test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Nukara Web Mine Launcher mk XII

24

Comments

  • maicake716maicake716 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    snoge00f wrote: »
    lol yep, and the Tractor Mines are even worse now.

    i doubt they are worse then when they first came out.


    remember that?

    and the whole thing with the community asking for less pet spam then them getting released?

    and how many of them there could be! and i think it was before there was "tractor lite" and whatnot....
    mancom wrote: »
    Frankly, I think the only sound advice that one can give new players at this time is to stay away from PVP in STO.
    Science pvp at its best-http://www.youtube.com/user/matteo716
    Do you even Science Bro?
  • mimey2mimey2 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Praxi asked, and I am curious as well:

    How are tractor mines better all of a sudden?
    I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
    I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
  • iskandusiskandus Member Posts: 1,062 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    I have been using this in pvp for a few days now, with DPB1. Buffs usually include : AUX = 125, APO3, Decloak ambush bonus, Nukara T4 rep, maxed out on projectile weapon skill points, Rule 62 combat console

    Here is my feedback :

    - When they hit, they are extremely powerful, often resulting in the death of the opponent but not always

    - The time to deploy these mines are very long, from launch to dispersal to armed - the target has about a good 8-10 seconds to react when they see mines are being deployed. This is a very long time

    - Mines have not been terribly popular since the tricobalt mine nerf because they take a long time to arm and this is no exception

    - These mines don't often hit their target because in pvp, many cycle EptE continuously, and even more are flying very rapidly to the point that it is more likely that people flew into the deployed mines by chance as opposed to being caught when they were first deployed - in other words, poor piloting skill is the culpit

    - They are often cleared by the spamming of pets and FAW and I will add tractor beam repulsors as being super effective as well


    Based on no less than 8 hours of actual pvp in Kerrat and Arena + Capture & Hold, the web mines really haven't been a major factor as some claimed in this thread. They are in fact rarely seen still in pvp, let alone an epidemic level. Maybe there was a premade spamming them to no end, I have not run into them yet. Then again, it doesn't mean the weapon is broken - it means that particular premade needs to be boycotted so that they will understand no one will play them in the future if they continue such behavior. Even if I were to run into such premade, I have to question those having trouble dealing with those - the mines deployment are clearly visible and they are stationary - why don't you adjust your approach to compensate??? In a week since these start to hit the holodeck, I can say I have been hit by a grand total of 1 time. Yes, that's all. It shows how hard it is for them to actually catch their target. Romulan players can also simply use Plasma Shockwave to clear them when near. They are only problematic if you can't see them but they aren't cloaked and all mines are visible when deployed and even light up like Christmas trees when armed.

    Tonight in Kerrat, I think I was the only one using it at all. Only came to the forum after someone started to talk about the numerous threads about this in the forum. I think many are finding it hard to incorporate them into their repertoire that's why. Mines deployment is very hard to master and easily countered, that's why cryptic thought about changing the tact console buff to mines last year although they didn't go through with it. Torpedo is rare and mines even rarer in terms of their use. To be honest, I was unsure whether to keep this set up where I forced myself to add DPB1 into the boff powers.

    As for a claim earlier that if someone just use DBP3 with this, it's a "I Win " button. I think that's so far out of touch with the reality that it deserves a dose of reality check. First, to do so, you will need to give up on APO3, which in turn lowers the buff you can give to those mines by a lot. Losing APO3 means it will not only affect the damage of everything you do - not just these mines - your overall defense and movement will also drop. Given how hard it is for these mines to hit their target, few if anyone in their sound mind would take such a gamble.

    As for dedicated cloaked bombers like the T'Varo - the only way you are going to be hit by those dropped from the T'Varo is if you fly into those mines totally blind. You see, the T'Varo can't tractor you without breaking its cloak and the DBP3 caused such a big spread that not only you can hear it, you also can't miss the visual deployment especially when they are meant to be deployed near you.

    On paper, these mines are very powerful however they rarely hit their targets, especially if their target is even just half decent. At the end of the day, for every 10 times these mines are deployed, they will end up hitting their intended target maybe less than 20% of the time. Even then, it may not the entire complement of the mines, but whatever that managed to survive until they hit the target.
  • iskandusiskandus Member Posts: 1,062 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    mimey2 wrote: »
    Praxi asked, and I am curious as well:

    How are tractor mines better all of a sudden?

    They are not. I suspect many started to use them again after seeing the new NPCs spam them in the various PvE missions and story missions. People tend to mimic what they saw and thought was effective.
  • qjuniorqjunior Member Posts: 2,023 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    iskandus wrote: »
    They are not. I suspect many started to use them again after seeing the new NPCs spam them in the various PvE missions and story missions. People tend to mimic what they saw and thought was effective.

    They are definately stronger than before. I remember a Mogai killing me with them when I was leveling a new Romulan. Before LoR, they wouldn't really hold you or do any noticeable damage and they disappeared after a few seconds.

    Now they do hold you, deal damage and cloak and decloak all the time, no vanishing after 2 seconds. I did not try the player usable version though. Maybe they're only stronger for NPC's now.
  • rmy1081rmy1081 Member Posts: 2,840 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Tractor mines are stronger. A week before LoR, those mines couldn't even hold the probes in KASE. Now they do.
  • iskandusiskandus Member Posts: 1,062 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    s7ike wrote: »
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgWpmBd38GA
    Web mine test right there.
    Also, i don't know about the second time in the video but we had the cruiser put on jevonite hard points to get the full effect.

    First of all, thanks for making this video and sharing it. It's quite interesting to see.

    After examining the content, I have to say I think the test is somewhat misleading.

    Here is why:

    - The bug ship deploying the mines are using DBP3 and every single tact buff out there, including Going Down Fighting (GDF), that's why the others were shooting it prior to deployment so that GDF can be deployed

    - DBP3 is such a rarely seen skill for a reason, even dedicated cloaked bombers don't often have them, let alone a regular escort

    - Testing done with GDF is not practical because it assumes a buff that can only be situationally deployed in rare circumstnaces as now hull has to be less 50% before it can be activated

    - I noticed APA was also used to buff up the mines - however, APA has a 2 minutes CD so you can use it with these mines only 25% of the time assuming deployment at every 30 sec. interval to match the mines's CD, again not very practical

    - The testing ignored the most important aspect of a mine's weakness - catching its opponent when they actually move : You will almost never encounter a stationary opponent in PvP, not unless they have passed out in front of their monitor, so how does the said bug ship intends to use these mines effectively with DBP3 without another skill(s) to disable or hold their target without them escaping easily?

    - Bug ship with DBP3 will have very few means of disabling its opponent for 8-10 seconds for these mines to deploy, armed and start moving so while this is interesting on paper, the demonstration is very much theoretical, as opposed to being practical

    - Theoretical damage really isn't very helpful in pvp unless they can translate into actual hits




    So what you have shown in this vid is that these mines can be very powerful with the right buffs. Except those buffs aren't always present and if and only if your opponent simply lays there for you to mine them, which is not going to happen in pvp.
  • snoge00fsnoge00f Member Posts: 1,812 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    praxi5 wrote: »
    How so?

    /10char

    It may just be me, but I don't recall the original mines holding as long as these mines do. They got buffed with the LoR release, for some dumb reason.

    At the very least they are as bad as they original were.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • snoge00fsnoge00f Member Posts: 1,812 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    iskandus wrote: »
    ...

    Oh look, it's someone who hasn't actually used or have had the mines used on him in PvP.

    And he's moved on from championing the defense of the Valdore console, to the Web mines now. :P
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • skyranger1414skyranger1414 Member Posts: 1,785 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    snoge00f wrote: »
    It may just be me, but I don't recall the original mines holding as long as these mines do. They got buffed with the LoR release, for some dumb reason.

    At the very least they are as bad as they original were.

    It wouldn't be STO if stealth changes weren't the standard would it?
  • scurry5scurry5 Member Posts: 1,554 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    iskandus wrote: »
    First of all, thanks for making this video and sharing it. It's quite interesting to see.

    After examining the content, I have to say I think the test is somewhat misleading.

    Here is why:

    - The bug ship deploying the mines are using DBP3 and every single tact buff out there, including Going Down Fighting (GDF), that's why the others were shooting it prior to deployment so that GDF can be deployed

    - DBP3 is such a rarely seen skill for a reason, even dedicated cloaked bombers don't often have them, let alone a regular escort
    Even if you leave out GDF, assuming half damage, you're still taking about half your entire hull - right through the shields. Is that not greater by an order of magnitude compared to any other weapon? Furthermore, the target of the mines was a cruiser. What if it was an escort that got hit? Or even a Sci ship? GDF would not be needed to pop that person.

    DBP3 was so unused because there were no good mines to use them with. Now that there are, well, people will begin gravitating towards using them.
    - Testing done with GDF is not practical because it assumes a buff that can only be situationally deployed in rare circumstnaces as now hull has to be less 50% before it can be activated

    - I noticed APA was also used to buff up the mines - however, APA has a 2 minutes CD so you can use it with these mines only 25% of the time assuming deployment at every 30 sec. interval to match the mines's CD, again not very practical

    - The testing ignored the most important aspect of a mine's weakness - catching its opponent when they actually move : You will almost never encounter a stationary opponent in PvP, not unless they have passed out in front of their monitor, so how does the said bug ship intends to use these mines effectively with DBP3 without another skill(s) to disable or hold their target without them escaping easily?

    - Bug ship with DBP3 will have very few means of disabling its opponent for 8-10 seconds for these mines to deploy, armed and start moving so while this is interesting on paper, the demonstration is very much theoretical, as opposed to being practical

    - Theoretical damage really isn't very helpful in pvp unless they can translate into actual hits

    All of which are valid points to think about. However, all of them were stated in the argument against tricobalt mines. Those were nerfed. In the almost exact same way, Tholian Web Mines can be said to be over the top.
    Mines have not been terribly popular since the tricobalt mine nerf because they take a long time to arm and this is no exception

    Please note: since the tricobalt mine nerf. Now, these mines are nearly the equal of tricobalt mines before the nerf. Hence, it is pretty near certain that these mines will be as popular as tric mines were before the nerf.
    Tonight in Kerrat, I think I was the only one using it at all. Only came to the forum after someone started to talk about the numerous threads about this in the forum. I think many are finding it hard to incorporate them into their repertoire that's why.

    And I would say you are mistaken. The reason being that these mines require plenty of resources to get, alongside needing t4 Nukara rep. I doubt that the majority of players have the marks/rep to obtain these mines just yet, and many simply focus on getting rep done first. Furthermore, few realize the potential these mines can have to create havoc. Once more start using them, you'll most likely see their popularity increasing.
  • mimey2mimey2 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Y'know, the real interesting thing isn't so much the 'potential' damage with a full alpha running, or if these have counters, how OP they may or may not be...

    ...more that a lot of folks aren't quite catching just how effective these can be in a busy environment.

    You give me someone good with mines (and I do mean actually skilled, not just spamming them), and no matter their ship, no matter their class, they will kill over and over with these, and there's going to be little a person can do about it.

    Just as there are counters to mines, there are counters to the counters. And strategies around them.

    My personal favorite is a simple one: Dummy mines.

    Or in other words, you purposefully drop mines of your choosing with the sake of knowing that they will probably use a counter on them. Like a FAW, or a TBR, etc. Or hope that they try and waste an 'escape button' like APO, Evasives, Deuterium Surplus, etc. There are lots of fun things to do with them. I prefer transphasic mines if I want to hopefully do a little damage, or chroniton mines for a hopeful slow effect.

    Once they waste their counters, I weaken them somehow, like a FOMM *if they have no TT*, or, as I usually run sci in these ships, an SNB/SS combo to make sure they can't do much of anything and they are gonna take a lot more damage. Once that's all nice and taken care of, then I launch my real mines and kill them off.

    Generally I also add in ways of hiding mines, quite useful. Scramble Sensors (without DOFF) is a personal favorite. Great for hiding Tric mines right as it hits, it well, messes up their screen for a few moments due to that big white ball exploding, so what better way to hide them? Also, a bit of EWP is an excellent choice (when it doesn't glitch), as it also acts as a slow. Lots of fun things really.


    Which is where the real danger comes in, vids are nice and all, but you get someone ACTUALLY good with mines, and then they go from just a potential 'I-win' button to an 'I always win' button.
    I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
    I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
  • eisenw0lfeisenw0lf Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Do these mines do AoE damage like tricobalts?

    Thing is, I tested tricobalts extensively in both PvE and PvP in a B'rel bomber and found them not to be really worthwile in the usual PvP environment. The amount of spam, AoE and random explosions in PvP almost always destroyed them before they could arm. Only one or two mines occasionally went off and did some damage and wiped pets from the area, but that's it. Without their AoE I would have dropped them even before the nerf. Granted there was this one cheese build with the timestop console, but I didn't encounter this one very often (this one might have a comeback with the nukara mines though ...).

    IMO tricobalts only really showed their power in PvE where I could easily kill structures and boss enemy in just a few seconds. This is also probably the main reason they got nerfed so heavily and not because of their impact in PvP. Now that pretty much everyone is running EPtE with 100% uptime and PvP battles often quickly shift from one edge of the map to another I don't see how mines can be used effectively. The video is nice, but when do we ever encounter a sitting duck in PvP apart from AFKers?
  • iskandusiskandus Member Posts: 1,062 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    scurry5 wrote: »
    Even if you leave out GDF, assuming half damage, you're still taking about half your entire hull - right through the shields. Is that not greater by an order of magnitude compared to any other weapon? Furthermore, the target of the mines was a cruiser. What if it was an escort that got hit? Or even a Sci ship? GDF would not be needed to pop that person.

    Except the assumption in there still includes DPB3 and other buffs such as APA and APO, all of which are big ifs. Even if just one of the above isn't present, the damage potential drops dramatically. I know because I have been actually using it in pvp. When my mines are fired with all the buffs, they are very powerful, otherwise, not so much.
    DBP3 was so unused because there were no good mines to use them with. Now that there are, well, people will begin gravitating towards using them.

    Not sure about that. See, I run a dedicated Transphasic build. Prior to acquiring these mines, there is nothing but Transphasic Torpedos on my ship. At one point, I even installed one Mk XII purple Transphasic mines to be used with DPB3 but gave it up after just a few days. In theory, that one mine which disperse up to 14 mines at once with all the buffs that I have can hit about 1.8K of post-shield base damage per mine due to its 80% bleedthrough. 1.8K X 14, pretty close to a base damage of 25K in one swoop and let's not even mention what would happen if they go critical. There is however some big problems with this, one of it being the sacrifice of APO3 and the other is the difficulty for these mines to hit their target. Eventually, it was decided that the hit % is too low for these mines or the DBP3 to worth its while. Even with these web mines, I am still not going back to DBP3. Simply put, there are too many situations in pvp where you need APO3 to save your behind so its exclusion would be pretty much suicidal. The compromise is DPB1 and that's where it will stay.
    All of which are valid points to think about. However, all of them were stated in the argument against tricobalt mines. Those were nerfed. In the almost exact same way, Tholian Web Mines can be said to be over the top.

    Interesting argument except the other powers have also been modified / changed greatly since the time of tricobalt mines epidemic. For one thing, no one could have 100% uptime with their EptE. Plasma shockwave didn't exist. And Dilithium mine and their enhanced armors don't either, and much much more. It's one thing to look at a power in isolation, it's quite another when put in practice and see how they interact in the real world or else, the great weapon in theory remains just that, a paper tiger, nothing more

    Please note: since the tricobalt mine nerf. Now, these mines are nearly the equal of tricobalt mines before the nerf. Hence, it is pretty near certain that these mines will be as popular as tric mines were before the nerf.

    There is no evidence in support of this theory however. It's been almost two weeks since the first people started to acquire them in the Holodeck. So far, they are still rarely seen. However, when the Adapted Destroyer were made available, people were flying them all over the place by the 2nd day of LoR. And 2 weeks is a very long time on STO.

    And I would say you are mistaken. The reason being that these mines require plenty of resources to get, alongside needing t4 Nukara rep. I doubt that the majority of players have the marks/rep to obtain these mines just yet, and many simply focus on getting rep done first. Furthermore, few realize the potential these mines can have to create havoc. Once more start using them, you'll most likely see their popularity increasing.

    I don't agree with that. PvP tend to have the highest concentration of "dedicated" players. It's been almost two weeks since the first wave of them hit T4 Nukara as the T5 is nothing to write home about and would have acquired this long ago. It would make more sense to review this issue once we are actually seeing a real epidemic use of this weapon. Until then, it's just pure speculation based on conjecture.
  • iskandusiskandus Member Posts: 1,062 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    mimey2 wrote: »

    You give me someone good with mines (and I do mean actually skilled, not just spamming them), and no matter their ship, no matter their class, they will kill over and over with these, and there's going to be little a person can do about it.

    Only if your opponent is a dummy. You will surprise them once, maybe twice. Soon or later, they will adapt. Even the BoP Alpha is becoming rare in Kerrat these days. People adapt, technology changes so some tactics will fall out of favor.

    Just as there are counters to mines, there are counters to the counters. And strategies around them.

    Indeed, except there are enough variety in the counters such that you can't anticipate them all. Jotkom ran a Klink Sci carrier as an engineer. He can really be a PvP coach on how to counter massive alpha attacks involving mines. I wish I had recorded my skirmishes with him in Kerrat two days ago. I was in awe how he dodged my attacks, including jam sensors and subnukes, not to mention countless number of cluster torps and DBP dispersed web mines. Occasionally, he will be hit but not enough to kill him. The downside is his attacks had less pressure so he was on the defensive all the time but I couldn't kill him on my own - well except once, when I ambushed him in surprise. I have been thinking if I see him next, I will be using Theta Radiation because he is a slow carrier and I will be making sure his HE is overwhelmed.

    Once they waste their counters, I weaken them somehow, like a FOMM *if they have no TT*, or, as I usually run sci in these ships, an SNB/SS combo to make sure they can't do much of anything and they are gonna take a lot more damage. Once that's all nice and taken care of, then I launch my real mines and kill them off.

    Generally I also add in ways of hiding mines, quite useful. Scramble Sensors (without DOFF) is a personal favorite. Great for hiding Tric mines right as it hits, it well, messes up their screen for a few moments due to that big white ball exploding, so what better way to hide them? Also, a bit of EWP is an excellent choice (when it doesn't glitch), as it also acts as a slow. Lots of fun things really.

    What you are describing is some of the effective combo attacks that MUST accompany these mines to make them useable. And you are correct - on their own, these mines have almost no chance of ever hitting their target saving for some people stupid enough to fly into them themselves and yes, it happens all the time. Did you notice all these supportive powers described are virtually all sci powers? Precisely, a DHC happy Escort will not be able to use these combos as they don't have the necessary Sci power to support them. At best, they will have a tractor beam and it's not even going to be tractor beam 3 and that's all. In other words, this isn't some I Win button for anyone and everyone. Rather, in order to make these work - one requires a dedicated build which only Sci oriented ships or captains can pull it off.

    Given how the DPS of this game has been so biased towards the Escorts for a long time, isn't it logical to tip the balance back more justly by giving the Sci a weapon that allows them to keep the Escorts in check? Conversely, why should this weapon be "balanced" so that Escorts can once again fly anywhere and everywhere mindlessly without any fear? Cruisers really don't have fear for this weapon, Jotkom is the proof. It seems to me, this whole thread is yet another veiled attempt by crying Escorts hoping to nerf something that doesn't favor them.

    Which is where the real danger comes in, vids are nice and all, but you get someone ACTUALLY good with mines, and then they go from just a potential 'I-win' button to an 'I always win' button.

    You can pull it off Jotkom, then I'll believe you. Good luck is all I can say to you. Really, I think you are underestimating the intelligence of a lot of PvPers.
  • iskandusiskandus Member Posts: 1,062 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    eisenw0lf wrote: »
    Do these mines do AoE damage like tricobalts?

    Thing is, I tested tricobalts extensively in both PvE and PvP in a B'rel bomber and found them not to be really worthwile in the usual PvP environment. The amount of spam, AoE and random explosions in PvP almost always destroyed them before they could arm. Only one or two mines occasionally went off and did some damage and wiped pets from the area, but that's it. Without their AoE I would have dropped them even before the nerf. Granted there was this one cheese build with the timestop console, but I didn't encounter this one very often (this one might have a comeback with the nukara mines though ...).

    IMO tricobalts only really showed their power in PvE where I could easily kill structures and boss enemy in just a few seconds. This is also probably the main reason they got nerfed so heavily and not because of their impact in PvP. Now that pretty much everyone is running EPtE with 100% uptime and PvP battles often quickly shift from one edge of the map to another I don't see how mines can be used effectively. The video is nice, but when do we ever encounter a sitting duck in PvP apart from AFKers?

    The web mines are definitely not AOE.
  • drkfrontiersdrkfrontiers Member Posts: 2,477 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    iskandus wrote: »
    The web mines are definitely not AOE.

    Unless that area just happens to be your ship :P

    They should really rename the description of these mines to be more indicative of their fatal attraction.

    I was thinking something along the lines of, "10..9..8..7..1.. {Help me!}".

    Perhaps for artistic flare, throw in a nice little annotation [in a weak emasculated kitten voice]: "10..9..8..7..1.. {Help me!}"
  • snoge00fsnoge00f Member Posts: 1,812 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Don't waste your time with that guy.

    He's just another console kid who doesn't want his toys taken away.

    He showed it in that Valdore thread, and now here again.

    And he's a 1v1er too, lulz, so his experience doesn't cover teamplay at all.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • eminencegriseeminencegrise Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    While the amount of damage the mines can do needs looking at, surely they must have been intended to do kinetic damage rather than physical damage? It seems extremely odd for a space weapon of any kind to do physical damage.
  • scurry5scurry5 Member Posts: 1,554 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    I had an idea for these things to deal with the damage. If the damage applied is unresistable, as has been stated, it only makes sense that the damage should be unbuffable.

    Honestly, though, the stun on these things is bad enough. They would have plenty of utility even if they didn't have damage.
  • shailatshailat Member Posts: 478 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    it makes me sad to think of all the marks i would still need to grind to max the rep, AND to get this weapon to try it out. sounds horrifyingly op, its like the ice shotgun in space

    Hmm i remember in the past when us grounders complained about the shotgun all you spacers and pvers said "Can't you put a environment suit on to nullify the effects of the gun?"
    well here it comes!!!!!


    Can't you use fire at will to shoot the mines before they attach themselves to your ship?
    Can't you use Tractor beam repulsers to push them away from your ship?
    Cant you use phonitic shock-wave to destroy most of them?
    Cant you you Cannon Scatter Volly to destroy most of them?
    Cant you use Torp Spread to destroy most of them?
    ogew7.jpg
  • scurry5scurry5 Member Posts: 1,554 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    shailat wrote: »
    Hmm i remember in the past when us grounders complained about the shotgun all you spacers and pvers said "Can't you put a environment suit on to nullify the effects of the gun?"
    well here it comes!!!!!


    Can't you use fire at will to shoot the mines before they attach themselves to your ship?
    Can't you use Tractor beam repulsers to push them away from your ship?
    Cant you use phonitic shock-wave to destroy most of them?
    Cant you you Cannon Scatter Volly to destroy most of them?
    Cant you use Torp Spread to destroy most of them?

    Read the thread. Same arguments were made for tric mines and for this. Don't generalise between communities. Some people disagreed with you. Different people are calling for balance here. Don't blame us for something we didn't do. Besides, players got their wish that time anyway. Cryo pulsewave was nerfed. If the situations are truly analogous, as you say, webmines should also be nerfed.

    Why are you holding a grudge for so long, anyway? Isn't healthy. Take your misguided, quixotic quest for revenge elsewhere.
  • praxi5praxi5 Member Posts: 1,562 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    shailat wrote: »
    Hmm i remember in the past when us grounders complained about the shotgun all you spacers and pvers said "Can't you put a environment suit on to nullify the effects of the gun?"
    well here it comes!!!!!


    Can't you use fire at will to shoot the mines before they attach themselves to your ship?
    Can't you use Tractor beam repulsers to push them away from your ship?
    Cant you use phonitic shock-wave to destroy most of them?
    Cant you you Cannon Scatter Volly to destroy most of them?
    Cant you use Torp Spread to destroy most of them?

    I have 2 Torp Spreads, Gravity Well (with purple Aftershock DOff), Eject Warp Plasma, and a set of Transphasic Mines... yet, I still get trapped in these.
  • mimey2mimey2 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    scurry5 wrote: »
    I had an idea for these things to deal with the damage. If the damage applied is unresistable, as has been stated, it only makes sense that the damage should be unbuffable.

    Honestly, though, the stun on these things is bad enough. They would have plenty of utility even if they didn't have damage.

    Good idea. If we can't resist the damage, then nothing should buff the damage.

    Or switch em to kinetic damage, then even if they are buffable, they can be easily resisted at least.

    Though I do think that they are totally ignoring shields and doing 100% bleedthrough.
    I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
    I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
  • dontdrunkimshootdontdrunkimshoot Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    shailat wrote: »
    Hmm i remember in the past when us grounders complained about the shotgun all you spacers and pvers said "Can't you put a environment suit on to nullify the effects of the gun?"
    well here it comes!!!!!


    Can't you use fire at will to shoot the mines before they attach themselves to your ship?
    Can't you use Tractor beam repulsers to push them away from your ship?
    Cant you use phonitic shock-wave to destroy most of them?
    Cant you you Cannon Scatter Volly to destroy most of them?
    Cant you use Torp Spread to destroy most of them?

    i was never one who dismissed that issue. a gun dealing damage theres no defense from i immediately thought was huge problem. though something that doesn't effect me, i argued against its existence on principle.
  • snoge00fsnoge00f Member Posts: 1,812 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    shailat wrote: »
    Hmm i remember in the past when us grounders complained about the shotgun all you spacers and pvers said "Can't you put a environment suit on to nullify the effects of the gun?"

    lol if they said that, they were probably saying it out of ignorance not malice.

    And whether or not anyone said anything, doesn't mean Cryptic can't fix the imbalance.

    The point stands though, these mines are too good for how little you give up to get and use them.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • snoge00fsnoge00f Member Posts: 1,812 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    i was never one who dismissed that issue. a gun dealing damage theres no defense from i immediately thought was huge problem. though something that doesn't effect me, i argued against its existence on principle.

    Yeah me too.

    The only people I saw defending that gun, were the people who were exploting the gun in conjunction with other combos that made it stupid-good.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • gojoredgojored Member Posts: 90 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    ya know, i really really wish that if it HAD to be nerfed, they could do it in respect to pvp only. i am so very sick of one shot invisitorps or invisibolts of particle fury that kill several ships in one shot, that i would love to give some back via this web mine weapon. please consider that option if it has to be nerfed, or at least give a player an easier way to pop the webmine op bubble in pvp only?

    i know...no use i guess, it will prolly be de-balled fast enough, but i had to speak up for pve-ers, i dont even mess with pvp.
    [SIGPIC]tritrophic mutualism: we get a viable game experience, and perfect worlds new ai "ARC" dines on our zen[/SIGPIC]
  • iskandusiskandus Member Posts: 1,062 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    gojored wrote: »
    ya know, i really really wish that if it HAD to be nerfed, they could do it in respect to pvp only. i am so very sick of one shot invisitorps or invisibolts of particle fury that kill several ships in one shot, that i would love to give some back via this web mine weapon. please consider that option if it has to be nerfed, or at least give a player an easier way to pop the webmine op bubble in pvp only?

    i know...no use i guess, it will prolly be de-balled fast enough, but i had to speak up for pve-ers, i dont even mess with pvp.

    It is more likely that the DHC will be nerfed first before these mines.
  • aethon3050aethon3050 Member Posts: 599 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    gojored wrote: »
    ya know, i really really wish that if it HAD to be nerfed, they could do it in respect to pvp only. i am so very sick of one shot invisitorps or invisibolts of particle fury that kill several ships in one shot, that i would love to give some back via this web mine weapon. please consider that option if it has to be nerfed, or at least give a player an easier way to pop the webmine op bubble in pvp only?

    i know...no use i guess, it will prolly be de-balled fast enough, but i had to speak up for pve-ers, i dont even mess with pvp.

    This. Nerfing useful PVE items because the PVP min-maxers are abusing it is lame; what they do in PVP is no longer my problem, since I stopped doing PVP after I got bored with it about a year ago.
Sign In or Register to comment.