test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

so it goodbye to winXP based players as of March 1, 2017

124678

Comments

  • fluffymooffluffymoof Member Posts: 430 Arc User
    For Mac users and others who do not own a Windows 10 license

    ANY Mac/Linux user that doesn't have a free Windows 10 from the Windows Insider Program FOR JUST THIS KIND OF MOMENT is intentionally shooting themselves in the foot. Seriously, Insider Win 10 is free.

    One of the many Tellarite Goddesses of Beauty!

    If there are posts here that do not appeal to you, or opinions you disagree with, the best way to deal with that is to resist the urge to add comments. Instead, engage with the content you like! Don't feed the trolls!
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    my father just got upgraded to a win7 machine.... course they also use dot matrix printers still with green bar paper.... yes that is a special order paper now a days that costs a shitload more than upgrading their printers would.
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • jaguarskxjaguarskx Member Posts: 5,945 Arc User
    fluffymoof wrote: »
    For Mac users and others who do not own a Windows 10 license

    ANY Mac/Linux user that doesn't have a free Windows 10 from the Windows Insider Program FOR JUST THIS KIND OF MOMENT is intentionally shooting themselves in the foot. Seriously, Insider Win 10 is free.

    Insider Windows 10 is not "free". A genuine version of Windows 10 is required to be installed on the computer before a person can participate in the Windows Insider program which is primarily for development purposes to test early build versions.

    Unless Microsoft has changed their policy recently.
  • bobbydazlersbobbydazlers Member Posts: 4,534 Arc User
    jaguarskx wrote: »
    fluffymoof wrote: »
    For Mac users and others who do not own a Windows 10 license

    ANY Mac/Linux user that doesn't have a free Windows 10 from the Windows Insider Program FOR JUST THIS KIND OF MOMENT is intentionally shooting themselves in the foot. Seriously, Insider Win 10 is free.

    Insider Windows 10 is not "free". A genuine version of Windows 10 is required to be installed on the computer before a person can participate in the Windows Insider program which is primarily for development purposes to test early build versions.

    Unless Microsoft has changed their policy recently.

    that's not quite accurate, I signed up for the windows insider program and installed a free pre release version of windows 10 long before windows 10 was ever released.
    I am continuing to participate in the program and so far have never been required to buy or install a paid for version of windows 10.
    how it stands now I couldn't say, but I did hear that the free sign ups for the program had ended at one point but more users may have been able to join after they had released the free full version in the first year.
    as the free full version has ended now and you will have to pay to upgrade to windows 10 I cant say what the status is.

    When I think about everything we've been through together,

    maybe it's not the destination that matters, maybe it's the journey,

     and if that journey takes a little longer,

    so we can do something we all believe in,

     I can't think of any place I'd rather be or any people I'd rather be with.

  • jaguarskxjaguarskx Member Posts: 5,945 Arc User
    edited December 2016
    that's not quite accurate, I signed up for the windows insider program and installed a free pre release version of windows 10 long before windows 10 was ever released.
    I am continuing to participate in the program and so far have never been required to buy or install a paid for version of windows 10.
    how it stands now I couldn't say, but I did hear that the free sign
    ups for the program had ended at one point but more users may have been able to join after they had released the free full version in the first year.
    as the free full version has ended now and you will have to pay to upgrade to windows 10 I cant say what the status is.

    For s.h.!.t. and giggles, I signed up for the Windows Insider Program (WIP). Below is screenshot of what needs to be done once you signed up for WIP. Basically you need to have Windows 10 installed since going into the Advanced Options is required in order to get access to Insider builds.

    Basically, the Windows Insider Program is "FREE" in a sense that it does not cost anything to become an Insider so as long as Windows 10 installed on the PC / laptop you are using is genuine. As for getting a copy of the pre release version of Windows 10... well obviously by now that is no longer an option.


    SB5AWdB.png
  • seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,918 Arc User
    You can still upgrade to Windows 10 for free using the 'Assistive Technologies' Program.

    The best part is, that you don't even have to use Assistive Technologies, it's just one extra click to go to the site. You can find instructions here.

    I have a buddy who did it a couple weeks ago and it worked fine. As of today it's still being offered and you can still get Windows 10 for free.
    Insert witty signature line here.
  • jaguarskxjaguarskx Member Posts: 5,945 Arc User
    You can still upgrade to Windows 10 for free using the 'Assistive Technologies' Program.

    True, people can still upgrade from Win 7 & 8 to Win 10 for free.

    My comment was directed more at fluffymoof's comment about being able to get Windows 10 for free via the Windows Insiders Program which is not true since a genuine copy of Windows 10 needs to be installed on the PC / laptop before being able access Windows 10 builds exclusive to Windows Insiders for free. Therefore, the Windows Insider Program will not help people using Linux or Mac OS.


  • seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,918 Arc User
    jaguarskx wrote: »
    You can still upgrade to Windows 10 for free using the 'Assistive Technologies' Program.

    True, people can still upgrade from Win 7 & 8 to Win 10 for free.

    My comment was directed more at fluffymoof's comment about being able to get Windows 10 for free via the Windows Insiders Program which is not true since a genuine copy of Windows 10 needs to be installed on the PC / laptop before being able access Windows 10 builds exclusive to Windows Insiders for free. Therefore, the Windows Insider Program will not help people using Linux or Mac OS.


    Ah, I see now, thanks. You're right about the insider program. :)
    Insert witty signature line here.
  • thlaylierahthlaylierah Member Posts: 2,987 Arc User
    edited December 2016
    I find the notion of people wanting to use a Microsoft anything to be quite absurd, but I shan't judge. Still, Windows 7 is an adequate replacement for XP. It still uses a sensible UI and can support a more up-to-date DirectX. Windows 10 is spyware garbage.

    I use Classic Shell to make Windows 8.1 look like Windows 7.

    Free or not I couldn't see upgrading to something that was marketed like malware and that I had to get a program to pull the gwx. Exe program so it would stop offering it to me continuously.
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    I recently inherited a broken win10 laptop, after fixing it Ive been TRIBBLE around with win10. Ye gods is it ever spyware at least you can kill most of that. I don't hate it, but I'm plannin to stick with win7 until I cant.
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,918 Arc User
    edited December 2016
    I recently inherited a broken win10 laptop, after fixing it Ive been **** around with win10. Ye gods is it ever spyware at least you can kill most of that. I don't hate it, but I'm plannin to stick with win7 until I cant.

    I really like Windows 10, but I encourage anyone using it to run a privacy tool to turn off all of it's horrible reporting tasks.

    You can find a list of several available Privacy Tools here.

    I personally use Ultimate Windows Tweaker, and I like it.
    Insert witty signature line here.
  • bobbydazlersbobbydazlers Member Posts: 4,534 Arc User
    edited December 2016
    I think I have cured the black screen and crashing to desktop issue I have been suffering since the lighting update was applied, sometimes I could play for a little while before it would hit, maybe long enough to run through a crystalline mission during the event or enough to run the fastest game on ice before a crash, other times I couldn't even get past the character selection screen without a crash, its been driving me bonkers.

    the prospect of the changes on the 1st march filled me with dread, although I thought my laptop hardware and OS should be up to the job the thought that this might be the final nail in the coffin for running sto on my laptop which was not a happy prospect even though I have a desktop that runs sto without issue I tend to play the most on my laptop.

    after discussing the issue with a fleet mate and telling him hew I had tweaked just about every setting there is in the game to no avail he suggested had I checked to see I had the latest drivers installed on my laptop, being as it was most definitely a graphics issue I thought I would check this but made the mistake of typing on google "best graphics driver" instead of "latest graphics driver".

    the result showed me that I was running a later version of the graphics driver then what was suggested as the best and with nothing to loose I installed the suggested best but older version.

    needless to say so far it seems to have done the trick after the "downgrade" I haven't experienced one crash (crossed fingers) and played for several hours yesterday without issue.

    perhaps this is one time that latest version is not necessarily the best version.

    I am filled with hope.

    Acer Aspire 5742Z duel core CPU with 6GB ram & 64bit windows 10 home.

    When I think about everything we've been through together,

    maybe it's not the destination that matters, maybe it's the journey,

     and if that journey takes a little longer,

    so we can do something we all believe in,

     I can't think of any place I'd rather be or any people I'd rather be with.

  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    Thats entirely possible bobby, recently I had an issue with an nvidia driver TRIBBLE up my fallout 4, then they fixed that and the new driver caused a small graphical issue in SWTOR for me, finally the third driver they released fixed it all.
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • siliconpsychosiliconpsycho Member Posts: 135 Arc User
    I'm wondering...

    With the coming demise of DX9 (and XP) support coming in March, which is typically around the time we see a new system overhaul or seasonal release...could this indicate that we are about to see some serious, long awaited graphics engine overhauls coming?

    The groundwork of which could be the already introduced Lighting 2.0.

    By removing DX9 support they are removing entire layers of code compatability which could be what has been holding back serious engine development
  • meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    I'm wondering...

    With the coming demise of DX9 (and XP) support coming in March, which is typically around the time we see a new system overhaul or seasonal release...could this indicate that we are about to see some serious, long awaited graphics engine overhauls coming?

    The groundwork of which could be the already introduced Lighting 2.0.

    By removing DX9 support they are removing entire layers of code compatability which could be what has been holding back serious engine development


    Lighting 2.0 is still rather crass now. But when it gets smoothed out (you *are* going to smooth it out, right, Cryptic?!), and the majority of the player base is using it, maintaining DX9 support is going to be pretty much undoable.

    As a company, you also want something what the Devs in Second Like call the shared experience, aka: whilst STO will still always allow for lower graphics settings, of course, you essentially want everyone to share the same visual experience as much as possible.

    As for an entire new Engine in the works? Hmm, I'm skeptical on that one, but who knows?! :) Regardless, dumping the old compatibility code is a good thing, if for nothing else, because it frees up the Devs' hands, to pursue some more worthwhile projects.
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • This content has been removed.
  • tom61stotom61sto Member Posts: 3,673 Arc User
    Some interesting data to share

    According to Steam's hardware surveys
    http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/
    50.62% - DX12GPU & WIN10
    22.22% - DX12GPU & Pre-WIN10
    13.44% - DX11GPU & Vista+
    10.52% - DX10GPU & Vista+
    0.75% - DX10/11/12GPU & XP
    2.45% - Other

    Also, according to the same data, Windows XP only makes up 1.19% of PC users operating systems.

    That's all of Steam users, not STO. Specific numbers will likely be different for this particular game, simply due to it previously supporting a wider range of OS and hardware than a good deal of Steam games. While I doubt that XP users are a particularly large segment, the numbers for those that don't have Direct3D 11 capability, due to unresolved driver issues or running WINE on Linux or Mac (which, despite the title, is mostly what has been the discussion in-thread).
  • edited December 2016
    This content has been removed.
  • warpangelwarpangel Member Posts: 9,427 Arc User
    Some interesting data to share

    According to Steam's hardware surveys
    http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/
    50.62% - DX12GPU & WIN10
    22.22% - DX12GPU & Pre-WIN10
    13.44% - DX11GPU & Vista+
    10.52% - DX10GPU & Vista+
    0.75% - DX10/11/12GPU & XP
    2.45% - Other

    Also, according to the same data, Windows XP only makes up 1.19% of PC users operating systems.
    Which data is that? In the "more info" link it says 1.25%. There are clearly at least two sets of different data on the tables.

    I'd also be interested to know what the "pre-win10" is in that.

    And, well:
    Participation in the survey is optional
    Means it doesn't actually prove anything.
  • edited December 2016
    This content has been removed.
  • jaguarskxjaguarskx Member Posts: 5,945 Arc User
    edited December 2016
    Some interesting data to share

    According to Steam's hardware surveys
    http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/
    50.62% - DX12GPU & WIN10
    22.22% - DX12GPU & Pre-WIN10
    13.44% - DX11GPU & Vista+
    10.52% - DX10GPU & Vista+
    0.75% - DX10/11/12GPU & XP
    2.45% - Other

    Also, according to the same data, Windows XP only makes up 1.19% of PC users operating systems.

    It would be nice if Steam also included the estimate number of Steam accounts and also the number of people who participated in the survey. That could be used to determine if the number of respondents represent a good sample size of all Steam accounts and how accurate the data is.

    For example, if there are 10 million Steam accounts, then to get a 95% confidence level and an error margin of +/-2%, only 2,400 Steam account holders needs to participate in the survey. For 99% confidence with at +/-2% error margin, the sample size would need to be 4,159 participants.

  • thlaylierahthlaylierah Member Posts: 2,987 Arc User
    edited December 2016
    SWTOR recently added an expansion that does the same thing that STO does when trying to run it windowed, namely starting the game window offset from the monitor viewing space so I have to grab it and move it into position every time.

    When I tried to adjust SWTOR to the maximized window setting, it dropped my resolution from it's native 1920 x 1200 to the smallest selectable. Restart did not fix it.

    I finally just optimized the game in GeForce Experience and that fixed it.

    Maybe this could help people with STO?

    I didn't see STO as one of the selectable games in GeForce Experience but I'm sure you could add it.
  • jorantomalakjorantomalak Member Posts: 7,133 Arc User
    jonsills wrote: »
    Hey, why won't this game support my Commodore 64? It still works!​​

    Because your using the wrong floppy , or something is wrong with your DOS , what windows does it have 10,000 BC? lol

    I miss my old Comm 64 alot of good times spent wearing out those floppy games :)
  • greygorlandomisgreygorlandomis Member Posts: 7 Arc User
    Yep, time has come, 2017 will change things. but while so many seem eager to say "Just Install Microsofts latest spy-in-a-box." I wonder, will those early gaming rebels who committed to trying the steam and linux route, made that hardware overkill build, a Multi Xenon or Operon all RAM Stacked. A perfect Linux Gaming\Space Heater. I seriously doubt any will do that. Why bother filling ram with a game that forces a obsolete slow janky DirectX compliant Virtual instance in 2017 when plenty of newer titles have the foresight to use Vulkan graphics for compatibility.
  • bobbydazlersbobbydazlers Member Posts: 4,534 Arc User
    reyan01 wrote: »
    jonsills wrote: »
    Hey, why won't this game support my Commodore 64? It still works!​​

    Because your using the wrong floppy , or something is wrong with your DOS , what windows does it have 10,000 BC? lol

    I miss my old Comm 64 alot of good times spent wearing out those floppy games :)

    Didn't have one of those - had an Amstrad CPC-464. Games loaded via cassette tape and often took a good five minutes to get to the game title screen. Assuming that the tape didn't wind up jumping or being chewed.

    I had a C64 and a C128, I also had a Amiga1200 and a spectrum 128+2 but my first computer was a Sinclair ZX81.

    When I think about everything we've been through together,

    maybe it's not the destination that matters, maybe it's the journey,

     and if that journey takes a little longer,

    so we can do something we all believe in,

     I can't think of any place I'd rather be or any people I'd rather be with.

  • tacofangstacofangs Member Posts: 2,951 Cryptic Developer
    Windows XP came out in 2001. That's 15 years ago.
    What would you have said to someone in 2010, still running Windows 95?
    Only YOU can prevent forum fires!
    19843299196_235e44bcf6_o.jpg
  • jorantomalakjorantomalak Member Posts: 7,133 Arc User
    tacofangs wrote: »
    Windows XP came out in 2001. That's 15 years ago.
    What would you have said to someone in 2010, still running Windows 95?

    Well if it were one of my mates who was still using win 95 in 2010 , id probably told him it was the game he was fine to keep using win 95 , then tell everyone he knows to keep their mouth shut and to see how long he would use it till he relised it WAS his windows lol

    Ok sure me and my old mates would prank each other ALOT lol.
  • davefenestratordavefenestrator Member Posts: 10,660 Arc User
    Yep, time has come, 2017 will change things. but while so many seem eager to say "Just Install Microsofts latest spy-in-a-box." I wonder, will those early gaming rebels who committed to trying the steam and linux route, made that hardware overkill build, a Multi Xenon or Operon all RAM Stacked. A perfect Linux Gaming\Space Heater. I seriously doubt any will do that. Why bother filling ram with a game that forces a obsolete slow janky DirectX compliant Virtual instance in 2017 when plenty of newer titles have the foresight to use Vulkan graphics for compatibility.

    Not really -- wiki lists a grand total of 8 Windows games, with Doom, a Need for Speed and DOTA2 being the AAA titles.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_games_with_Vulkan_support

    Reality has a Direct3D bias.
  • warpangelwarpangel Member Posts: 9,427 Arc User
    Yep, time has come, 2017 will change things. but while so many seem eager to say "Just Install Microsofts latest spy-in-a-box." I wonder, will those early gaming rebels who committed to trying the steam and linux route, made that hardware overkill build, a Multi Xenon or Operon all RAM Stacked. A perfect Linux Gaming\Space Heater. I seriously doubt any will do that. Why bother filling ram with a game that forces a obsolete slow janky DirectX compliant Virtual instance in 2017 when plenty of newer titles have the foresight to use Vulkan graphics for compatibility.

    Exactly. At least my computer will never run said spy-in-a-box so if STO stops running on real OS's I'll stop playing it.
    Yep, time has come, 2017 will change things. but while so many seem eager to say "Just Install Microsofts latest spy-in-a-box." I wonder, will those early gaming rebels who committed to trying the steam and linux route, made that hardware overkill build, a Multi Xenon or Operon all RAM Stacked. A perfect Linux Gaming\Space Heater. I seriously doubt any will do that. Why bother filling ram with a game that forces a obsolete slow janky DirectX compliant Virtual instance in 2017 when plenty of newer titles have the foresight to use Vulkan graphics for compatibility.

    Not really -- wiki lists a grand total of 8 Windows games, with Doom, a Need for Speed and DOTA2 being the AAA titles.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_games_with_Vulkan_support

    Reality has a Direct3D bias.

    Guess that must be why STO is the last Windows game I still play.
  • asches1asches1 Member Posts: 150 Arc User
    Wine Wrapper is Windows XP based? So the doh123 created wrapper which Mac Players use, will be unusable after march 1. 2017? Is it possible to update the wine wrapper? Anybody knows?
    Everybody looks right, but you pass left...
Sign In or Register to comment.