test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

It's time for the Defiant to have an integrated Battle Cloak

newromulan1newromulan1 Member Posts: 2,229
edited August 2013 in Federation Discussion
Yes now that the Romulans are the Friends and allies of the Federation it's time they provided the Defiant class with a fully integrated battle cloak.

It's time starfleet demanded some compensation for all the hard work it's officers and staff have been doing for the Romulan people.

The treaty is null and void - as it was with the old empire and definitely void now that Romulans are now allies.
Post edited by newromulan1 on
«1345

Comments

  • elandarkskyelandarksky Member Posts: 1,013 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    only if the ship gets a hull, shield, shield modifier and tactical console slot decrease, then maybe.

    While using a semblance of what canon (might) dictate is one thing, ""ballance""" of the game must be maintained.

    Romulan battle cloaks come at the cost of nefed general power levels, kdf battle cloaks are limited to BoPs, the most fragile ships in the game. (the vet ship admittingly being out of my expertise on stats, so i cant really comment)
    [Combat (Self)] Your Bite deals 2378 (1475) Physical Damage(Critical) to Spawnmother.
  • timezargtimezarg Member Posts: 1,268
    edited July 2013
    Yes now that the Romulans are the Friends and allies of the Federation it's time they provided the Defiant class with a fully integrated battle cloak.

    It's time starfleet demanded some compensation for all the hard work it's officers and staff have been doing for the Romulan people.

    The treaty is null and void - as it was with the old empire and definitely void now that Romulans are now allies.

    Only if you agree to a nerf. KDF raptors suffer from lower turnrates in general, or borked turn rate axis. They also don't have a 5-tac console option, so you'd best be willing to either suggest a raptor for that or nerf the Fleet Defiant back down to 4 tac consoles.

    The Romulans are a special case, as elandarksky stated. You have to compare the Fed ships to KDF counterparts, and the KDF escort counterparts are nerfed slightly to compensate for the integrated cloak. Defiants should suffer the same.

    EDIT: Corrected a name, wasn't paying attention.
    tIqIpqu' 'ej nom tIqIp
  • newromulan1newromulan1 Member Posts: 2,229
    edited July 2013
    timezarg wrote: »
    Only if you agree to a nerf. KDF raptors suffer from lower turnrates in general, or borked turn rate axis. They also don't have a 5-tac console option, so you'd best be willing to either suggest a raptor for that or nerf the Fleet Defiant back down to 4 tac consoles.

    The Romulans are a special case, as newromulan1 stated. You have to compare the Fed ships to KDF counterparts, and the KDF escort counterparts are nerfed slightly to compensate for the integrated cloak. Defiants should suffer the same.

    Actually this whole thread is made for neoakiraii - he knows why.
  • jer5488jer5488 Member Posts: 506 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    While I don't think the Defiant or Galaxy-X need a battle cloak, I wouldn't mind if they had an integrated standard cloak. /shrug. I don't see it happening, though.
  • stardestroyer001stardestroyer001 Member Posts: 2,615 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    jer5488 wrote: »
    While I don't think the Defiant or Galaxy-X need a battle cloak, I wouldn't mind if they had an integrated standard cloak. /shrug. I don't see it happening, though.

    Agreed. No battle cloak, just built in regular cloak.
    stardestroyer001, Admiral, Explorers Fury PvE/PvP Fleet | Retired PvP Player
    Missing the good ol' days of PvP: Legacy of Romulus to Season 9
    My List of Useful Links, Recently Updated November 25 2017!
  • newromulan1newromulan1 Member Posts: 2,229
    edited July 2013
    Agreed. No battle cloak, just built in regular cloak.

    fine, fine, a built in regular cloak would free up one console slot at least.
  • mimey2mimey2 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    I'll get this out of the way first:

    Jeez...ANOTHER one of those threads.



    Ok, that's done now.

    I was actually recently thinking about this. I thought of a nice way to let everyone have what they want, without stepping on toes as much, and then maybe we can have this debate dead and finished for good:



    Federation cloaks (Gal-X and Defiant-R): Would be called a 'Federation Cloaking Device'. They would gain the ability to cloak under fire, and NOTHING ELSE.

    Klingon cloaks: Would be called 'Klingon Cloak'. All raptors and battlecruisers would gain all the benefits from battle cloak, but could still only ever cloak when not in red alert. BoPs would stay the same. Possibly give a bump to th effectiveness of all Klingon cloaks. Not gigantic, but enough to make it worthwhile.

    Romulan cloaks: Would remain the same.

    T'varo, B'rel, Scimitar (with consoles) cloaks: Stay mostly the same. Possibly for the B'rel, gain a greater amount of stealth bonus to make it a bit more unique or add in some other extra.

    Tal Shiar Adapted Destroyer and Battlecruiser: Would gain the ability to cloak under fire, but nothing else.


    There, everyone gets what they want without stepping on toes as badly as just giving feds a battle cloak with all the dressings.
    I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
    I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
  • jetwtfjetwtf Member Posts: 1,207
    edited July 2013
    I have a fleet tactical retro and if it comes with a nerf to consoles then i say hell no! the 5 tac consoles are worth more than a battle cloak to me. Thats why i have a rommie tac and a KDF tac for useing a battle cloak. a regular built in cloak i wouldnt mind so much but probably would rarely use it since I dont do pvp.

    But then what would happen to PvP if everyone had a cloak? nothing would happen in PvP at all because everyone would be cloaked waiting on the first fool to decloak so they can alpha strike them. I think wanting battle cloaks on every ship would make for very boring PvP and i dont even do PvP.
    Join Date: Nobody cares.
    "I'm drunk, whats your excuse for being an idiot?" - Unknown drunk man. :eek:
  • topsettopset Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    jetwtf wrote: »
    But then what would happen to PvP if everyone had a cloak?

    It's be EXACTLY WHAT IT'S LIKE NOW lol. PvP is just Fed-Romulans v Klingons v KDF-Romulans. Everyone has battle cloaks, and it's all stealthy decloaky alpha strikes.

    It's not like the cloaks are impenetrable though - you can detect cloaking vessels with some boff abilities.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Kirk's Protege.
  • ursusmorologusursusmorologus Member Posts: 5,328 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    If you give the c-store retrofit an integrated battlecloak, then the fleet ship wont be able to use it (it needs the console from the c-store ship). So you are really asking to have an integrated battlecloak added to the fleet ship. That really would be an OP ship. Even dialing this down to an integrated cloak would be a big deal for the fleet defiant.

    My personal opinion, is that cloak/bc/ebc should be skill-based with some combination of player skill and ship skill booster points. Say cloaking requires 100 skill points--you can use 50 points in character skill a +50 cloak device or a couple of purple cloaking consoles, or 99 character points with a booster deflector, or whatever, and there you go. Something similar with battlecloaks and enhanced battlecloaks. If that kind of model were adopted, you could get more cloaking with a much broader variety of ships without changing the ships at all, everything would come from player skill points and consoles, aka balance
  • frostovskifrostovski Member Posts: 46 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    I dunno, the feds aren't sharing their top-of-the-line ships, why should the romulans share their latest developments in cloaking technology? And giving feds battle cloak would have huge implications for balace since even raptors don't have it, only the resilient-as-cardboard BoPs and power-level-hindered warbirds.

    What I think would make a lot more sense is to give feds the option to use a basic cloaking device on ANY SHIP. I mean why should it only be used on the defiant & the gal-x? Before these where exceptions to the Treaty of Algeron, but it makes no sense whatsoever any more. The feds already have the technology to cloak ships big and small when not under fire, use it!
  • katanic123katanic123 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    The defiant doesnt need a battlecloak, it would definatly be a bonus if it was built in rather than taking up a console slot. The defiant should be classed as the equivalent of the KDF Raptor, Cryptic could then modify the Aquarius stats to be more in line with the Birds of prey, give that a battle cloak and then take my money! (please, please, please) :)
    Captain Cavillian
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • gardatgardat Member Posts: 280 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    I am all for the defiant getting a battle cloak:

    You can copy and paste the exact same stats and layout that a bird of prey has over what the defiant has currently and problem solved! No balance issues whatsoever :D
    486 DX2/66Mhz, 4MB SD-RAM, 16KB L-1 cache, 120MB HDD, 3.5" FDD, 2x CD-ROM, 8-Bit Soundblaster Pro, IBM Model M PS/2 keyboard, Microsoft trackball mouse, 256KB S3 graphics chip, 14" VGA CRT monitor, MS-DOS 6.22
  • burstorionburstorion Member Posts: 1,750 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Geeze, some feds... you whined/campaigned to get cloaks, was given it via the romulan backdoor yet you STILL want it for a fedrat ship?!?

    ...sometime words fail me...
  • tonyalmeida2tonyalmeida2 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Scimitar. Hanger. Battlecloak. 5 Tac Consoles. 5 Rom Boffs. Nice hull and shields. Can use elite disruptors or adv antiprotons or rep rom plasmas. Can use omghax valdore shield console.

    If the turn rate is a turn off (lol) use those nice fleet rcs 12s that will be out in less than 2 months. Use helmsman, use evasive maneuvers, use battlecloak, and use the tachyokinetic console (turn rate buff AND crit chance buff).

    Win.

    Poor Kumari.
    pvp = small package
  • skyranger1414skyranger1414 Member Posts: 1,785 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    timezarg wrote: »
    Only if you agree to a nerf.

    The days of balance are OVER! Look at the Roms, you don't really think they pay for their singularity abilities and battlecloak on everything do you?

    At this point they could give a defiant battlecloak without changing any stats and it'd still be inferior to a Mogai.
  • daan2006daan2006 Member Posts: 5,346 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    no no no no and more no
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    swimwear off risa not fixed
    system Lord Baal is dead
    macronius wrote: »
    This! Their ability to outdo their own failures is quite impressive. If only this power could be harnessed for good.
  • johnnymo1johnnymo1 Member Posts: 697 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    I'm all in favor of the fleet and z-store versions had a battle cloak. The Rolulan ships are superior to virtually all other ships in the game. The Defiant is a war ship, plain and simple. The hull, shields weapon and console slots should stay the same. (I personally would like to see a 4th weapon slot in the rear of the ship) The Battle cloak will go a long way to balancing the field in pvp matches as well as give the ship its proper stats and abilities.

    I also want to see all ships properly set up to their canon abilities.
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    So to sum up the arguments:
    -Federation is at war with the Klingons "BATTLECLOAK!"
    -Federation is in a struggle with the Tal Shiar "BATTLECLOAK!"
    -Federation is in an alliance wit the Romulans Republic "BATTLECLOAK!"

    I'm still waiting for someone to scream "BATTLECLOAK!" at the drop of a hat.:rolleyes:

    If the Republic is to be considered the legitimate successor state of the Romulan Star Empire then treaties that were made with the RSE would also be in effect with the RR.
    West Germany (and now the reunificated Germany) is considered to be the legitimate successor state of the German Reich...that includes treaties etc.
    Russia is considered the legitimate successor of the Soviet Union, that includes the nuclear weapons treaties etc.
    Governments rise and fall, but treaties continue after they're gone. And that means Treaty of Algeron.
    They should actually remove all the cloaks from Federation Starships...but that's something nobody wants to hear and I'm eagerly waiting for someone to attack me because I've got the "wrong" avatar and the "wrong" opinion on the matter.

    Oh, BTW I see an interesting double standard in this thread:
    To give the Defiant a battlecloak is good because it supposedly increases balance.
    To change the stats on the Defiant to counteweight the battlecloak is not needed because balance is not a factor.
    In that case the Defiant doesn't need a battlecloak for balance either because balance is not a factor.

    As far as the "warship" argument is concerned...do you honestly think Raptors (the counterpart to Defiants with lower turnrate, less shields and no intergrated battlecloak) and Warbirds are pleasure craft?
  • ebeneezergoodeebeneezergoode Member Posts: 227 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Romulans to share technology?

    I direct you to exhibit A, the rep system, and exhibit B, the Embassy consoles. There's your Romulan technology.;)
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    misterde3 wrote: »
    So to sum up the arguments:
    -Federation is at war with the Klingons "BATTLECLOAK!"
    -Federation is in a struggle with the Tal Shiar "BATTLECLOAK!"
    -Federation is in an alliance wit the Romulans Republic "BATTLECLOAK!"

    I'm still waiting for someone to scream "BATTLECLOAK!" at the drop of a hat.:rolleyes:

    Here you go:

    -I had pizza for lunch today. I needz BATTLECLOAK!!!

    There. :D Just to get it out of the way. It's not like it isn't already happening. :rolleyes:
    Romulans to share technology?

    I direct you to exhibit A, the rep system, and exhibit B, the Embassy consoles. There's your Romulan technology.;)

    ^^^ This guy knows what he's talking about!
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    shpoks wrote: »
    Here you go:

    -I had pizza for lunch today. I needz BATTLECLOAK!!!

    There. :D Just to get it out of the way. It's not like it isn't already happening. :rolleyes:

    Knowing how much I can suddenly eat when a well-done pizza is on the table...don't you mean "BELLYCLOAK!"?:P
  • linkjoylinkjoy Member Posts: 60 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    only if the ship gets a hull, shield, shield modifier and tactical console slot decrease, then maybe.

    While using a semblance of what canon (might) dictate is one thing, ""ballance""" of the game must be maintained.

    Romulan battle cloaks come at the cost of nefed general power levels, kdf battle cloaks are limited to BoPs, the most fragile ships in the game. (the vet ship admittingly being out of my expertise on stats, so i cant really comment)

    In what way, shape, or form is this game balanced?
  • redsnake721redsnake721 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    How about this:

    Fed's want the ability to get away when they are about to get killed like the Rom's and Klinks can. To cloak and run when things get to hot right?
    How about a warp core ability that does the Picard manuever. It makes you appear 2 places at once and sends your ship 10k away from your target.
    (I know thats not exactly how the picard manuever worked in the show) but it would make all the targets shooting at you to suddenly be attacking your warp shadow and not you. You would be 10k away and can hit EPTE or Evasive or whatever to heal or run. Im surprised that this ability is not in the game for Feds already as it is cannon and from the TNG series. I know we have the Jumper but this is a defensive move. And it leaves a copy of you in its place, not like photonic fleet or as in your attackers will see a flash and thats it. They still have a target lock on your shadow but you are long gone. The shadow lasts for say 3 seconds. How would that work for you?
  • ursusmorologusursusmorologus Member Posts: 5,328 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    every ship can have battlecloak for escape purposes now, with the T5 Romulan Reputation ability. it even keeps your shields up
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    How about this:

    Fed's want the ability to get away when they are about to get killed like the Rom's and Klinks can. To cloak and run when things get to hot right?
    How about a warp core ability that does the Picard manuever. It makes you appear 2 places at once and sends your ship 10k away from your target.
    (I know thats not exactly how the picard manuever worked in the show) but it would make all the targets shooting at you to suddenly be attacking your warp shadow and not you. You would be 10k away and can hit EPTE or Evasive or whatever to heal or run. Im surprised that this ability is not in the game for Feds already as it is cannon and from the TNG series. I know we have the Jumper but this is a defensive move. And it leaves a copy of you in its place, not like photonic fleet or as in your attackers will see a flash and thats it. They still have a target lock on your shadow but you are long gone. The shadow lasts for say 3 seconds. How would that work for you?

    HMMM...doesn't the Nova refit console pretty much cover most of this?
  • teklionbenrashateklionbenrasha Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    misterde3 wrote: »
    HMMM...doesn't the Nova refit console pretty much cover most of this?

    Took the words right out of my mouth.

    A battle cloak might be nice but sure isn't needed. And integrating it would sort of ruin the concept of the Tier-5 console ship vs the fleet console-less ship.

    (Disclosure: speaking as a Defiant lover)
  • redsnake721redsnake721 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    misterde3 wrote: »
    HMMM...doesn't the Nova refit console pretty much cover most of this?

    Sort of, but it does not trasport you a safe distance from your attacker. It cloaks you and it is obvious when it happens. If this consoles ability was a little steathier in its application than yes it would work well. But as it is now your attacker can see you use it and easily target and kill you as you are cloaking. If you are getting pummeled and want to escape and hit this ability your shields drop as you start to cloak and there is a 2 second delay before your photonic replacement appears. And the entire time your still getting shot and now have no shields. You attacker sees this happening and is not stupid enought to change target to attack your doppelganger. In PVE it works put in PVP it's laughable.
  • newromulan1newromulan1 Member Posts: 2,229
    edited July 2013
    Took the words right out of my mouth.

    A battle cloak might be nice but sure isn't needed. And integrating it would sort of ruin the concept of the Tier-5 console ship vs the fleet console-less ship.

    (Disclosure: speaking as a Defiant lover)

    Not really - they can integrate the ability on both the refit and the fleet version - simple coding.

    The Excel refits ability - extended transwarp is not a console - but integrated on the refit and the fleet version.

    They only made it a console to make KDF players feel better about losing a "unique" ability - but now with the Romulans having cloak, the rep system having cloak and with a few more lock-boxes - every KDF console ported to the Feds - what does it matter any more if the cloak is integrated?

    And going by canon - ALL cloaks should be battlecloaks - in the show you see defiant and Klingon battlecruisers cloaking under fire. The first one that comes to mind of the Defiant is when they are escaping DS9 after leaving before the Dominion boards the station - Defiant is under fire from some domion ships and then cloaks.

    She is right beside Martok's(my second favorite character) BoP - which cloaks at the same time:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkQizwbq7Rs
  • raslekx626raslekx626 Member Posts: 28 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    the only deal the fed has with the romulans is to put an embassy on new romulus the feds have no right to demand anything more from them other then assistance with the klingons in suport via ships not tech
    To understand the underlying philosophy of the Sith. The dark side offers power for power's sake. You must crave it. Covet it. You must SEEK POWER ABOVE ALL ELSE WITH NO RESERVATION OR HESITATION.
Sign In or Register to comment.