test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Galactic News Network [PC]

Breen Chael Boalg Warship Stats! [PC]

ambassadorkael#6946 ambassadorkael
ambassadorkael#6946
 Member, Administrator Posts: 2,679 Community Manager
edited November 2016 in Galactic News Network [PC]
The 2016 Winter Event will offer a brand new starship requisition project available in the Event Reputation: the Tier 6 Breen Chel Boalg Warship.

Check out full details here:
http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/10289743-breen-chel-boalg-warship-stats
«1

Comments

  • risian4risian4 Member Posts: 3,711 Arc User
    Would have preferred something different this year... looks like we'll be seeing Breen ships for the next couple of years then and nothing Andorian :/

    The ship has a nice skin though, I'll admit that.
  • sheldonlcoopersheldonlcooper Member Posts: 4,042 Arc User
    The ltc science means this might finally be the ship i've been looking for for my Klingon. let the games begin.
    Captain Jean-Luc Picard: "We think we've come so far. Torture of heretics, burning of witches, it's all ancient history. Then - before you can blink an eye - suddenly it threatens to start all over again."

    "With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
  • judasjungjudasjung Member Posts: 22 Arc User
    Are you sure the Engineer and Science Console slots aren't suppose to be reversed? A ship with a Lt Commander Science seat and only a Lt Engineer seat sounds like it should have 4 Science consoles and 3 Engineer consoles instead. Just my $0.02
  • shurato2099shurato2099 Member Posts: 588 Arc User
    edited November 2016
    It'll be good to get a T6 version of this ship.
  • szimszim Member Posts: 2,503 Arc User
    risian4 wrote: »
    Would have preferred something different this year... looks like we'll be seeing Breen ships for the next couple of years then and nothing Andorian :/

    The ship has a nice skin though, I'll admit that.

    My thought exactly. I would have prefered an entirely new ship instead of recycling an old design and giving it slightly improved stats. But it's a "free" ship so I can't complain.
  • angrybobhangrybobh Member Posts: 420 Arc User
    judasjung wrote: »
    Are you sure the Engineer and Science Console slots aren't suppose to be reversed? A ship with a Lt Commander Science seat and only a Lt Engineer seat sounds like it should have 4 Science consoles and 3 Engineer consoles instead. Just my $0.02

    I agree. I would also prefer it to have 4 sci slots. I'm not going to knock a free ship. Free is great no matter the console layout. And the trait (depending on exact stats) could be something useful.
  • jorantomalakjorantomalak Member Posts: 7,133 Arc User
    i like it and look forward to running my frozen testicles off to get it lol
  • drowrulesupremedrowrulesupreme Member Posts: 692 Arc User
    I have a few toons that I just couldn't justify prying from their Chel Gretts because I just loved the versatility of that ship... now I have found my crowbar. A ship that looks that mean with those stats... FOR FREE? Yes please.
    "...we are far more united and have far more in common with each other than the things that divide us.”
    Jo Cox 22.6.1974 - 16.6.2016

  • inferiorityinferiority Member Posts: 4,412 Arc User
    The Enhanced Breen Energy Dissipator console is a potent weapon that was able to incapacitate enemy ships during the Dominion War until the Federation and Klingon forces adapted their ships to compensate.
    If memory serves, it was Federation and Romulan forces that needed to adapt their ships - the Klingon ships were unaffected by the Dissapator.
    I may be remembering it wrong, though...
    - - - - I n f e r i o r i t y - C o m p l e x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Everyone has a better name and Youtube Channel than me...  :/
  • toivatoiva Member Posts: 3,276 Arc User
    Well, nothing against Breen ships (although I was just slightly hoping for the Nagus or another variant of it), but I find the original NPC versions (and the canon Grett) were just looking way better than what they are giving players.
    Thus:
    Chel Grett >> Chel Boalg
    Old Sarr Theln >>>>> New Sarr Theln
    Only the Rezreth wasn't that bad, both the old and new version are a bit too weird.

    But as far as the stats go, making the tac Lt. become universal Lt. Comm. is a pretty big deal. That opens up a lot of possibilities for my most used ship across characters. It ensures the Chel Grett (Boalg) will remain very much used.
    TOIVA, Toi Vaxx, Toia Vix, Toveg, T'vritha, To Vrax: Bring in the Allegiance class.
    Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider.
    Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.

    Don't make ARC mandatory! Keep it optional only!
  • lucho80lucho80 Member Posts: 6,600 Bug Hunter
    Thank you devs for giving science some love. Between the Nebula trait and this one, my drain ship will be a shield devastator.
  • avengerofvulcanavengerofvulcan Member Posts: 29 Arc User
    inferiority wrote: »
    The Enhanced Breen Energy Dissipator console is a potent weapon that was able to incapacitate enemy ships during the Dominion War until the Federation and Klingon forces adapted their ships to compensate.
    If memory serves, it was Federation and Romulan forces that needed to adapt their ships - the Klingon ships were unaffected by the Dissapator.
    I may be remembering it wrong, though...

    You are correct. the klingon's were the only force not taken offline by the weapon. it is from this anomoly that the alterations to federation technology were made. something about the warp cores if memory serves.
  • robofearthrobofearth Member Posts: 33 Arc User
    inferiority wrote: »
    The Enhanced Breen Energy Dissipator console is a potent weapon that was able to incapacitate enemy ships during the Dominion War until the Federation and Klingon forces adapted their ships to compensate.
    If memory serves, it was Federation and Romulan forces that needed to adapt their ships - the Klingon ships were unaffected by the Dissapator.
    I may be remembering it wrong, though...

    Your memory is correct. The Breen first deployed the weapon at the Second Battle of Chin'toka in 2375. 311 Alliance ships were destroyed or damaged beyond repair, including the original USS Defiant. During the battle, the Klingon Bird of Prey Ki'tang was found to be immune from the new weapon. Investigation revealed that before the battle, the chief engineer adjusted the tritium intermix to compensate for a warp core containment problem. This accidental innovation allowed the Klingons to quickly protect their fleet against the Breen weapons, but the Feds and Roms took considerably longer to modify their ships.

    http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Second_Battle_of_Chin'toka
  • keletteskelettes Member Posts: 488 Arc User
    I was wondering whether these ships would ever get a refit or not :smile: Looking forward to taking her out for a spin! :smile:
    "Ad astra audacter eamus in alis fidelium."
    -
    "To boldly go to the stars on the wings of the faithful."
  • tousseautousseau Member Posts: 1,484 Arc User
    [quote="lucho80;13117798"]Thank you devs for giving science some love. Between the Nebula trait and this one, my drain ship will be a shield devastator.[/quote]
    That's what I was thinking... could make for a nasty shield shattering nemesis...
  • spc1spc1 Member Posts: 20 Arc User
    Isn't this ship the same as Chel Grett ? only that it is T6 version ?
    :D
  • sadorsador Member Posts: 93 Arc User
    That's kind of the point.
  • saber1973asaber1973a Member Posts: 1,225 Arc User
    edited December 2016
    It would not surpise me if it could use T5 Chel Grett costume
    (of course for players that own T5 Chel Grett)...

    And about the BOFFs seats (Eng and Sci), the ship also got 2 universal seats, so it can be mighty skewed by putting whatever we need here...
  • letsfadeawayletsfadeaway Member Posts: 110 Arc User
    Temporal specialist seating?
    Strange choice, but then again it had to be Temporal as it is the new shiny.
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    drowrulesupreme wrote: »
    I have a few toons that I just couldn't justify prying from their Chel Gretts because I just loved the versatility of that ship... now I have found my crowbar. A ship that looks that mean with those stats... FOR FREE? Yes please.
    Well, my guy who used to fly it all the time traded for a Rezreth. :p
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • toivatoiva Member Posts: 3,276 Arc User
    saber1973a wrote: »
    It would not surpise me if it could use T5 Chel Grett costume
    (of course for players that own T5 Chel Grett)...

    Gotta admit I'm relying on that. I'd probably be very pissed if the Boalg couldn't use the Chel Grett skin.
    TOIVA, Toi Vaxx, Toia Vix, Toveg, T'vritha, To Vrax: Bring in the Allegiance class.
    Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider.
    Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.

    Don't make ARC mandatory! Keep it optional only!
  • shantavishantavi Member Posts: 129 Arc User
    So, is this ship going to be account unlock like all the other reputation ships? The posts about the Winter Rewards and the Ship stat page don't state either way. Confirmation would be welcome.

    "Back on topic. Destinii is correct."

    (Formerly Destinii until the 'Great PWE Forum Shakeup of 2012')
  • omnius0001omnius0001 Member Posts: 3 Arc User
    shantavi wrote: »
    So, is this ship going to be account unlock like all the other reputation ships? The posts about the Winter Rewards and the Ship stat page don't state either way. Confirmation would be welcome.

    Agreed on confirmation. The slotted mission doesn't state either.

  • avoozuulavoozuul Member Posts: 3,215 Arc User
    edited December 2016
    But why the temporal spec, does it really makes sense for a Breen ship to have it or did they just slap it on for something different?
    Post edited by avoozuul on
    I stream on Twitch, look for Avoozl_
  • haarddhaardd Member Posts: 27 Arc User
    shantavi wrote: »
    So, is this ship going to be account unlock like all the other reputation ships? The posts about the Winter Rewards and the Ship stat page don't state either way. Confirmation would be welcome.

    Same here, Please confirm this in time for us to start running all our toons if it is BTC instead of BTA
    LTS4LIFE
  • crosis2014crosis2014 Member Posts: 48 Arc User
    So the specs are published incorrect. it is Commander Tactical, Lt Commander Tactical, Lt Cdr Science/Intel, Lt Engineering and Ensign Universal. I would have most definitely preferred the Temporal Seating.
  • nimbullnimbull Member Posts: 1,564 Arc User
    avoozuul wrote: »
    But why the temporal spec, does it really makes sense for a Breen ship to have it or did they just slap it on for something different?

    Temporal is the new shiny on ships these days.
    Green people don't have to be.... little.
  • hanover2hanover2 Member Posts: 1,053 Arc User
    sheldonlcooper wrote: »
    The ltc science means this might finally be the ship i've been looking for for my Klingon. let the games begin.

    Indeed. This one will be dethroning the dread as my go-to free ship.
  • aquaelf#4075 aquaelf
    aquaelf#4075
         Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    That's not cool. People spent lobi to get this ship sooner based on the original info in the blog that said it had a LtC universal slot and a sci/temporal slot, not a ltC tac and sci/intel. And if that's not bad enough, you don't even admit you made a mistake, you just go back and edit the blog like no one would notice. And it's still wrong cause it still says LtC universal and it's not, its a tac seat.
  • odinforever20000odinforever20000 Member Posts: 1,849 Arc User
    x48rph wrote: »
    That's not cool. People spent lobi to get this ship sooner based on the original info in the blog that said it had a LtC universal slot and a sci/temporal slot, not a ltC tac and sci/intel. And if that's not bad enough, you don't even admit you made a mistake, you just go back and edit the blog like no one would notice. And it's still wrong cause it still says LtC universal and it's not, its a tac seat.

    So..this is listed at the bottom of the Warships stats page from arc..

    "NOTE: The above stats and systems are subject to change..."

    The_Science_Channel_Signature_Gen_2_-_Jacobs_xSmall.png


    Rouge Sto Wiki Editor.


Sign In or Register to comment.