test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Changes to Ranks Coming to STO? (Minor Spoiler for Picard episode 2)

A commodore was introduced, meaning Rear Admiral lower and upper halves are no longer the canonical rank structure (after all they were never spoken aloud as far as I can recall). I wonder if we will see this official change to rank designation reflected in level up ranks. It is much less clunky, I like the change (or reversion I guess).
«1

Comments

  • captainbrian11captainbrian11 Member Posts: 733 Arc User
    yeah I'd be on baord with them going with commadore then rear admiral. it's agrivating doing a mission at that level. because being addressed as "Rear admiral, upper half" is just silly.

    my guess is that the rank of commadore was restored as a result of reforms added after the dominion war. War time tends to lead innovation and reforms as "giant glaring errors" in peace time orginization etc are revealed
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited January 2020
    Starfleet has had Commodore already, even used in TOS. Even addressed him as such.

    latest?cb=20090325181015&path-prefix=en
    XzRTofz.gif
  • nrobbiecnrobbiec Member Posts: 959 Arc User
    Starfleet has had Commodore already, even used in TOS.

    Yes commodore was used in ENT and TOS. Then it just sort of disappeared and everyone was just admiral.

    I'm not sure where upper and lower halves originated from, was it an interview or source book?
  • This content has been removed.
  • nrobbiecnrobbiec Member Posts: 959 Arc User

    Unless I'm missing something, there doesn't seem to be a source to the halving distinction cited. Rear Admiral is officially only the 2 pip version accordingly.
  • evilmark444evilmark444 Member Posts: 6,952 Arc User
    I personally wish they'd just make rank a selectable title, on most of my characters I stick to Captain pips because an Admiral would never be doing the things we do in missions. If they did that then they could add Commodore without needing to change anything else.
    Lifetime Subscriber since Beta
    eaY7Xxu.png
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    It depends on how much content from Picard that Cryptic is willing to use. It is getting to the point where STO is set in an alternate timeline and there is no way to make STO consistent with the events in Picard.
  • khan5000khan5000 Member Posts: 3,008 Arc User
    It also depends on the usage of Commodore. In the current US Navy Commodore is a position and not a rank...usually a ranked Captain in charge of a squadron.
    Your pain runs deep.
    Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,728 Community Moderator
    I'd have to agree on the use of Commodore in the US navy, which seems to be the basis for Starfleet's rank structure. However we have seen Commodore used in the past.
    wikipedia wrote:
    Commodore is a naval rank used in many navies that is superior to a navy captain, but below a rear admiral. It is either regarded as the lowest of the flag officers rank or may not hold the jurisdiction of a flag officer at all depending on the officers appointment. Non-English-speaking nations often use the rank of flotilla admiral, counter admiral, or senior captain as an equivalent, although counter admiral may also correspond to rear admiral.

    Traditionally, "commodore" is the title for any officer assigned to command more than one ship at a time, even temporarily, much as "captain" is the traditional title for the commanding officer of a single ship even if the officer's official title in the service is a lower rank. As an official rank, a commodore typically commands a flotilla or squadron of ships as part of a larger task force or naval fleet commanded by an admiral. A commodore's ship is typically designated by the flying of a broad pennant, as opposed to an admiral's flag.

    It is often regarded as a one-star rank with a NATO code of OF-6 (which is known in the U.S. as "rear admiral (lower half)"), but whether it is regarded as a flag rank varies between countries.[1]

    It is sometimes abbreviated: as "Cdre" in British Royal Navy, "CDRE" in the US Navy, "Cmdre" in the Royal Canadian Navy, "COMO" in the Spanish Navy and in some navies speaking the Spanish language, or "CMDE" as used in some other Navies of several countries.[2]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore_(rank)

    And apparently the Rear Admiral Lower seems to stem from the US Navy?
    wikipedia wrote:
    In the United States since 1984, there have been two ranks with the title of rear admiral: rear admiral (lower half) (RDML), a one-star rank; and rear admiral (RADM), a two-star rank. Prior to that, a combination of ranks was used.
    Only the US doesn't use upper half to denote the higher level. Its just straight Rear Admiral.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rear_admiral_(United_States)
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
    normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
    colored text = mod mode
  • crypticarmsmancrypticarmsman Member Posts: 4,115 Arc User
    nrobbiec wrote: »
    A commodore was introduced, meaning Rear Admiral lower and upper halves are no longer the canonical rank structure (after all they were never spoken aloud as far as I can recall). I wonder if we will see this official change to rank designation reflected in level up ranks. It is much less clunky, I like the change (or reversion I guess).

    Picard is now 12 years in STOs past. Thus if they had the VCommodore Rank for a time back then, in the next 12 years they got rid of it again.

    TOS had Commodores but by STII:TWoK forward, the rank no longer existed.

    So yeah, 12 years on Star Fleet removed it again. ;)
    Formerly known as Armsman from June 2008 to June 20, 2012
    TOS_Connie_Sig_final9550Pop.jpg
    PWE ARC Drone says: "Your STO forum community as you have known it is ended...Display names are irrelevant...Any further sense of community is irrelevant...Resistance is futile...You will be assimilated..."
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    nrobbiec wrote: »
    A commodore was introduced, meaning Rear Admiral lower and upper halves are no longer the canonical rank structure (after all they were never spoken aloud as far as I can recall). I wonder if we will see this official change to rank designation reflected in level up ranks. It is much less clunky, I like the change (or reversion I guess).

    Picard is now 12 years in STOs past. Thus if they had the VCommodore Rank for a time back then, in the next 12 years they got rid of it again.

    TOS had Commodores but by STII:TWoK forward, the rank no longer existed.

    So yeah, 12 years on Star Fleet removed it again. ;)

    Actually, Commodore was used in the first season of TNG. So in 2365, it was no longer used or at least shown in Star Trek. There is always the possibility that the Commodore rank still exist after 2364, but never mentioned.
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,902 Arc User
    I really doubt they're going to go into the game and change the rank structure for a single character in Picard

    Even if Commodore existed in that era all the devs need to say is things changed with the 25th century.
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,016 Arc User
    edited January 2020
    The rank of Commodore never 'disappeared'. Starfleet always had them, it's the lowest rank of the admiralty, a one-stripe admiral has always been a Commodore. We just never saw someone holding this rank for a long time in the shows, but if it's used again in PIC that dumb rumour can be laid to rest.

    And the 'halves' of RA have always been stupid, from the day the rank was added to the game. We saw Commodores in the show, then everyone suddenly said Starfleet stopped using it, but we never once saw or heard or read about a 'lower half' RA in canon but that was for some reason never a problem, it was completely logical to assume the rank was changed despite never having a single hint about it or any reason to even speculate that happened.

    I would welcome them making this change, even if it's only a minor cosmetical one.
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • phoenixc#0738 phoenixc Member Posts: 5,912 Arc User
    edited January 2020
    They could use always use the TOS definition of commodore, which was actually rather well defined and you can see in the different tunic emblems (contrary to what a lot of people think, the shapes actually denoted branch or division, not individual ship).

    In that, most commodores command starbases and only occasionally squadrons on anything other than a temporary basis (which would not be a problem for a player character since they are supposed to be unusual anway). In fact, Matt Decker is the only full time independent squadron commodore shown in TOS (the "pretzel" emblem), the other commodores (like Bob Wesley) were all Starbase division and wore the "evening starflower" emblem. Informal ad-hoc squadrons were also sometimes lead by a "fleet captain" like Garth, they would have worn the standard "Starship Duty" delta (which in turn was originally the UESPA logo repurposed and turned to point up).

    Just for completeness, besides the delta, the pretzel, and the starflower they had three (or four) others: a smaller simpler version of the starflower for academy cadets, the merchant marine one seen on the crew of the Antares in "Charly X", and the outpost/colony services which looked a bit like a pinecone laying on its side.

    Then there one is the "boomerang" often called the "Defiant" emblem (in fact STO uses it as such for TOS uniforms), but it is actually the general Starfleet emblem (in fact it is painted on the Enterprise's secondary hull just behind the deflector to signify that it is a Starfleet ship) and possibly meant that a lot of the personnel who were on the Defiant when it was trapped were unassigned temporary personnel for some unknown reason, or that the ship itself may have been reserve and not assigned to a particular division.

    The long vertical rectangle that the crew of the Exeter was wearing in "Omega Glory" was a mistake in costuming, and was the subject of a memo from Bob Justman calling them out for the error. Since too many scenes were already shot to go back and fix it at that point they kept going with it for that episode but would not use it again. It could be explained easily enough by calling it yet another division emblem that was being phased out however. From the mission Exeter was on perhaps some kind of planetary science/anthropology/archaeology division (perhaps like the people stationed in the "blinds" observing the locals in "Insurrection", and the resemblance to some Vulcan wall hangings and jewelry could mean that it was borrowed from the Vulcan Science Academy the same way the UESPA logo was for the delta.
  • section31agent#8506 section31agent Member Posts: 665 Arc User
    > @warmaker001b said:
    > Starfleet has had Commodore already, even used in TOS. Even addressed him as such.
    >
    > (Image)

    Commode Matthew Decker
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,902 Arc User
    angrytarg wrote: »
    The rank of Commodore never 'disappeared'. Starfleet always had them, it's the lowest rank of the admiralty, a one-stripe admiral has always been a Commodore. We just never saw someone holding this rank for a long time in the shows, but if it's used again in PIC that dumb rumour can be laid to rest.

    And the 'halves' of RA have always been stupid, from the day the rank was added to the game. We saw Commodores in the show, then everyone suddenly said Starfleet stopped using it, but we never once saw or heard or read about a 'lower half' RA in canon but that was for some reason never a problem, it was completely logical to assume the rank was changed despite never having a single hint about it or any reason to even speculate that happened.

    I would welcome them making this change, even if it's only a minor cosmetical one.

    Lower and Upper half come from the real life ranks of the Navy, which Star Trek is based on...Rear Admiral Lower Half replaced Commodore in the 80s in the US Navy which is why we probably don't see it in anything TNG and beyond.

    Star Trek followed the Navy and STO followed Star Trek.
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,016 Arc User
    > @lianthelia said:
    > (Quote)
    >
    > Lower and Upper half come from the real life ranks of the Navy, which Star Trek is based on...Rear Admiral Lower Half replaced Commodore in the 80s in the US Navy which is why we probably don't see it in anything TNG and beyond.
    >
    > Star Trek followed the Navy and STO followed Star Trek.

    That is absolutely no reason whatsoever to assume any such change took place in universe. And now we know it didn't. The reasoning was always flawed.

    Otherwise it would be reasonable to assume every rank, service or character not seen in an episode was discontinued or resigned until it showed up again. Makes no sense.
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,902 Arc User
    edited January 2020
    angrytarg wrote: »
    > @lianthelia said:
    > (Quote)
    >
    > Lower and Upper half come from the real life ranks of the Navy, which Star Trek is based on...Rear Admiral Lower Half replaced Commodore in the 80s in the US Navy which is why we probably don't see it in anything TNG and beyond.
    >
    > Star Trek followed the Navy and STO followed Star Trek.

    That is absolutely no reason whatsoever to assume any such change took place in universe. And now we know it didn't. The reasoning was always flawed.

    Otherwise it would be reasonable to assume every rank, service or character not seen in an episode was discontinued or resigned until it showed up again. Makes no sense.

    Rear Admiral Lower Half was in TNG...sorry

    LH
    latest?cb=20170418023326&path-prefix=en

    UH
    latest?cb=20170418023313&path-prefix=en

    VA
    latest?cb=20170418023300&path-prefix=en

    So Lower Half Did exist...and there has been zero mention of any kind of Commodore after TNG...they had one in Enterprise but that of course is well before TNG and TOS. There isn't even a official insignia for Commodore beyond TMP...

    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • shadowkoshshadowkosh Member Posts: 1,688 Arc User
    nrobbiec wrote: »
    Starfleet has had Commodore already, even used in TOS.

    Yes commodore was used in ENT and TOS. Then it just sort of disappeared and everyone was just admiral.

    I'm not sure where upper and lower halves originated from, was it an interview or source book?

    Came from the US Navy the ranks of Starfleet are based on US Navy ranks
  • nrobbiecnrobbiec Member Posts: 959 Arc User
    > @lianthelia said:
    > (Quote
    >
    > So Lower Half Did exist...and there has been zero mention of any kind of Commodore after TNG...they had one in Enterprise but that of course is well before TNG and TOS. There isn't even a official insignia for Commodore beyond TMP...

    Picard shows the one pip admiral is commodore. Lower half and upper half are just interpretations.

    > @shadowkosh said:
    > (Quote)
    >
    > Came from the US Navy the ranks of Starfleet are based on US Navy ranks

    So there never has been any in universe evidence of this rank. The only canonical example we have is a commodore with the rank pips one below rear admiral.

    I think this overrides one country's naval traditions
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,016 Arc User
    lianthelia wrote: »

    Rear Admiral Lower Half was in TNG...sorry

    So Lower Half Did exist...and there has been zero mention of any kind of Commodore after TNG...they had one in Enterprise but that of course is well before TNG and TOS. There isn't even a official insignia for Commodore beyond TMP...

    Nothing indicates how these ranks are called, as they were never adressed as such. Commodore however exists and was appearantly just renewed. So the 'halves' have been nullified by canon.​​
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • ltminnsltminns Member Posts: 12,572 Arc User
    Barstow, Decker, Enright, Mendez, Stocker, Stone.
    'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
    Judge Dan Haywood
    'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
    l don't know.
    l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
    That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
    Lt. Philip J. Minns
  • captainwellscaptainwells Member Posts: 718 Arc User
    edited January 2020
    Reinstate Commodore and merge the separate Rear Admiral designations into a single.
  • fallenkezef#4581 fallenkezef Member Posts: 644 Arc User
    Or just assume Commodore is an "appointment" rather than a rank? Sch as RSM in the British military.
  • foxspirit13foxspirit13 Member Posts: 75 Arc User
    Rear Admiral Upper Half is the most extra (and I don't mean that in a good way) title I have ever came across in a game. It needs to be retired. I mean, imagine if you had to address someone like that all the time. You have 30 seconds to get a message out and protocol demands you use their title... better hope there's no interruptions. lol But then only in formal situations should RALH be addressed by their formal titles, otherwise Admiral is acceptable. Cryptic should really change that in the dialogues.

    Commodore and Admiral are sufficient... though I think they should just retire all the titles above Commodore since Admirals aren't going to be going out and fighting the Breen or whatever.
  • shadowkoshshadowkosh Member Posts: 1,688 Arc User
    Rear Admiral Upper Half is the most extra (and I don't mean that in a good way) title I have ever came across in a game. It needs to be retired. I mean, imagine if you had to address someone like that all the time. You have 30 seconds to get a message out and protocol demands you use their title... better hope there's no interruptions. lol But then only in formal situations should RALH be addressed by their formal titles, otherwise Admiral is acceptable. Cryptic should really change that in the dialogues.

    Commodore and Admiral are sufficient... though I think they should just retire all the titles above Commodore since Admirals aren't going to be going out and fighting the Breen or whatever.

    Sorry this has been brought up time and again no they are not going to retire admiral ranks
  • shadowkoshshadowkosh Member Posts: 1,688 Arc User
    nrobbiec wrote: »
    > @lianthelia said:
    > (Quote
    >
    > So Lower Half Did exist...and there has been zero mention of any kind of Commodore after TNG...they had one in Enterprise but that of course is well before TNG and TOS. There isn't even a official insignia for Commodore beyond TMP...

    Picard shows the one pip admiral is commodore. Lower half and upper half are just interpretations.

    > @shadowkosh said:
    > (Quote)
    >
    > Came from the US Navy the ranks of Starfleet are based on US Navy ranks

    So there never has been any in universe evidence of this rank. The only canonical example we have is a commodore with the rank pips one below rear admiral.

    I think this overrides one country's naval traditions

    Here it is in universe

    https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Bob_Wesley
  • nrobbiecnrobbiec Member Posts: 959 Arc User
    > @shadowkosh said:
    > (Quote)
    >
    > Here it is in universe
    >
    > https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Bob_Wesley

    I see no evidence of lower half admiral existing in universe in this article.
  • shadowkoshshadowkosh Member Posts: 1,688 Arc User
    edited January 2020
    nrobbiec wrote: »
    > @shadowkosh said:
    > (Quote)
    >
    > Here it is in universe
    >
    > https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Bob_Wesley

    I see no evidence of lower half admiral existing in universe in this article.

    It doesn’t matter Star Trek has used US Navy ranks for years enough said commodore was used in TOS when they started to use rear admiral
This discussion has been closed.