test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Federation Cloak - Pointless?

pulserazorpulserazor Member Posts: 590 Arc User
What is the point of having a cloaking device on a ship that can only deploy outside combat?

In almost any situation, we are always in combat. It wouldnt be much of a game if it was not so. What then are we to do with this cloak? Depoly it at the beginning of a mission/ques event/pvp, decloak to get a short ambush buff... and then perform like a ship that has no cloak?

Make it a battle cloak, or dont give us a cloak at all. Non combat cloak will have pretty much no impact on gameplay.

Stop me if im wrong.
Post edited by pulserazor on
«1

Comments

  • annemarie30annemarie30 Member Posts: 2,696 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    welcome to the 43rd Fed Cloak thread of the week. Admins, Fed Cloak really needs to go into the common thread file cabinet
    We Want Vic Fontaine
  • thratch1thratch1 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    You've basically described why it was dumb to put it on a console before.

    Cloaks are fun. In PVP, they allow you to stalk your prey before hitting them with a well-executed Alpha Strike. In single-player missions, you can sneak through mobs of enemies. In STFs, you can cloak out of combat to get a boosted alpha strike against a target for slightly more damage.

    They're not supposed to be huge features, just fun little gimmicks.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • hyplhypl Member Posts: 3,719 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    The basic cloak is outdated at this point. All basic cloaks should be battle cloaks.

    *zips up flame suit*
  • thecosmic1thecosmic1 Member Posts: 9,365 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    pulserazor wrote: »
    In almost any situation, we are always in combat.
    Outside of PvP you constantly have the opportunity to re-cloak between mobs. The PvE mobs are set-up to allow you time to recloak before reaching the next one. You are clearly not "always in combat" within the game.
    STO is about my Liberated Borg Federation Captain with his Breen 1st Officer, Jem'Hadar Tactical Officer, Liberated Borg Engineering Officer, Android Ops Officer, Photonic Science Officer, Gorn Science Officer, and Reman Medical Officer jumping into their Jem'Hadar Carrier and flying off to do missions for the new Romulan Empire. But for some players allowing a T5 Connie to be used breaks the canon in the game.
  • rynohawkrynohawk Member Posts: 66 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    Decloaking 2km off an enemy's aft and unleashing heck?
  • rezkingrezking Member Posts: 1,109 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    :rolleyes:

    The Feds shouldn't get even a regular cloak.
    Seeing that the Rommy intel ship is hull nerfed for it's EBC, the Fed cloak should be nerfed.
    Make it a 10 second duration with no decloak bonus and a cooldown of 3 mins.
    NO to ARC
    RIP KDF and PvP 2014-07-17 Season 9.5 - Death by Dev
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    Welcome to the KDF version of the cloak.

    1:
    Your not always in combat. As you start out out of combat. And most mission mobs have gaps large enough to cloak.

    2:
    You can easily pop up from the rear, side, or what ever you choose. Then use the bonus of coming off the cloak to unleash fury on the target.

    3: Its a fun way to attack your target.

    I been doing this with my KDF for a long time now. And its fun.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • pulserazorpulserazor Member Posts: 590 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    thecosmic1 wrote: »
    Outside of PvP you constantly have the opportunity to re-cloak between mobs. The PvE mobs are set-up to allow you time to recloak before reaching the next one. You are clearly not "always in combat" within the game.

    CSE - cloak between cubes... maybe. if you deliberately park for it, I can make it there in less then 4 seconds.

    Ise - Claok at spawn.

    Kase - cloak at spawn, Cloak while going to second gate (but its probably dead) cloak for Donatra's Spawn.

    Hoe - Cloak at spawn.

    FA - Cloak at spawn

    I could go on. but the point is, yes. you are pretty much always in combat unless you deliberately run away or afk in this mythical gap between mobs you allude to -- for however long it will take to get out of combat, which slows down damage output so much that you are far better to yourself and to your team if you just dont run away to cloak.

    Cloak at spawn, then cloak at spawn again when you die, or deliberately run away from combat (whilst achieving 0dps, and allowing AI to scatter, or player created opportunities like grav well etc pass by) for as long and far as you have to, (12 seconds is it? - an eternity.) just to enable the cloak again.


    Non Battle Cloak = Pointless. Please keep your Spawn-in-only cloak. We cant use it, ergo we dont need it. Save your time and resources coding better things into the game.
  • stf65stf65 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    cloaks are for fun. and since they don't take any time to code, because they were coded into the game 5 years ago, it's not a big deal. if you don't like it don't worry about it, but feds aren't ever going go get a battlecloak. those tears have been cried out for years.
  • edited September 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • imruinedimruined Member Posts: 1,457 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    coldnapalm wrote: »
    Maybe for how YOU play. Not everyone plays like you. There is no one true way in this game (because no carddy for player). If your so arrogrant to think your way is the ONLY way...then I have some sad news for you. It's not. Your not so important as to dictate how others have fun in this game. I am perfectly willing to believe that none battle cloak is useless for YOU. That however does not mean it should or will change to suit YOU. Your just not that important. Sorry to bring you the sad news.

    Dude you need to pause, take a deep breath and chill... So their opinion differs to yours, his opinion also differs to mine, there's no need for such a blatant over-reaction...

    I find plenty of opportunity in PVE to re-cloak, while still spending the minimum amount of time out of combat, generally while moving between groups of enemies...

    I do not intentionally disengage, or shy from combat, simply to re-cloak but re-cloak at every opportunity otherwise...
    The entitlement is strong in these forums...

    not_funny_Q_shadows_small.jpg
  • ghyudtghyudt Member Posts: 1,112 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    hypl wrote: »
    The basic cloak is outdated at this point. All basic cloaks should be battle cloaks.

    *zips up flame suit*

    Remove all cloaks from the game. Failing that, cloaking devices should reduce damage resistance and weapon damage as long as its equipped. Ships that have it as a permanent feature should inherently be weaker than other ships of the same category (I.e. a D'Deridex should lose HP and DPS compared to a Galaxy of the same tier).
  • tekehdtekehd Member Posts: 2,032 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    thratch1 wrote: »
    You've basically described why it was dumb to put it on a console before.

    Cloaks are fun. In PVP, they allow you to stalk your prey before hitting them with a well-executed Alpha Strike. In single-player missions, you can sneak through mobs of enemies. In STFs, you can cloak out of combat to get a boosted alpha strike against a target for slightly more damage.

    They're not supposed to be huge features, just fun little gimmicks.

    This..... so this.... my KDF flies a mogh.... the cloak gets used.... not in combat..... but it still gets used.... especially for that decloak-alpha
  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,593 Community Moderator
    edited September 2014
    So... basically its Battlecloak envy here? Feds get ships with cloaks, and now feel nerfed? Can't believe I'm gonna say this, but the KDF worked with standard cloaks since day one and made good use of them. And I'm pretty sure Fed players with the Defiant Retrofit, Galaxy-X, and Avenger made good use of their cloaks too.
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
  • edited September 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • cbrjwrrcbrjwrr Member Posts: 2,782 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    This is gold.


    Feds: "We want cloak!"

    When they actually get open cloak use: "We don't want cloak anymore!"


    Make your minds up, KDF players have been effectively using these cloaks for years, so it isn't the cloaks.
  • edited September 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • edited September 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • cbrjwrrcbrjwrr Member Posts: 2,782 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    coldnapalm wrote: »
    But that seems to be the running thread of this board.

    Endless moaning and complaing about things they get after asking for it.

    I know. Doesn't stop it being amusing. :)
  • knuhteb5knuhteb5 Member Posts: 1,831 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    You're lucky you even got cloaks when you shouldn't have gotten them to begin with.
    aGHGQIKr41KNi.gif
  • skyranger1414skyranger1414 Member Posts: 1,785 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    pulserazor wrote: »
    What is the point of having a cloaking device on a ship that can only deploy outside combat?

    In almost any situation, we are always in combat. It wouldnt be much of a game if it was not so. What then are we to do with this cloak? Depoly it at the beginning of a mission/ques event/pvp, decloak to get a short ambush buff... and then perform like a ship that has no cloak?

    Make it a battle cloak, or dont give us a cloak at all. Non combat cloak will have pretty much no impact on gameplay.

    Stop me if im wrong.

    You´re not wrong. At this point regular cloak is just for the sake of lore of fluff.
    coldnapalm wrote: »
    Actually...they do. The roms have a -10 to all subsystem (so less damage...well less EVERYTHING really) and their hull HP is scaled back compared to other ships of their class.

    If you really think roms do less damage and are less durable... well, dang, I don´t know what to tell you other than perhaps you should educate yourself further in the game.
  • stf65stf65 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    cbrjwrr wrote: »
    This is gold.


    Feds: "We want cloak!"
    it's not "feds." its one deluded player with cloak envy. it grows tiring watching you groups us all together based on a few idiots.
  • nightkennightken Member Posts: 2,824 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    stf65 wrote: »
    it's not "feds." its one deluded player with cloak envy. it grows tiring watching you groups us all together based on a few idiots.

    it's the feds not just a few not all maybe not even most but not a few ether.... the fact that there a thread whining that now they got cloak calling it "fed cloak" when it the same cloak kdf has, and asking for battle cloak says alot and none of it good.

    if I stop posting it doesn't make you right it. just means I don't have enough rum to continue interacting with you.
  • tehbubbalootehbubbaloo Member Posts: 2,003 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    just as predicted. fed cloak isnt good enough, now you want battlecloak. obviously that wont be good enough either and feddies will be crying for enhanced battlecloak.
    its just so fitting that the very same cloak feddies cried over for years as being so OP and such a huge advantage suddenly isnt very great at all... and you creampuffs havent even flown the ships yet :rolleyes:

    seriously, you guys are the running joke of sto.
  • stf65stf65 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    nightken wrote: »
    it's the feds not just a few not all maybe not even most but not a few ether.... the fact that there a thread whining that now they got cloak calling it "fed cloak" when it the same cloak kdf has, and asking for battle cloak says alot and none of it good.
    this whole forum doesn't even have a couple of hundred regular posters, so don't assume that 25 people on this forum speak for anyone other then 25 people who want something. it's not most and it's not even a few. it's a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of the players in the game.
  • stf65stf65 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    just as predicted. fed cloak isnt good enough, now you want battlecloak. obviously that wont be good enough either and feddies will be crying for enhanced battlecloak.
    its just so fitting that the very same cloak feddies cried over for years as being so OP and such a huge advantage suddenly isnt very great at all... and you creampuffs havent even flown the ships yet :rolleyes:

    seriously, you guys are the running joke of sto.
    jez people. it's one guy. not all of us. most of the peopel disagreeing with him are fed players. keep it in perspective.
  • nightkennightken Member Posts: 2,824 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    stf65 wrote: »
    this whole forum doesn't even have a couple of hundred regular posters, so don't assume that 25 people on this forum speak for anyone other then 25 people who want something. it's not most and it's not even a few. it's a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of the players in the game.

    I'm sorry I'm far too cynical to assume people who don't post are any better... it's a character flaw.

    if I stop posting it doesn't make you right it. just means I don't have enough rum to continue interacting with you.
  • cbrjwrrcbrjwrr Member Posts: 2,782 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    stf65 wrote: »
    it's not "feds." its one deluded player with cloak envy. it grows tiring watching you groups us all together based on a few idiots.

    Look mate, Feds have been demanding cloaks for years, and they are now moving onto demanding battle-cloaks now they realise basic cloak isn't what they thought it was. It is only worthy of derisory laughter.
  • vetteguy904vetteguy904 Member Posts: 3,923 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    cbrjwrr wrote: »
    Look mate, Feds have been demanding cloaks for years, and they are now moving onto demanding battle-cloaks now they realise basic cloak isn't what they thought it was. It is only worthy of derisory laughter.

    I'm with Annemarie on it. this needs to be included in the FCT
    sig.jpg
  • stf65stf65 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    cbrjwrr wrote: »
    Look mate, Feds have been demanding cloaks for years, and they are now moving onto demanding battle-cloaks now they realise basic cloak isn't what they thought it was. It is only worthy of derisory laughter.
    i'm not saying the op shouldn't be laughed at. i'm just saying the op is 1 post in this thread. you don't see 100 fed jumping up and down in this thread to agree with him. and i'm in the game most nights and i don't see 10,000 posts in chat by fed players demanding battle cloaks.

    don't turn it into a bigger issue then it is: one person on a forum who wants something.
Sign In or Register to comment.