test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Star Trek Online General Discussion

I think we need a t6 version of the Vor'Cha or the Vor'Kang

gaevsmangaevsman Member Posts: 3,190 Arc User
in Star Trek Online General Discussion
Orbiting the homeworld:
mxj3ot3.jpg
Look at the details!:
3dV6Ber.jpg
The forces of darkness are upon us!
«13

Comments

  • jaguarskxjaguarskx Member Posts: 5,945 Arc User
    This topic has already been brought up many times in the past.
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    jaguarskx wrote: »
    This topic has already been brought up many times in the past.

    its the new endgame connie thread ;) lol
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • gaevsmangaevsman Member Posts: 3,190 Arc User
    edited March 2017
    Yeah, i know, its just i forgot how detailed the Vor'Kang model is, it's a great model :smile: just wanted to praise it a little
    The forces of darkness are upon us!
  • odyssey47odyssey47 Member Posts: 524 Arc User
    We'll get it eventually.
  • ssbn655ssbn655 Member Posts: 1,894 Arc User
    edited March 2017
    I just don't get why people bother with it when the Fleet Tor'Khat is the same ship but vastly improved over either of those two. Outside of getting them for the costume for the Tor'kaht why bother? The Tor'kaht will chew the T-4 versions up for scrap metal. I still use my T5-U Tor'Khat and its a damn good ship and I have the Vorcha costume on it. Hopefully the do a T-6 Tor'Khat instead of those two.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • captainbmoneycaptainbmoney Member Posts: 1,323 Arc User
    I hate to be a buzzkill. But I'm still waiting for a endgame K'Tanco. which has never been touched.
    Like my fanpage!
    https://www.facebook.com/CaptainBMoney913
    Join Date: August 29th 2010
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    Vor'Cha is the last TOS onwards Klingon warship that needs to make it to T6. The B'Rel, Negh'Var, D7 / K'T'Inga have all made it.

    For the Roms, all their canon ships have made it to T6, even the ENT-era T'Varo.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • nikephorusnikephorus Member Posts: 2,744 Arc User
    Funny actually because I put my Klingon character back into her old tor'kaht (fleet vorcha) the other day. I missed that ship.
    Tza0PEl.png
  • ssbn655ssbn655 Member Posts: 1,894 Arc User
    warmaker001b wrote: »
    Vor'Cha is the last TOS onwards Klingon warship that needs to make it to T6. The B'Rel, Negh'Var, D7 / K'T'Inga have all made it.

    For the Roms, all their canon ships have made it to T6, even the ENT-era T'Varo.

    I can't really count the T-6 TOS D-7 as it was a Sh@t move putting it out like they did. Considering everyone and thier dog can get a KT T-6 Dred and the stupidly high numbers of KT T-6 Constitutions running around. Just glad the Drexler NX-Refit was lobi they should have done that with the TOS Consitution/D-7. I have yet to even see a T-6 D-7.
  • nickodaemusnickodaemus Member Posts: 711 Arc User
    edited March 2017
    ssbn655 wrote: »
    warmaker001b wrote: »
    Vor'Cha is the last TOS onwards Klingon warship that needs to make it to T6. The B'Rel, Negh'Var, D7 / K'T'Inga have all made it.

    For the Roms, all their canon ships have made it to T6, even the ENT-era T'Varo.

    I can't really count the T-6 TOS D-7 as it was a Sh@t move putting it out like they did. Considering everyone and thier dog can get a KT T-6 Dred and the stupidly high numbers of KT T-6 Constitutions running around. Just glad the Drexler NX-Refit was lobi they should have done that with the TOS Consitution/D-7. I have yet to even see a T-6 D-7.

    It looks like they'd be fun to play:

    http://sto.gamepedia.com/D7_Temporal_Battlecruiser

    I will likely get a fleet K'tinga, but not in a rush. The one I have does fine now but I'd always like another console.
  • seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,919 Arc User
    It's insane that there is still no T6 Vor'cha.

    Honestly, it's just silly.
    Insert witty signature line here.
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    edited March 2017
    The Vor'Cha and its variants belong to the best ship models in the game ,I think, particularly if you consider how some of the other Klingon ships look. Both the production value and the designs are superb.

    Is the responsible artist still working at Cryptic? They shoud let him do more Klingon designs.
    Post edited by mustrumridcully0 on
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • gaevsmangaevsman Member Posts: 3,190 Arc User
    mustrumridcully0 wrote: »
    The Vor'Cha and its variants belong to the best ship models in the game ,I think, particularly if you consider how some of the other Klingon ships look. Both the production value and the designs are superb.

    Is the responsible artist still working at Cryptic? They shoud let him do more Klingon designs.

    Dont know who made the model, but its a great work
    The forces of darkness are upon us!
  • goodscotchgoodscotch Member Posts: 1,680 Arc User
    nickodaemus wrote: »
    ssbn655 wrote: »
    warmaker001b wrote: »
    Vor'Cha is the last TOS onwards Klingon warship that needs to make it to T6. The B'Rel, Negh'Var, D7 / K'T'Inga have all made it.

    For the Roms, all their canon ships have made it to T6, even the ENT-era T'Varo.

    I can't really count the T-6 TOS D-7 as it was a Sh@t move putting it out like they did. Considering everyone and thier dog can get a KT T-6 Dred and the stupidly high numbers of KT T-6 Constitutions running around. Just glad the Drexler NX-Refit was lobi they should have done that with the TOS Consitution/D-7. I have yet to even see a T-6 D-7.

    It looks like they'd be fun to play:

    http://sto.gamepedia.com/D7_Temporal_Battlecruiser

    I will likely get a fleet K'tinga, but not in a rush. The one I have does fine now but I'd always like another console.

    I was fortunate enough to have one of these drop very early. I think I only opened up about 8 R&D packs and I got the D7 Temporal which I have set up with the K'tinga skin. I can tell you that it is head and shoulders above a T-5U Fleet K'tinga. It's in a different class. I have a T5-U Fleet K'tinga and will never use it again now that I have the D7 Temporal Battlecruiser. And prior to getting this ship the Fleet T5-U Tor'khat kitted out as a Vor'cha and the Fleet T5-U K'tinga were the ships I used all the time. The Tor'khat I still take out for a stroll, but the Fleet K'tinga...no way. The D7 Temporal Battlecruiser is so much better it's not even funny.

    But, sticking with the thread topic...I am very much looking forward to a T6 variant of the Vor'cha. Iconic canon Trek ship.
    klingon-bridge.jpg




  • tarran61tarran61 Member Posts: 827 Arc User
    Great, just another lockbox TOS ship. I gave up on my KDF alt.
    Positive thoughts.
    NeAC.gif
  • sovereign010sovereign010 Member Posts: 641 Arc User
    I would love a T6 Vor'cha, though it would have to be more tactically-focused than its bigger brother, the Negh'Var in order to persuade me to buy it. Currently if you want a ship with both 5 tac consoles and 5 forward guns your only choices are the Mat'ha and pilot raptors. There's also the (lockbox) D4x, which is vastly superior to every other raider in the game.

    Thus, a T6 Vor'cha with 5/5 (make the 5th tac the fleet version if need be) is the only solution- that the Romulans have a ship like that but the Klingons don't is something that should be rectified immediately.
  • nikephorusnikephorus Member Posts: 2,744 Arc User
    sovereign010 wrote: »
    I would love a T6 Vor'cha, though it would have to be more tactically-focused than its bigger brother, the Negh'Var in order to persuade me to buy it. Currently if you want a ship with both 5 tac consoles and 5 forward guns your only choices are the Mat'ha and pilot raptors. There's also the (lockbox) D4x, which is vastly superior to every other raider in the game.

    Thus, a T6 Vor'cha with 5/5 (make the 5th tac the fleet version if need be) is the only solution- that the Romulans have a ship like that but the Klingons don't is something that should be rectified immediately.

    The Fleet Tor'Kaht (vorcha) was, before the release of T6 ships, one of the most tactical battlecruisers available to the KDF. As a battlecruiser it wouldn't have 5 tactical consoles though.
    Tza0PEl.png
  • goodscotchgoodscotch Member Posts: 1,680 Arc User
    Those are nice pictures of the Vor'kang! It is a nice looking, definitively Klingon, ship.
    klingon-bridge.jpg




  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    That Klingon science ship was a lot like the Vorcha.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • seriousxenoseriousxeno Member Posts: 473 Arc User
    T6 Vor'cha seems to be a given to be made eventually. I totally expected her to be in a cross-faction bundle with the Sovereign (intel version), but that didn't happen.

    Maybe bundle her up with a T6 Ambassador and a new Romulan Battlecruiser Warbird?
    latest?cb=20090525051807&path-prefix=en
    "Let them eat static!"
  • sovereign010sovereign010 Member Posts: 641 Arc User
    nikephorus wrote: »
    sovereign010 wrote: »
    I would love a T6 Vor'cha, though it would have to be more tactically-focused than its bigger brother, the Negh'Var in order to persuade me to buy it. Currently if you want a ship with both 5 tac consoles and 5 forward guns your only choices are the Mat'ha and pilot raptors. There's also the (lockbox) D4x, which is vastly superior to every other raider in the game.

    Thus, a T6 Vor'cha with 5/5 (make the 5th tac the fleet version if need be) is the only solution- that the Romulans have a ship like that but the Klingons don't is something that should be rectified immediately.

    The Fleet Tor'Kaht (vorcha) was, before the release of T6 ships, one of the most tactical battlecruisers available to the KDF. As a battlecruiser it wouldn't have 5 tactical consoles though.

    I still have my Tor'Kaht actually, I loved that thing when I got it even though it cost me 4 fleet ship modules and has since been superseded by the Mat'Ha with the heavy disruptor nose spinal cannons. A T6 version would make a viable alternative to the lockbox-only battlecruisers :D
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited March 2017
    sovereign010 wrote: »
    I would love a T6 Vor'cha, though it would have to be more tactically-focused than its bigger brother, the Negh'Var in order to persuade me to buy it. Currently if you want a ship with both 5 tac consoles and 5 forward guns your only choices are the Mat'ha and pilot raptors. There's also the (lockbox) D4x, which is vastly superior to every other raider in the game.

    Thus, a T6 Vor'cha with 5/5 (make the 5th tac the fleet version if need be) is the only solution- that the Romulans have a ship like that but the Klingons don't is something that should be rectified immediately.

    The T5U Fleet Vor'Cha was already TAC oriented. A T6 version would improve on the BOFF stations as every conversion would. The T5 one had a very heavy TAC alignment already. Hell, the T5U Fleet Vor'Cha still has more tactical ability seating than the T6 Negh'Var/Negh'Tev, even if you use the Universal Ensign as Tactical!

    Also, back when LOR released with the Elach Lockbox, one of the Lobi Ships was the Elachi Monbosh. It was actually an amazing Battlecruiser for the simple fact that at release, it was really a copy & paste in stats of the KDF Fleet Vor'Cha. Look at the stats, they are so identical. How was it a copy & paste? Why, it even had the Vor'Cha's Standard Cloak capability, which Cryptic emergency patched out after a few days LOR came out.

    Fast forward to not long ago, the T6 Elachi Ornash released, a T6 version of the Monbosh, which is funny since the Monbosh was a copy & paste of the KDF Fleet Vor'Cha to begin with. If you want a good idea what a T6 Vor'Cha would look like in stats, look no further than the Elachi Ornash.

    Tweak the Ornash for:
    - Built in Standard Cloak
    - The guess is up in the air for specialization hybrid seating, but you can bet it's going to be Command as most Faction Cruisers are.
    - I expect the same seats to be the hybrid, again I predict that Command will be the one being used.
    - New T6 model
    - Whatever console the T6 Vor'Cha would have would make a 2-piece set with the Isometric Charge Console from the T4 Vor'Kang.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • corelogikcorelogik Member Posts: 1,039 Arc User
    gaevsman wrote: »
    Orbiting the homeworld:
    mxj3ot3.jpg
    Look at the details!:
    3dV6Ber.jpg

    Agreed. My Cruiser-Klingon flies a T6 Fleet Mogh atm but would love to have a T6 Vor'cha or Vorkang. I do have the T5-U Fleet version of the Tor'kaht, but a T6 would be awesome sauce to me.
    "Go play with your DPS in the corner, I don't care how big it is." ~ Me
    "There... are... four... lights!" ~Jean Luc Picard
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    t6 kamarang with all of the above skins lol
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • captainbmoneycaptainbmoney Member Posts: 1,323 Arc User
    Once again K'Tanco gets ignored.
    Like my fanpage!
    https://www.facebook.com/CaptainBMoney913
    Join Date: August 29th 2010
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    Are we there yet?
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • fiberteksyfirfiberteksyfir Member Posts: 1,207 Arc User
    +1 for t6 torkaht!! I loved that beast. I mean for reals now, we have a t6 d4, d9, d7.. but no vorcha or its variants :)
Sign In or Register to comment.