test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

nothing wrong with pvp

beameddownbeameddown Member Posts: 1,215 Arc User
look, I know many wont be able to wrap their head around this concept... but

you know how in pve pug cues... folks kind of avoid them on account of all the TRIBBLE 1k boats.. that fail objectives..etc right?

well same is for pvp pug cues... TRIBBLE that do everything broken you have complained about for ages packed wall to wall

so the pve kids figured to make private matches... to side step the horrible guidance that cryptic does for fresh players, folks that build jacked ships... not their fault really when you think about it, good lord I can honestly say I have had to learn about 90% of star trek online ... without being IN star trek online LOL!!! truth

anyways, same really goes for pvp at this point, private cues... private matches..

no reason you cant find a handful of people online that wana play the pvp match with the same set of rules that you want..

then find a few more, IF you think your rules are as fair and even handed as it gets.. then there should be no problem finding folks in game with (as most pvpers totally agree with what is op/broken/cheese for the most part) THE exact same feelings..

I don't know, beats trying to get cryptic to do anything for pvp (we know they wont) beats complaining about the reality of the game daily, beats logging in and hitting the pug cues to see junk match after junk match...

you have always had the power to improve your gameplay as well as your enjoyment of the game everyday, its right there..

silly pve guys get it

why cant the pvp folks get it..
P R I V A T E C U E S

what? cant make new friends?
cause you know just as well as I do, what your going to see from cryptic towards pvp over the next month, next 6 months, next year, 2 years from now etc etc

so with knowing that, WITH KNOWING THAT AS REAL AS sky is blue, water is wet... instead of complaining about it, wanting some magic wand that will never happen make it all better...

why not take a little responsibility for your own entertainment needs and go do something about it, make some new friends, do some private matches..

so few pvpers left now, but doesn't mean you cant find folks to honestly have a great laugh with, a solid match with, and who knows?

perhaps with a bit of effort... it might snowball into something bigger;)

anyways, best of luck to all pvpers going forward-
my hopes and dreams go with you:)

>
pro tip concluded,
you are now all free to commence with the "doom" you have been sucking the TRIBBLE at for over 4 years now;P






«13

Comments

  • This content has been removed.
  • riccardo171riccardo171 Member Posts: 1,802 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    Case Study: I have a 15" 2012 Retina MacBook Pro (Nvidia 650M 1GB GPU, i7 quad, 8GB RAM, Solid State Drive), and it runs Tomb Raider 2013 on high settings just fine.

    On the same computer, STO at low-medium settings in PvP or PvE or any place that involves uber fireworks LAGS. And no, I'm not referring to server rubberbanding. No. So many clickety click, lens flaring, eye disturbing stuff going on that puts the GPU to the knees. You know what? SSOA actually kills FPS especially on ground maps.

    While Tomb Raider 2013 runs fine. I'm going to say that STO has some tremendous issues with the code itself. With such a bad performance comparison I don't even wanna know the details to be honest.

    Still PvP mechanics are broken, something really fishy is going on with the game itself and, on top of that, connection rubberbanding kicks in as icing on the cake. There's a reason if Steam reviews about STO are so bad.
  • edited June 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • edited June 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • bwemobwemo Member Posts: 257 Arc User
    You play pool with a cue. You pvp in the queues. Dear god.
  • edited June 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • edited June 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    There's not a way to post this without it embedding, so my apologies for it embedding...however, the thread title and the discussion, well, I just couldn't help thinking about this:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vuW6tQ0218
  • riccardo171riccardo171 Member Posts: 1,802 Arc User
    beameddown wrote: »
    LOL! dude, you never stopped complaining

    that's kind of your mo on the forums;P

    Keep inventing. Do like I did with a fair bit of heavy delay compared to many others.
    Airlock.
  • edited June 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    There's nothing wrong with PvP in STO. It's just resting. It's pining for the fjords. It's got beautiful plumage.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • wast33wast33 Member Posts: 1,855 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    patrickngo wrote: »
    [...]

    ashes to ashes and dust to dust. in nomine patris et filii, et spiritus sancti, amen.
    Post edited by wast33 on
  • nikephorusnikephorus Member Posts: 2,744 Arc User
    I'll keep this brief. I use to pvp, a lot, but since dr...not so much. Is pvp dead? Well it's dead to me atm. I unfortunately don't see it getting better. The game constantly introduces more and more power creep with zero thought of how it will function in pvp.
    Tza0PEl.png
  • webdeathwebdeath Member Posts: 1,570 Arc User
    You think that your beta test was bad?
    Think about this:
    American Football has been in open beta for 144 years. ~Kotaku
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • playhard88playhard88 Member Posts: 733 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    I recall beamdown wall-of-text-of-nonsense post, telling us that we were wrong about delta rising, that the pvp was not dead, that the game was not p2w, that pvp wasn't broken, that we were old idiots that refuse to accept changes. Now with the pvp complete dead, i find this really post amusing.

    Get over with this dude, you need to let the addiction goes, as we all did. It was a fun ride, but everything have an end. If you made some friends, try to move with them to another game, there is nothing left to do here, they will keep squeezing every penny and reducing personal until is no longer profitable to keep the servers online.

    Not even the forum remains, this abomination of user experience a web design is even worst than the previous
    John Sheridan@playhard88 - FED Tactical
    Vin Naftero@playhard88 - FED Sciencie
    K'tan@playhard88 - KDF Tactical
    Argento@playhard88 - RRF Tactical (FED)
  • voporakvoporak Member Posts: 5,621 Arc User
    Just give it a rest. We tried Vanilla, we tried T5U, but Cryptic still won in the end. Patrick said it best.
    patrickngo wrote: »
    PvP is DONE, okay? it's not coming back, no channels will bring it back, no bootcamps will revive it, no massive public effort will breathe life into the corpse, and if anything DOES look like it might start to succeed, you can be certain that Geko and his comrades will find a way to kill it again.

    Just like they have most every time so far. it is what it is.

    I ask nothing but that you remember me.
  • vonednavonedna Member Posts: 61 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    deokkent wrote: »
    You must be bored as TRIBBLE to type something like this, OP.

    let him write bs about nothing its better than fapfap lol

  • dgdolphdgdolph Member Posts: 592 Arc User
    patrickngo wrote: »
    ...and if anything DOES look like it might start to succeed, you can be certain that Geko and his comrades will find a way to kill it again.
    So much this, it's almost funny when you think about it.

  • riccardo171riccardo171 Member Posts: 1,802 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    I can't even get to play this, because Adventure found me! (<- click)
  • zobovorzobovor Member Posts: 198 Arc User
    voporak wrote: »
    Just give it a rest. We tried Vanilla, we tried T5U, but Cryptic still won in the end.

    There is one thing that has not been tried:

    A VPVP like experience / standards , but with T1 ships (possibly following up with a T2 and T3 ships) .
    Then delete the toon & start over .

    I know you & many others have thrown in the towel, but in theory at least, it sounds good . ;)
  • This content has been removed.
  • zobovorzobovor Member Posts: 198 Arc User
    edited July 2015
    patrickngo wrote: »
    actually, there was a try for that back in April-no demand presence, nobody showed

    I'm sad to hear that ... -- both from a standpoint of it's failure and from a standpoint that it happened , as I had no idea that it was happening .

    My reference to a "VPVP like experience / standards" regarding a T1 ship PVP was because I was very impressed with the "taking the time to get things right" approach that 'voporak' applied ... -- meaning that it was not done with a "hey , let's declare victory / defeat and then move on because I had a brain TRIBBLE" mentality like many of the PVP tournaments had been done in the past , but a genuine "take a small idea and take the time (with input & aid from others) and watch it grow " -- more akin to the PVP Bootcamp , which took its time to set things up , and no less importantly it was ADVERTIZED across multiple forum platforms (general forums , Reddit) ahead of time and ... as a personal experience , while I was unable to attend the original Bootcamps , I did have the pleasure of having Bootcamp graduates start small 'courses' in my own fleet back in the day .

    at a time when things WERE in a position of balance (everyone had a fresh slot, was at the same footing.) What happened instead, is that everyone launched straight into the PvE grind...

    Hmmm ... , well without insulting the good intention of others (and I do see the positive thing with the new slot and all) , IMHO that sounds like a terrible time to start something like this ... , as frankly it's akin to doing something like that this weekend (Bonus XP weekend) , when it's quite obvious that ppl will be working on their XP for Spec points .

    Which brings me back again (and again) to the disheartened feelings of many fine folk here who at the time supported VPVP , Bootcamp and other efforts .

    The last thing I read from 'Voporak' regarding VPVP was that it was impossible to maintain an equality among players due to the Spec system that could not be turned off .
    And he was right about that .

    But as I look at this quote from him ... :
    voporak wrote: »
    Just give it a rest. We tried Vanilla, we tried T5U, but Cryptic still won in the end.


    ... I can't help but feel that we let Cryptic roll us over too quickly .

    I disagreed with PVP-ers who said for years that Cryptic can't afford to loose the PVP base based on how much (some of us) spend ... -- I disagreed with that because I always believed that true PVP is based on skill first ... , even as in reality I was outmatched by gear on more than one occasion .

    And like 'Voporak' I believe that the underlying mechanics of STO are amazing for PVP when all the players are on more or less equal footing ... , which is why I think that PVP's last 'hurah' should be in T1 ships and it should be by the fans and not some Cryptic powercreep deluge that leaves bleeding hearts all over the place ... -- which is why I'm ultimatly saddened that 'Voporak' or someone like him does not pick up the challange of creating what I see as (to quote Babylon 5) :
    "a last best hope , for victory !" . :smile:

    INDEPENDENCE-DAY-SPEECH.jpg

    * the points in this post and the pic above might not be entirely coincidental ... :p
    Post edited by zobovor on
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.