test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Is it time for Cryptic to relent on the T5U to T6 stance?

carlosbflycarlosbfly Member Posts: 682 Arc User
Looking through the thread on the new Command Ships, it seems to be a very divided reaction. A shame since I think the designs (minus the poor Klingons) are pretty good and they've put in some impressive work. But given how Cryptic seem to be unable to entice so many players over to T6 still, is it time for them to acknowledge how many players how dug their feet in and how many customers they are missing out by not making some more T5-U ships T6?

While I understand they cant do this for every T5-U ship, there are clearly several in high use that players will simply not abandon. I'm thinking the Oddy, Avenger, Scimitar, Galaxy, Advanced Escort, etc Metrics will help them identify the most used in game.

I suspect there is a massive and very easy amount of revenue to be made by giving them what they want (and it obviously isn't going to be any of these new T6 ship efforts) for very little work. Like with the Intrepid, just make another new, interchangeable skin, boost some stats, add a ship trait and (maybe) a console or some BOFF station tweeks if needed.

Its very little work by comparison and new money for old rope. At this stage, I honestly think they should just consider it as I can't see the T5-U supporters ever shifting on their stance and that is a LOT of money being sat on.
Post edited by carlosbfly on
«134

Comments

  • sheldonlcoopersheldonlcooper Member Posts: 4,042 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    As a Vesta pilot, I would buy a fleet T6 Vesta if it was available. I would not give up a console for a regular T6. Give credit where it's due, there are many T5 ships that hold their own with the T6 ships. I guess in the pvp maybe you need the surgical strikes3 but I haven't played pvp in a year.

    I would say this is one promise that was upheld. I suppose others might disagree. But I like my vesta and xindi carrier still just as much. They are much better than the Intrepid and breen carrier T6 which I fly on other characters.
    Captain Jean-Luc Picard: "We think we've come so far. Torture of heretics, burning of witches, it's all ancient history. Then - before you can blink an eye - suddenly it threatens to start all over again."

    "With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

  • jexsamxjexsamx Member Posts: 2,803 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    The Pathfinder already opened the door for this. Question is, will they step through, or will it be a one-off?

    As much as the idea of paying again for the same ships I already have irks me, rationally I realize these would effectively be new ships entirely, with their own gimmicks and BOff layouts. Different playstyles that just happen to support old skins, and if you don't like that playstyle, you don't have to buy. So yeah, I think in the end I'd be okay with it.

    When all's said and done, if a T6 Prometheus drops with a Cmdr Tac and Lt. Cmdr Sci, I'll buy it. I'll take a T6 Luna with Cmdr Sci and Lt. Cmdr Tac while they're at it, too. I don't really care about anything else.
  • sqwishedsqwished Member Posts: 1,475 Bug Hunter
    edited February 2015
    carlosbfly wrote: »
    Looking through the thread on the new Command Ships, it seems to be a very divided reaction. A shame since I think the designs (minus the poor Klingons) are pretty good and they've put in some impressive work. But given how Cryptic seem to be unable to entice so many players over to T6 still, is it time for them to acknowledge how many players how dug their feet in and how many customers they are missing out by not making some more T5-U ships T6?

    While I understand they cant do this for every T5-U ship, there are clearly several in high use that players will simply not abandon. I'm thinking the Oddy, Avenger, Scimitar, Galaxy, Advanced Escort, etc Metrics will help them identify the most used in game.

    I suspect there is a massive and very easy amount of revenue to be made by giving them what they want (and it obviously isn't going to be any of these new T6 ship efforts) for very little work. Like with the Intrepid, just make another new, interchangeable skin, boost some stats, add a ship trait and (maybe) a console or some BOFF station tweeks if needed.

    Its very little work by comparison and new money for old rope. At this stage, I honestly think they should just consider it as I can't see the T5-U supporters ever shifting on their stance and that is a LOT of money being sat on.

    I agree with you. If memory serves they've yet to knock a t5-U of the top spot at least for DPS. Or at least bring the cost of the T6 ships down by around 500 zen so cost wise they're at least on a levelish playing field with T5-U.
    Oh, it's not broken? We can soon fix that!

  • carlosbflycarlosbfly Member Posts: 682 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    jexsamx wrote: »
    The Pathfinder already opened the door for this. Question is, will they step through, or will it be a one-off?

    Yes and I guess the question is - how well did the Pathfinder do? Unfortunately, I doubt it was the best benchmark to base it on as the Intrepid was never a popular ship anyway. Now if it had been, say an Oddy class then it would have been a different story.
  • jarfarujarfaru Member Posts: 573 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    They really wanted to sell those t6 ships. Makes me wonder why for the anniversary they gave away a free one. All those hold outs will just grind for the free ship. So i agree with the OP. They should really give some thought to making some of the more popular t5 ships t6.
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I hope they'll eventually create Tier 6 versions of all existing Tier 5 ships. I don't think it's guaranteed they will do that.


    But one thing to consider for both us and them - the reason we have Tier 5 versions of all canon ships is because people want to play canon ships at endgame. And Tier 5 U is just not quite endgame!

    It will inevitably take a lot of time, I think. First, if still necessary, to convince Cryptic that it's the thing the players want (and will sell best), second, to simply implement it. Because Cryptic has stated certain requirements for a ship to be Tier 6 implicitely:
    • It needs a new console power.
    • It needs a new Starship Mastery Trait.
    • It needs specialization slots.
    That may not seem much, but it means coming up with creative abilities.
    Also, they will have to figure out which specialization fits best to the ship, possibly even creating completely new specializations - and how to distinguish the ships from existing ones.

    My hopes were dampened somewhat by the new Command ships. I think Command ships would have been the perfect candidates for a flagship overhaul, but it looks like they will instead stand on their own. :( But not having Tier 6 flagships seems just wrong.



    I guess if we really want to be certain they give us more Tier 6 variants of existing ships, we need to not buy the other Tier 6 ships. Or at least buy the Tier 6 variants more. Doubtful that will happen however, because people seem to buy "for power" a lot in this game, considering the happy outcries of players when a new lockbox ships comes out, saying "wow, that looks powerful, I must have it".
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • hyperionx09hyperionx09 Member Posts: 1,709 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Most players still dug in are those only wanting their favorite ships in T6 format (see: Hardcore Galaxy Fans as the most notable). There's a few noted Defiant fans, Sovereign fans, and Nova/Rhode Island fans as well. Intrepid fans got it and bought into it pretty fast. The only thing keeping T6 versions of existing iconic T5 ships is a lack of episode content to star the ship enough times (Rhode Island would be possible if they focus on Harry Kim for the rest of DR).

    In fact, the Devs laid out the requirements of making an existing ship (at least, canon ships) T6; which they used to explain the Pathfinder's existence when they otherwise said they wouldn't create T6 versions of existing ships "at this time":
    - Must be iconic enough to star in a major mission series
    - Must had effort put into the NPC design they could copy/paste over to a playable design
    - Must be central to the ongoing effort of the mission series
    - Must have had the resources already spent on it to make selling it for some $$$ worthwhile.

    Plenty of others have gone and purchased T6s; even just for the Mastery Traits to use on their favorite T5U/T5FU.

    It'd be nice if Cryptic could just release Fleet T6 versions of the Fleet level T5s (Odyssey/Bortasqu/Scimitar, Dysons, Andorian Escorts, and Vestas). They just more or less need a Mastery Trait, an extra seat rank, and a Hybrid seat, and Cryptic would still make a profit since they would need Fleet Modules (and Fleet Credit) to buy.

    Just give the Flagships a Universal Specialization Hybrid seat to be compatible with existing and future Primary Specializations. The rest can be made Specialization-specific. I suspect however, they're waiting until they get a 3rd Primary Specialization before they start releasing T6 versions of those Fleet level 3-Pack T5s (Tac is one Specialization, Sci is one Specialization, and Eng is one Specialization).

    I really do hope though that at least the T6 Flagships would have a Universal Specialization seat. Guaranteed purchase by many, and guaranteed compatibility with all existing and future Specializations.
  • sonnikkusonnikku Member Posts: 77 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    The tier 6 ships look very good in their own right, but I still hope one of them has a Galaxy skin as the Pathfinder had an Intrepid one. I mean cutting a break for Voyager fans but for no one else would just be favoritism at this point. :P
  • gavinrunebladegavinruneblade Member Posts: 3,894 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Borticus already said in a priority one podcast that if they do anything the pathfinder is the route they will go, where they make a new ship and allow it to use bits from older ones.

    He didn't commit to it happening, but said that was the only way they'd go. I hope they do go for it as I have a lot of fleeties who'd jump all over them.

    Me, only classic ships I really care that much about the looks of would be a Connie or guramba. And somehow, I doubt I'll ever see a t6 of either.
  • reginamala78reginamala78 Member Posts: 4,593 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Would we the players love to just upgrade our ships and fly our favorites? Sure. Will they allow it? Of course not. At best we'll get more like the Pathfinder stupidity, where we'd be expected to buy an entirely separate ship fro $30 more. Throw out a T6 Fleet Odyssey or Fleet Vesta, I'd be there with a Fleet Module and Upgrade Token within a few hours, but I'd be genuinely (and pleasantly) surprised if they went that route.
  • cromarty1cromarty1 Member Posts: 138 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    carlosbfly wrote: »
    Looking through the thread on the new Command Ships, it seems to be a very divided reaction. A shame since I think the designs (minus the poor Klingons) are pretty good and they've put in some impressive work. But given how Cryptic seem to be unable to entice so many players over to T6 still, is it time for them to acknowledge how many players how dug their feet in and how many customers they are missing out by not making some more T5-U ships T6?

    While I understand they cant do this for every T5-U ship, there are clearly several in high use that players will simply not abandon. I'm thinking the Oddy, Avenger, Scimitar, Galaxy, Advanced Escort, etc Metrics will help them identify the most used in game.

    I suspect there is a massive and very easy amount of revenue to be made by giving them what they want (and it obviously isn't going to be any of these new T6 ship efforts) for very little work. Like with the Intrepid, just make another new, interchangeable skin, boost some stats, add a ship trait and (maybe) a console or some BOFF station tweeks if needed.

    Its very little work by comparison and new money for old rope. At this stage, I honestly think they should just consider it as I can't see the T5-U supporters ever shifting on their stance and that is a LOT of money being sat on.

    its thare plan to offer new ships and stuff for profit but TRIBBLE up your account so having anything to feel accomplished never happens no matter what thay will even delete your stuff in the hope of making you spend and that's bad in a years time sto has gone from best game ive played to a criminal expliote of the players that have invested
    and like ive said your paying cash or hundreds of hours that is not free hell the free players earn about less than a dime an hour for grind to cash value that's not even slave wage and a dime is what I figure the gamers twice as good with this whole video game money bs that in my opnion is not fun at the level it has grown in sto
    like really whos bad idea was it to turn sto into a banking bankers game anyhow its a game for TRIBBLE sake not the new York stock exchange dammit
  • redheadguyredheadguy Member Posts: 423 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    carlosbfly wrote: »
    Looking through the thread on the new Command Ships, it seems to be a very divided reaction. A shame since I think the designs (minus the poor Klingons) are pretty good and they've put in some impressive work. But given how Cryptic seem to be unable to entice so many players over to T6 still, is it time for them to acknowledge how many players how dug their feet in and how many customers they are missing out by not making some more T5-U ships T6?

    While I understand they cant do this for every T5-U ship, there are clearly several in high use that players will simply not abandon. I'm thinking the Oddy, Avenger, Scimitar, Galaxy, Advanced Escort, etc Metrics will help them identify the most used in game.

    I suspect there is a massive and very easy amount of revenue to be made by giving them what they want (and it obviously isn't going to be any of these new T6 ship efforts) for very little work. Like with the Intrepid, just make another new, interchangeable skin, boost some stats, add a ship trait and (maybe) a console or some BOFF station tweeks if needed.

    Its very little work by comparison and new money for old rope. At this stage, I honestly think they should just consider it as I can't see the T5-U supporters ever shifting on their stance and that is a LOT of money being sat on.

    I agree with the OP on this. I don't know how I can add more to what has already been stated. The only reason I have the breen carrir is so I can unlock the ship triat to use on my T5U Galaxy class. The only reason I'm grinding for the Koboli ship is for the console and the ship trait, both to be used on my T5U Galaxy class. :D
    Can you tell I'm a TNG fan? I'm not giving up my favorite ships for this T6 stuff anytime soon.
    [SIGPIC]

    [/SIGPIC]
  • keladorkelador Member Posts: 318 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Personally I hate the T5-T5U system its a complete rip off that was not need they could of just upgraded all T5 with the mastery system and not rip people off. Its just going to get confusing when they want to add a new Tier what they going to do next T6U and T7....

    It cheaper to buy a T6 ship then get a fleet T5 then upgrade it to T5U so personally I think the whole upgrade system puts people off buying T5 ships.

    So yeah if you a fan of TNG like myself and want the Galaxy and new to the game its going to cost more than a T6 ship and not be as good....

    Now if they had upgraded all T5 ships so you get the first 4 mastery's and then gave you the option to upgrade to T6 to get the trait added that would of been a better route and less confusing.
  • carlosbflycarlosbfly Member Posts: 682 Arc User
    edited February 2015

    It'd be nice if Cryptic could just release Fleet T6 versions of the Fleet level T5s (Odyssey/Bortasqu/Scimitar, Dysons, Andorian Escorts, and Vestas).

    For it to work, they'd absolutely need to start at the top ie; the ships that are very popular and have a lot of players stuck on them and refusing to budge. Everything on that list - barring the Dyson - would be a great place to start.
  • tilarium1979tilarium1979 Member Posts: 567 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I was thinking similar last night after I read about the T6 command ships. I have a couple of characters I'll switch over. The problem is, the T6 ships don't fit most of my characters, their play style and (get this) their RP style. My main Klingon is a General in the KDF and leader of his House. He's a carrier commander, he's dabbled in other ship styles and switches based on the needs of the mission, but ultimately comes back to a carrier command ship. Their are no T6 dedicated KLINGON carriers, the house (fleet) hasn't reached level 5 shipyard yet and I don't like the BOff layout for the basic version. I have him in the mirror Vo'Guv (spelling?), which can't go T5U. I MIGHT try the new command ship with him, it MIGHT work for him, but I'm not hopeful. Another Klingon is also carrier based, he's been flying around in the first of the Orion Flight Deck Cruisers (don't like the look of the other one, it's to big). I just switched him over to the Breen one, but that's only until he gets master and unlocks the trait. Out of all 14 or so characters able to use T6, 5 of them are in one because it works for them, 2 are in one just to get the trait, and the rest are still in T5Us because those ships better fit them. I think 3 or 4 might switch to the new command ships (thats including some of the T6 users currently), how long they stick depends on how the ships play. I'd happily spent the Zen to get T5U <-> T6 upgrade tokens. Especially for the characters flying the lockbox ships... my Cardassian that flys a Galor and my Ferengi that flies a Marauder.
  • variant37variant37 Member Posts: 867 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Where's that Fry "Go ahead and take my money" image when I need it?

    I would gladly give Cryptic money for T6 versions of the following ships:

    Vesta
    Bortasqu'
    Excelsior
    D'Deridex


    I really think Cryptic is missing out on a massive money-making opportunity here. Give us T6 versions of our favorite ships!
  • carlosbflycarlosbfly Member Posts: 682 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Borticus already said in a priority one podcast that if they do anything the pathfinder is the route they will go, where they make a new ship and allow it to use bits from older ones.

    He didn't commit to it happening, but said that was the only way they'd go. I hope they do go for it as I have a lot of fleeties who'd jump all over them.

    That's fine for me. I mean either way, Cryptic gets their T6 money and the T5U players essentially get the same ship but enhanced. They don't even need to use the new skin option if they didn't want to. I think Cryptic are massively underestimating how many players would jump over to T6 if they could at least keep flying their beloved ship.

    For many who are stuck on their stance, I'd say its less about money and more about the ship. They'd pay if the way is paved.
  • crazyned1066crazyned1066 Member Posts: 198 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    carlosbfly wrote: »
    Yes and I guess the question is - how well did the Pathfinder do? Unfortunately, I doubt it was the best benchmark to base it on as the Intrepid was never a popular ship anyway. Now if it had been, say an Oddy class then it would have been a different story.

    I think Tier 6 scimitars would sell like hotcakes - even though the T5U is still awesome.
  • gavinrunebladegavinruneblade Member Posts: 3,894 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    carlosbfly wrote: »
    That's fine for me. I mean either way, Cryptic gets their T6 money and the T5U players essentially get the same ship but enhanced. They don't even need to use the new skin option if they didn't want to. I think Cryptic are massively underestimating how many players would jump over to T6 if they could at least keep flying their beloved ship.

    For many who are stuck on their stance, I'd say its less about money and more about the ship. They'd pay if the way is paved.

    I don't think they underestimate it at all. I think the forum u derestimates the spending habits of the silent players.

    Consider the forum's opinion of the dyson bundle. And yet gecko said in the priority one interview that "bundles of bundles" were a huge money maker for them and something they were planning more of. Days later the command ships hit.

    Believe me, there will be more 9-packs coming. They sell. Just not to forumites.
  • carlosbflycarlosbfly Member Posts: 682 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I think Tier 6 scimitars would sell like hotcakes - even though the T5U is still awesome.

    Absolutely. I don't fly one but the numbers I still see in game are staggering. I'd safely bet most Romulan players kept them over the T6 ships offered. Scimitar would easily be one of the first ships I'd suggest making a T6.
  • hyperionx09hyperionx09 Member Posts: 1,709 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    carlosbfly wrote: »
    For it to work, they'd absolutely need to start at the top ie; the ships that are very popular and have a lot of players stuck on them and refusing to budge. Everything on that list - barring the Dyson - would be a great place to start.
    The reason I suggested the 3-ship bundles first is that they are all already at Fleet T5 prior to being upgraded, and are more or less set for Fleet T6 if they just get a Mastery Trait, an extra seat, and a Hybrid seat. They already match Fleet T6 console-wise, and already have the scaling features set. A change to their base stats so that they scale like T6 ships would is they only other changes required.

    In addition to the above, even if players dislike the Dysons for whatever reason, it's a Science ship in 3 variants per faction, and would go a long way towards padding the otherwise non-existent Sci Ships for those two factions at T6. The addition of alternate skin options help make them more tolerable, and most players don't bother with it's useless Proton cannons anyway. They do need a fix to their inability to access their appropriate Commander level skill though.

    After all those ships have been dealt with, it's a matter of Cryptic coming up with a major mission chain to star the most popular canon ships. Of them, the following 3 are the most likely based on the Pathfinder criteria:

    - Rhode Island - If DR switches focus to Harry Kim for awhile, it would meet the requirements.

    - Galaxy - Geordi La Forge in command of a Challenger and a hero ship like the Pathfinder (same core Boff seating class-wise)

    - Defiant - Hero ship like the Pathfinder (same core Boff seating class-wise), could be made to star in some DS9 content.
  • carlosbflycarlosbfly Member Posts: 682 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I don't think they underestimate it at all. I think the forum u derestimates the spending habits of the silent players.

    This goes beyond the forum (which is, alas, a bit extreme). You only need to go in game to see the sheer number of T5U ships still in service. The popular ones are what I'm focusing on here - you can still easily enter numerous STF's at any hour of the day and you'll end up seeing an Oddy, Scimitar and Avenger paired in a team. That is an undeniable fact.

    Those are perfectly viable consumers right there, sitting on a T5U.
  • roadghostroadghost Member Posts: 394 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I'm sticking with my Fleet Avenger. If they make a T6 upgrade path or a straight purchase T6 I'll jump, but I'm not going to move to any other ship design. I don't do enough combat, other than the occasional pug, for a small percentage dmg/res increase to matter enough to swap to something I don't prefer. The FA reminds me of a '57 Chevy with the fins reversed. It's a classic. Now if they would just put a Sonic Drive-In at ESD so I can pull up and order my chili-cheesedog.
  • carlosbflycarlosbfly Member Posts: 682 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    roadghost wrote: »
    I'm sticking with my Fleet Avenger. If they make a T6 upgrade path or a straight purchase T6 I'll jump, but I'm not going to move to any other ship design. I don't do enough combat, other than the occasional pug, for a small percentage dmg/res increase to matter enough to swap to something I don't prefer.

    Someone like you, flying a popular ship, is exactly the kind of consumer I mean. You wont part with the ship but will part with the money if they T6ed it. There is a lot of easy revenue to be made from people like you flying those still popular ships.
  • bobtheskull99bobtheskull99 Member Posts: 706 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    carlosbfly wrote: »
    This goes beyond the forum (which is, alas, a bit extreme). You only need to go in game to see the sheer number of T5U ships still in service. The popular ones are what I'm focusing on here - you can still easily enter numerous STF's at any hour of the day and you'll end up seeing an Oddy, Scimitar and Avenger paired in a team. That is an undeniable fact.

    Those are perfectly viable consumers right there, sitting on a T5U.

    I think that might say more about the viability of t5u, just because you still see them doesn't mean those people aren't buying t6 ships. I know plenty of players who have t6s who still fly (and sometimes flip flop between) t5u ships...myself included
  • tilarium1979tilarium1979 Member Posts: 567 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Honestly, I'd be fine if the current ships are made T6 (either a separate purchase or upgrade) even if they didn't have the mastery trait. Just give me access to the extra console and the BOff seating of the T6 ships along with the upgraded stats. The mastery trait is just icing to me.
  • carlosbflycarlosbfly Member Posts: 682 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I think that might say more about the viability of t5u, just because you still see them doesn't mean those people aren't buying t6 ships. I know plenty of players who have t6s who still fly (and sometimes flip flop between) t5u ships...myself included

    Did I say T6 ships weren't being purchased? No. I stated the clear resistance of a large chunk of players (and potential revenue) who just won't dump their T5U.
  • nimbullnimbull Member Posts: 1,564 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I fly a Faeht on my tac Romulan but I'm gearing up my T5-U T'varo for another run because I want to play with the level 60 version of the BIG RED BALL OF DEATH console. Once I'm done leveling the zombie ship for it's trait I'm going to run around in my T'varo for a bit. Having an upgrade path like T5 -> T5U -> T6 wouldn't be too bad, easier to skip the U but eh, whatever.

    I wish I could put the BIG RED BALL OF DEATH console on my Faeht. Shame they don't make all the consoles that were bound to specific T5 ships now open to all T5U and T6 ships.
    Green people don't have to be.... little.
  • wast33wast33 Member Posts: 1,855 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    did not read through all in here, just wanted to drop my opinion on the matter again:

    just let us upgrade the ships we already got to t6 fleet level, without traits. tie those to the new t6's to come. just as all the command/intel and whatever to come seatings.
    more money in a whole lotta ton existing ships than i a few new ones imho...

    it's like with t4 and t5, only that in comparison there are MUCH more t5's than t4 or t6 and that many players collected MANY t5's over years just to see them being outdated by now.

    made a thread about, barely visited lol:
    http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1353631
  • edited February 2015
    This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.