test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Building the Jupiter

11921232425

Comments

  • drkfrontiersdrkfrontiers Member Posts: 2,477 Arc User
    WOW - I'm really impressed. Moderation has obviously taken a nose dive at Cryptic..
  • dumas13dumas13 Member Posts: 281 Arc User
    So, bets on very very similar demands when the next full Science Vessel comes out with the usual 3/3 weapons and limited Tac boff/console slots? This carrier looks decent, might provide an interesting change of pace if the pet ai isn't too frustrating. I for one am willing to take a chance on a ship that doesn't play like anything else.

    I'm just holding off in hopes of getting a multi-faction 3-pack later.

    There's nothing wrong with niche ships that require different gameplay. They keep the game from getting too boring.
  • rosetyler51rosetyler51 Member Posts: 1,631 Arc User
    kelshando wrote: »
    annahiel wrote: »

    1) There wont be a 3 pack Jupiter bundle for obvious and deserving reasons. To want it is unethical.
    2) The Jupiter class is the first faction specific T6 two hanger vessel. It follows in the tradition of some other 2 hanger ships and the Klingons can reasonably expect a copy just as the Atrox was a copy of the Vo'Quv.
    3) Cryptic designed and slotted the Jupiter correctly in respects to their design philosophy.
    4) Klingons players should be humble with their gifts or the cry for balance may net the FEDs more fighters, more frigates and more carriers.

    Some wiser members knew all this info already but the ignorant, the self serving and the intentionally deceitful desire to corrupt the Jupiter into something it shouldn't be.

    PS: It is curious to notice that the Romulan D'Deridex has larger shuttle bays and more shuttle compliments than both the Galaxy class and Vesta class but has does not have the option to mount pets in STO. Pre DS9, the D'Deridex had the largest shuttle compliment in the Star Trek canon.

    /facepalm....

    The federation already had a copy of Vo'Quv the Atrox.. so by your logic.. we should be getting a copy of the other KDF Carrier the Kar'Fi.... as we have already pointed out many times.. that we already have a sci based Carrier.

    As others have pointed out they already stated.. the DEVS stated that from the start they were looking at this replacing a dreadnought class starship...

    So more points to a 4/3 with a lttac then does a 3/3 sci carrier...

    But I'm still waiting for someone to prove how the 3/3 breen carrier that had 4 tac consoles and a ltcmd tac that was free to almost 2million captains at the time imbalanced the game...

    Pretty much everyone has already said. Event ship=does not play by the normal rules. c-store ship=plays by the rules

    Also there is the point about the ship being so very limited
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2015
    WOW - I'm really impressed. Moderation has obviously taken a nose dive at Cryptic..

    Quality control, in general, has gone downhill. ;)
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,896 Arc User
    edited November 2015
    kelshando wrote: »
    annahiel wrote: »

    1) There wont be a 3 pack Jupiter bundle for obvious and deserving reasons. To want it is unethical.
    2) The Jupiter class is the first faction specific T6 two hanger vessel. It follows in the tradition of some other 2 hanger ships and the Klingons can reasonably expect a copy just as the Atrox was a copy of the Vo'Quv.
    3) Cryptic designed and slotted the Jupiter correctly in respects to their design philosophy.
    4) Klingons players should be humble with their gifts or the cry for balance may net the FEDs more fighters, more frigates and more carriers.

    Some wiser members knew all this info already but the ignorant, the self serving and the intentionally deceitful desire to corrupt the Jupiter into something it shouldn't be.

    PS: It is curious to notice that the Romulan D'Deridex has larger shuttle bays and more shuttle compliments than both the Galaxy class and Vesta class but has does not have the option to mount pets in STO. Pre DS9, the D'Deridex had the largest shuttle compliment in the Star Trek canon.

    /facepalm....

    The federation already had a copy of Vo'Quv the Atrox.. so by your logic.. we should be getting a copy of the other KDF Carrier the Kar'Fi.... as we have already pointed out many times.. that we already have a sci based Carrier.

    As others have pointed out they already stated.. the DEVS stated that from the start they were looking at this replacing a dreadnought class starship...

    So more points to a 4/3 with a lttac then does a 3/3 sci carrier...

    But I'm still waiting for someone to prove how the 3/3 breen carrier that had 4 tac consoles and a ltcmd tac that was free to almost 2million captains at the time imbalanced the game...

    Still after all of this people sticking their fingers in their ears and yelling "LALALA" completely ignoring the evidence that the Jupiter was called a dreadnought only by NPC standards and not by player standards...so cute.
    sov42 wrote: »
    lianthelia wrote: »
    genhauk wrote: »
    5.this point is releated to the first point....LtComUni making it a inferior Vonph JHDC and so on.....you even notcie how much BS you talk there? you even know WHY so many People would like to fly it? even if its inferior here and there? i tell ya, because IT LOOKS LIKE A STARFLEET SHIP, some people dont like the Alien Ships, that goes for some KDF, FED AND ROM Players, who like to fly what looks like a ship from that Faction, BUT those People would also Prefer if that ship also has a somewhat fitting layout,

    There is a HUGE amount of truth in that comment right there.

    It's the one thing I hate most about the JH Dreadnought Cruiser. ... I love the performance but it is not Klingon. It is not Romulan ... and it is not Starfleet.

    I'd trade it in a heartbeat for one that could perform close to the JHDC but be faction oriented.

    EXACTLY. I fly the Jem Dread WITH the Attack Ship Pets on Fed Side...on my Vulcan Engineer Sarek....and while the Ship Performs outstandingly (outperforming most other ships including the Jupiter) i HATE the Fact that a Federation Vulcan flys...a Dominion Ship O_o and for this Character i wanted the Jupiter, KNOWING that technicaly it would be a MAJOR Downgrade in "MOAR TAC" and "PEW PEW" (to quote some people saying all i want is moar tac bla bla)

    But it would be OK, at least i would not get eye cancer seing my Fed Vulcan flying an Alien Ship....but this thing....its WAY to Restricted to Justify pulling my char out of them Jem into this thing....and this Hurts because this could be such a Fine Ship, with just a smidgin more Flexibility (LtComUni) but of course dont we dare asking for such a thing, or else we will be shoot to death by the self rightous Defenders of Grayskull errr i mean Cryptic :|

    So like I said...you want another generic piece of Tac junk...stop trying to turn one of the few Sci ships into a Tac variant...you keep bringing up selfish...well you're the very definition of selfish.

    Just stop...stop...with any BS you're claiming in the name of diversity when all you want is a Tac heavy ship...you want a Tac Carrier go play the T6 Akira. The ship has enough Tac to slot FaW, APB, TT, and a Kemo...if you need more than that it's not the ships fault it's yours.

    So how about instead of trying to turn the first Sci ship released in a year that doesn't cost almost a billion EC into the millionth Tac ship you go learn to play?

    "stop trying to turn one of the few Sci ships into a Tac variant"...again? the same TRIBBLE?....dude what kind of Major Braindamage one must have to repeat the same stuff again and again and again and 5000x more again, when it was allready said TIME AFTER TIME that ITS NOT the case? What Language you need it to be explained in so that even you can understand it? Certainly not English seing that you still repeat the same BS.

    Every Piece of your answer shows me that you have not read anything that i wrote, or if so that you have not understand a single word.

    The Character that i wanted this Ship for flys the Jem Hadar Dreadnought WITH the Attack Ship Pets, so i have an overload of PEW PEW and TAC, yet still you say this garbage that i want more Tac and Pew Pew, when its clear that i would sacrifice most of that Pew Pew only so i can Fly something that has a STARFLEET Design on it? *TRIPPLE FACEPALM*

    Even changing the LtComEng to ta Uni would still be a Major Downgrade in Tac for me, BUT it would make it at least a smidgin less Devastating, you now what Smidging means? JUST A LITTLE, no ones asks for a Commander level Tac, 5 Tac Consoles or a Scimitar like 5/3 Weapons Layout, reading all your BS would makes one think exactly that......

    So by your Flawed Logic Sellfish means: Someone who wants everyone to be able to utilize something EQUALLY
    BUT, someone who wants ONLY a Portiona of People to be able to use that "something" is not Sellfish?.....
    You need help man...serious help, with your logic, half the Humanity would Starve to death, while the others are swimming in Wine.....

    So YOU STOP Repeating the same, far from any logic, nonsense arguments, because it really gets so badly pathetic (if it can even get worse than it is allready)
    people just can't accept that this ship was chosen to be a sci oriented ship and not another tac boat, of which there are more than enough. Ones that can ever out perform this one as so many have said. So why tac ppl are complaining when they supposedly have ships that are already better, is beyond me. If you have better ships than this now, then you obviously just don't need this one.

    the problem is people want this one, but its not geared towards their particular desires and of course, that just won't do.

    *rolls eyes*

    you also didnt read anything at all, or else you would know WHY those people would like to fly this Particular Ship, and not ANY other Ship......*Facepalming while Eyes Rolling*

    Just curious... were you a douche from the point of conception, or did it take practice being this much of an a**?

    Too much d*ck-waving in this thread.

    in a thread full with douches and a**, who know only the me me me, iam certain that iam the least douche here, thank you very much.

    Could of fooled me...or wait maybe not a D but you keep tossing the word selfish around a lot which you clearly are since you obviously want to turn this Sci carrier into a Fed version of the Jem Dread.
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • pwlaughingtrendypwlaughingtrendy Member Posts: 2,966 Arc User
    WOW - I'm really impressed. Moderation has obviously taken a nose dive at Cryptic..
    1. Cryptic isn't in charge of moderation.
    2. I have other things to do in terms of blogs such as Chase Masterson and Attack Wing Blog today
    3. I have other NON-public facing things to such as managing schedules
    4. I'm not in the forums literally every moment
  • yakodymyakodym Member Posts: 363 Arc User
    edited November 2015
    Well, how do you control people who keep repeating the same arguments over and over again, like a broken record? Hey, guys, do one more round of "You guys are selfish, lt com uni ftw"&"You just want more tac, get used to stuff not being like you want it to be". You know, just in case that the previous dozens of times weren't enough. Maybe if you repeat it another dozen of times, you'll finally change everyone's opinion. Imho devs stopped caring around the post where Trendy posted the self-desintegration gif. From that moment onward, they wouldn't touch this thread with a 10-foot pole... at least until someone comes crying that people are just calling each other names, and then they're going to lock this up for good.

    EDIT: ...and there goes Trendy, proving me wrong :smiley:
  • rosetyler51rosetyler51 Member Posts: 1,631 Arc User
    I don't want to put anything that is not tasty thanksgiving food on Trendy's plate so I'm going to just step out. I hope everyone on both sides this little spat does the same.

    HAPPY THANKSGIVING AND Happy Wednesday to our friends across the sea.
  • sharpie65sharpie65 Member Posts: 679 Arc User
    Indeed. Hopefully, a Happy Thanksgiving to those of you Stateside. For the rest of the world - GET BACK TA WORK, YA SLACKERS!
    MXeSfqV.jpg
  • pwlaughingtrendypwlaughingtrendy Member Posts: 2,966 Arc User
    End the argument or flat out bans will happen. No more nice Raptor.
  • qjuniorqjunior Member Posts: 2,023 Arc User
    End the argument or flat out bans will happen. No more nice Raptor.

    Maybe I can cheer you up a little by wishing you and everyone else a Happy Thanksgiving ! :)
  • pwlaughingtrendypwlaughingtrendy Member Posts: 2,966 Arc User
    qjunior wrote: »
    End the argument or flat out bans will happen. No more nice Raptor.

    Maybe I can cheer you up a little by wishing you and everyone else a Happy Thanksgiving ! :)
    Happy pre-emptive Thanksgiving, Qjunior. :)
  • claudiusdkclaudiusdk Member Posts: 561 Arc User
    So, shot in the dark, where the answer most likely will be "no"... Will the new Jupiter have the old Jupiter model as an option? ^^
    "Please, Captain, not in front of the Klingons."
    Spock to Kirk, as Kirk is about to hug him.
    Star Trek V: "The Final Frontier"
  • reximuzreximuz Member Posts: 1,172 Arc User
    WOW - I'm really impressed. Moderation has obviously taken a nose dive at Cryptic..
    1. Cryptic isn't in charge of moderation.
    2. I have other things to do in terms of blogs such as Chase Masterson and Attack Wing Blog today
    3. I have other NON-public facing things to such as managing schedules
    4. I'm not in the forums literally every moment

    You obviously need a Clone Army! One might even say a Grand Army!

  • yakodymyakodym Member Posts: 363 Arc User
    Our devs in Cryptic,
    We give thanks for the pleasure
    Of gathering together for playing Star Trek
    We give thanks for these ships
    Prepared by loving hands.
    We give thanks for our toons,
    The freedom to enjoy it all
    And all other blessings.
    As we partake of these kit modules and consoles,
    We pray for hitpoints and shields
    To respawn and try to live as Q would have us.
    This we ask in the name of Trendy,
    Our Cool Community Raptor,
    who shall go full furiadon on anyone who doesn't keep things civilised :wink:
  • sorceror01sorceror01 Member Posts: 1,042 Arc User
    claudiusdk wrote: »
    So, shot in the dark, where the answer most likely will be "no"... Will the new Jupiter have the old Jupiter model as an option? ^^

    More than likely not. It was an interesting and memorable design, but being an NPC only ship, it kind of suffered from sub-par textures and less-than-quality model work.

    The only thing I will really lament about the old Jupiter is the pylon arrangement, honestly. I was a huge fan of how the pylons mimicked a stylized chevron shape. The nacelles were also unique, too, with nothing coming close to matching them in a playable ship for years, but I won't miss those half as much as I'll miss those pylons.
    ".... you're gonna have a bad time."
  • vengefuldjinnvengefuldjinn Member Posts: 1,521 Arc User
    qjunior wrote: »
    While I like the general design and love carriers in general, the pet nerfs combined with the ever increasing A.I. stupidity on them makes me not want the ship. Half the time my pets are doing something elsewhere which makes my carriers gimped space whales with hangars.(

    This ^ Plus the fact that the ship only has a sciencey feel to it. No sensor analysis, No secondary deflector.
    As a science player, I have better choices, Like the Annorax.

    Not to mention, I'm not too fond of the design myself. Sorry, I realize that popular vote won out, but still, I'm only being honest here.






    tumblr_o2aau3b7nh1rkvl19o1_400.gif








  • yakodymyakodym Member Posts: 363 Arc User
    sorceror01 wrote: »
    claudiusdk wrote: »
    So, shot in the dark, where the answer most likely will be "no"... Will the new Jupiter have the old Jupiter model as an option? ^^

    More than likely not. It was an interesting and memorable design, but being an NPC only ship, it kind of suffered from sub-par textures and less-than-quality model work.

    The only thing I will really lament about the old Jupiter is the pylon arrangement, honestly. I was a huge fan of how the pylons mimicked a stylized chevron shape. The nacelles were also unique, too, with nothing coming close to matching them in a playable ship for years, but I won't miss those half as much as I'll miss those pylons.

    ...weren't those pylons just two vertically oriented Cheyenne pylons?

  • oldravenman3025oldravenman3025 Member Posts: 1,892 Arc User
    qjunior wrote: »
    While I like the general design and love carriers in general, the pet nerfs combined with the ever increasing A.I. stupidity on them makes me not want the ship. Half the time my pets are doing something elsewhere which makes my carriers gimped space whales with hangars.(

    This ^ Plus the fact that the ship only has a sciencey feel to it. No sensor analysis, No secondary deflector.
    As a science player, I have better choices, Like the Annorax.

    Not to mention, I'm not too fond of the design myself. Sorry, I realize that popular vote won out, but still, I'm only being honest here.








    That's because it's not a science vessel.

    You're not going to get all of the bells and whistles here.
  • sorceror01sorceror01 Member Posts: 1,042 Arc User
    edited November 2015
    yakodym wrote: »
    sorceror01 wrote: »
    claudiusdk wrote: »
    So, shot in the dark, where the answer most likely will be "no"... Will the new Jupiter have the old Jupiter model as an option? ^^

    More than likely not. It was an interesting and memorable design, but being an NPC only ship, it kind of suffered from sub-par textures and less-than-quality model work.

    The only thing I will really lament about the old Jupiter is the pylon arrangement, honestly. I was a huge fan of how the pylons mimicked a stylized chevron shape. The nacelles were also unique, too, with nothing coming close to matching them in a playable ship for years, but I won't miss those half as much as I'll miss those pylons.

    ...weren't those pylons just two vertically oriented Cheyenne pylons?

    Nope! The pylons were actually twinned stylized chevrons that bisected the aft end of the vessel a bit, with another, smaller pair of stylized chevrons at their ends to act as stanchions for the nacelles.

    Pics for comparison:
    USS_Zodiac.jpg
    tumblr_mdrex7tKtD1rzu2xzo1_1280.png

    Though it's easy to confuse them considering they have vaguely similar quad nacelle arrangements.

    ".... you're gonna have a bad time."
  • vengefuldjinnvengefuldjinn Member Posts: 1,521 Arc User
    qjunior wrote: »
    While I like the general design and love carriers in general, the pet nerfs combined with the ever increasing A.I. stupidity on them makes me not want the ship. Half the time my pets are doing something elsewhere which makes my carriers gimped space whales with hangars.(

    This ^ Plus the fact that the ship only has a sciencey feel to it. No sensor analysis, No secondary deflector.
    As a science player, I have better choices, Like the Annorax.

    Not to mention, I'm not too fond of the design myself. Sorry, I realize that popular vote won out, but still, I'm only being honest here.



    That's because it's not a science vessel.

    You're not going to get all of the bells and whistles here.

    Sigh, Fair enough, point taken.

    "After some discussion, we finally settled on making a Carrier. Starfleet players have access to plenty of Escort and Cruiser options, but not very many Science ships and even fewer Carriers. This gave us a perfect opportunity to fill that gap."

    I obviously misunderstood, cause I interpreted that to mean it was science/carrier and I was hoping for similar treatment the Annorax got, my mistake.

    Again, guess I'm sticking with my Annorax then.

    I honestly just don't know who they were marketing this to then, "Starfleet players have access to plenty of Escort and Cruiser options"
    Since It's not filling this particular Science player's "gap"
    tumblr_o2aau3b7nh1rkvl19o1_400.gif








  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0 Arc User
    claudiusdk wrote: »
    So, shot in the dark, where the answer most likely will be "no"... Will the new Jupiter have the old Jupiter model as an option? ^^

    Now why would you want that bucket 'o bolts?
  • yakodymyakodym Member Posts: 363 Arc User
    It's just that I vaguely remembered someone mentioning the ship parts that were used to kitbash jupiter together... Maybe I'm wrong but the upper hull is resized intrepid saucer, the lower hull is from patrol escort, and the "chevrons" are iirc on some ship somewhere, in a horizontal position. Maybe the support cruiser or some such... (someone might want to correct me on this) :wink:
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2015
    BaU-jjNCIAEZWML.jpg

    Have a good turkey day, Americans.
  • zedbrightlander1zedbrightlander1 Member Posts: 14,782 Arc User
    sov42 wrote: »
    BaU-jjNCIAEZWML.jpg

    Have a good turkey day, Americans.
    Well, that pic is a great start! LOL

    f5cc65bc8f3b91f963e328314df7c48d.jpg
    Sig? What sig? I don't see any sig.
  • sgoneillsgoneill Member Posts: 30 Arc User
    sov42 wrote: »
    BaU-jjNCIAEZWML.jpg

    Have a good turkey day, Americans.

    Let us be thankful for the miracle of Photoshop. :D
  • johnwatson71johnwatson71 Member Posts: 187 Arc User
    I don't want to put anything that is not tasty thanksgiving food on Trendy's plate so I'm going to just step out. I hope everyone on both sides this little spat does the same.

    HAPPY THANKSGIVING AND Happy Wednesday to our friends across the sea.

    Seconded! Happy thanksgiving!
    7aamriW.png
  • jimkirk#6925 jimkirk Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    Hi.

    what about the idea of earning 1 - 2 (ZEN) once per day doing foundary missions? has criptic considered that option as its hard for ppl with low income that have bills to pay and cant afford to be buying ZEN online through STO so earning the ZEN ingame would be beneficial for us granted it would take longer to earn up the amount needed to buy items or ships etc... but it would be worth doing and building the zen up would be a challenge as well as the free sign up gift between 500 - 1000 (ZEN) and because of the amount that would be recieved it would be easy to buy a delta flyer so there fore obtaining the delta flyer would be made a little harder as it would be available once a certain leveled rank has to be reached in order to purchase it i think the rank of CAPTAIN as the delta flyer was created by Tom Paris using borg & Federation Tech so when the long range science vessel becomes available at that rank so can the purchase of the delta flyer and all other purchases of other ships too be locked out by rank so once that rank is achieved then the ships associated with that rank can be bought with the zen purchased or earned through ingame foundary missions once per day.

    Thats my opinion does anyone else agree with me? also to add to it all if we can roam the ship there should be more inside the ship to view and interact with like for eg, captains quarters the captain should be able to lay down on her bed walk over to the replicator and replicate a coffee take the coffee sit down on the chair and drink the coffee via a cinematic video clip once the clip is over the captain can walk freely to another part of the ship and all those other rooms on the decks of the ship that have doors locked should be unlocked and be able to have something like a holodeck inside or a shuttle room where you can see and view the shuttles maybe an astrometrics lab where 7 of 9 on voyager use to be stationed at viewing anomolies and such not just game play but be able to do things outside of game play like viewing the ship how are we as the main character ingame suppost to know our ship if we cant roam the ship and see where everything is and what decks they are on like on Bajor i interacted with the holodeck i want one of those on my ship that im using or on all ships that i use

    anyway if i think of something else to add i post it up...
  • grtiggygrtiggy Member Posts: 444 Arc User
    edited November 2015
    Hi.

    what about the idea of earning 1 - 2 (ZEN) once per day doing foundary missions? has criptic considered that option as its hard for ppl with low income that have bills to pay and cant afford to be buying ZEN online through STO so earning the ZEN ingame would be beneficial for us granted it would take longer to earn up the amount needed to buy items or ships etc... but it would be worth doing and building the zen up would be a challenge as well as the free sign up gift between 500 - 1000 (ZEN) and because of the amount that would be recieved it would be easy to buy a delta flyer so there fore obtaining the delta flyer would be made a little harder as it would be available once a certain leveled rank has to be reached in order to purchase it i think the rank of CAPTAIN as the delta flyer was created by Tom Paris using borg & Federation Tech so when the long range science vessel becomes available at that rank so can the purchase of the delta flyer and all other purchases of other ships too be locked out by rank so once that rank is achieved then the ships associated with that rank can be bought with the zen purchased or earned through ingame foundary missions once per day.

    Thats my opinion does anyone else agree with me? also to add to it all if we can roam the ship there should be more inside the ship to view and interact with like for eg, captains quarters the captain should be able to lay down on her bed walk over to the replicator and replicate a coffee take the coffee sit down on the chair and drink the coffee via a cinematic video clip once the clip is over the captain can walk freely to another part of the ship and all those other rooms on the decks of the ship that have doors locked should be unlocked and be able to have something like a holodeck inside or a shuttle room where you can see and view the shuttles maybe an astrometrics lab where 7 of 9 on voyager use to be stationed at viewing anomolies and such not just game play but be able to do things outside of game play like viewing the ship how are we as the main character ingame suppost to know our ship if we cant roam the ship and see where everything is and what decks they are on like on Bajor i interacted with the holodeck i want one of those on my ship that im using or on all ships that i use

    anyway if i think of something else to add i post it up...

    C-Store,Zen and Promotions forum section is THIS WAY

  • metacloutmetaclout Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    Nice job devs, I am eagerly awaiting this ship
    .
Sign In or Register to comment.