test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Options

T6 Hestia Class Advanced Escort

135678

Comments

  • Options
    mathcubemathcube Member Posts: 28 Arc User
    rtk142 wrote: »
    still no defiant? sad

    Wasn't the Phantom Escort essentially a T6 Defiant replacement? The differences between a FT5-U Defiant and a FT6 Phantom are pretty much what you'd expect in a T6 update, with a slight knock in hull strength. Now, I think it'd be pretty nice, and super easy, for them to add a Defiant skin to the Phantom. Would that satisfy anybody?
    Exactly as much as the Guardian Cruiser was the replacement for the Galaxy Class, or the Command Cruisers were a replacement for the Excelsior Class.

    SO.. Nope. The Phantom is aesthetically clearly inspired by the Defiant, but it is not the Tier 6 Defiant. If it was the Tier 6 Defiant, you could use costume parts of the Tier 6 Defiant with it. And you can't.​​

    I think the Guardian cruiser would have worked out OK as the T6 Ambassador class, actually. But they didn't do it that way so w/e.
  • Options
    cmdrscarletcmdrscarlet Member Posts: 5,137 Arc User
    That is a sexy ship.

    Nothing like the Resolute ... but sexy enough.
  • Options
    hawku001xhawku001x Member Posts: 10,764 Arc User
    That is a sexy ship.

    Nothing like the Resolute ... but sexy enough.

    Why, thank you.
  • Options
    karlbarbkarlbarb Member Posts: 166 Arc User
    Honestly, while I know this one was in demand, I too am a bit saddened by the fact that there's yet again another solo Fed release. Players have been clamouring for a T6 Bird of Prey for a loooooooooong time.

    Still, it is indeed very pretty,
  • Options
    naharikajalnaharikajal Member Posts: 232 Arc User
    I like this much better than the original.

    Me too! :-)
  • Options
    mayito2009mayito2009 Member Posts: 643 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    Nice ship
    Seek and ye shall find. Ask and ye shall receive. Rabboni
    Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" (Benjamin Franklin).

    Most unexpectedly, this turned into a flame-fest! Closed it goes!. /sigh What flamefestery is this? pwlaughingtrendy
  • Options
    mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    illcadia wrote: »
    It's a vicious cycle. They don't make science ships because they don't sell well. They don't sell well because they don't make science ships (and when they do, they're TRIBBLE).
    No, there is no vicious cycle here, unless Cryptic beancounters don't know how to count their beans correctly.

    They can take any given single Cruiser they released and count how much money it made them. And then they can look at any single Science Vessel they made and count how much money it made them.
    We can estimate that the cost for making a Cruiser or a Science Vessel (or an Escort, or a KDF ship, or a Romulan ship) are usually around the same - it doesn't matter what stats you use or what aesthetics you follow, you still gotta make the same type of work that will cost a similar amount of work hours to get done.

    So, whatever ship had more sales is the kind of ship that is gonna make them more money.

    OF course, once they realized that they put out 6 C-Store Cruisers in the same time they released 3 Science Vessels and each C-Store Cruiser made more money than each Science Vessel, they can safely say that Science Vessels don't sell well. If the player population loved Cruisers and Science Vessels equally, then each Science Vessel should at minimum sell as well as each Cruiser, but quite possibly even more, since there are fewer Science Vessels to choose from so you don't risk cannibalizing sales.

    I think the same math is what leads to a ship like the Hestia being released without Romulan or Klingon counter-parts - there is room for another Fed ship on the market, that won't cannibalize sales of other Fed ships, but the KDF and RR population isn't that far yet.



    Now, one could theorize that Cruisers are popular because they deliver the best DPS or something like that and that'S what everyone is after, and maybe that is true.
    But my memory tells me that Cruisers were always really popular with players, at all times, even when some called the game "Escorts Online" and everyone was envious of Escorts (and Bird of Preys and sometimes eve Carriers ). People asked for buffs for Cruisers, there were long threads demanding improvements to the Galaxy Class Cruiser (never seen such long threads for the D'Kyr or the Deep Space Science Vessel or Recon Science Vessel).​​
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • Options
    ladytiamat666ladytiamat666 Member Posts: 276 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    Looks like fun.

    I'm not normally one to nitpick like this, but surely "Hestia-class" should be reserved for the T6 update to the Vesta? What with being basically just Greek and Roman names for the same figure. Isn't there a more appropriate name for the T6 Prometheus?

    In Greek mythology, Prometheus is the Titan who made the gift of fire to mankind. And Hestia is the greek fire goddess. So yes, Hestia is an appropriate name for a T6 Prometheus, especially considering the fire-themed special console of the ship.

    signature%201.jpg_zpsklpuyd7v.png
  • Options
    thlaylierahthlaylierah Member Posts: 2,985 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    "and its fleet variant"

    Well that just ruined the whole thing like it always does.

    Why can't ships be released like the Command Ships already at Fleet Level?

    I'll wait for the ship sale then.
  • Options
    gabeoz1gabeoz1 Member Posts: 161 Arc User
    Though I love the look of it, do we seriously need another t6 fed tac ship/escort. And apparently there is a t6 defiant on its way. What's the point? I want my t6 Sovy!
  • Options
    robeasomrobeasom Member Posts: 1,911 Arc User
    Although it looks nice you would get more sales if you released the T'varo b'rel and defiant three pack
    NO TO ARC
    Vice Admiral Volmack ISS Thundermole
    Brigadier General Jokag IKS Gorkan
    Centurion Kares RRW Tomalak
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Options
    ladytiamat666ladytiamat666 Member Posts: 276 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    gabeoz1 wrote: »
    Though I love the look of it, do we seriously need another t6 fed tac ship/escort. And apparently there is a t6 defiant on its way. What's the point? I want my t6 Sovy!

    I want a T6 Sovereign too, but we have 8 fed cruisers (Eclipse, Guardian, Resolute, Andromeda, Arbiter, and the 3 Command Cruisers) and only 5 escorts (6 with the T6 Veteran destroyer ; Phantom, Alita and the 3 pilot ships). So excepting science ships, more escorts are more needed than other cruisers for the feds.

    signature%201.jpg_zpsklpuyd7v.png
  • Options
    markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,231 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    Magnificient ship, polyvalent console (offensive + defensive + weapon power boost), and an interesting trait against hp-bag capital ships (i think that the console + the trait will be quite useful in tholian and borg red alerts).

    I have a question for the devs : will the devices like deployable turrets or scorpion fighters (that we can earn in "The Vault" mission) benefit from the Trait or are they considered as hangar pets ?
    Hehe, that was my question.
    Looks like fun.

    I'm not normally one to nitpick like this, but surely "Hestia-class" should be reserved for the T6 update to the Vesta? What with being basically just Greek and Roman names for the same figure. Isn't there a more appropriate name for the T6 Prometheus?
    I'd have gone with Charon myself, but meh.... Hmm....

    Prometheus - titan who gave the gift of fire to mankind.
    Cerberus - hound who guarded the underworld.
    Phoenix - mystic bird that reincarnated.
    Hephaestus - blacksmith god

    Soo... Hestia(goddess of architecture) kinda fits... And yeah, all of them are associated with fire in some way.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • Options
    lordsteve1lordsteve1 Member Posts: 3,492 Arc User
    That is a lovely looking ship, the model designers are really putting out some stunning stuff these days.

    I'd really love to see a T6 Vesta before i'd consider buying this ship though but I can still appreciate the quality of the design.
    SulMatuul.png
  • Options
    azurianstarazurianstar Member Posts: 6,985 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    Okay, this design resonates well with me. :smiley:

    And "Hestia-class"? Makes me wonder if someone is an Anime fan. :tongue:

    Besides, you would think they would reserve this name for the T6 Vesta, because Vesta and Hestia are the same goddess.

  • Options
    captainchaos66captainchaos66 Member Posts: 409 Arc User
    djmarr1964 wrote: »
    ok i hope that we will be able to use the multi- vector assualt mode console on the new ship as i saw no mention of it in the blog

    From the blog " When installed, this system is present on all sections of separated Multi-Vector Assault Mode escorts, allowing all sections to coordinate the use of these dangerous plasma expulsers. In addition, this console provides a passive bonus to plasma and tetryon damage resistance rating as well as a boost to Weapon Power."

    I would take that as a definite YES! I am happy about that, the Prometheus with MVAM was one of my FAVORITE ships, alas,, as happened to many ships, they just grew very out of date with todays gameplay. This ship is going on my WILL BUY list !!!!



    ***************************
    Fleet Admiral In charge of Bacon
    Fighting 5th Attack Squadron
    The Devils Henchman
  • Options
    supergirl1611supergirl1611 Member Posts: 809 Arc User
    Is the Prometheus skin itself getting a visual update like the Galaxy, Akira and Intrepid have ?
  • Options
    xinaerkxinaerk Member Posts: 64 Arc User
    When we get a BAD@$$ T6 Assault Cruiser and makes a fair stand versus anything in PVE or PVP and looks nice... You'll get me as lifetimer and more buddies coming along not to mention investment.

    So get your butt out there and bring me a REAL Assault Cruiser T6 that kicks TRIBBLE$.

    In any case, good job; it looks really nice and nasty. Hope to buy it IF we get an updated Assault Cruiser that is REALLY good...
  • Options
    thlaylierahthlaylierah Member Posts: 2,985 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    If even one player decides not to buy this ship for whatever reasons, your marketing plan has FAILED.

    Instead of bolstering the Fleet system by tying a steak around it's neck to get people to play with it all the time and catering to only one class at a time,

    How about releasing a three pack: Cruiser, Escort, Science ship based on the artist's selected look?

    Making these eleven console Fleet equivalents like the Command ships would insure sales.

    You can still have these ships available to Fleets as well, just don't put them behind the Starbase level wall like you usually do and discourage people like me from buying them.
  • Options
    jcswwjcsww Member Posts: 6,800 Arc User
    This was a ship I wanted a while back when I first heard about it. Unfortunately, it took too long to come out. The ship looks nice all but the nacelles, I don't see any mention of a Prometheus interior, and I really don't want to offer up another $5 for a fleet module to bring it up to spec.

    I am also too annoyed with the Fed favoritism to bother spending money. The T6 BoP was leaked at the same time this was and yet we still have yet to see that. Until I see an 11 console T6 BoP straight out of the C-Store, you won't be getting any money out of me!
  • Options
    kianazerokianazero Member Posts: 247 Arc User
    *throws wallet at monitor*

    It's...it's not working! I want that ship! I want it now!
  • Options
    hawku001xhawku001x Member Posts: 10,764 Arc User
    kianazero wrote: »
    *throws wallet at monitor*

    It's...it's not working! I want that ship! I want it now!

    I tried that.

    Going to try some jewelry and watches next.
  • Options
    shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    And suddenly thousands of STO players wept in joy....
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • Options
    breadandcircusesbreadandcircuses Member Posts: 2,355 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    If even one player decides not to buy this ship for whatever reasons, your marketing plan has FAILED.

    Instead of bolstering the Fleet system by tying a steak around it's neck to get people to play with it all the time and catering to only one class at a time,

    How about releasing a three pack: Cruiser, Escort, Science ship based on the artist's selected look?

    Making these eleven console Fleet equivalents like the Command ships would insure sales.

    You can still have these ships available to Fleets as well, just don't put them behind the Starbase level wall like you usually do and discourage people like me from buying them.

    I know you said "even one player" (me) and "for whatever reasons" (standalone Federation offering)... but since my reason for not purchasing it is completely different from yours, does that count?

    Oh, and to reiterate, it's not the desinger's fault, that's a very nice looking ship. I just choose not to support lopsided offerings, that's all.
    Ym9x9Ji.png
    meimeitoo wrote: »
    I do not like Geko ether.
    iconians wrote: »
    With each passing day I wonder if I stepped into an alternate reality. The Cubs win the world series. Donald Trump is President. Britain leaves the EU. STO gets a dedicated PvP season. Engineers are "out of control" in STO.​​
  • Options
    trailturtletrailturtle Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58
    Not going to lie, that's a gorgeous ship.
  • Options
    loading159loading159 Member Posts: 184 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    THUD THUD THUD, TAKE MY MONEY.

    Goodbye 35 dollars.

    I saw this post and nearly screamed I was so excited.

    FAVORITE SHIP EVER. PLEASE release it on Thursday!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    azniadeet wrote: »
    I've always said I'd give my left eye for a T6 Prometheus.

    Where do you want me to send it?

    ^
    Captain Moe
    U.S.S. Prometheus
    Fleet Multi Vector Advanced Escort
    Resistance is futile
  • Options
    thomaselkinsthomaselkins Member Posts: 575 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    That Type 7 material looks good on everything. I really, really, really want it for my Odyssey. Hell, I'd really like a T6 Odyssey :wink:
  • Options
    sennahcheribsennahcherib Member Posts: 2,823 Arc User
    well done, this ship is really beautiful. the best revamp of a fed ship :)
  • Options
    ovrkylovrkyl Member Posts: 309 Arc User
    ...so...no T6 Defiant, huh? :/
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
Sign In or Register to comment.