It comes down to setting precedents, or improper expectations.
Thanks for piping in. Much respected and appreciated.
Allow me to proffer the viewpoint that it would seem you don't want to increase expectations by making this Blue Box ship "mo' betta" then the previous ones, but there is little issue on the part of your employer to make current lockbox ships "Mo betta'" than previous lockbox ships.
So, its ok to improve the ships when its to the benefit of sales, but not to the benefit of players? I respectfully submit that's what I'm seeing.
The odds are always against you instead of using keys sell them on the exchange and then buy what you want from there you will have better odds on getting the ship then than the lockbox gamble
NO TO ARC
Vice Admiral Volmack ISS Thundermole
Brigadier General Jokag IKS Gorkan
Centurion Kares RRW Tomalak
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Comments
Thanks for piping in. Much respected and appreciated.
Allow me to proffer the viewpoint that it would seem you don't want to increase expectations by making this Blue Box ship "mo' betta" then the previous ones, but there is little issue on the part of your employer to make current lockbox ships "Mo betta'" than previous lockbox ships.
So, its ok to improve the ships when its to the benefit of sales, but not to the benefit of players? I respectfully submit that's what I'm seeing.
Vice Admiral Volmack ISS Thundermole
Brigadier General Jokag IKS Gorkan
Centurion Kares RRW Tomalak
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]