test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

No To Federation Carriers !

124»

Comments

  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited October 2010
    Asakara wrote:
    Each time some Klingons complain and demand that the Feds never get something... They get it.
    Actually, it's only about some Feds whining about how they want to have everything everybody else has, too. Because some people apparently dislike diversity and want every faction to be a carbon copy of the other. The Klingons' opinion does not count, whether they approve or disapprove. :)
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited October 2010
    Klingons don't have Science Vessels.
    Starfleet doesn't have Warships.

    Instead, Klingons have warships with excellent science labatories and sensors.
    Instead, Starfleet has exploration ships with excellent armnament and shielding.

    ;)
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited October 2010
    Valias wrote:
    Actually, it's only about some Feds whining about how they want to have everything everybody else has, too. Because some people apparently dislike diversity and want every faction to be a carbon copy of the other. The Klingons' opinion does not count, whether they approve or disapprove. :)

    It's not actually that.
    Feds don't want one faction to be a carbon-copy of the other.
    Their argument is another:
    Feds are the good guys which means whatever the other guy has, the Feds must have too
    (cloaks better yet battlecloaks, carriers, an unlimited number of universal slots).

    http://forums.startrekonline.com/showthread.php?t=175065&highlight=battlecloak
    http://forums.startrekonline.com/showthread.php?t=179180&highlight=battlecloak

    I remember that as part of the feedback for the Gal-X some folks complained that it had only
    a normal cloak and that it should have a battlecloak.

    http://forums.startrekonline.com/showthread.php?t=169385&highlight=battlecloak
    There a people who want a battlecloak on the Defiant etc.
    http://forums.startrekonline.com/showthread.php?t=183625

    But since the other guy is evil he must not have what the Feds have.
    (ships with more than one science slot for example)
    Especially since we've never seen a Klingon who does research or was a science officer.:rolleyes:

    *EDIT, found some more:

    http://forums.startrekonline.com/showthread.php?t=167476

    http://forums.startrekonline.com/showthread.php?t=167533

    http://forums.startrekonline.com/showthread.php?t=180952&highlight=tooth%20paste

    And Klingons should not have access to Quantums even 40 years after the shows , when we look at posts like this:
    http://forums.startrekonline.com/showpost.php?p=2852794&postcount=12
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited October 2010
    mister_dee wrote:
    we've never seen a Klingon who does research or was a science officer.:rolleyes

    No Klingon science officers ever seen in Star Trek you say?

    You may be partially correct, as I don't believe we've ever seen a Klingon science officer in Star Trek, but we most definitely have seen a Klingon scientist, specifically seen in the TNG episode "Suspicions" and her name is Kurak.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited October 2010
    Alecto wrote: »
    No Klingon science officers ever seen in Star Trek you say?

    You may be partially correct, as I don't believe we've ever seen a Klingon science officer in Star Trek, but we most definitely have seen a Klingon scientist, specifically seen in the TNG episode "Suspicions" and her name is Kurak.

    That rolleyes was pure irony.

    This should explain how I really feel quite well: :)

    http://forums.startrekonline.com/showpost.php?p=3108372&postcount=17

    And we HAVE seen a Klingon science officer, during TOS so it's old news actually.
    So this was irony on my part.

    http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/Mara
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited October 2010
    Valias wrote:
    Actually, it's only about some Feds whining about how they want to have everything everybody else has, too. Because some people apparently dislike diversity and want every faction to be a carbon copy of the other
    .
    Funny, I always felt like some of the feds just wanted to have all the other kids toys too, and believed they were entitled becuase they are the focus of the story, the prima donna of the show so to speak.
    You know, that one person in the group that gets whatever they want, pouts if they don't and everybody dislikes behind thier back. Veruca Salt, thats who some of the feds remind me of.
    The Klingons' opinion does not count, whether they approve or disapprove. :)

    Certainly feels that way a times.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited October 2010
    mister_dee wrote:
    That rolleyes was pure irony.

    This should explain how I really feel quite well: :)

    http://forums.startrekonline.com/showpost.php?p=3108372&postcount=17

    Understood and acknowledged mister_dee, you have my apologies, I read your post out of context.

    I also firmly agree with what you stated in the post you linked.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited October 2010
    Alecto wrote: »
    Understood and acknowledged mister_dee, you have my apologies, I read your post out of context.

    I also firmly agree with what you stated in the post you linked.

    No apologies required and thank you.:)
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited October 2010
    Valias wrote:
    Actually, it's only about some Feds whining about how they want to have everything everybody else has, too. Because some people apparently dislike diversity and want every faction to be a carbon copy of the other. The Klingons' opinion does not count, whether they approve or disapprove. :)

    That was extrememly funny...lol
Sign In or Register to comment.