No, this game skirts the issue by allowing zen to be traded for refined dilithium so that you can buy keys without having to pay anything. Further, keys can be sold on the Exchange allowing you to use credits to buy them. That and unlike most other systems, lockboxes drop lobi which can be used as yet another currency to get something of commensurate value to what's available in the lockboxes themselves.
0
rattler2Member, Star Trek Online ModeratorPosts: 58,829Community Moderator
No, this game skirts the issue by allowing zen to be traded for refined dilithium so that you can buy keys without having to pay anything. Further, keys can be sold on the Exchange allowing you to use credits to buy them. That and unlike most other systems, lockboxes drop lobi which can be used as yet another currency to get something of commensurate value to what's available in the lockboxes themselves.
I'd agree. We don't have to worry at all. We ALWAYS get something of value in return. Team Fortress 2 also skirts the issue with the fact that everything in the crate is ALSO available as random drops, crafting, and straight up purchase. ONLY thing you can only get from the crate is kill tracking gear and cosmetic. And the Kill Tracking... has no other bonus. A Strange Sydney Sleeper has no stat difference vs a normal Sydney Sleeper.
I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
normal text = me speaking as fellow formite colored text = mod mode
That didn't take long! i found out about this a week ago. It is a start and i suspect it won't be long before the EU follows Begium's example and make it Union wide.
The UK already went through one of these months back without success, i wonder if there is now enough basis to put another one before the leaders?
No it won't, the decision only names 3 games and cleared Battlefront 2's boxes in their current form.
Baby steps often to lead to much bigger steps. You wouldn't be worried now but wait for a few years and see where it is at. Seems a bit early to suggest anything yet.
T6 Miranda Hero Ship FTW. Been around since Dec 2010 on STO and bought LTS in Apr 2013 for STO.
No it won't, the decision only names 3 games and cleared Battlefront 2's boxes in their current form.
it could, since one of the named ones, overwatch is a purely cosmetic no matter how much you spead you get nothing back and you can buy them outright with credits you get from opening boxs. so even the most harmless kinds of lock boxs are not safe.
really this reinforces my belief goverment should be as hands off as possible, they are just too stupid andor clueless to do any real good.
if I stop posting it doesn't make you right it. just means I don't have enough rum to continue interacting with you.
USS Sharlin NCC79713 B (part of sheridans access code) - T6, Hestia Class Advanced Escort
USS Babylon IV - T6 Krenim Science Vessel
USS Brakiri - T6 Elachi Escort
"I am Grey. I stand between the candle and the star."
"We are Grey. We stand between the darkness and the light."
The USA will probably be one of the last, if not the last, country to regulate gambling for online games if ever. Our culture is more about, "as long as I win not how I win" nowadays & with that breeds less integrity. I applaud Belgium & the other countries that have declared it gambling. There should be official accountability & transparency for online game gambling. However, I do think that each game should be evaluated upon it's own merits & mechanics.
No, this game skirts the issue by allowing zen to be traded for refined dilithium so that you can buy keys without having to pay anything. Further, keys can be sold on the Exchange allowing you to use credits to buy them. That and unlike most other systems, lockboxes drop lobi which can be used as yet another currency to get something of commensurate value to what's available in the lockboxes themselves.
As this law is worded perhaps, however the more aggressive proposals I've seen would indeed affect STO as well, and I highly doubt this will be the only law passed regarding loot boxes.
As this law is worded perhaps, however the more aggressive proposals I've seen would indeed affect STO as well, and I highly doubt this will be the only law passed regarding loot boxes.
Indeed but I doubt that the concept of a small, randomized pack of in-game goodies is going to go away any time soon. Publish the odds and we're on the same footing as trading card packs. It's "good business" now that keeps those hidden but if push comes to shove then it seems like the easiest change that would [apparently] suit regulators (and better allow the industry to self-regulate by letting consumers better vet loot box models.)
As for the Belgian news: I can speak to Counterstrike and that hella falls under the definition provided for "Games of Chance." Steam allows you to sell weapon skins to other players for real money (simply added to your Steam wallet), making their loot boxes a defacto slot machine with prizes graded by market demand (which is largely informed by weapon skin odds.) People can literally try to fund their gaming via loot box gambling.
STO is a very long way away from that model, to the point where only an overgeneralization could find them comparable. Yes, it's money tied to a randomized content box but the implementation and context are wildly different (ex. what STO does with lock boxes is entirely within gameplay, prizes have no meaning outside the game. Arguably, CS skins only have meaning outside the game.) CS's loot boxes may now be illegal in Belgium but that's not a blanket ban on all randomized content delivery systems (ex. gumball machines.)
Bipedal mammal and senior Foundry author.
Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
Honestly the age factor is the only part that really bothers me, so the only legislation I'd like to see is for loot boxes to be restricted to whatever the local gambling age is.
Honestly the age factor is the only part that really bothers me, so the only legislation I'd like to see is for loot boxes to be restricted to whatever the local gambling age is.
I'd rather see games adjust their practices rather than consumers provide more legal documentation. If age gating would become a thing then it certainly wouldn't be on the honors basis of merely specifying your date of birth. Companies would be very liable for under-aged gambling in that case. So we're looking at giving publishers our driver license numbers (U.S.) to support their most parasitic habits. I don't that as an improvement over the current situation.
Bipedal mammal and senior Foundry author.
Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
Good news all around, hope it gains momentum. Won't change a thing here, though, as the only interface between real and virtual currency is in the purchase of zen which is used for more than just keys for lockboxes. Keys which themselves can be sold and traded for in-game credits outside of the purview of the zen market.
Loot boxes considered as criminal gambling in Belgium.
You posted the same exact thing as the OP.
i posted it in general since I dont normally come to this branch of the forums. btw Belgium considers gambling anything left to chance... if you open the box and the contents can change or is random... it is gambling. that would apply to STO.
0
rattler2Member, Star Trek Online ModeratorPosts: 58,829Community Moderator
btw Belgium considers gambling anything left to chance... if you open the box and the contents can change or is random... it is gambling. that would apply to STO.
I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
normal text = me speaking as fellow formite colored text = mod mode
btw Belgium considers gambling anything left to chance... if you open the box and the contents can change or is random... it is gambling. that would apply to STO.
That's probably not a fair read. Here's the (translated) objections the commission had:
Emotional profit forecast: uncertainty loot box is associated with profit forecast;
A player can think that purchasing a loot box a benefit, which is not always the case
Blending of fiction and reality: known real people promoting the most expensive loot boxes;
Use own coinage system: for a real amount players can buy in-game coins;
Seemingly infinite ways of money on players to deposit accounts;
Hiding the RNG or at least the opacity.
1. Slanted presentation, implying that you will win big in spite of statistics (just as with Casino commercials)
2. Absolutely worthless content (not "oh, not useful for my character" but not useful to any character)
3. Celebrity endorsements of top content (probably FIFA)
4. Essentially: using analogous currency to casino poker chips (no other value)
5. I think: being able to earn unlimited money from loot boxes (probably CS:GO)
6. Unspecified odds (something everyone does)
They aren't objecting to the mere presence of an RNG prize system, it's the use of RNG to create definite gambling mechanics in Overwatch, FIFA, and Counterstrike. At the very least, this means presenting loot boxes as something to play for fun and the promise of riches, as opposed to an available content packaging option. For context, here's the Discovery Lock box blog:
It simply presents what's available, it doesn't promote lock boxes as a separate gameplay activity or even make simple reference to the experience of opening packs. Now: compare that to FIFA. They're directly promoting the opening of loot boxes as entertainment in its own right while providing no meaningful context or content break-down (see. youtube link of their "pack" opening animations, directly advertising the neurochemical high of winning big.)
Basically: there is some dark TRIBBLE going with the specific examples Belgium reviewed. STO isn't necessarily subject to the same regulations (given lobi, a strict in-game focus, a much better selection of content, a full break-down of that content, and a very different [ie. largely matter of fact] marketing approach) though they may still have to shift focus to Lobi a bit more and publish lock box odds in the event that becomes a sticking point.
Bipedal mammal and senior Foundry author.
Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
Loot boxes considered as criminal gambling in Belgium.
That's not what the article actually says. What it actually says is that those specific games violate Belgium's laws. It really has nothing to do with the concept in general.
I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
normal text = me speaking as fellow formite colored text = mod mode
Loot boxes considered as criminal gambling in Belgium.
That's not what the article actually says. What it actually says is that those specific games violate Belgium's laws. It really has nothing to do with the concept in general.
Here's an except from the official press release:
De onderzochte spellen met betalende loot boxen, zoals deze momenteel in ons land worden aangeboden, zijn dan ook in overtreding met de kansspelwetgeving en kunnen strafrechtelijk worden aangepakt. De loot boxen dienen dan ook verwijderd te worden. Indien dat niet gebeurt, riskeren de exploitanten een gevangenisstraf tot vijf jaar en een geldboete tot 800.000 euro. Wanneer ook minderjarigen zijn betrokken, kunnen die straffen verdubbeld worden.
Google Translate:
The games with paid loot boxes, as currently offered in our country, are therefore in violation of the gaming legislation and can be dealt with under criminal law. The loot boxes must therefore also be removed. If that does not happen, the operators risk a prison sentence of up to five years and a fine of up to 800,000 euros. When minors are involved, those punishments can be doubled.
Which only applies to the 3 games in the decision.
Not necessarily, they only actually investigated four games, the fourth being Battlefront 2 which got a pass because they had removed lock boxes after the backlash (they are coming back though so who knows if that will remain the case). More than likely if they were to investigate other games they would find at least some of them to be breaking the law as well. It would not be a good idea for devs of any game with loot boxes to see their game is not listed and decide to just ignore this.
Lifetime Subscriber since Beta
0
rattler2Member, Star Trek Online ModeratorPosts: 58,829Community Moderator
EA isn't gonna cross Disney again. They don't want to risk losing the license to distribute Star Wars games.
I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
normal text = me speaking as fellow formite colored text = mod mode
EA isn't gonna cross Disney again. They don't want to risk losing the license to distribute Star Wars games.
I wish they would lose the license, I'm dieing for more Jedi Knight, Rogue Squadron, and X-Wing style games. Star Wars always had so many great games until Disney got their claws on the franchise ...
Lifetime Subscriber since Beta
0
rattler2Member, Star Trek Online ModeratorPosts: 58,829Community Moderator
Its not Disney that is the problem. Its EA and their greed, wanting to monitize every aspect of a game. I mean Their first Battlefront... had no single player!
I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
normal text = me speaking as fellow formite colored text = mod mode
Comments
I'd agree. We don't have to worry at all. We ALWAYS get something of value in return.
Team Fortress 2 also skirts the issue with the fact that everything in the crate is ALSO available as random drops, crafting, and straight up purchase. ONLY thing you can only get from the crate is kill tracking gear and cosmetic. And the Kill Tracking... has no other bonus. A Strange Sydney Sleeper has no stat difference vs a normal Sydney Sleeper.
normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
colored text = mod mode
The UK already went through one of these months back without success, i wonder if there is now enough basis to put another one before the leaders?
Baby steps often to lead to much bigger steps. You wouldn't be worried now but wait for a few years and see where it is at. Seems a bit early to suggest anything yet.
Been around since Dec 2010 on STO and bought LTS in Apr 2013 for STO.
it could, since one of the named ones, overwatch is a purely cosmetic no matter how much you spead you get nothing back and you can buy them outright with credits you get from opening boxs. so even the most harmless kinds of lock boxs are not safe.
really this reinforces my belief goverment should be as hands off as possible, they are just too stupid andor clueless to do any real good.
if I stop posting it doesn't make you right it. just means I don't have enough rum to continue interacting with you.
also in the netherlands
https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2018-04-19-the-netherlands-declares-some-loot-boxes-are-gambling
USS Sharlin NCC79713 B (part of sheridans access code) - T6, Hestia Class Advanced Escort
USS Babylon IV - T6 Krenim Science Vessel
USS Brakiri - T6 Elachi Escort
"We are Grey. We stand between the darkness and the light."
– Grey Council greeting
As this law is worded perhaps, however the more aggressive proposals I've seen would indeed affect STO as well, and I highly doubt this will be the only law passed regarding loot boxes.
Indeed but I doubt that the concept of a small, randomized pack of in-game goodies is going to go away any time soon. Publish the odds and we're on the same footing as trading card packs. It's "good business" now that keeps those hidden but if push comes to shove then it seems like the easiest change that would [apparently] suit regulators (and better allow the industry to self-regulate by letting consumers better vet loot box models.)
As for the Belgian news: I can speak to Counterstrike and that hella falls under the definition provided for "Games of Chance." Steam allows you to sell weapon skins to other players for real money (simply added to your Steam wallet), making their loot boxes a defacto slot machine with prizes graded by market demand (which is largely informed by weapon skin odds.) People can literally try to fund their gaming via loot box gambling.
STO is a very long way away from that model, to the point where only an overgeneralization could find them comparable. Yes, it's money tied to a randomized content box but the implementation and context are wildly different (ex. what STO does with lock boxes is entirely within gameplay, prizes have no meaning outside the game. Arguably, CS skins only have meaning outside the game.) CS's loot boxes may now be illegal in Belgium but that's not a blanket ban on all randomized content delivery systems (ex. gumball machines.)
Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
I'd rather see games adjust their practices rather than consumers provide more legal documentation. If age gating would become a thing then it certainly wouldn't be on the honors basis of merely specifying your date of birth. Companies would be very liable for under-aged gambling in that case. So we're looking at giving publishers our driver license numbers (U.S.) to support their most parasitic habits. I don't that as an improvement over the current situation.
Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
Loot boxes considered as criminal gambling in Belgium.
i posted it in general since I dont normally come to this branch of the forums. btw Belgium considers gambling anything left to chance... if you open the box and the contents can change or is random... it is gambling. that would apply to STO.
So... even trading cards are gambling.
normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
colored text = mod mode
Been around since Dec 2010 on STO and bought LTS in Apr 2013 for STO.
That's probably not a fair read. Here's the (translated) objections the commission had:
1. Slanted presentation, implying that you will win big in spite of statistics (just as with Casino commercials)
2. Absolutely worthless content (not "oh, not useful for my character" but not useful to any character)
3. Celebrity endorsements of top content (probably FIFA)
4. Essentially: using analogous currency to casino poker chips (no other value)
5. I think: being able to earn unlimited money from loot boxes (probably CS:GO)
6. Unspecified odds (something everyone does)
They aren't objecting to the mere presence of an RNG prize system, it's the use of RNG to create definite gambling mechanics in Overwatch, FIFA, and Counterstrike. At the very least, this means presenting loot boxes as something to play for fun and the promise of riches, as opposed to an available content packaging option. For context, here's the Discovery Lock box blog:
Arcgames Linky
It simply presents what's available, it doesn't promote lock boxes as a separate gameplay activity or even make simple reference to the experience of opening packs. Now: compare that to FIFA. They're directly promoting the opening of loot boxes as entertainment in its own right while providing no meaningful context or content break-down (see. youtube link of their "pack" opening animations, directly advertising the neurochemical high of winning big.)
EA Linky
Basically: there is some dark TRIBBLE going with the specific examples Belgium reviewed. STO isn't necessarily subject to the same regulations (given lobi, a strict in-game focus, a much better selection of content, a full break-down of that content, and a very different [ie. largely matter of fact] marketing approach) though they may still have to shift focus to Lobi a bit more and publish lock box odds in the event that becomes a sticking point.
Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
My character Tsin'xing
But... but... you can't put a blonde tribble on his head!
normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
colored text = mod mode
Here's an except from the official press release:
De onderzochte spellen met betalende loot boxen, zoals deze momenteel in ons land worden aangeboden, zijn dan ook in overtreding met de kansspelwetgeving en kunnen strafrechtelijk worden aangepakt. De loot boxen dienen dan ook verwijderd te worden. Indien dat niet gebeurt, riskeren de exploitanten een gevangenisstraf tot vijf jaar en een geldboete tot 800.000 euro. Wanneer ook minderjarigen zijn betrokken, kunnen die straffen verdubbeld worden.
Google Translate:
The games with paid loot boxes, as currently offered in our country, are therefore in violation of the gaming legislation and can be dealt with under criminal law. The loot boxes must therefore also be removed. If that does not happen, the operators risk a prison sentence of up to five years and a fine of up to 800,000 euros. When minors are involved, those punishments can be doubled.
Not necessarily, they only actually investigated four games, the fourth being Battlefront 2 which got a pass because they had removed lock boxes after the backlash (they are coming back though so who knows if that will remain the case). More than likely if they were to investigate other games they would find at least some of them to be breaking the law as well. It would not be a good idea for devs of any game with loot boxes to see their game is not listed and decide to just ignore this.
normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
colored text = mod mode
I wish they would lose the license, I'm dieing for more Jedi Knight, Rogue Squadron, and X-Wing style games. Star Wars always had so many great games until Disney got their claws on the franchise ...
normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
colored text = mod mode