test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

So, why can't FED cruisers have dual cannons/heavy cannons?

jkwrangler2010jkwrangler2010 Member Posts: 263 Arc User
Anyone else wonder why cruisers can't have heavy or dual cannons? I know there will be people saying "cruisers are too slow to use cannons." Shouldn't it be up to the individual player to decide if they want to run cannons on a slow ship? The majority of Klingon and probably Romulan ships can all equip cannons stronger then singles. Not to mention lock box ships; Cardassian, Domionion, Breen, Tholian, Temporal and Romulan [unsure of Ferengi].

I just find it dumb that small ships like the Defiant can have dual heavy cannons but large ships like an Excelsior, Ambassador, Sovereign, Galaxy etc can't. Yes, I do know Starfleets main mission is exploration. But with how the story line goes in the game, war is still the overshadowing factor of gameplay. The Dominion War just ended, the Borg are still a threat and so are all of the regular enemies like True Way, Tal Shiar, Tholians, Undine etc. I know cannons would be mostly useless in story missions, but I could put them to good use in PVE against large enemy cruisers, battleships and dreadnoughts. I mean, a Borg Cube is a big enough target that even an Odyssey with dual heavy cannons could easily hit.

It's discriminatory that all other ships can have heavy cannons but I can't on my cruiser.

:(
Post edited by jkwrangler2010 on
«1

Comments

  • polie05polie05 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Because they can't turn for $&@#. Cruisers use beams due to the fact they can't keep the dhc on target. If your still silly about dhc get the deadnaught or vesta 3 pack.
  • captainrevo1captainrevo1 Member Posts: 3,948 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    its because Federation ships dont use duel cannons in the shows (except for the defiant of course).
  • bitemepwebitemepwe Member Posts: 6,760 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    I was under the impression that some could use Dual cannons.
    Leonard Nimoy, Spock.....:(

    R.I.P
  • jestersagejestersage Member Posts: 8 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Regarding to the argument of "how the story line goes in Star Trek canon or the game", you do notice the following:
    -One of the first new ship developed is Prometheus, an Escort
    -The Galaxy-X or Vesta or Atrox - ships of 25th century, are capable of equiping cannons.

    Just because JJ's vengeance can equip cannon doesn't mean this timeline's cruiser can. In fact, apparently those are more of a torpedo banks, ala Escort carrier's TPDS.
  • anazondaanazonda Member Posts: 8,399 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Yay... I am always up for kicking a dead horse.

    Because it would be silly to equip a weapon with only 45 degree fireing ark on ship that can barely turn...

    But hey... I am all in for it... i'd love to see cruisers try to attack my speedy little defiant while having cannons equipped.

    Die horse, DIE.
    Don't look silly... Don't call it the "Z-Store/Zen Store"...
    Let me put the rumors to rest: it's definitely still the C-Store (Cryptic Store) It just takes ZEN.
    Like Duty Officers? Support effords to gather ideas
  • stealthriderstealthrider Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    FYI the Galor cannot use DHCs.
  • blafiblafi Member Posts: 68 Arc User
    edited June 2013

    It's discriminatory that all other ships can have heavy cannons but I can't on my cruiser.

    :(

    That maybe true but it's better to have 1 topic like this once in a while then daily whining about useless dhc's on fed cruisers.:D

    moradum: I got banned for saying "I started my day with cutting off 3 MM off of the bottom of my cabinet"
    http://www.elitedefensestarfleet.com
  • newromulan1newromulan1 Member Posts: 2,229
    edited June 2013
    anazonda wrote: »
    Yay... I am always up for kicking a dead horse.

    Because it would be silly to equip a weapon with only 45 degree fireing ark on ship that can barely turn...

    But hey... I am all in for it... i'd love to see cruisers try to attack my speedy little defiant while having cannons equipped.

    Die horse, DIE.

    I am sure the Failxy-X can load DHC
  • beerxhyperbeerxhyper Member Posts: 676 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    polie05 wrote: »
    Because they can't turn for $&@#. Cruisers use beams due to the fact they can't keep the dhc on target. If your still silly about dhc get the deadnaught or vesta 3 pack.

    i'm sorry but what? excuse me since when can the Ha'apek warbird and the De'direk can turn on a dime? i for one would love duel heavy cannons on my fed ships and if u wanna get technical voyager had borg modified dual heavy cannons on it for 2 maybe 3 episodes when fighting the undine so it is possible.


  • tc10btc10b Member Posts: 1,549 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    anazonda wrote: »
    Die horse, DIE.
    He's dead Jim.
  • theonerussian762theonerussian762 Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    I think that at least the Galor should 8e a8le to fire DHCs. Hell, why not all cruisers? I mean, if a captain can keep his/her heavy cruiser on point within a 45 degree angle, why not reward him/her for it?
  • stirling191stirling191 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    beerxhyper wrote: »
    i'm sorry but what? excuse me since when can the Ha'apek warbird and the De'direk can turn on a dime? i for one would love duel heavy cannons on my fed ships and if u wanna get technical voyager had borg modified dual heavy cannons on it for 2 maybe 3 episodes when fighting the undine so it is possible.

    Those were torpedoes.
    I think that at least the Galor should 8e a8le to fire DHCs. Hell, why not all cruisers? I mean, if a captain can keep his/her heavy cruiser on point within a 45 degree angle, why not reward him/her for it?

    Because not every ship gets to do everything. If you want to have dhcs, fly a ship that has been shown, or known, to load cannons.
  • cha0s1428cha0s1428 Member Posts: 416 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    I used to feel the same way about wanting DHCs on my fed cruiser. Now that the RCS and SIT have massively increased our turn rates, as well as EPtE being awesome now, I am running with Dual Beams and having more fun, and doing more damage that I thought possible.

    Try them out.
  • jtoney3448jtoney3448 Member Posts: 642 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    beerxhyper wrote: »
    i'm sorry but what? excuse me since when can the Ha'apek warbird and the De'direk can turn on a dime? i for one would love duel heavy cannons on my fed ships and if u wanna get technical voyager had borg modified dual heavy cannons on it for 2 maybe 3 episodes when fighting the undine so it is possible.

    The reason why roms can is they get a cloak, they can ambush and alpha strike. An assault cruiser cant. The KDF pay for DHC/turnrate/cloak with less hull. DHC are great on a cruiser if your target sits still forever like in an STF, other then that your out your mind to try that on a cruiser without cloak/MES3.

    Single cannons work great on tac cruisers, same with dual beams, you dont NEED DHC's its the fact that you dont have them that you want them. People can push 10k dps builds with beam arrays/torpedos, look into those.

    All else fails get a Dakora/Galaxy X. I fly my KDF dakora with 4 dhc/3 turrets 1 kcb and pvp with it. Even with high turn rate on it 25+ its hard to keep dhc on target, i rock it but i know id be far more effective with beams. This game has already become escorts online lets not make it worse with DHC or bust! on every ship. DHC on a cruiser without alpha strike will be lucky to bust someones shields before they just out circle you and whoop your TRIBBLE with beams, with EptE its hard to even keep escorts ontarget with the looneytoon speed people are cruising at atm.
  • caemgencaemgen Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    I don't know why but I've never thought it through more than canon and the hard fact that different ships have different strengths.

    Why can't cruisers and escorts get sensor analysis and subsystem targetting? We've seen the Enterprise(s) and Defiant do both. It's because science ships, and we know some are better suited than others, have something they do *best*, represented in game by Science Ship traits.

    Why don't cruisers get DCs/DHCs? Because that's an escort thing. Klingons and Romulans get to spread that restriction, but they pay for it with something else.
  • savnokasavnoka Member Posts: 176 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    It's discriminatory that all other ships can have heavy cannons but I can't on my cruiser.

    :(


    I believe it's called game balance. Cruisers, for their role, are supposed to tank. For some reason in every game, people want to have it all, a tank that can DPS.


    It's not about 'canon' , it's about game balance. A properly built cruiser laying beams on broadside with FAW can do good damage, as long as you utilize the proper skills with it. Putting DHC's on cruisers would only do two things:

    1) increase the number of people complaining about turn rates who insist on stuffing their ships with beam banks and wanting them to turn like BoP's
    2) complain about cruiser DPS (rolls eyes)

    Both of those arguments are hardly worth having.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ursusmorologusursusmorologus Member Posts: 5,328 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    There's no good reason anymore, so much tech has been spread around and the game has become very homogenized. If somebody wants to put them on a cruiser, let them go at it.
  • neoakiraiineoakiraii Member Posts: 7,468 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    GwaoHAD.png
  • timezargtimezarg Member Posts: 1,268
    edited June 2013
    No, the real simple answer, and the answer to any Feddie who brings this up, is this: Because they don't, that's why. You want cruisers that carry DHCs, play KDF (or just use your Romulan puppets). It's one of the few remaining performance-related reasons why anyone would play KDF.
    tIqIpqu' 'ej nom tIqIp
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Mainly due to the movies and shows they didn't equip them. Plus Federation ships really didn't get into mounting cannons. Until the Borg and Dominion Wars hit. Then they finally decided to get some more weaponry on the ships. Look how the ships started evolving after those brutal times. With more and more threats it was time for upgrades. Which is why some of the newer ships can use cannons.

    Personally I'm good with just the beam arrays on my Federation ships. I don't mind broadsiding my target to death. So I don't really need cannons on my Federation Cruisers.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • beerxhyperbeerxhyper Member Posts: 676 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    jtoney3448 wrote: »
    The reason why roms can is they get a cloak, they can ambush and alpha strike. An assault cruiser cant. The KDF pay for DHC/turnrate/cloak with less hull. DHC are great on a cruiser if your target sits still forever like in an STF, other then that your out your mind to try that on a cruiser without cloak/MES3.

    Single cannons work great on tac cruisers, same with dual beams, you dont NEED DHC's its the fact that you dont have them that you want them. People can push 10k dps builds with beam arrays/torpedos, look into those.

    All else fails get a Dakora/Galaxy X. I fly my KDF dakora with 4 dhc/3 turrets 1 kcb and pvp with it. Even with high turn rate on it 25+ its hard to keep dhc on target, i rock it but i know id be far more effective with beams. This game has already become escorts online lets not make it worse with DHC or bust! on every ship. DHC on a cruiser without alpha strike will be lucky to bust someones shields before they just out circle you and whoop your TRIBBLE with beams, with EptE its hard to even keep escorts ontarget with the looneytoon speed people are cruising at atm.

    oh i'd love to have dual heavy cannons/turrets on my enterprise E wanna be fed ship but i already know it won't happen and again i still wanna stat what i said from the other guy since when does my romulan Ha'apek advanced warbird turn on a dime 5.5 turn rate is blah even with the evasive manuvers skill i mean 5.5 is what .5 more then the De'dericks turn rate? my fed ship can run circles on it lol.


  • jorantomalakjorantomalak Member Posts: 7,133 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    beerxhyper wrote: »
    i'm sorry but what? excuse me since when can the Ha'apek warbird and the De'direk can turn on a dime? i for one would love duel heavy cannons on my fed ships and if u wanna get technical voyager had borg modified dual heavy cannons on it for 2 maybe 3 episodes when fighting the undine so it is possible.

    they dont but using DHCs on a ship that can decloak launch a devastating alpha strike then recloak and hit you again with yet another decloak alpha can be devastating.

    The added weapons power buff upon decloak makes it even more devastating aswell also any romulan ship gets a nice turn buff while cloaked.

    so DHCs on a romulan warbird like the d'deridex and ha'apax is practicle.
  • age03age03 Member Posts: 1,664 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    You could try making one uisng 3 dc or dhc 1 torp and 4 turret in the rear.

    Here is an example.

    http://skillplanner.stoacademy.com/?build=age05_0
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Age StarTrek-Gamers Administrator
    USS WARRIOR NCC 1720 Commanding Officer
    Star Trek Gamers
  • edited June 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • ccarmichael07ccarmichael07 Member Posts: 755 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    What we really need are broadside Dual Heavy Cannons, so we can warp into a fight and start unloading on the enemy like Imperial Star Destroyers!

    :rolleyes:


    "You shoot him, I shoot you, I leave both your bodies here and go out for a late night snack.
    I'm thinking maybe pancakes." ~ John Casey
  • jkwrangler2010jkwrangler2010 Member Posts: 263 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Actually, that would be awesome. Would be like an AC-130 Spectre gunship.
  • ccarmichael07ccarmichael07 Member Posts: 755 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Actually, that would be awesome. Would be like an AC-130 Spectre gunship.

    Of course it would be awesome...if this were a Star Wars: Online - Legacy of the Force.

    But its not.

    This is Star Trek Online - Legacy of Romulus, where Federation cruisers use beam arrays.


    "You shoot him, I shoot you, I leave both your bodies here and go out for a late night snack.
    I'm thinking maybe pancakes." ~ John Casey
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,897 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    I notice no one is complaining about Sci ships not having cannons, if you want to be so selfish then I'm glad cruisers don't get cannons! :P
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • edited June 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • ursusmorologusursusmorologus Member Posts: 5,328 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    timezarg wrote: »
    No, the real simple answer, and the answer to any Feddie who brings this up, is this: Because they don't, that's why. You want cruisers that carry DHCs, play KDF (or just use your Romulan puppets). It's one of the few remaining performance-related reasons why anyone would play KDF.

    that ship done sailed with Romulans
Sign In or Register to comment.