test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

The 3rd Official "No BS" Tournament - >>> Rules and team registration <<<

124678

Comments

  • pascalb1pascalb1 Member Posts: 135 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~Askray
    Nova Aurora Polaris
    - Nova Aurora Polaris -
    @pascalb1
  • polie05polie05 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~Askray
  • pascalb1pascalb1 Member Posts: 135 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~Askray
    Nova Aurora Polaris
    - Nova Aurora Polaris -
    @pascalb1
  • polie05polie05 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~Askray
  • xtremenoob1xtremenoob1 Member Posts: 489 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~Askray
    -X-/Pandas - Pheo
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • pascalb1pascalb1 Member Posts: 135 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~Askray
    Nova Aurora Polaris
    - Nova Aurora Polaris -
    @pascalb1
  • pascalb1pascalb1 Member Posts: 135 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~Askray
    Nova Aurora Polaris
    - Nova Aurora Polaris -
    @pascalb1
  • polie05polie05 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~Askray
  • pascalb1pascalb1 Member Posts: 135 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~BranFlakes
    Nova Aurora Polaris
    - Nova Aurora Polaris -
    @pascalb1
  • pascalb1pascalb1 Member Posts: 135 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~BranFlakes
    Nova Aurora Polaris
    - Nova Aurora Polaris -
    @pascalb1
  • polie05polie05 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~BranFlakes
  • shinzon2013shinzon2013 Member Posts: 17 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    The first two tournaments were actually fun. These rules are just getting ridiculous now.

    I'm not sure I understand the need to put a ban on Cloaking and Clickable consoles. You say you're not concerned about decloak alpha's so why ban? As far as I know, there are only a couple fleets out there that use Vapers and really only one of them that does it successfully. And you're right, they can be defended against. Just spam a keybind that targets the Vaper by name. So, you just keep spamming it and when they decloak you lock on and nuke their alpha off.

    Anyway, good luck to all the participants. It's good to see this many teams participating. I just wonder if these tournaments are doing more harm than good. I forsee the winning team consisting of two bugs and three wells running a lot of warp plasma. That's not boring at all...:rolleyes:
  • havamhavam Member Posts: 1,735 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    damn mods have beaten me to the lols.

    Its not like i recall that many kdf premades using bops to begin with. Still the rules seem heavily feddie biased.

    good luck with the tourny, yet another testament to how much cryptic fails to balance its TRIBBLE, way beyond the point were simple player agreements can fix things.
  • pascalb1pascalb1 Member Posts: 135 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~BranFlakes
    Nova Aurora Polaris
    - Nova Aurora Polaris -
    @pascalb1
  • scurry5scurry5 Member Posts: 1,554 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~BranFlakes
  • pascalb1pascalb1 Member Posts: 135 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~BranFlakes
    Nova Aurora Polaris
    - Nova Aurora Polaris -
    @pascalb1
  • wast33wast33 Member Posts: 1,855 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~BranFlakes
  • jornadojornado Member Posts: 918 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    scurry5 wrote: »
    Just for your information, all ships can equip the debuff, so the rule you mentioned won't help.

    A big reason why it is so hated is because it can cause very bad UI lag and desync issues for some people. There's a thread somewhere around here for that. I personally get quite a bit of lag whenever it's used, so I have a distaste for it as well.

    Thank you! I've been trying to get an answer on this for a long time. I forgot that other ships got the AoE debuff from using it, got the self buff and AoE debuff confused in my head. Well, since I know that it causes lag, I think I'm gonna drop if from my ship. I have no problem using abilities that may seem overpowered to some as long as they work strictly via game mechanics, but something that causes an actual problem code-wise is not good IMO.

    Thanks again for an answer!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    My guess is "hope" keeps people not playing but posting on the forums. For others, its a path of sad realization and closure. Grieving takes time. The worst "haters" here love the game, or did at some point.
  • masterkeychnk5masterkeychnk5 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    pascalb1 wrote: »
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~BranFlakes

    now now, dont be so rude my old 'teacher' hahaha
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] I am not Snakie, MT is!
  • masterkeychnk5masterkeychnk5 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    spherb wrote: »
    It is obvious Bieber replied post #8 trying to enter tournament, and somehow a 16 team tournament is full before the 8th responder. If you want to exclude the Pandas because you cant beat them than just say no Pandas up front. Your tournament and your rules, which no Panda complained about. So be it. Run your tournament and the Panda's will play the winner ;)

    You are right, i ve seen the exact same thing happen.

    Anyway could someone pm me the posts of pascal i wanna have a good laugh tonight haha
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] I am not Snakie, MT is!
  • pascalb1pascalb1 Member Posts: 135 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~BranFlakes
    Nova Aurora Polaris
    - Nova Aurora Polaris -
    @pascalb1
  • pulserazorpulserazor Member Posts: 590 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    ilhansk wrote: »

    Regarding ROM ships:

    Romulan ships have way more advantages than their cloak alone. They still have devastating spike potential and they have their singularity abilities. If you rely on cloaked alpha strikes you have to change your tactics, that is true. But I believe, most PVP'ers should be able to so. If not, sit this one out then.



    You neglect to mention that romulan ships have a severe system power penalty that is mitigated by their ability to battlecloak, as well as their increased critical chance and modest gimmick abilities afforded to them by the singularity power tray. Take away their cloak, and that power deficit becomes a major issue.

    Dont try to flip this 'most pvpers should be able to adapt, if not, sit out' coin - Thats crass and ignorant. Romulan ships are garbage without the cloak next to kdf/fed ships in their same class, you know its true.
  • naz4naz4 Member Posts: 1,373 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Interesting turn of events in this thread.

    The Whole "No BS" term was coined up to mitigate these types of issues so all could participate without alienating anyone.

    So "No BS" doesn't really fit sadly :(

    Hi all by the way....
  • cichicichicichicichi Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    too bad this issue with clickable consoles severely disrupts ships like the breen.
  • ussenterpisezussenterpisez Member Posts: 163 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    naz4 wrote: »
    Interesting turn of events in this thread.

    The Whole "No BS" term was coined up to mitigate these types of issues so all could participate without alienating anyone.

    So "No BS" doesn't really fit sadly :(

    Hi all by the way....

    Nazy come back!!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • aquitaine985aquitaine985 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    naz4 wrote: »
    Interesting turn of events in this thread.

    The Whole "No BS" term was coined up to mitigate these types of issues so all could participate without alienating anyone.

    So "No BS" doesn't really fit sadly :(

    Hi all by the way....

    Naz!

    /10prodigalSonMustBeAsleep
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    @Aquitaine985
    Lag Industries STO PvP Fleet - Executive
    A Sad Panda of Industrial calibre.
    2010: This is Cryptic PvP. Please hold the line, your call is very important to us...
  • xtremenoob1xtremenoob1 Member Posts: 489 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    naz4 wrote: »
    Interesting turn of events in this thread.

    The Whole "No BS" term was coined up to mitigate these types of issues so all could participate without alienating anyone.

    So "No BS" doesn't really fit sadly :(

    Hi all by the way....

    Sad to see the 1st event pulling >100 people.

    Sad to see the current developments.

    Just Sad. /facepalm
    -X-/Pandas - Pheo
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • spherbspherb Member Posts: 53 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    pascalb1 wrote: »
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~Askray


    Sorry I meant to comment on this and many other threads but the original content is gone, so sad too bad, musta been fun and juicy though, maybe next time
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • naz4naz4 Member Posts: 1,373 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Nazy come back!!

    Oi Oi - maybe later when the big *PVP* content is release hmmmmm.....lol
    Naz!

    /10prodigalSonMustBeAsleep

    Oi Oi wassup!!
  • brokenmirror2012brokenmirror2012 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Risa is out unless rules 1, 2 and 5 are disbanded.

    No Clickable Consoles, (seriously? I can see broken ones but that's a bit rediculus)

    No Cloak? (Really? Yea NO Just ban romulans please)

    There are no broken pets all pets working as intended. They ARENT op.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
This discussion has been closed.