test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

From the Desk of Starfleet Intelligence

2»

Comments

  • alcyoneserenealcyoneserene Member Posts: 2,414 Arc User
    jaturnley wrote: »
    Well, that explains the patches to the Dyson Science Destroyers after all this time. The Crossfield will be pretty interesting with the mode switch ability.

    So much for T6 Dysons indeed. At least there won't be the inevitable disappointment with omitting the Romulan variants.
    Y945Yzx.jpg
  • westx211westx211 Member Posts: 42,328 Arc User
    It might wind up being the ship for the summer event. Probably not but maybe. Or maybe the next lockbox ship.
    Men are not punished for their sins, but by them.
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,008 Arc User
    "Threat Force Starship Assessment" calling it, great band name.
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • legendarylycan#5411 legendarylycan Member Posts: 37,284 Arc User
    alexhayden wrote: »
    Never mind the Mirror Crossfield..I wanna know what cardinal sin Kyla Van Zyl committed to get busted down to Lieutenant..😁

    probably just an error from the guy who wrote the blog not realizing vanzyl is supposed to be a lieutenant commander​​
    Like special weapons from other Star Trek games? Wondering if they can be replicated in STO even a little bit? Check this out: https://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1262277/a-mostly-comprehensive-guide-to-star-trek-videogame-special-weapons-and-their-sto-equivalents

    #LegalizeAwoo

    A normie goes "Oh, what's this?"
    An otaku goes "UwU, what's this?"
    A furry goes "OwO, what's this?"
    A werewolf goes "Awoo, what's this?"


    "It's nothing personal, I just don't feel like I've gotten to know a person until I've sniffed their crotch."
    "We said 'no' to Mr. Curiosity. We're not home. Curiosity is not welcome, it is not to be invited in. Curiosity...is bad. It gets you in trouble, it gets you killed, and more importantly...it makes you poor!"
    Passion and Serenity are one.
    I gain power by understanding both.
    In the chaos of their battle, I bring order.
    I am a shadow, darkness born from light.
    The Force is united within me.
  • chipg7chipg7 Member Posts: 1,577 Arc User
    alexhayden wrote: »
    Never mind the Mirror Crossfield..I wanna know what cardinal sin Kyla Van Zyl committed to get busted down to Lieutenant..😁

    Might have something to do with her being taken over by the Bluegills back in the day? Although I recall that not being her fault... But still a massive slip-up for a so-called intelligence specialist.
  • jcswwjcsww Member Posts: 6,828 Arc User
    edited March 2019
    In my opinion, more ships, especially Mirror Universe ships, are always welcome. We can never have too many ships in this game. I just hope it comes with an MU themed Crossfield interior.
  • marty123#3757 marty123 Member Posts: 674 Arc User
    Assuming this won’t have a spore drive, please say this is c-store and has a 2410 skin
  • jaturnleyjaturnley Member Posts: 1,218 Arc User
    jcsww wrote: »
    In my opinion, more ships, especially Mirror Universe ships, are always welcome. We can never have too many ships in this game. I just hope it comes with an MU themed Crossfield interior.

    It's already done. They put out the bridge with the last patch, for use with the two other mirror disco ships. It's actually pretty nice looking, although the crew is a mix of old and new unis and the ops station guy is floating a foot above his chair.
  • gaevsmangaevsman Member Posts: 3,190 Arc User
    jaturnley wrote: »
    jcsww wrote: »
    In my opinion, more ships, especially Mirror Universe ships, are always welcome. We can never have too many ships in this game. I just hope it comes with an MU themed Crossfield interior.

    It's already done. They put out the bridge with the last patch, for use with the two other mirror disco ships. It's actually pretty nice looking, although the crew is a mix of old and new unis and the ops station guy is floating a foot above his chair.

    True, still i like it.. also, what update to the destroyers?? there was an update??, perhaps a T6 in the near future???
    The forces of darkness are upon us!
  • seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,919 Arc User
    Nice.. an R&D ship that I don't care about.

    Time to sit back and watch others dump unreal amounts of money allowing me to continue to play for free.

    Sounds good to me!
    Insert witty signature line here.
  • disqord#9557 disqord Member Posts: 567 Arc User
    jaturnley wrote: »
    Well, that explains the patches to the Dyson Science Destroyers after all this time. The Crossfield will be pretty interesting with the mode switch ability.

    So much for T6 Dysons indeed. At least there won't be the inevitable disappointment with omitting the Romulan variants.

    Maybe they'll have realised the moderate amount of hype the fix garnered and have started plans for it anyway? Or maybe I'm grasping at straws.


    Semi-related: Now is a good enough time as any to point out that every single ship transformation/separation mechanic is still broken because they never actually give an increase/decrease to impulse flight speed. I expect this to be fixed for the new golden-boy ship release, so that will be fun.
  • predking669predking669 Member Posts: 5 Arc User
    edited March 2019
    This should be interesting to say the least...
  • This content has been removed.
  • captaincelestialcaptaincelestial Member Posts: 1,925 Arc User
    chipg7 wrote: »
    reyan01 wrote: »
    Will be interesting to see if a set bonus appears, from equipping consoles from both Crossfield classes.

    Are you talking about crossing the Crossfields' fields? That's madness!

    Crossing the Crossfields is bad.
  • burstorionburstorion Member Posts: 1,750 Arc User
    chipg7 wrote: »
    reyan01 wrote: »
    Will be interesting to see if a set bonus appears, from equipping consoles from both Crossfield classes.

    Are you talking about crossing the Crossfields' fields? That's madness!

    Crossing the Crossfields is bad.

    Criss-Crossed Crossfields?
  • smokebaileysmokebailey Member Posts: 4,668 Arc User
    Nice.. an R&D ship that I don't care about.

    Time to sit back and watch others dump unreal amounts of money allowing me to continue to play for free.

    Sounds good to me!

    *nod nod*

    Cookie?
    dvZq2Aj.jpg
  • gaevsmangaevsman Member Posts: 3,190 Arc User
    > @smokebailey said:
    > seaofsorrows wrote: »
    >
    > Nice.. an R&D ship that I don't care about.
    >
    > Time to sit back and watch others dump unreal amounts of money allowing me to continue to play for free.
    >
    > Sounds good to me!
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > *nod nod*
    >
    > Cookie?

    Didnt like it at first, but it grow on me.. lets see how it will be available.. already have a char ready for it :blush:
    The forces of darkness are upon us!
  • seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,919 Arc User
    gaevsman wrote: »
    Didnt like it at first, but it grow on me.. lets see how it will be available.. already have a char ready for it :blush:

    I like the ship, just not enough to open R&D Boxes to get it.

    If it was C-Store, I would strongly consider it.. but I think we all know it's going to be a game box ship. :lol:
    Insert witty signature line here.
  • duasynduasyn Member Posts: 492 Arc User
    reyan01 wrote: »

    Other than the TOS ships (which are a special case), all the R&D ships are unique, so getting a reskin of a previously released ship seems disappointing for such a expensive ship, imo, even with the Dyson transformation gimmick included.
  • bubblegirl2015bubblegirl2015 Member Posts: 831 Arc User
    gilion wrote: »
    ... I don't care what kind of well thought out technobabble you come up with to explain it, the spinning saucer section still looks stupid XD

    I guess they had to do anything to sell this ship since looks like the most ugliest ever conceived in Trek history.​​
    Wiki editor http://sto.gamepedia.com
    Original STO beta tester.
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    reyan01 wrote: »

    Interesting re-use of the Dyson Destroyer mechanics. Might be a better implementation, but of course, Experimental Weapons didn't exist when the Dyson Destroyers appeared on the scene.

    I hope this mean there is some hope for a Dyson Destroyer T6 upgrade. (After the Nova, I know.)
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • jaturnleyjaturnley Member Posts: 1,218 Arc User
    gaevsman wrote: »
    jaturnley wrote: »
    jcsww wrote: »
    In my opinion, more ships, especially Mirror Universe ships, are always welcome. We can never have too many ships in this game. I just hope it comes with an MU themed Crossfield interior.

    It's already done. They put out the bridge with the last patch, for use with the two other mirror disco ships. It's actually pretty nice looking, although the crew is a mix of old and new unis and the ops station guy is floating a foot above his chair.

    True, still i like it.. also, what update to the destroyers?? there was an update??, perhaps a T6 in the near future???

    Check last week's patch notes for the Dyson update. It's actually pretty much a nerf - some stuff that was supposed to be disabled in tac mode wasn't happening (or, ya know, they just changed their minds on those).

    There's always hope for a T6 update to the few remaining ships that haven't gotten one, but as always I would not get my hopes up (I am personally rooting for a T6 Patrol Escort with a fixed experimental phaser cannon replacing the tail gun). It would be a major improvement for the Dyson ships to swap that fixed proton cannon for an experimental slot, though.
  • jrdobbsjr#3264 jrdobbsjr Member Posts: 431 Arc User
    edited March 2019
    > @chipg7 said:

    > I'm only complaining because Cryptic chose one strategy to start with, and then complete 180'd on it. And because I'm afraid to see the space shuttle Enterprise at T6 one day :worried:

    “Fanboys” pay for the game, and STO isn’t a simulator. IRL you’re lucky to get to command a warship at all, much less have a small fleet to shift your flag among because reasons. A naval warfare sim would bomb hard if U.S.S. Monitor could slug it out toe to toe with Yamato in game, but Star Trek is science fantasy so it’s OK that 23rd century ships can mop the floor with ships “built” centuries later.
  • ichaerus1ichaerus1 Member Posts: 986 Arc User
    jaturnley wrote: »
    gaevsman wrote: »
    jaturnley wrote: »
    jcsww wrote: »
    In my opinion, more ships, especially Mirror Universe ships, are always welcome. We can never have too many ships in this game. I just hope it comes with an MU themed Crossfield interior.

    It's already done. They put out the bridge with the last patch, for use with the two other mirror disco ships. It's actually pretty nice looking, although the crew is a mix of old and new unis and the ops station guy is floating a foot above his chair.

    True, still i like it.. also, what update to the destroyers?? there was an update??, perhaps a T6 in the near future???

    Check last week's patch notes for the Dyson update. It's actually pretty much a nerf - some stuff that was supposed to be disabled in tac mode wasn't happening (or, ya know, they just changed their minds on those).

    There's always hope for a T6 update to the few remaining ships that haven't gotten one, but as always I would not get my hopes up (I am personally rooting for a T6 Patrol Escort with a fixed experimental phaser cannon replacing the tail gun). It would be a major improvement for the Dyson ships to swap that fixed proton cannon for an experimental slot, though.

    Add an experimental slot. Move the Proton DHC to the experimental slot, make it a 360 DHC. Not like there's a huge amount of support for proton damage anyways. And it's not like Cryptic did much to poke at the Dyson Science Destroyer after pushing it out the door.
  • bughunter357bughunter357 Member Posts: 588 Arc User
    reyan01 wrote: »
    lnblade wrote: »
    lnblade wrote: »
    reyan01 wrote: »
    So, Mirror Crossfield class incoming.

    Wonder what the method of obtaining will be....
    My bet is on R&D promo, since the bog standard Crossfield is in lockboxes (and remains the only hero ship not available in the C-Store).

    Well....the T6 Connie was also lockbox. I think R&D? As was both Kelvin (JJverse) ships, Enterprise and the intel dread.

    But I agree that the mirror Crossfield will likely be a gamble ship. I would love to see it as Cstore, but agree that is unlikely.
    The T6 Constitution is (lamely) R&D, true, but you can still get it at T2 for free (or the T1 and Exeter versions in the C-Store). I'm not particularly a fan of DSC, but it still sucks that the people who are can't easily fly the show's main ship.

    Lets be honest, they have an 'odd' history with regard to the main ships of the show at Endgame level. I mean:

    ENT: T6 NX class is a Lobi store ship
    DSC: Crossfield class is a Lockbox ship. (Status of mirror Crossfield TBC)
    TOS (inc TOS movies): T6 Constitution is a R&D Prize ship
    TNG: Galaxy class is a C-store and Fleet ship. Also has full interior via C-store;
    Sovereign class is a C-store and Fleet ship
    DS9: Defiant class is C-store and fleet ship. Also has full interior via C-store
    VOY: Intrepid class is C-store and fleet ship. Also has full interior via C-store

    most of those ships are from series not running, I can understand doing the connie as a R&D ship they did not want everyone flying a connie in game all the time, the crossfield is a ship from a running series so again they did not want the entire community running the "new" ship etc. etc. simple logic.
  • bughunter357bughunter357 Member Posts: 588 Arc User
    reyan01 wrote: »
    lnblade wrote: »
    lnblade wrote: »
    reyan01 wrote: »
    So, Mirror Crossfield class incoming.

    Wonder what the method of obtaining will be....
    My bet is on R&D promo, since the bog standard Crossfield is in lockboxes (and remains the only hero ship not available in the C-Store).

    Well....the T6 Connie was also lockbox. I think R&D? As was both Kelvin (JJverse) ships, Enterprise and the intel dread.

    But I agree that the mirror Crossfield will likely be a gamble ship. I would love to see it as Cstore, but agree that is unlikely.
    The T6 Constitution is (lamely) R&D, true, but you can still get it at T2 for free (or the T1 and Exeter versions in the C-Store). I'm not particularly a fan of DSC, but it still sucks that the people who are can't easily fly the show's main ship.

    Lets be honest, they have an 'odd' history with regard to the main ships of the show at Endgame level. I mean:

    ENT: T6 NX class is a Lobi store ship
    DSC: Crossfield class is a Lockbox ship. (Status of mirror Crossfield TBC)
    TOS (inc TOS movies): T6 Constitution is a R&D Prize ship
    TNG: Galaxy class is a C-store and Fleet ship. Also has full interior via C-store;
    Sovereign class is a C-store and Fleet ship
    DS9: Defiant class is C-store and fleet ship. Also has full interior via C-store
    VOY: Intrepid class is C-store and fleet ship. Also has full interior via C-store

    most of those ships are from series not running, I can understand doing the connie as a R&D ship they did not want everyone flying a connie in game all the time, the crossfield is a ship from a running series so again they did not want the entire community running the "new" ship etc. etc. simple logic.
Sign In or Register to comment.