test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Heavy Escort Carriers Stats

245

Comments

  • freakiumfreakium Member Posts: 439 Arc User
    Q: Why isn’t the Qa’Tel Flight Deck Raptor’s Destabilized Tachyon Emitters console part of a set?

    A: No other Raptor variants came with a console, so there were no consoles with which to make a set.

    Uhmm... SuQob Raptor came with Bioneural Warhead. Puyjaq Raptor came with Graviton Pulse Generator...

    They are but they're not part of the Qin Heavy Raptor line.
    m12Pkoj.png
  • alastorforthrighalastorforthrigh Member Posts: 222 Arc User
    freakium wrote: »
    Q: Why isn’t the Qa’Tel Flight Deck Raptor’s Destabilized Tachyon Emitters console part of a set?

    A: No other Raptor variants came with a console, so there were no consoles with which to make a set.

    Uhmm... SuQob Raptor came with Bioneural Warhead. Puyjaq Raptor came with Graviton Pulse Generator...

    They are but they're not part of the Qin Heavy Raptor line.

    Doesn't stop them from making sets out of them, they have non-in-line ships taking advantage of consoles from others already. The Fed Battlecruiers being able to make use of the cloaks for example. So while not specifically sets, there is nothing keeping them from making them so, since they are able to edit existing consoles/console sets and adding to them. Additionally at multiple times in the past the SoQob and Puyjaq have been given away so the KDF players would be able to make a full set from varying vessels without having to purchase them all so long as they took advantage of those giveaways.
    2qTOAB3.gif
  • blitzy4blitzy4 Member Posts: 839 Arc User
    Or better yet, if a person has the set pieces for one of the factions with full sets, allow the pieces to be claimed by a KDFer, of course only one set would apply if someone owns both.
    jKixCmJ.jpg
    "..and like children playing after sunset, we were surrounded by darkness." -Ruri Hoshino



  • thecoffinflythecoffinfly Member Posts: 203 Arc User
    Where do these ships derive their names from? Does anybody know?
  • wakeoflovewakeoflove Member Posts: 103 Arc User
    freakium wrote: »
    BOff slot wise I'd rank it Fed > Rom > KDF.

    The Fed's lowest BOff seat is a lieutenant so you don't need to deal with singular ensigns sitting in the corner.

    The Roms get an ensign engineering seat but that can go into emergency power abilities or an engineering team. That and they get access to another universal Lt. Commander slot for either more healing, more firepower, or more space wizardry.

    The KDF seats are my least favourite. The ensign seat will most likely be a tactical team or a beam overload. I've always loved the Lt. Commander/Commander BOff setup for escorts so if I pick the Lt. Commander slot for something other than Tac, I'm missing two abilities.

    I'll most likely just buy the Alita though. I've been drooling for this ship for quite some time so thanks for all the time you've spent on bringing this beauty back up to par!

    I actually prefer the Klingon seating best because I like heaps of engineering and putting that lt.com universal into engineering with the lt.com eng would make for an epic little cruiser/escort hybrid. The fed version would do, but that klink seating on the fed version would have REALLY tempted me to buy... we shall see if the fed is tempting enough.
    NebulaOdyssey1_zpsqjc6anjg.jpg
    The Nebula-configured Odyssey needs to be a thing.
  • lordgyorlordgyor Member Posts: 2,820 Arc User
    Q: Why isn’t the Qa’Tel Flight Deck Raptor’s Destabilized Tachyon Emitters console part of a set?

    A: No other Raptor variants came with a console, so there were no consoles with which to make a set.

    Uhmm... SuQob Raptor came with Bioneural Warhead. Puyjaq Raptor came with Graviton Pulse Generator...

    We get both cloak and high hull points and shields, so I'm not complaining.

  • lordgyorlordgyor Member Posts: 2,820 Arc User
    Actually personally I like the KDF>Rom>Fed for boff seating, the Lt. Com Universal might not be ideal for a particular build that you like, but its highly versatile in general.
  • lordgyorlordgyor Member Posts: 2,820 Arc User
    The Fleet verison of this ship has more hull points then my Fleet Corsair T-U, better Boff seating, trades cruiser commands for a cloak, and .02 shields for better turn rate, trades hull restance and healing for Defence, Accuracy, and crit severity, and the ability to load cannons.

    Even the Qa'tel's skin looks simular to the Corsair's.

    I has more skin/parts options too.

    If its bigger then the Qin it'll be nearly the same size.

    The only thing I'll miss is the O.S.S. prefix and the giant guns.

    I'm going to trade in a FDC for a FDR.

  • hyefatherhyefather Member Posts: 1,286 Arc User
    YAY that the Fed one got rid of the useless tac ensign slot. Boo, that the other factions did not. ​​

    I don't think that matters anymore? With the new ensign abilitys it kinda takes care of ships with a single tac ensign slot. Kemocite 1, Structural integrity collapse and Subspace Vortex. Not to mention a ton of new Intel, Com, and Pilot skills to use if its a universal. Never again are we plauged with 3 Emergency power to ? or TT1 x2 or whatever But, You know what really is awesome, alot of these DON"T SHARE a CD with other abilitys.
  • toivatoiva Member Posts: 3,276 Arc User
    rmy1081 wrote: »
    toiva wrote: »
    Umm, are you sure about the raptor's hull and shields Trendy?

    It's the same as the Alita ones while raptors used to have worse shields and more hull. Since the Qa'Tel is based upon the Qin, it should theoretically have 44k hull at lvl 60 and 0.833 shield mod. Of course if you're actually giving it FED escort values, I'll be glad since they're better (please update lower tier raptors too, btw).

    I'm hoping it's because of the lack of set bonus. Hope it's not a typo.
    Seems legit.

    Well then let's rejoice.
    On the other hand, my more OCD part would like to know why every T6 KDF raptor has a different shield mod. Or even, entirely different characteristics.

    Afaik, all raptors till Tier 5 have more hull than similar FED escorts and 0.833 shield mod (compared with FED 0.9). Also a tad lower turn rate, on average.
    At Tier 6:
    • the Mat'Ha stays true to those ideas. More hull, 15 turn rate and a lower shield mod (somehow 0.85 and not 0.833 though);
    • the Pilor raptors are more similar to raiders in order to fit with the other factions' pilot ships. Very low hull - though still higher than FED and ROM pilot ships, very high turn and another different shield mod, even higher this time (0.97 for Fleet, thus about 0.88 for the imaginary non-Fleet base);
    • the Qa'tel keeps the 15 turn rate but somehow gains FED escort like hull (thus lower than on a typical raptor) and shields (0.9 - thus significantly better than on typical raptors).

    If someone asked me, I'd tell him just giving all the raptors what the Qa'Tel just received would be best. At last they'd finally follow the same rule.
    TOIVA, Toi Vaxx, Toia Vix, Toveg, T'vritha, To Vrax: Bring in the Allegiance class.
    Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider.
    Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.

    Don't make ARC mandatory! Keep it optional only!
  • solarwraithsolarwraith Member Posts: 191 Arc User
    Interesting, looks like I'll take a few of these for a spin, I am a big fan of versatility and these fit the bill adequately.
  • robertc328robertc328 Member Posts: 19 Arc User
    Nice ships, but not really an improvement over the Command set IMO. Personally, I find it a little disappointing that there's only one hangar slot. I think I'll stick with my Command ships when I want a good carrier.
  • sharpie65sharpie65 Member Posts: 679 Arc User
    No other Heavy Raptor variants came with a console, so there were no consoles with which to make a set.

    Fixed that, editing the blog should levy any forumrage about the lack of a console set for the KDF. :smile:
    MXeSfqV.jpg
  • kimonykimony Member Posts: 571 Arc User
    Wow, the 1-liter looks like it just climbed out of the pool (if ya know what I mean?.. shrinkage?!?..) though I do like the '59 Caddy tail lights flavor.

    The K-Tel or is it ¿Que Tal? looks like it's wearing headphones (20 Original Hits! 20 Original Stars!)

    and

    The Jewel went Cyclops (Green eyed lady lovely lady, moving slowly towards the sun..)

    My score: A solid double.

    #SaucersForever #TrianglesCutDeep #TeamBeta #ShipOneisNumberOne
  • chipg7chipg7 Member Posts: 1,577 Arc User
    edited July 2015
    That is just enough above the Ar'kif that I might have to save some ZEN for that one. Very, very nice update stats-wise, and the bird just looks vicious with the 2410 update.

    Pilot's an intersting choice. But these ships don't scream Intel or Command at me either, so Pilot wins out by default.
    Where do these ships derive their names from? Does anybody know?

    For the Romulan one, this seems to fly as the source (terrible, terrible pun intended):

    Jhu = Angel
    Ael = Winged (also the name of a main character in the Rihannsu series, Ael t'Rllaillieu)

    so... "Jhu'ael" suggests "Winged Angel."
  • captaincelestialcaptaincelestial Member Posts: 1,925 Arc User
    They look nice. Yes, indeed.
  • khamseenairkhamseenair Member Posts: 2,640 Bug Hunter
    hyefather wrote: »
    YAY that the Fed one got rid of the useless tac ensign slot. Boo, that the other factions did not.

    I don't think that matters anymore? With the new ensign abilitys it kinda takes care of ships with a single tac ensign slot. Kemocite 1, Structural integrity collapse and Subspace Vortex. Not to mention a ton of new Intel, Com, and Pilot skills to use if its a universal. Never again are we plauged with 3 Emergency power to ? or TT1 x2 or whatever But, You know what really is awesome, alot of these DON"T SHARE a CD with other abilitys.


    Only the first power you've listed is a tactical power. And the station I was referring to was a tactical station so it could only use pure tactical abilities. So I'm still glad the Feds have lost the ensign tac slot and wish the KDF and Roms had followed suit, it was what drove me away from my T5 version. I may try the T6 version out now though for Feds. That said though, I think they shot themselves in the foot slightly with the pilot ships. Those mechanics have really changed how I fly and now I'm preferring dual beam banks because keeping things in front of me is a cake walk haha. I think they should have given all ships, or at least all escort ships, the manoeuvring systems of the pilot ships.
    ​​
    Join date is wrong, I've actually been around since STO Beta.
    True alters don't have a "main". Account wide unlocks for all unique event rewards!!
  • sharpie65sharpie65 Member Posts: 679 Arc User
    edited July 2015
    Doesn't stop them from making sets out of them, they have non-in-line ships taking advantage of consoles from others already. The Fed Battlecruiers being able to make use of the cloaks for example. So while not specifically sets, there is nothing keeping them from making them so, since they are able to edit existing consoles/console sets and adding to them. Additionally at multiple times in the past the SoQob and Puyjaq have been given away so the KDF players would be able to make a full set from varying vessels without having to purchase them all so long as they took advantage of those giveaways.

    That first part is true, but it still doesn't get any sort of set bonus from equipping the parts - this is what, in my opinion, people are up in arms about (the fact that there's no Raptor console set bonus).
    MXeSfqV.jpg
  • shantavishantavi Member Posts: 129 Arc User
    edited July 2015
    gilion wrote: »
    Looks nice, however I have a small issue with what was written in the stats:
    Friction/Traction: 60

    Friction
    Friction

    There is no friction in space!!! Space is empty, there's nothing to create friction! Why didnt you just leave it on inertia?

    Because not all missions take place in space. There's Friction inside the Solanae Dyson Sphere (for instance), and there are even abilities to buy from fleet spires that make your ship more controllable inside an atmosphere. Plus, Undine Space, you know, is filled with water, and there's Friction between that water and your ship's hull.


    "Back on topic. Destinii is correct."

    (Formerly Destinii until the 'Great PWE Forum Shakeup of 2012')
  • gilrandir00gilrandir00 Member Posts: 14 Arc User
    Does the trait trigger off [over] or [rapid] weapons?
  • jonathanlonehawkjonathanlonehawk Member Posts: 674 Arc User
    @pwlaughingtrendy - The blog states:

    Set Bonuses
    Advanced Tactical Systems (3 pc) – Passive
    –Recharge Time on Tactical and Pilot Bridge Officer abilities
    +Accuracy
    +Critical Hit Chance

    However on tribble, the Consoles have the 3 pc set bonus as:
    Advanced Tactical Systems (3 pc)
    –15% Recharge Time Reduction to Pilot Bridge Officer abilities (no mention of tactical)
    +3% Accuracy
    +2.5% Critical Hit Chance


    Is/was the blog wrong? Or is the item information on the consoles on tribble wrong?

    Just trying to make an informed purchase here. Thanks!
    Formerly Known as Protector from June 2008 to June 20, 2012
    STOSIG.png
    Please enable us to buy a token with Zen to faction change a 25th Century FED to a TOS FED.
  • kittyflofykittyflofy Member Posts: 1,004 Arc User
    edited July 2015
    lordgyor wrote: »
    Q: Why isn’t the Qa’Tel Flight Deck Raptor’s Destabilized Tachyon Emitters console part of a set?

    A: No other Raptor variants came with a console, so there were no consoles with which to make a set.

    Uhmm... SuQob Raptor came with Bioneural Warhead. Puyjaq Raptor came with Graviton Pulse Generator...

    We get both cloak and high hull points and shields, so I'm not complaining.

    Who cares about high hull points and shields.. ??? ROFL... and the cloak.. ¿? of course you get a cloak... ow.

    On a sidenote is so funny to see how so many people get excited (again) when new shinys arrive, even if half of those ships will be bugged somehow lol (im pretty sure the singularity beam of the Arkif is still bugged as hell). But anyways will be always the same story who really bothers anymore xD.
  • cmdrscarletcmdrscarlet Member Posts: 5,137 Arc User
    Haters gotta hate it seems.

    although a dedicated Fed player myself, even I thought the lack of 'compensation' to the KDF ship was odd.

  • moshiomoshio Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    I love this improved version of the Ar´kif!! My question is if they will have in the near future a unique bridge layout? Since all the romulan ships have the same bridge! If you can make that It will be glorious!

    But I must say that this Upgrade It´s fantastic!! I hope the patch ends fast so I can grab one!!

    Keep up the great work!

    Cheers

    Willy
  • captaincelestialcaptaincelestial Member Posts: 1,925 Arc User
    moshio wrote: »
    I love this improved version of the Ar´kif!! My question is if they will have in the near future a unique bridge layout? Since all the romulan ships have the same bridge! If you can make that It will be glorious!

    But I must say that this Upgrade It´s fantastic!! I hope the patch ends fast so I can grab one!!

    Keep up the great work!

    Cheers

    Willy

    I agree, even if the ship layout remains the same, it would be nice to choose different bridge designs/layouts for the Romulan ships.
  • rezkingrezking Member Posts: 1,109 Arc User
    Haters gotta hate it seems.

    although a dedicated Fed player myself, even I thought the lack of 'compensation' to the KDF ship was odd.

    If you were a dedicated KDF player...this sorta thing would be expected.
    They could have made an awesome 2-piece set with the MatHa's Cannon console.
    Could have.
    But, they didn't.
    ...
    At least they're consistent.
    NO to ARC
    RIP KDF and PvP 2014-07-17 Season 9.5 - Death by Dev
  • xiesha911xiesha911 Member Posts: 36 Arc User
    Dear Cryptic... If you make a different boff seats then make available to choose it! I'm playing on FED side, and when i saw Lt.Universal i was very very very disappointed :( ... I think KDF version (Ltc.Universal) is a lot BETTER.
    Please, make available to CHOOSE boff seats!
  • toivatoiva Member Posts: 3,276 Arc User
    Funny thing is they won't really be able to make adequate console sets even with the T6 B'Rel, T6 Vor'cha (should it ever come) or T6 Vo'quv (should it ever come).

    What I mean by adequate? Well, the Vor'cha and B'Rel have a lower tier C-store versions with consoles, but their T5 ones don't. So at best, they can get two part sets where many of the recent FED and ROM versions have 3-part sets.
    And obviously, neither the Qin nor the Negh'var had any other consoles from their lower tier versions.
    TOIVA, Toi Vaxx, Toia Vix, Toveg, T'vritha, To Vrax: Bring in the Allegiance class.
    Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider.
    Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.

    Don't make ARC mandatory! Keep it optional only!
  • breadandcircusesbreadandcircuses Member Posts: 2,355 Arc User
    edited July 2015
    Q&A


    Q: Why isn’t the Qa’Tel Flight Deck Raptor’s Destabilized Tachyon Emitters console part of a set?

    A: No other Raptor variants came with a console, so there were no consoles with which to make a set.

    I've got to ask: isn't that a bit disingenuous when in both of the examples where KDF ships are restricted from acquiring a console set bonus... there are cross-faction consoles that are part of that set bonus? Why are cross-faction consoles, already available to the Fed/KDF/Rom before these new sets are released, not being included in the possible console set combinations? I'm not expecting any higher tiers for the set bonuses (in fact, I'd be in favor of capping the set bonus at the lowest tier available to all factions), but why does:
    • Console - Universal - Destabilized Tachyon Emitters+ Console - Universal - Point Defense System = Set Bonus
      ...and yet...
    • Console - Universal - Destabilized Tachyon Emitters+ Console - Universal - Point Defense System = Nothing
    Yes, by the way, I am asking about all cross-faction consoles, for all factions; not only would it open up more options for all players, it would help fund the game by increasing demand for cross-faction consoles... which we all know come from lock boxes.
    Ym9x9Ji.png
    meimeitoo wrote: »
    I do not like Geko ether.
    iconians wrote: »
    With each passing day I wonder if I stepped into an alternate reality. The Cubs win the world series. Donald Trump is President. Britain leaves the EU. STO gets a dedicated PvP season. Engineers are "out of control" in STO.​​
Sign In or Register to comment.