test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Brickwallers and their inability to understand changing circumstances

tilartatilarta Member Posts: 1,801 Arc User
I was doing my daily Borg Cube mission for the Competitive marks.
I assume there was a player new to the console for the tube, because they kept misaligning the colored lines and the shield never went down.
Then there was an announcement that the tube was resetting.
Since I'd never seen this happen before, I naturally paused to watch it.
At this point, considering the other team was in the endroom, I didn't figure it was worth continuing to fight and holstered my weapon to wait for the rewards to be granted.
Then I get this PM:
Brickwaller01_zpszcpuuful.png

I think there are certain players who are so inflexible that if anyone departs from zergrush full on attack tactics for whatever reason, they get snitty.
I think they assume that someone who isn't fighting, even for a few seconds is being a leech (from their point of view).
In the above scenario, we'd already lost, so why should we keep fighting?

And it isn't the first time I've had to deal with players like this.
1. Someone kept triggering the Thalaron Pulse in KASE and because my ship was highly manoeuvrable/fast, I was able to dodge out of the way. Got attitude for not fighting enough.
2. Dummyspit followed by ragequit when I suggested the team change tactics at the first transformer set in Cure Ground, because zergrushing wasn't working. We'd been at this transformer for 15 minutes and failed the optional......

I hope these are kinds of players aren't common.
I truly cannot comprehend someone who doesn't, as the Borg put it, adapt when circumstances change.

Bees like honey, they don't like vinegar.
Everytime someone makes a character that is an copy of an existing superhuman, Creativity is sad :'(
«13

Comments

  • This content has been removed.
  • dracounguisdracounguis Member Posts: 5,358 Arc User
    edited June 2017
    I've never needed to bother rotating the tubes, someone else always seems to get them done speedily. I'd probably just get in the way at this point. I just shoot things and run. B)
  • tilartatilarta Member Posts: 1,801 Arc User
    @dracounguis
    That's another reason why I didn't move from where I was standing.
    Given that I've never used the consoles, it's best to let someone who knows how to align the colored lines.
    If I was to go over there and try myself, I'd probably be interfering with the control sequence.

    That's also another example of inflexible thinking, that every player must be an instant expert and know everything to do without ever being told how to do it or learning about it.
    And if you happen to ask for an explanation, you're either ignored or insulted.


    As an aside, should I be concerned I keep coming up with names for problematic players?
    This is the third term I've come up with and the second one within a month.
    If you are curious, the other two are Vinegar and Paintballer.

    Bees like honey, they don't like vinegar.
    Everytime someone makes a character that is an copy of an existing superhuman, Creativity is sad :'(
  • thunderfoot#5163 thunderfoot Member Posts: 4,545 Arc User
    Why bother wasting the time it takes to pay attention to people such as these, OP? Giving them any notice at all reinforces their negative behavior. I doubt you are the only person they've done this to. I also doubt you will be the last person they do this with. They're not going to learn anything because they are already the smartest people in the PUG. Just ask them if you're not sure about this, they'll tell you they are.

    I could make the requisite 'Don't PUG' remark here, but it would be pointless to do so after seeing your post count. You've been here long enough to know this already. Contact with people like you've described can be discouraging and disappointing. However, it does not happen as often as it appears to. I'm thinking you started this thread as a way for newer players to be forewarned. So they will not stop playing STO due to the bad attitudes of what is actually a very tiny percentage of, ahem, ...'snitheads' ;)

    What actually worries me more is the thought these...'snitheads' may have bred children.
    Isn't the gene pool shallow enough already?
    A six year old boy and his starship. Living the dream.
  • spiritbornspiritborn Member Posts: 4,393 Arc User
    the tube puzzle is actually quite easy if you know the trick (you match lines to the short unmoving section on your side) that said, honestly only term I'd come up with problematic players is "something to be ignored" because if you worry too much about trolls or harassers you just worry yourself into an early grave.

    If I got 1 (euro)cent for each time I've had my intelligence or sexual preference questioned online by someone who himself (and it's pretty much always male) isn't really doing better or worse is the source of the problem, I'd have so much money that I wouldn't have to work and honestly as far as intelligence and manners go STO is one of the better games I've played online, in that in STO I've actually not had that many toxic pugs, some sure but honestly I can't even remember when was the last time a STO pug devolved into name calling and (metaphorical) finger pointing.
  • mosul33mosul33 Member Posts: 836 Arc User
    tilarta wrote: »
    I was doing my daily Borg Cube mission for the Competitive marks.
    I assume there was a player new to the console for the tube, because they kept misaligning the colored lines and the shield never went down.
    Then there was an announcement that the tube was resetting.
    Since I'd never seen this happen before, I naturally paused to watch it.
    At this point, considering the other team was in the endroom, I didn't figure it was worth continuing to fight and holstered my weapon to wait for the rewards to be granted.
    Then I get this PM:
    Brickwaller01_zpszcpuuful.png

    I think there are certain players who are so inflexible that if anyone departs from zergrush full on attack tactics for whatever reason, they get snitty.
    I think they assume that someone who isn't fighting, even for a few seconds is being a leech (from their point of view).
    In the above scenario, we'd already lost, so why should we keep fighting?

    And it isn't the first time I've had to deal with players like this.
    1. Someone kept triggering the Thalaron Pulse in KASE and because my ship was highly manoeuvrable/fast, I was able to dodge out of the way. Got attitude for not fighting enough.
    2. Dummyspit followed by ragequit when I suggested the team change tactics at the first transformer set in Cure Ground, because zergrushing wasn't working. We'd been at this transformer for 15 minutes and failed the optional......

    I hope these are kinds of players aren't common.
    I truly cannot comprehend someone who doesn't, as the Borg put it, adapt when circumstances change.

    Ohh, that one is just a TRIBBLE troll (hope I dont get modded again, but it is TRUE). He allways does that, keeps missalingning to cause ppl to fail. Meet him in a few instances and he allways does that, and if you try to pm him, he puts you on ignore...
  • silverlobes#2676 silverlobes Member Posts: 1,953 Arc User
    This is why when I play, the chat box is minimized ;) If I can't see the abuse, I don't need to acknowledge it or be emotionally impacted by it :)
    "I fight for the Users!" - Tron

    "I was here before you, I will be here after you are gone. I am here, regardless of your acknowledgement or acceptance..." - The Truth
  • tilartatilarta Member Posts: 1,801 Arc User
    @thunderfoot006
    I don't give them the satisfaction of responding to their unthinking aggression ingame.
    The point of this thread was to encourage the Brickwallers to think before typing, to look at a situation and have something other then an instinctive intolerant reaction.
    Look for the door in the wall, open it and walk through instead of banging your head against the bricks next to it.

    And that's why I prefer to PUG, it's an unwritten rule "you take who you get on your team" and accept you may not get the best players.
    You want a Pro team, make a Premade group and do not use the PUG system.
    However, given the Competitive aspect of the CPvE queues, I suspect it's drawing the worst players towards it, those who are overly emotionally invested in winning.
    I've seen at least three impolite statements over the past 2 weeks when the match was being lost to the other team.
    spiritborn wrote: »
    the tube puzzle is actually quite easy if you know the trick (you match lines to the short unmoving section on your side)
    So I assume it takes two players to complete the puzzle, one standing on either side, given that there are two colors.

    For the record, I came up with the different names to identify categories of problematic players.
    Brickwallers and Ragers are the ones most likely to cause problems ingame, typically during team based missions.
    Paintballers may cause problems ingame. I've never encountered any ingame, but I think they would inhabit social hubs, because they need an audience to listen to their soapboxing.
    mosul33 wrote: »
    Ohh, that one is just a troll. They always does that, keeps misaligning to cause ppl to fail.
    Ah I see, they were intentionally sabotaging the team to provoke conflict.
    And since I stopped to stare at the unexpected situation, I was chosen as a target.

    I'm thinking there should be a downvote system, if a player receives enough negative votes, they're blocked for a month from joining any queue ingame.
    It needs to be a harsh penalty, to get them to acknowledge that they have done something really wrong and there are consequences for their actions.

    Bees like honey, they don't like vinegar.
    Everytime someone makes a character that is an copy of an existing superhuman, Creativity is sad :'(
  • baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 11,007 Community Moderator
    Just an observation, but, if the Rager is yelling at you in chat because you're standing around doing nothing, doesn't that mean he's standing around doing nothing in order to type in the chat window? I've never understood this behavior. I'm too busy in an event trying to accomplish the objectives to be typing in chat. Even if I'm "doing it wrong" at least I'm doing something, as opposed to the guy doing nothing but yelling in the chat window. :smirk:
    GrWzQke.png
    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
    Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
    Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
    ----> Contact Customer Support <----
    Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
    Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
    Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
    Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
  • szimszim Member Posts: 2,503 Arc User
    tilarta wrote: »
    I think they assume that someone who isn't fighting, even for a few seconds is being a leech (from their point of view).
    In the above scenario, we'd already lost, so why should we keep fighting?

    Because every puzzle section that your team completes gives you additional competitive marks, even if you lose.
  • fringecutleryfringecutlery Member Posts: 119 Arc User
    I'm too busy in an event trying to accomplish the objectives to be typing in chat. Even if I'm "doing it wrong" at least I'm doing something, as opposed to the guy doing nothing but yelling in the chat window. :smirk:
    I hope you hijacked the thread for a cursory comment rather than suggesting that you're sabotaging the progress for your team as they desperately try to make you stop.
  • kikskenkiksken Member Posts: 664 Arc User
    tilarta wrote: »
    I was doing my daily Borg Cube mission for the Competitive marks.
    I assume there was a player new to the console for the tube, because they kept misaligning the colored lines and the shield never went down.
    Then there was an announcement that the tube was resetting.
    Since I'd never seen this happen before, I naturally paused to watch it.
    At this point, considering the other team was in the endroom, I didn't figure it was worth continuing to fight and holstered my weapon to wait for the rewards to be granted.
    Then I get this PM:
    Brickwaller01_zpszcpuuful.png

    I think there are certain players who are so inflexible that if anyone departs from zergrush full on attack tactics for whatever reason, they get snitty.
    I think they assume that someone who isn't fighting, even for a few seconds is being a leech (from their point of view).
    In the above scenario, we'd already lost, so why should we keep fighting?

    And it isn't the first time I've had to deal with players like this.
    1. Someone kept triggering the Thalaron Pulse in KASE and because my ship was highly manoeuvrable/fast, I was able to dodge out of the way. Got attitude for not fighting enough.
    2. Dummyspit followed by ragequit when I suggested the team change tactics at the first transformer set in Cure Ground, because zergrushing wasn't working. We'd been at this transformer for 15 minutes and failed the optional......

    I hope these are kinds of players aren't common.
    I truly cannot comprehend someone who doesn't, as the Borg put it, adapt when circumstances change.
    Because, even though the situation looks hopeless, one does NOT give up, under any circumstance.
    EVER.
    And, since you mentioned the borg, they too never give up.
    Klingons don't get drunk.
    They just get less sober.
  • saurializardsaurializard Member Posts: 4,404 Arc User
    szim wrote: »
    tilarta wrote: »
    I think they assume that someone who isn't fighting, even for a few seconds is being a leech (from their point of view).
    In the above scenario, we'd already lost, so why should we keep fighting?

    Because every puzzle section that your team completes gives you additional competitive marks, even if you lose.
    This. Interacting with each console opening the doors to the next puzzle gives you an additional reward.
    #TASforSTO
    Iconian_Trio_sign.jpg?raw=1
  • warpangelwarpangel Member Posts: 9,427 Arc User
    tilarta wrote: »
    I don't give them the satisfaction of responding to their unthinking aggression ingame.
    The point of this thread was to encourage the Brickwallers to think before typing, to look at a situation and have something other then an instinctive intolerant reaction.
    Look for the door in the wall, open it and walk through instead of banging your head against the bricks next to it.
    Trying to encourage jerks on the internet to "think before typing" is a total waste of time. They either don't care or just enjoy the attention. Just ignore them or close the chat box.
    spiritborn wrote: »
    the tube puzzle is actually quite easy if you know the trick (you match lines to the short unmoving section on your side)
    So I assume it takes two players to complete the puzzle, one standing on either side, given that there are two colors.
    A single player can align them just fine as long as someone else isn't turning them the wrong way.
    I'm thinking there should be a downvote system, if a player receives enough negative votes, they're blocked for a month from joining any queue ingame.
    No, there shouldn't.
  • meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    Just an observation, but, if the Rager is yelling at you in chat because you're standing around doing nothing, doesn't that mean he's standing around doing nothing in order to type in the chat window? I've never understood this behavior. I'm too busy in an event trying to accomplish the objectives to be typing in chat. Even if I'm "doing it wrong" at least I'm doing something, as opposed to the guy doing nothing but yelling in the chat window. :smirk:


    I see yellers in MIA too. They just get blocked.
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 11,007 Community Moderator
    I'm too busy in an event trying to accomplish the objectives to be typing in chat. Even if I'm "doing it wrong" at least I'm doing something, as opposed to the guy doing nothing but yelling in the chat window. :smirk:
    I hope you hijacked the thread for a cursory comment rather than suggesting that you're sabotaging the progress for your team as they desperately try to make you stop.

    Hijacked? LOL. Cute.

    Who said anything about sabotage? I said accomplish the objectives. That's not sabotage. The quotes around "doing it wrong" were to emphasize how these types of players have it in their heads that you must play the game their way, or else they fly into a rage. Help me out here, folks. Was this not evident from my original post? Could I have been more clear?
    GrWzQke.png
    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
    Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
    Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
    ----> Contact Customer Support <----
    Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
    Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
    Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
    Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
  • nightkennightken Member Posts: 2,824 Arc User
    I'm too busy in an event trying to accomplish the objectives to be typing in chat. Even if I'm "doing it wrong" at least I'm doing something, as opposed to the guy doing nothing but yelling in the chat window. :smirk:
    I hope you hijacked the thread for a cursory comment rather than suggesting that you're sabotaging the progress for your team as they desperately try to make you stop.

    Hijacked? LOL. Cute.

    Who said anything about sabotage? I said accomplish the objectives. That's not sabotage. The quotes around "doing it wrong" were to emphasize how these types of players have it in their heads that you must play the game their way, or else they fly into a rage. Help me out here, folks. Was this not evident from my original post? Could I have been more clear?

    well first of all you assumed that people know what context is. two you assumed people knew a common indictation. it was, and probably not.


    if I stop posting it doesn't make you right it. just means I don't have enough rum to continue interacting with you.
  • fringecutleryfringecutlery Member Posts: 119 Arc User
    I'm too busy in an event trying to accomplish the objectives to be typing in chat. Even if I'm "doing it wrong" at least I'm doing something, as opposed to the guy doing nothing but yelling in the chat window. :smirk:
    I hope you hijacked the thread for a cursory comment rather than suggesting that you're sabotaging the progress for your team as they desperately try to make you stop.

    Hijacked? LOL. Cute.

    Who said anything about sabotage? I said accomplish the objectives. That's not sabotage. The quotes around "doing it wrong" were to emphasize how these types of players have it in their heads that you must play the game their way, or else they fly into a rage. Help me out here, folks. Was this not evident from my original post? Could I have been more clear?

    Trying to accomplish an objective is not the same as actually solving the problem, as evident by the issue the OP's post regarding repeated failures during puzzle elements and "zergrushing". Hence the question if you actually were responding to the author and the scenarios they put forward, or if you used the thread to express something outside of that.
  • This content has been removed.
  • baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 11,007 Community Moderator
    edited June 2017
    I'm too busy in an event trying to accomplish the objectives to be typing in chat. Even if I'm "doing it wrong" at least I'm doing something, as opposed to the guy doing nothing but yelling in the chat window. :smirk:
    I hope you hijacked the thread for a cursory comment rather than suggesting that you're sabotaging the progress for your team as they desperately try to make you stop.

    Hijacked? LOL. Cute.

    Who said anything about sabotage? I said accomplish the objectives. That's not sabotage. The quotes around "doing it wrong" were to emphasize how these types of players have it in their heads that you must play the game their way, or else they fly into a rage. Help me out here, folks. Was this not evident from my original post? Could I have been more clear?

    Trying to accomplish an objective is not the same as actually solving the problem, as evident by the issue the OP's post regarding repeated failures during puzzle elements and "zergrushing". Hence the question if you actually were responding to the author and the scenarios they put forward, or if you used the thread to express something outside of that.

    Remarking on the behaviors of the types of players the OP is talking about. So, yes, I'd say I was responding relevantly to the author. But now, we're talking about the context of my comments, and not the issue at hand, so let's get back on track. :)
    GrWzQke.png
    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
    Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
    Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
    ----> Contact Customer Support <----
    Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
    Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
    Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
    Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
  • This content has been removed.
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,896 Arc User
    coldnapalm wrote: »
    Yeah...sorry, but the level of intelligence in this game is pretty low.

    This pretty much...some of the most inflexible people I've ever seen in a MMO. Think pew pew will conquer all...happens when you balance a game around nothing at all but dps.

    Had a guy yelling at me in KASA like it was my fault he let probes go by when I noticed that objective was failed while I was helping finish the gate on the other side.
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • tilartatilarta Member Posts: 1,801 Arc User
    valoreah wrote: »
    If I'm reading your OP correctly, you were standing there doing nothing, so it seems the tell was warranted.

    My standard MO is to go to the tube entrance and defend it until there are no more attackers left.
    While doing this, I will occasionally rotate the camera to see if the shield is down so I can run through the tube as soon as is possible.
    This time however, I was so surprised to see something unusual happen, I naturally paused all activity to watch the tube lines and verify it was really happening.
    And FYI, all the enemies were defeated, so I didn't actually have anything to do.
    Then I looked to the mission progression, Red Team were nearly finished in the boss room and the tube shield was still up, so any further effort was indeed futile.

    By the way, nobody has ever complained about me doing this before and I've been doing this for a month now, so I assumed that they accepted the way I chose to play this map.

    And I wasn't going to go over to the line consoles and interfere with whatever was going on there, in the past, players have been quite clear regarding console interaction, if you haven't done it before and don't know how, do not, you're just inhibiting the ones who actually know how to solve the puzzle.

    But given that the player in question has been identified as actively doing this regularly to sabotage the team to give them a reason to send insulting PMs and adding players who PM back to ingore to avoid being told off indicates they were doing this for the exact purpose of inciting conflict.
    The fact I didn't even identify them by handle and they were still recognized says it all.

    Bees like honey, they don't like vinegar.
    Everytime someone makes a character that is an copy of an existing superhuman, Creativity is sad :'(
  • postagepaidpostagepaid Member Posts: 2,899 Arc User
    Makes sense to hang back if someone is doing the consoles as its all too easy for a 2nd person becoming more of a hindrance than a help on that tube section.

    You do highlight the issue that people on ignore can still be grouped with the folk who ignored them which seems to be slightly contradictory to the concept of ignoring them in the first place.

    As with AFKers in the MI I've ignored one person who runs an engineer for binary circuit who loves to place that barrier down in the most helpful of places as well as other fun things like getting leaping off a platform on the first section to trap a teammate. And yet the ignore is futile as the same @handle keeps being met.
  • lnbladelnblade Member Posts: 410 Arc User
    spiritborn wrote: »
    the tube puzzle is actually quite easy if you know the trick (you match lines to the short unmoving section on your side)
    The tube puzzle is even easier once you realize that the blue line is always on the left and the yellow line is always on the right. It's also more frustrating once you realize that. I could understand some confusion if the correct alignment was random, but it's the same Every. Single. Time. The fact that there are people who still can't figure out the correct alignment is just baffling. Even worse are the people who rotate the tube to the wrong color after you had it correctly aligned.

    Now as for the OP, as others have pointed out it's at least worth getting through the first three puzzles if possible. The more puzzles you get through, the more marks you get even if you lose. Although in that situation, it sounds like you had someone working against your team, either out of malice or ignorance. Whether you kept shooting NPCs or not, you probably wouldn't have gotten through that puzzle.
  • ltminnsltminns Member Posts: 12,572 Arc User
    I always stand back by the tunnel and the door and provide cover fire.
    'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
    Judge Dan Haywood
    'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
    l don't know.
    l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
    That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
    Lt. Philip J. Minns
  • unotetsuunotetsu Member Posts: 662 Arc User
    ltminns wrote: »
    I always stand back by the tunnel and the door and provide cover fire.

    I always setup gens then use my sniper to shoot the mobs by the consoles.

    I have been yelled at before for correctly aligning the tube segments and then aligning them correctly to have some idiot troll intentionally misaligned them, so you know what i will setup my gens, turrets and mines, and shoot the mobs and let other people rotate them.

    Won't get yelled at no more.

    I must warn you, I am quite Isane! I am Grand Duchess of the Abh Empire: Beneej Letopanyu Spoor!
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • e30erneste30ernest Member Posts: 1,794 Arc User
    nabreeki wrote: »
    Why would you be emotionally impacted by it anyway, even if you could see it?

    Yeah, I find it a bit sad that some players find themselves "needing" to minimize the chat window - the main means of communication you have in a team game.

    I have my chat window open all the time. I have rarely seen any rude comments to anyone in the team. In fact, I have not seen any rude comments made in the last month or so. The very few times I have seen someone say something rude in the game, that person making negative comments is usually also the one who doesn't actually know what he is doing.
Sign In or Register to comment.