached a new one has to replace an old one and they have to wait a month before another can then be activated, this might allow the game company to ban multiple sellers far quicker than a lengthy submission and deactivation of the box. This would limit the return on investment for the con men, and for some may prove sufficient to stop them.

    While that may affect the resale value on ebay, it would be quicker, and buying a box in that condition should be a no no for even the hungriest bargain hunter.
    The box would become redundant to the crims quicker, and they wouldn't be able to run dozens of spam monkeys from one box.
  • omegarealities#7219 omegarealities Member Posts: 1,004 Arc User
    I feel for the parents of the x + 1 child when they have to explain that they can't play on the Xbox because of that limit.
Sign In or Register to comment.