test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

14TH ANNIVERSARY BUNDLE!

13»

Comments

  • husanakxhusanakx Member Posts: 1,608 Arc User
    duskwood wrote: »
    I was SUPER excited for the borg probes, but ...they're really dumb. How are these supposed to benefit from hangar pet consoles, hangar pet traits, etc. when they literally just run in and kill themselves immediately? Does that even benefit from the +torp dmg from the consoles?

    Ya if the explosion actually did comparable dmg to a few good torp hits.... ???? Maybe
    No they are just stupid.
  • duncanidaho11duncanidaho11 Member Posts: 7,980 Arc User
    edited February 16
    Right, so after testing out 3/4 ships (didn't get the Princeton yet): holy TRIBBLE. This is my favorite set of new ships Cryptic's introduced in one go.

    Ahwahnee: Don't be a coward, fill this thing with ALL the pet spam you can
    Atlantis: TAC/SCI doom boat with a bit of build tweaking
    Chekov: Crossfield with a big gun

    It also doesn't hurt that these are playing to new ship layouts and riffs on FED design themes. There's a lot of rich, indulgent variety here that begs new build directions from what I was using. Well done Cryptic folks, this is a really fun gaggle of ships and it's really great to see this effort put into accessible content that any player can reach for.
    Bipedal mammal and senior Foundry author.
    Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
    Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
  • pottsey5gpottsey5g Member Posts: 4,251 Arc User
    edited February 16
    Right, so after testing out 3/4 ships (didn't get the Princeton yet): holy TRIBBLE. This is my favorite set of new ships Cryptic's introduced in one go.

    Ahwahnee: Don't be a coward, fill this thing with ALL the pet spam you can
    Atlantis: TAC/SCI doom boat with a bit of build tweaking
    Chekov: Crossfield with a big gun

    It also doesn't hurt that these are playing to new ship layouts and riffs on FED design themes. There's a lot of rich, indulgent variety here that begs new build directions from what I was using. Well done Cryptic folks, this is a really fun gaggle of ships and it's really great to see this effort put into accessible content that any player can reach for.
    The Fed Design theme is a big factor. The other ships that I can layout like the Ahwahnee are mostly alien ships. Having a Fed Versions that is not only better as a Carrier but also a Fed theme is a major plus point.

    @ rattler2 I am glad your found your Carrier interesting. Those are my favourite playstyle.
  • novapolaris#2925 novapolaris Member Posts: 805 Arc User
    edited February 16
    Right, so after testing out 3/4 ships (didn't get the Princeton yet): holy TRIBBLE. This is my favorite set of new ships Cryptic's introduced in one go.

    Ahwahnee: Don't be a coward, fill this thing with ALL the pet spam you can
    Atlantis: TAC/SCI doom boat with a bit of build tweaking
    Chekov: Crossfield with a big gun

    It also doesn't hurt that these are playing to new ship layouts and riffs on FED design themes. There's a lot of rich, indulgent variety here that begs new build directions from what I was using. Well done Cryptic folks, this is a really fun gaggle of ships and it's really great to see this effort put into accessible content that any player can reach for.

    Agreed! I've been loving these so far. I actually switched one of my characters from a Vesta to the Atlantis and it feels pretty good so far! Same for the Ahwahnee. I switched a character from the Europa to that and it feels like an upgrade/trade on the same ship archetype. And dear lord, that lance on the Chekov feels scary, but I haven't tested it at higher levels yet.

    As an aside, dear GOD I wish the gear on the Mandukar was unrestricted. ,_, How good is this as a bonus if it's ship restricted?
  • avoozuulavoozuul Member Posts: 3,215 Arc User
    umaeko wrote: »
    Finally, I'm going bitter, because this was the most sought after vessel for me in this bundle... and this was it. It was our chance to have a T6 Cheyenne. We got it! And I'm not going to delude myself with thinking there's going to be another one. The chance to get a T6 Cheyenne has been squandered. I would have loved to get one, but that's not what we got.
    I think a legendary Stargazer could still happen even though it isn't quite a Cheyenne.

    I stream on Twitch, look for Avoozl_
  • duncanidaho11duncanidaho11 Member Posts: 7,980 Arc User
    edited February 17
    avoozuul wrote: »
    umaeko wrote: »
    Finally, I'm going bitter, because this was the most sought after vessel for me in this bundle... and this was it. It was our chance to have a T6 Cheyenne. We got it! And I'm not going to delude myself with thinking there's going to be another one. The chance to get a T6 Cheyenne has been squandered. I would have loved to get one, but that's not what we got.
    I think a legendary Stargazer could still happen even though it isn't quite a Cheyenne.

    It could, and it would be a "Cheyenne" per the class definition. The Cheyenne retrofit had assault cruiser seating with star cruiser seating, a combination which is not at all desirable these days. See. the Princeton. It's a massive step up but probably the least desirable ship of the bundle for "suboptimal" seating. Which in this case counts as dual spec, Lt. Cmdr tac, and Lt. Cmdr universal.

    Anyone care to guess how a "faithful" T6 Cheyenne would have been received? Even the Patrol escort got a major concept change to make it work with modern builds and its release slot. Granted, they could have made the Princeton the carrier but I don't think that works as well as this combo. Every other available carrier to the FED is unconventional (see. Seneca, Atrox, Jupiter). Throw the odd-ball Princeton into the role and the cycle continues. The Ahwahnee brings a conventional Federation design FOR ONCE to the carrier class.

    Deciding what ship goes where isn't just a matter of filling expectations dogmatically (never shall we surprise you, my lord) but balancing the needs of ship releases against eachother. See. the Cyclone shifting to a science leaning intel escort, even though miracle worker or command and an engineering focus may have been "on brand." The need to be a purist was not the only need that required accommodation, hence a different optimum being found.

    This is all to say that there's nothing wrong at all with the Ahwahnee (besides the hull glowing in the dark, issue reported). And for those that want another class, well a multi-mission cruiser would be a good fit for a legendary constellation which we can now get thanks to two premium variants of the ship (Constellation, Ahwahnee) now existing.
    Post edited by duncanidaho11 on
    Bipedal mammal and senior Foundry author.
    Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
    Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,575 Community Moderator
    pottsey5g wrote: »
    @ rattler2 I am glad your found your Carrier interesting. Those are my favourite playstyle.

    Should see my Discovery Connie. >:)
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
  • curly#6174 curly Member Posts: 2 New User
    edited February 16
    (Flaming, trolling comments moderated out. - BMR)
  • curly#6174 curly Member Posts: 2 New User
    edited February 16
    (Flaming, trolling comments moderated out. - BMR)
  • theraven2378theraven2378 Member Posts: 6,015 Arc User
    I'm giving this bundle a hard pass, nothing really stands out for me
    NMXb2ph.png
      "The meaning of victory is not to merely defeat your enemy but to destroy him, to completely eradicate him from living memory, to leave no remnant of his endeavours, to crush utterly his achievement and remove from all record his every trace of existence. From that defeat no enemy can ever recover. That is the meaning of victory."
      -Lord Commander Solar Macharius
    • novapolaris#2925 novapolaris Member Posts: 805 Arc User
      edited February 22
      It still gets to me that the warp core and console on the Mandukar are ship-restricted. Even with all the unrestricting passes being done in the game, and the ship now being part of the anniversary bundle. It feels like it detracts from the ship's value in the bundle that it's one of the only ships in the game now that has restricted gear that doesn't make sense it's restricted (like separation consoles).

      Can't its stuff be unrestricted finally? Please?
    • theraven2378theraven2378 Member Posts: 6,015 Arc User
      The Ahwahnee only has one tactical console, I put her to T6-X2 just to get her into a decent set up
      NMXb2ph.png
        "The meaning of victory is not to merely defeat your enemy but to destroy him, to completely eradicate him from living memory, to leave no remnant of his endeavours, to crush utterly his achievement and remove from all record his every trace of existence. From that defeat no enemy can ever recover. That is the meaning of victory."
        -Lord Commander Solar Macharius
      • pottsey5gpottsey5g Member Posts: 4,251 Arc User
        edited February 22
        The Ahwahnee only has one tactical console, I put her to T6-X2 just to get her into a decent set up
        You seem to be suggesting you need 3 tactical consoles to make the ship decent which isn't the case. While it can be done the Ahwahnee is not designed around using tactical consoles or ship weapons as primary weapons. There are plenty of decent or even strong setups that use zero tactical consoles. If you really want to use main ship weapons instead of tactical consoles try 7 Isomag consoles. That will provide massively better results then 3 tactical consoles.
      • theraven2378theraven2378 Member Posts: 6,015 Arc User
        I was limited by what I had equipment wise in my inventory
        I've managed to get the ship to a decent level and she performs well
        NMXb2ph.png
          "The meaning of victory is not to merely defeat your enemy but to destroy him, to completely eradicate him from living memory, to leave no remnant of his endeavours, to crush utterly his achievement and remove from all record his every trace of existence. From that defeat no enemy can ever recover. That is the meaning of victory."
          -Lord Commander Solar Macharius
        • tweihtweih Member Posts: 22 Arc User
          There is no Wolf Bundle in the Promotions tab at all
        • fltcaptalanfltcaptalan Member Posts: 47 Arc User
          tweih wrote: »
          There is no Wolf Bundle in the Promotions tab at all

          I came here to say the same thing
        • pottsey5gpottsey5g Member Posts: 4,251 Arc User
          tweih wrote: »
          There is no Wolf Bundle in the Promotions tab at all
          tweih wrote: »
          There is no Wolf Bundle in the Promotions tab at all

          I came here to say the same thing
          Someone made a new Promotions tab under Items then top right Promotions rather then use the Promotions tab we are all used to, that has all the other promotions in.
        This discussion has been closed.