test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

What Discovery Ship would you like to see released next?

2»

Comments

  • thay8472thay8472 Member Posts: 6,151 Arc User
    T6 Malachowski ?
    zx2t8tuj4i10.png
    Thank you for the Typhoon!
  • mirrorchaosmirrorchaos Member Posts: 9,844 Arc User
    edited October 2018
    thay8472 wrote: »
    T6 Malachowski ?

    that T1 thing handles worse than a double-decker bus running around on rims. if a t6 version comes, it better be more agile.
    T6 Miranda Hero Ship FTW.
    Been around since Dec 2010 on STO and bought LTS in Apr 2013 for STO.
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    Sech and Shepard Class would be two I hope for. The Europa/Nimitz is okay, but I don't like her as much as the Shepard.

    And the Sech looks pretty cool.
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    thay8472 wrote: »
    T6 Malachowski ?

    that T1 thing handles worse than a double-decker bus running around on rims. if a t6 version comes, it better be more agile.

    It's relatively slow turning at Tier 1 because you're a Level 1-10 character with Mark I gear. Add all the bonuses you get on your turn rate from skills and better items, an the ship will be very agile.

    The Malachowski has a turn rate of 11 and an Inertia Rating of 50 which is better than the Vor'Ral (T6 Vor'Cha), which is a Klingon Battlecruiser that can easily support dual heavy cannons and also better than the Arbiter (Tier 6 Avenger).
    It's really just an AoD Miranda.
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • bubblegirl2015bubblegirl2015 Member Posts: 831 Arc User
    With the release of the Europa/Nimitz-Class and since the USS Sebrova was a Shepard-Class, I wanted to ask folks what playable ship they'd like to see next from Discovery.

    For visual reference only I'm not here to start or see any arguments: http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/schematics/discovery_federation.htm

    I would love to see NON DISCo ships tiger-2.gif​​
    Wiki editor http://sto.gamepedia.com
    Original STO beta tester.
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,867 Arc User
    I'll say the Cardenas, it's the best looking one IMO and it is probably the most likely to get a hangar bay if such were ever possible
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • oldravenman3025oldravenman3025 Member Posts: 1,892 Arc User
    The ships are one of the two or three things I like about TRIBBLE. So, it's hard to choose since I like all of the Starfleet vessels seen so far. The Hoover got my vote, since I could only pick one.
  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,498 Community Moderator
    azrael605 wrote: »
    You are missing my point. When those classes were introduced they used TMP warp effects, when they were used in another Trek production they used the warp effects for that series, not TMP. Thus Discovery ships in STO should be using STO warp effects as a franchise precedent.

    Franchise precedent?
    Um... last I checked, TOS characters were all using the TOS warp effects on everything. So having Discovery characters use their own is fine. Everyone has their own warp effects. The fact that the big 4 of the 25th Century all use pallet swap variants of the same effect doesn't mean ALL of them have to without question.

    The only real anomalies are the Kelvin ships using their own warp animations, showing that they can to a degree tie the effects to a ship. Granted the Kelvin Timeline effects are a variation of the default effects... but still...

    Frankly I wouldn't mind if they made the Sarco, Crossfield, and Walker have the Discovery warp effects by default as well instead of tied to faction.

    Also... the reason TMP era ships were using TNG warp effects in DS9 was because those particular ships were using modern warp drives rather than 23rd Century ones. Basically its like putting a modern engine in an old Model T Ford. Its not the looks, its whats under the hood.
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
  • vetteguy904vetteguy904 Member Posts: 3,912 Arc User
    T6 Vo'quv, Karfi, the K'vort, the only canon ship not in the freaking game yet...
    oh wait you said Discovery.. my bad. yeah we need all these 200 year old ships be in game and more powerful than the latest starfleet designs.. carry on
    sig.jpg
This discussion has been closed.