test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Star Trek Online General Discussion

T6 Klingon Carrier

jade1280jade1280 Member Posts: 868 Arc User
edited December 2016 in Star Trek Online General Discussion
I belive Klingons deserve a T6 Carrier ship with access to new and original Vo'quv/Vod'leh skins.

Who else would love a Klingon T6 Carrier ship equivilent to the Federations new Jupiter or better?
Show of hands in the poll below because Cryptic loves polls! :)

PS: People are interested in Ferasan, Gorn and or Orion skins for it as well D:

T6 Klingon Carrier 75 votes

Yay
90%
ikonn#1068sophlogimogaraks31daboholicbaddmoonrizingaevsmanmustrumridcully0dracounguisreyan01meimeitooangrybobhblitzy4vegeta50024lordsteve1rmy1081kodachikunoazrael605geekysoldierarliekkosrattler2 68 votes
Nay
9%
ssbn655questeriusarabaturevilmark444raiggescrooge69officerbatman81 7 votes
Post edited by jade1280 on
«1

Comments

  • garaks31garaks31 Member Posts: 2,845 Arc User
    Yay
    Feresan Maybe ?!
    tmprl.jpg?width=998&height=499

    https://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1249570/axanar-locks-in-start-date-for-filming
  • baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 11,031 Community Moderator
    Yay
    ^This. I would definitely love to see a Ferasan carrier.
    GrWzQke.png
    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
    Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
    Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
    ----> Contact Customer Support <----
    Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
    Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
    Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
    Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
  • ichaerus1ichaerus1 Member Posts: 986 Arc User
    New Orion carrier would do as well.
  • jade1280jade1280 Member Posts: 868 Arc User
    Yay
    People want to the T6 carrier with all the skins!
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    Yay
    Im not gonna say ferasan carrier cause Id love to see ANY ferasan ships atm. But a t6 carrier? yes. Since we got a klink sci ship maybe a gorn carrier? :D
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • jbmonroejbmonroe Member Posts: 809 Arc User
    edited December 2016
    You forgot the third option: "No opinion."

    These polls aren't in any way accurate because they always involve self-selecting samples (which a statistically valid poll can't have), but adding "none of the above" or "not interested" at least allows one to determine whether the issue is worth pursuing. Because only "yes" and "no" are offered, you can't tell who's abstaining. (Well, now you can tell there's at least one person abstaining.)
    boldly-watched.png
  • jade1280jade1280 Member Posts: 868 Arc User
    Yay
    jbmonroe wrote: »
    You forgot the third option: "No opinion."

    These polls aren't in any way accurate because they always involve self-selecting samples (which a statistically valid poll can't have), but adding "none of the above" or "not interested" at least allows one to determine whether the issue is worth pursuing. Because only "yes" and "no" are offered, you can't tell who's abstaining. (Well, now you can tell there's at least one person abstaining.)

    Do not spoil the magic for people Scrooge.
  • wendysue53wendysue53 Member Posts: 1,569 Arc User
    Why would any Klingon need more than an EV suit and their bare hands for an Honorable space battle?
  • questeriusquesterius Member Posts: 8,509 Arc User
    Nay
    wendysue53 wrote: »
    Why would any Klingon need more than an EV suit and their bare hands for an Honorable space battle?

    That's obvious: for anything out of reach of the batleth
    This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Questerius 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
  • postagepaidpostagepaid Member Posts: 2,899 Arc User
    Yay
    Would really like a T6 Karfi carrier.

    Got my regular one back when carriers were klink only and compared to the spacebarge that was the voquv it was (and kind of still is) fun to fly. Carriers with frigate hangar options are pretty sparse without going into lockbox territory.
  • gawainviiigawainviii Member Posts: 328 Arc User
    Yay
    Not super interested in a Klingon Carrier myself. Simply not my preferred play style. Given their conquering history, it would only make sense that Klingons and their allies have something as large as a carrier or troop transport. So, unless someone provides me a reasonably convincing explanation against it--I vote "Yea!" because "why not?".
    newstosiggy.png
  • jorantomalakjorantomalak Member Posts: 7,133 Arc User
    Yay
    T6 Vo'Quv
  • wendysue53wendysue53 Member Posts: 1,569 Arc User
    questerius wrote: »
    wendysue53 wrote: »
    Why would any Klingon need more than an EV suit and their bare hands for an Honorable space battle?

    That's obvious: for anything out of reach of the batleth

    :D
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    Yay
    No, I hate when the Klingons get stuff. Everything should go to the Federation.

    The KLingons can keep their never-reworked old Vo'Quv and the half-transparent Kar'Fi and be happy about that.



    Not.
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • theraven2378theraven2378 Member Posts: 6,016 Arc User
    Yay
    I'm a fan of the Vo'Quv design, I'd take one at T6
    NMXb2ph.png
      "The meaning of victory is not to merely defeat your enemy but to destroy him, to completely eradicate him from living memory, to leave no remnant of his endeavours, to crush utterly his achievement and remove from all record his every trace of existence. From that defeat no enemy can ever recover. That is the meaning of victory."
      -Lord Commander Solar Macharius
    • lessley00lessley00 Member Posts: 1,200 Arc User
      Yay
      I support a T6 Vo'Quv and I think it should be a KLINGON design
      Captain Joseph Riker, U.S.S. Odyssey==General V'Mar, U.S.S. Blackwater-A==Admiral Laura Holmes, U.S.S. Forward Unto Dawn
      Grand Master Thotok, son of Koloth, I.K.S. Sompek==Dahar Master Shanara, I.K.S. Balth'Quv
      Admiral R'Tath V'Tirex, R.R.W. Dhael Glohha'enh==Commander Ta'eth Korval, R.R.W Hachae ch'Rhian==Admiral Vranuk, R.R.W Delevhas
    • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,014 Arc User
      Yay
      Literally no reason to not bring the Vo'Quv to T6.​​
      lFC4bt2.gif
      ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
      "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
      "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
      "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
      #TASforSTO
      Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
    • warpangelwarpangel Member Posts: 9,427 Arc User
      If I could fly it with my Romulan, sure. But since I can't, I don't care.
    • meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
      Yay
      Though I despise polls, and have no Klink alt to speak of (only lv. 40), I support them getting a T6 carrier! At least they made Roms totally OP! The Klink just got abandoned, pretty much.
      3lsZz0w.jpg
    • risian4risian4 Member Posts: 3,711 Arc User
      Hmm... it is my understanding that you guys like the Bortasque a lot. Maybe they could turn that into a carrier?
    • davefenestratordavefenestrator Member Posts: 10,696 Arc User
      Yay
      I bought the science 3-pack, I'd buy this.

      I'd even buy it in a 3-pack bundle if Cryptic added a Romulan carrier and paired this with the Jupiter.
    • UnknownUnknown
      This content has been removed.
    • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
      edited December 2016
      Yay
      angrytarg wrote: »
      Literally no reason to not bring the Vo'Quv to T6.​​

      To be honest, I know one reason:

      There is no way in hell we'll get a Klingon Tier 6 Vo'Quv and also a revamp of the original ship models. And those are extremely ugly, original release level quality models. I am not sure that there would it be feasible to really add a new model with a higher level of quality. I suspect any mix & matching would lead to horrible results. SO they could just as well create a completely new ship and not be bound by the old model.


      Tier 6 Vo'Quv Command Carrier
      Yeah, I know, Command is probably the worst specialization we have, but I think it would be the most fitting one thematically, and there are some Command Powers that I think would work really well with a full wing of Carrier Pets. Rallying Point for example will be awesome for your pets.
      • Weapons: 3 Font, 3 Aft (can use Dual Cannons)
      • Devices: 4
      • Hangar Bays: 2
      • Console Slots: 3 Tactical, 3 Engineering (4 Fleet), 4 Science
      • Bridge Officer Seats: Commander Command|Science, Lt.Cmdr Tactical, Lt.Cmdr Science, Lt.Universal|Command, Ensign Universal
      • Turn Rate: 5
      • Inertia Rating: 20
      • Impulse Modifier: 0.15
      • Shield Modifier: 1.25 (1.375 Fleet)
      • Bonus Power: +10 Shields and +10 Auxiliary
      • Hull: 52,000 (Fleet 57.000) (@Level 60)
      • Special Abilities:
        • Inspiration Abilities
        • Carrier Commands
        • Subsystem Targeting
      • Carrier Starship Masteries
      • Coordinated Subsystem Targeting - Starship Mastery Trait: When you activate Subsystem Targeting, you and all your pets gain a 2.5 % chance per attack to disable the selected system with any attack for the next 10 seconds.
      • Extended Cloaking Screen - Universal Console
        • Passive Benefit: Grants a bonus to Auxiliary Power and a bonus to Stealth rating.
        • Active Benefit: You gain the normal benefits of cloak, and all carrier pets within 15 km are cloaked. For the first 15 seconds while you are cloaked, and the first 15 seconds after you uncloak, your pets remain cloaked even when firing weapons. Allies in the same radius gain a bonus to stealth. Cloaked carrier pets always retain their shield.

      Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
    • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,701 Community Moderator
      edited December 2016
      Yay
      mustrumridcully0 wrote: »
      To be honest, I know one reason:

      There is no way in hell we'll get a Klingon Tier 6 Vo'Quv and also a revamp of the original ship models. And those are extremely ugly, original release level quality models. I am not sure that there would it be feasible to really add a new model with a higher level of quality. I suspect any mix & matching would lead to horrible results. SO they could just as well create a completely new ship and not be bound by the old model.

      Actually... they've done a lot of revamping of Fed ships that have customization options, and other than the Defiant most have come out pretty decent with the other parts. They also did a revamp of the Negh'var back when they made the Negh'Tev, allowing for a more canon Negh'var as well as the Negh'var variant we saw in All Good Things. So saying that we won't get a new ship and a revamped model is false as we have seen them do it many times in the past already.
      • Galaxy revamp with Andromeda release
      • Sovereign revamp with Archon release
      • Prometheus revamp with Hestia release
      • Akira revamp with Alita relies
      • Nebula revamp with Sutherland release
      • Defiant revamp with Valiant release
      db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
      Yang Xiao Long wrote:
      I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
      The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
      normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
      colored text = mod mode
    • questeriusquesterius Member Posts: 8,509 Arc User
      Nay
      I have the mirror Vo'quv in my inventory and to be honest the only redeeming quality is the access to BoP pets.
      Maybe i am biased due to my preferred play style involving fast and agile ships, but the Vo'quv carrier is IMO something best forgotten.

      Allow the pets to be used on all carriers and flight deck cruisers though.
      This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Questerius 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
    • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,701 Community Moderator
      Yay
      questerius wrote: »
      I have the mirror Vo'quv in my inventory and to be honest the only redeeming quality is the access to BoP pets.
      Maybe i am biased due to my preferred play style involving fast and agile ships, but the Vo'quv carrier is IMO something best forgotten.

      Allow the pets to be used on all carriers and flight deck cruisers though.

      Carrier playstyle is different from escort playstyle. I'd compare it more to beam cruiser playstyle. Set up right, the Mirror Vo'quv used to be one of the tankyest ships KDF side. Don't know if that still holds true now with T6...
      db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
      Yang Xiao Long wrote:
      I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
      The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
      normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
      colored text = mod mode
    • rikwesselsrikwessels Member Posts: 367 Arc User
      edited December 2016
      Yay
      absolutely yes, in fact more than one carrier should be upgraded to T 6 ( both the Vo'Quv and the Kar'Fi are marvelous ships and should be updated including new skins ) . I like the ideas for the command carrier by mustrumridcully0 ( it should most definitely have a science emphasis , including the same crappy turnrate the Vo'Quv now has ...) .I always feel carriers should be science boats anyway . As is even the Vo'Quv T5 is still a great ship ( if you equip it with advanced/elite BoP's ,beams all around with torpedos fore and aft ,GW ,torpedo spread and FAW )

      I still love to approach DS 9 with a Vo'Quv and see how tiny every other ship is compared to that one ....
    • ssbn655ssbn655 Member Posts: 1,894 Arc User
      Nay
      Not only no but HELL NO! To many carriers as it is and far too few players that know how to fight them. I have lost count of the fails in PVE pugs caused by a player using a Carrier as a Cruiser or Escort or Sci ship.
    • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,701 Community Moderator
      Yay
      ssbn655 wrote: »
      Not only no but HELL NO! To many carriers as it is and far too few players that know how to fight them. I have lost count of the fails in PVE pugs caused by a player using a Carrier as a Cruiser or Escort or Sci ship.

      How do you expect people to LEARN if you deny them the means to?
      db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
      Yang Xiao Long wrote:
      I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
      The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
      normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
      colored text = mod mode
    • davefenestratordavefenestrator Member Posts: 10,696 Arc User
      Yay
      ssbn655 wrote: »
      Not only no but HELL NO! To many carriers as it is and far too few players that know how to fight them. I have lost count of the fails in PVE pugs caused by a player using a Carrier as a Cruiser or Escort or Sci ship.

      Those people would be just as useless in an Arbiter, Phantom or Paradox.
    Sign In or Register to comment.