test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

The Temporal Raider: under-rated and little used.

I un-mothballed my Ourborous the other night, just to muck about with it on my tac captain for the lolz.

Turns out I'm having a blast with it. Built-in raider flanking coupled with Int/strat specs makes for some epic flanking damage. Adequate weapon layout, although only being 4:2 hurts it a little, I'm still posting good numbers. Built-in battle cloak.

Yes it's a glass cannon, like all 'scorts, but with the right build and spec this is a hard-hitting little monster with lots of room for creative Temporal ability shenanigans given the boff layout.

Did I mention the battle cloak?

Why is this ship so under-utilised? I know the Temporal ships are a bit "meh", but I hardly see anyone running about in them. I'm not a min-maxer posting 500k ISA runs, so I'm sure the space-rich end-gamers will sniff at it, but it seems a great little ship for us 50-100k+'ers.
«1

Comments

  • burstorionburstorion Member Posts: 1,750 Arc User
    I'm surprised by it too, considering its a bona fide fed bop in all but name - it works really well as a dual bo/hyt alpha striker (for fun I went disap and used the two energy torps, giving me a doubletap bo of sorts) and unlike kdf bops, gets much love; not suffering the decreases kdf bops get for existing in hull and shield

    Of course its not really designed for faw, so thats likely a reason for its unpopularity.
  • nightkennightken Member Posts: 2,824 Arc User
    the answer is simple, it's a raider.. actually it may be the best raider but it's still a raider. which means it good for a lot but bfaw spam in the middle of a large group of enemies is not one of them. which mean for a lot of people it is completely useless.

    and some people like myself will not touch it for reasons not based on effectiveness.

    if I stop posting it doesn't make you right it. just means I don't have enough rum to continue interacting with you.
  • meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    If it had a Pilot seating, I could use an APO3/APL2 combo (like on my Nah'kuhl raider). Since it doesn't, hard to double the Attack Pattern is (and keep everything else I want slotted too).
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • nekofury86nekofury86 Member Posts: 181 Arc User
    koppster wrote: »
    I un-mothballed my Ourborous the other night, just to muck about with it on my tac captain for the lolz.

    Turns out I'm having a blast with it. Built-in raider flanking coupled with Int/strat specs makes for some epic flanking damage. Adequate weapon layout, although only being 4:2 hurts it a little, I'm still posting good numbers. Built-in battle cloak.

    Yes it's a glass cannon, like all 'scorts, but with the right build and spec this is a hard-hitting little monster with lots of room for creative Temporal ability shenanigans given the boff layout.

    Did I mention the battle cloak?

    Why is this ship so under-utilised? I know the Temporal ships are a bit "meh", but I hardly see anyone running about in them. I'm not a min-maxer posting 500k ISA runs, so I'm sure the space-rich end-gamers will sniff at it, but it seems a great little ship for us 50-100k+'ers.

    Temporal Ships are meh? Raider never used? You must not be around much. The temporal ships are very very good ships. The dread allows for excellent tanking, with high hull and shields, while offering a bit of offense with it's traits and molecular reconstruction options. The science ship allows for excellent AoE-DoT with it's molecular Reconstruction and temporal seating, allowing even a poorly geared fresh lvl 50 character to push out 50k+ DPS pretty much right out of the box. As for the Raider, I don't play tactical toons, but if I did, it wouldn't be my first option on the Fed side, but Rom/KDF, it would be up there. I see them frequently everyday, at least once per 3 queues. The fact that the three ships are universal makes them even better. Are they the best ships in the game, no, absolutely not. Are they the worst ships in the game? Far from it.
  • jaguarskxjaguarskx Member Posts: 5,945 Arc User
    I suppose I am one of those people who have not commanded the Ourborous yet. In fact, even though I bought the 31st Century ship bundle last year, I have only just started to command the Chronos Dreadnought Cruiser on a character not very long ago. For the most part, I have been focusing on ground combat rather than space combat lately with the exception of Mirror Invasion (which I stopped playing). Even the last Double Tech Point Weekend was solely focused on ground gear.

    I will likely wait for the Summer Event to wind down before focusing my attention to the Ourborous and Eternal.
  • koppsterkoppster Member Posts: 179 Arc User
    Temporal Ships are meh? Raider never used? You must not be around much. The temporal ships are very very good ships. The dread allows for excellent tanking, with high hull and shields, while offering a bit of offense with it's traits and molecular reconstruction options. The science ship allows for excellent AoE-DoT with it's molecular Reconstruction and temporal seating, allowing even a poorly geared fresh lvl 50 character to push out 50k+ DPS pretty much right out of the box. As for the Raider, I don't play tactical toons, but if I did, it wouldn't be my first option on the Fed side, but Rom/KDF, it would be up there. I see them frequently everyday, at least once per 3 queues. The fact that the three ships are universal makes them even better. Are they the best ships in the game, no, absolutely not. Are they the worst ships in the game? Far from it.

    I mostly play sci and I'm not long off levelling a klink alt. I think I seen the temporal raider once while I was levelling him and not often since then. That was over tens of dozens of queues grinding marks for rep gear.

    I mis-worded the "meh" comment. The rest of my original post makes it clear I find the raider a great little ship. I use the temporal sci vessel on my rom alt also. Personally I think they're a great bundle, but that's an opinion that doesn't seem to be reflected by the rest of playerbase. Although in saying that, I do see the sci vessel a lot more often.

  • salazarrazesalazarraze Member Posts: 3,794 Arc User
    It's pretty boring to fly TBH despite being a good ship. I want my federation ships to FEEL like federation ships. Whenever I want to FEEL like I'm flying a BoP, I fly my actual BoP.
    When you see "TRIBBLE" in my posts, it's because I manually typed "TRIBBLE" and censored myself.
  • dumas13dumas13 Member Posts: 281 Arc User
    edited June 2017
    I think I flew mine just long enough to get the trait on one toon. It's a fun little bird, but the raiding playstyle just doesn't suit me. Molecular Reconstruction, fully universal boff seating, and temporal seats make it very versatile, even if it's hard to get gear together that boosts weapons and exotic damage at the same time. I just don't do well with jumpy and fragile little craft that overshoot things too easily.

    As for the other temporal ships, the Eternal is probably one of the better science vessels available and I love using it on one of my science toons. The Chronos is just too big and unwieldy for me to really enjoy, so big it screws with the camera sometimes. It's made me a bit wary of flying other dreadnoughts, really.

    Edit: I have seen them fairly regularly in the Mirror Invasion queue these last couple weeks, about the same frequency as the Eternal and Chronos.
  • bossheisenbergbossheisenberg Member Posts: 603 Arc User
    Just because you just now discovered how awesome that ship is doesn't mean no one else is using it. If you had been around Kerret six months ago you would have seen that the temporal ships were king. It's not being used as much now because it's no longer new, and people like new stuff, like the Miradorn Raider, which is superior to the temporal in some ways, less in others. Also, the temporal abilities got a huge nerf with season 13 so that could be part of the reason why you don't see them as much.
  • tobiashirttobiashirt Member Posts: 630 Arc User
    edited June 2017
    nekofury86 wrote: »
    koppster wrote: »
    I un-mothballed my Ourborous the other night, just to muck about with it on my tac captain for the lolz.

    Turns out I'm having a blast with it. Built-in raider flanking coupled with Int/strat specs makes for some epic flanking damage. Adequate weapon layout, although only being 4:2 hurts it a little, I'm still posting good numbers. Built-in battle cloak.

    Yes it's a glass cannon, like all 'scorts, but with the right build and spec this is a hard-hitting little monster with lots of room for creative Temporal ability shenanigans given the boff layout.

    Did I mention the battle cloak?

    Why is this ship so under-utilised? I know the Temporal ships are a bit "meh", but I hardly see anyone running about in them. I'm not a min-maxer posting 500k ISA runs, so I'm sure the space-rich end-gamers will sniff at it, but it seems a great little ship for us 50-100k+'ers.

    Temporal Ships are meh? Raider never used? You must not be around much. The temporal ships are very very good ships. The dread allows for excellent tanking, with high hull and shields, while offering a bit of offense with it's traits and molecular reconstruction options. The science ship allows for excellent AoE-DoT with it's molecular Reconstruction and temporal seating, allowing even a poorly geared fresh lvl 50 character to push out 50k+ DPS pretty much right out of the box. As for the Raider, I don't play tactical toons, but if I did, it wouldn't be my first option on the Fed side, but Rom/KDF, it would be up there. I see them frequently everyday, at least once per 3 queues. The fact that the three ships are universal makes them even better. Are they the best ships in the game, no, absolutely not. Are they the worst ships in the game? Far from it.

    Most of this seems on the money, but 50k for a fresh lvl50 seems a tad off, especially post-s13. Even for a fresh-60 romtac aliengen, thats optimistic. On an account that's bought a lot of good c-store ships and has been around for all the events so you have options in what to fly and a good stable of traits if you go through mastery, maybe this number works. I have my engineer from the last recruitment event who can get 60k on a good day, but is more around 50k on average...after maxing out all reps, getting spire consoles/special boffs, purchasing some good traits, buying the 5th ship trait slot, and shelling out half a billion or so on a good set of weapons. 50k was possible for a relatively new character...on an already well set up account.

    Edit: As for the temporal ships, they're not only good, but probably the best value to date in the C-store. My main runs the Chronos and managed 113k post-s13 while using a mission-reward shield/engine/deflector and the entire ship-specific console set (character was a Fed/Andorian/Engineer). KDF and Rom-KDF use the raider instead of BoPs, and my best exotic-damage scientist uses the Eternal.
  • tousseautousseau Member Posts: 1,484 Arc User
    Agreed... the Temporal Raider is a fun little ship. I, likewise, just pulled mine out of space dock (fitted with the Temporal set and Delphic weapons). The U.S.S. Ushaan-tor is a beast of a little ship.
  • odinforever20000odinforever20000 Member Posts: 1,849 Arc User
    koppster wrote: »
    Temporal Ships are meh? Raider never used? You must not be around much. The temporal ships are very very good ships. The dread allows for excellent tanking, with high hull and shields, while offering a bit of offense with it's traits and molecular reconstruction options. The science ship allows for excellent AoE-DoT with it's molecular Reconstruction and temporal seating, allowing even a poorly geared fresh lvl 50 character to push out 50k+ DPS pretty much right out of the box. As for the Raider, I don't play tactical toons, but if I did, it wouldn't be my first option on the Fed side, but Rom/KDF, it would be up there. I see them frequently everyday, at least once per 3 queues. The fact that the three ships are universal makes them even better. Are they the best ships in the game, no, absolutely not. Are they the worst ships in the game? Far from it.

    I mostly play sci and I'm not long off levelling a klink alt. I think I seen the temporal raider once while I was levelling him and not often since then. That was over tens of dozens of queues grinding marks for rep gear.

    I mis-worded the "meh" comment. The rest of my original post makes it clear I find the raider a great little ship. I use the temporal sci vessel on my rom alt also. Personally I think they're a great bundle, but that's an opinion that doesn't seem to be reflected by the rest of playerbase. Although in saying that, I do see the sci vessel a lot more often.

    Yup its a good ship. Like many here I got it when it came out and it was wicked fun. However, I prefer science ships and If I need a Battle cloak, All my Romulan Science ship got one (Excluding my R'mor):P...Tho..the new Rep weapon 2 piece would do in a pinch..

    Like also mentioned..the cruiser is just awesome. I scored 110kdps with that pre season 13.My KDF toon runs the 31c Sci vessel with Siphon Drones or the Oroboros.:D.. Some of the temporal abilities (Namely Entropic) got a nerf.

    The_Science_Channel_Signature_Gen_2_-_Jacobs_xSmall.png


    Rouge Sto Wiki Editor.


  • xyquarzexyquarze Member Posts: 2,117 Arc User
    I actually like all three temporal ships, but two things make me still feel "on the fence" about assigning them to a toon as a go to ship.

    1) The looks. Just not my cup of tea.
    2) With my dedication to using ship series' epic consoles to differentiate ships even more than just boff seating, don't mind DPS drops here, they tend to become a major clickfest, especially the dread. Again my own personal problem.

    That being said, they're good ships and fly really well.
    My mother was an epohh and my father smelled of tulaberries
  • ltminnsltminns Member Posts: 12,572 Arc User
    The Feds do have another Faction Raider - the Aquarius Light Escort. Fleet T5U Version - Commander Tactical, Lt. Commander Universal, 2 Lt. Universal, and an Ensign Universal. 4/2 Weapons, 5T/4E/2S Consoles.
    'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
    Judge Dan Haywood
    'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
    l don't know.
    l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
    That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
    Lt. Philip J. Minns
  • discojerdiscojer Member Posts: 533 Arc User
    Pre-recent Nerf, I liked flying the Raider because you could put Gravity Well III in it. Afterwards, not so much. I switched to a pilot ship. You lose the raider flanking, but gain pilot maneuvers and an extra forward weapon.
  • peterconnorfirstpeterconnorfirst Member Posts: 6,225 Arc User
    edited June 2017
    koppster wrote: »
    I un-mothballed my Ourborous the other night, just to muck about with it on my tac captain for the lolz.

    Turns out I'm having a blast with it. Built-in raider flanking coupled with Int/strat specs makes for some epic flanking damage. Adequate weapon layout, although only being 4:2 hurts it a little, I'm still posting good numbers. Built-in battle cloak.

    Yes it's a glass cannon, like all 'scorts, but with the right build and spec this is a hard-hitting little monster with lots of room for creative Temporal ability shenanigans given the boff layout.

    Did I mention the battle cloak?

    Why is this ship so under-utilised? I know the Temporal ships are a bit "meh", but I hardly see anyone running about in them. I'm not a min-maxer posting 500k ISA runs, so I'm sure the space-rich end-gamers will sniff at it, but it seems a great little ship for us 50-100k+'ers.

    Temporal ships and especially the console set are fine. Problem is just that raiders and escorts lack a gun port. I know, I know we have this new heavy weapon with S13. Well sorry, simply not good enough. Especially not considering by how much carrier pets alone got buffed and dreadnoughts get that even on top of a full weapon loadout.

    Don’t get me wrong, escorts are the most fun to play but If one does it, it really comes down to a ship you are nuts about because it’s cool an special and whatsoever. Space Barbie if you will. That’s the second time the Ourborous loses and that one time too many for me.

    I currently sit on a JHSS and NX. If I had much less resources perhaps I reconsider but even in Z-Store terms we got cooler ones flying around.
    animated.gif
    Looking for a fun PvE fleet? Join us at Omega Combat Division today.
    felisean wrote: »
    teamwork to reach a goal is awesome and highly appreciated
  • seriousdaveseriousdave Member Posts: 2,777 Arc User
    ltminns wrote: »
    The Feds do have another Faction Raider - the Aquarius Light Escort. Fleet T5U Version - Commander Tactical, Lt. Commander Universal, 2 Lt. Universal, and an Ensign Universal. 4/2 Weapons, 5T/4E/2S Consoles.

    And nobody uses it because it's way too expensive for what it delivers. Either 200k fc for a garbage can that's stuck at t5 or 20k + 4 fsm for an underperfoming escort.
    Not really a serious competition for the Ouroboros.

    Aside from that raiders have a hard time competeting with escorts nowadays. Especially since we got all those 5/x ships. They're slightly beefier, pack more fire power and their turn rate really isn't that much worse than the raider's.
  • ltminnsltminns Member Posts: 12,572 Arc User
    Wasn't the point. Just pointing out that the Feds do have another Faction Raider.

    Ships with a 5/2 layout and Commander Tactical also got the Heavy Weapon Slot.
    'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
    Judge Dan Haywood
    'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
    l don't know.
    l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
    That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
    Lt. Philip J. Minns
  • ev1taev1ta Member Posts: 42 Arc User
    It's got okay stats, but it's an incredibly ugly ship.

    Never discount the appearance of a ship. It has to be something extra special to warrant the ugliness.
  • koppsterkoppster Member Posts: 179 Arc User
    edited June 2017
    I don't know about appearance. This is mine using the Nukara shield and Lukari Deflector visuals. It's not too shabby to my eyesscreenshot_2017_06_06_15_08_14.jpg
  • xyquarzexyquarze Member Posts: 2,117 Arc User
    You're referring very much towards PvP there though, which isn't as much of an issue in queues or in Sector Space. And PvP is still a minor part, so shouldn't really influence the overall experience as much.

    As a side note: I wonder how many "Fed players" are out there, i. e. those not (seriously) playing other faction toons. I was under the impression that most players have at least one of each, so they will know the limitations and how to deal with them. That there may be better ships for certain factions out there would be a different issue.
    My mother was an epohh and my father smelled of tulaberries
  • meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    I prefer my Na'kuhl Raider: have one on my Fed Engi and on my Tact Rom.
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • e30erneste30ernest Member Posts: 1,794 Arc User
    I own it, but I don't use it because I find it an absolute eye-sore. :neutral:
  • meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    coolbatman wrote: »
    don't dismiss the Aquarius Light Escort, the challenge is to make do with what you have, just look at the 'dps gawds' that get 50k to 100k out of a t1/ t2 constitution, if they can do that then i'm sure there is a way to use the Aquarius Light Escort to good effect.......even w/o having the newest clicky or boff seating


    But the point is, if 'dps gawds' can get 50k to 100k out of an Aquarius, they could get 75k to 150k out of a better ship. :)
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • odinforever20000odinforever20000 Member Posts: 1,849 Arc User
    meimeitoo wrote: »
    coolbatman wrote: »
    don't dismiss the Aquarius Light Escort, the challenge is to make do with what you have, just look at the 'dps gawds' that get 50k to 100k out of a t1/ t2 constitution, if they can do that then i'm sure there is a way to use the Aquarius Light Escort to good effect.......even w/o having the newest clicky or boff seating


    But the point is, if 'dps gawds' can get 50k to 100k out of an Aquarius, they could get 75k to 150k out of a better ship. :)

    The whole..."better ship" thing is largely subjective.

    The_Science_Channel_Signature_Gen_2_-_Jacobs_xSmall.png


    Rouge Sto Wiki Editor.


  • gaevsmangaevsman Member Posts: 3,190 Arc User
    I think the problem with that ship is that it has no faction materials, Klingon, Romulan, Federation, as it was, back in the day, the Dyson Destroyer. We know there is faction specific temporal ships, so why not in the 31 century?, you should be able to customice your ship to your appeal, it makes sense..
    The forces of darkness are upon us!
  • odinforever20000odinforever20000 Member Posts: 1,849 Arc User
    gaevsman wrote: »
    I think the problem with that ship is that it has no faction materials, Klingon, Romulan, Federation, as it was, back in the day, the Dyson Destroyer. We know there is faction specific temporal ships, so why not in the 31 century?, you should be able to customize your ship to your appeal, it makes sense..

    CUz in the 31st century..All Waz Federation..Romulan...Klingon...All now iz Fed :P

    The_Science_Channel_Signature_Gen_2_-_Jacobs_xSmall.png


    Rouge Sto Wiki Editor.


  • meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    meimeitoo wrote: »
    coolbatman wrote: »
    don't dismiss the Aquarius Light Escort, the challenge is to make do with what you have, just look at the 'dps gawds' that get 50k to 100k out of a t1/ t2 constitution, if they can do that then i'm sure there is a way to use the Aquarius Light Escort to good effect.......even w/o having the newest clicky or boff seating


    But the point is, if 'dps gawds' can get 50k to 100k out of an Aquarius, they could get 75k to 150k out of a better ship. :)

    The whole..."better ship" thing is largely subjective.


    Be that as it may, the point remains the same: people who can squeeze X dmg out of the Aquarius Light Escort, can get X + 50% out of another ship easily. Hence, apart from its looks maybe -- or just because ppl want it -- it's becoming progressively harder to justify buying a Aquarius Light Escort nowadays.
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • where2r1where2r1 Member Posts: 6,054 Arc User
    ev1ta wrote: »
    It's got okay stats, but it's an incredibly ugly ship.

    Never discount the appearance of a ship. It has to be something extra special to warrant the ugliness.

    I agree.
    "Spend your life doing strange things with weird people." -- UNK

    “Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.” -- Benjamin Franklin
  • gaevsmangaevsman Member Posts: 3,190 Arc User
    gaevsman wrote: »
    I think the problem with that ship is that it has no faction materials, Klingon, Romulan, Federation, as it was, back in the day, the Dyson Destroyer. We know there is faction specific temporal ships, so why not in the 31 century?, you should be able to customize your ship to your appeal, it makes sense..

    CUz in the 31st century..All Waz Federation..Romulan...Klingon...All now iz Fed :P

    It's an Alliance.. so, you dont loose your identity in an Alliance... :wink:
    The forces of darkness are upon us!
Sign In or Register to comment.