test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Tier 6 Battlecruisers Stats

13

Comments

  • skylordquasarskylordquasar Member Posts: 5 Arc User
    just pointing out that the arbiter has less health then a t5u avenger
  • seriousdaveseriousdave Member Posts: 2,777 Arc User
    just pointing out that the arbiter has less health then a t5u avenger

    No it dosen't. The T6 Arbiter has the same base health as the T5u Avanger same goes for fleet T6 & fleet T5u.
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    For the life of me I can see how a "Battle" Cruiser does not have a Commander Tactical station.
    Because it's not an Escort, but still a Cruiser?

    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • nandospcnandospc Member Posts: 1,260 Arc User
    The Morrigu has 4 front weapons or it's a mistake in the devblog? Just to understand...
  • captaincelestialcaptaincelestial Member Posts: 1,925 Arc User
    Hmmm, the Morrigu Heavy Warbird has a wattle/beard. Will the Mirror Universe version of the Arbiter Class Battlecruiser skin have a goatee?
  • alcyoneserenealcyoneserene Member Posts: 2,413 Arc User
    nandospc wrote: »
    The Morrigu has 4 front weapons or it's a mistake in the devblog? Just to understand...

    Not a mistake. One less weapon slot, but more turn rate (+5), impulse mod (+0.05), inertia rating (+10), +3 piece set bonuses, Rom battle cloak (but less hull), Commander Tac, Singularity abilities (but no cruiser commands & low power levels).

    I'm curious why the blog says "Can Load Cannons" for the Fed/KDF but "Can Load Dual Cannons" for the Rom. Just standardize it and say dual cannons for all, otherwise you risk someone thinking the Fed/KDF has no access to DC/DHC which clearly isn't true.
    Y945Yzx.jpg
    Devs: Provide the option to Turn OFF full screen flashes from enemy ship explosions
    · ♥ · ◦.¸¸. ◦'¯`·. (Ɏ) V A N U _ S O V E R E I G N T Y (Ɏ) .·´¯'◦.¸¸. ◦ · ♡ ·
    «» \▼/ T E R R A N ¦ R E P U B L I C \▼/ «»
    ﴾﴿ ₪ṩ ||| N A N I T E S Y S T E M S : B L A C K | O P S ||| ₪ṩ ﴾﴿
  • nrobbiecnrobbiec Member Posts: 959 Arc User
    The Arbiter class has got to be the ugliest ship these guys have ever designed.
  • commanderkassycommanderkassy Member Posts: 1,005 Arc User
    That starship trait is like, super broken. It's going to be a must have for all top-end builds, period.
    ♪ I'm going around not in circles but in spirographs.
    It's pretty much this hard to keep just one timeline intact. ♪
  • yreodredyreodred Member Posts: 3,527 Arc User
    jexsamx wrote: »
    zeatrex wrote: »
    And instead of making all these ugly TRIBBLE ships, can you people finally f**king add the freaking Typhoon Battleship already for f**k sakes!

    The sheer irony of complaining about ugly ships yet wanting the Typhoon is incredibly humorous to me.
    I just wanted to write something similar. ;)

    Regarding the ships stats, i find it a bit odd that a Battlecruiser gets a "stealthy" intel theme. When i was suggesting a Intel hybrid BOFF layout for the Andromeda (instead of a rather useless command theme), everyone and their dog was barking it wouldn't fit to the ships theme... but now noone's surprised that a pure combat ship gets a stealthy theme?

    I'd be annoyed if i didn't feel so indifferent about STO.
    "...'With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured...the first thought forbidden...the first freedom denied--chains us all irrevocably.' ... The first time any man's freedom is trodden on, we're all damaged. I fear that today--" - (TNG) Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie

    A tale of two Picards
    (also applies to Star Trek in general)
  • supergirl1611supergirl1611 Member Posts: 809 Arc User
    Other than possibly the Mogai i have no interest in the Fed or KDF ships. the starship trait is of no use to me and the atheistic's of the ships themselves are even less pleasing, I'll stick with the FT5U Akira, Sovereign,Nebula and Tier 6 Galaxy on my Feds and Fleet Vor'cha on my KDF. I'll save my cash for any of these aforementioned (minus Galaxy) ships getting tier 6 status.
  • hyperionx09hyperionx09 Member Posts: 1,709 Arc User
    yreodred wrote: »
    Regarding the ships stats, i find it a bit odd that a Battlecruiser gets a "stealthy" intel theme. When i was suggesting a Intel hybrid BOFF layout for the Andromeda (instead of a rather useless command theme), everyone and their dog was barking it wouldn't fit to the ships theme... but now noone's surprised that a pure combat ship gets a stealthy theme?

    I'd be annoyed if i didn't feel so indifferent about STO.
    Intel went to Pathfinder and the Ambassador/Galaxy hybrid the Guardian, so two major reasons why they could not double-up. One of the big 3 iconic ships was already given Intel, and there was already a Galaxy-equivalent in the Guardian. And naturally, with the Command Specialization that recently came out, Command would fit better, especially with how most everyone in the Galaxy threads where demanding it as Galaxies were used as Command vessels in a number of episodes (and for that matter, so was the Negh and D'D).

    So Intel does better fit battlecruisers (and warbird) who aren't there to command or look pretty, but to debilitate and annihilate their enemies. And fits especially well with KDF and Romulans where cloaking is part of their standard equipment (Avenger can equip the Defiant's Cloaking Module, so it too could count).
  • jonathanlonehawkjonathanlonehawk Member Posts: 674 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    if buy this ship it will be for the trait... it certainly wont be for its looks ...

    Oh you will buy it, I will buy it... my precious... Besides, you can use yer old Avenger skin...
    ________________________________________________________________________________
    Formerly Known as Protector from June 2008 to June 20, 2012
    STO-LCARS-Sig11a.png
    If the KDF can get a Fleet D7 (that can be upgraded to a T5-U), the Feds should have a Fleet Exeter.
    Formerly Known as Protector from June 2008 to June 20, 2012
    STOSIG.png
    Please enable us to buy a token with Zen to faction change a 25th Century FED to a TOS FED.
  • hunterguyver4hunterguyver4 Member Posts: 64 Arc User
    I think the Tier 6 Avenger, looks more like the Solanae Feddie ship. I may get it..... eventually. But I would rather have Tier 6 Odyssey, Scimitar, and Bortesqu classes. They are after all the Flagship classes of their represented factions. I would also like to see a new original design for a Tier 6 Carrier in which can launch 3 waves of fighters.
    "Richard, I'll give you one word of advice, you shouldn't anger a demigod" - Lord Archanfel, Supreme Zoalord and leader of the Chronos Organization in the series Guyver: The Bioboosted Armor series.
  • sunfranckssunfrancks Member Posts: 3,925 Arc User
    zeatrex wrote: »
    WHEN ARE YOU GUYS GOING TO REVAMP THE MULTI-VECTOR ADVANCED ESCORT!

    It is coming...

    Fed: Eng Lib Borg (Five) Tac Andorian (Shen) Sci Alien/Klingon (Maelrock) KDF:Tac Romulan KDF (Sasha) Tac Klingon (K'dopis)
    Founder, member and former leader to Pride Of The Federation Fleet.
    What I feel after I hear about every decision made since Andre "Mobile Games Generalisimo" Emerson arrived...
    3oz8xC9gn8Fh4DK9Q4.gif





  • captaincelestialcaptaincelestial Member Posts: 1,925 Arc User
    I like the Arbiter's nascelles....
  • speedofheatspeedofheat Member Posts: 111 Arc User
    [quote="jonathanlonehawk;12568232
    Oh you will buy it, I will buy it... my precious... Besides, you can use yer old Avenger skin...
    [/quote]

    maybe...

    y3m-yM6W2jBAA7NpYi95PewTOHD9vSNpFGl3huKvuKsGif7jH9lBSYRtnx-AxOUzQw00u0SrjnMeAt0McFsPmCC2FoawxgX3ZON4Ork7H39MCRYsgBUn0QYSADDqYpB6wB5twq-_jNOp7AdrNeItQjiXChE9kwGvBsqc-vTz7oj3YM?width=660&height=198&cropmode=none
  • toivatoiva Member Posts: 3,276 Arc User
    Is the Lieutenant Commander Universal/Intel on the Morrigu real or just a mistake in the blog?

    Cause I vaguely remember some talk about how universals won't/can't become hybrid stations.

    It was a little misunderstood, afaik. The point had been that no seat could become a 'universal hybrid', aka that could use intel, command or pilot, as one would wish. But universal seats (that can slot eng, tac or sci) can also be a hybrid with one of the specializations. If I recall well, the JHSS also had a Lt. universal/Command.
    TOIVA, Toi Vaxx, Toia Vix, Toveg, T'vritha, To Vrax: Bring in the Allegiance class.
    Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider.
    Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.

    Don't make ARC mandatory! Keep it optional only!
  • doubleohninedoubleohnine Member Posts: 818 Arc User
    tick0 wrote: »
    I have to agree with some of the other posters here in regards to the Arbiter's design. It doesn't look like a Starfleet ship made in 2410 - or any time period, for that matter. As shown with the Arbiter, there seems to be a trend going on lately in making ships with fancy, and often over-sized, deflectors. Also, tone down on the nacelle designs; there are too many different cut-outs and shapes exposing the shiny blue and red areas. I think the Odyssey is a good example of keeping these two things simple but elegant.

    I've just recently come across this design by Michael Wiley: https://sketchfab.com/models/8a91022fd8854034ae81a6c0e1ffadb3. This is exactly the kind of ship you'd expect to be made in STO's era. It looks like a believable Starfleet vessel developed in the decades after a design like the Sovereign's in the 2370s. Not to mention that it's a beautiful looking ship (just look at those curves). :*

    With that said... Get Michael Wiley on your ship team! ;)

    Anyway, that's just my insignificant opinion.
    Nice. While its not so hot Id start a new Fed toon JUST to command it, it comes very close. Id give it a 9/10. It has a very aquatic look without the beer belly the Odyssey has (and the reason I refuse to command one). THIS is the type of designs Cryptic should be doing after all this time. The new 2410 look, with all the extra busy lines and black sections is "doin too much". This Wiley design would sell circles around every Fed ship Ive seen since the Vesta (which ironically WASNT in house). Cryptic, you should buy this guy's design, you'd DEFINITELY make a profit off it.

    And after all this time, where is the Madden Enterprise F design ship at? We get all this in house non sense and people have been telling you for years theyd buy the Maddenprize. T6 this ship, and I'll buy it
    Madden Enterprise F design

    STO: @AGNT009 Since Dec 2010
    Capt. Will Conquest of the U.S.S. Crusader
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    zeatrex wrote: »

    Can't really think of a ship in KDF that even looks good.
    And it seems for FED if it doesn't has a big TRIBBLE saucer on it, it isn't a FED ship. Which this in turn makes everything look almost the same if not worse. Sometimes the same thing over and over again can become annoying instead of keeping things "in the style" of.

    There is several, and I use them. The K'Tinga, Vor'cha, Negh'var, BoPs, Raptors, Kamarag, Mogh, Borta', all those are fine examples of good looking ships. The latest looks like Legos.

    A Fed ship don't have to have a big saucer to look good. I use a few that don't. Like some of the escorts and Sci ships. But these latest just looks epic horrible.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • riccardo171riccardo171 Member Posts: 1,802 Arc User
    Um okay, good stats. Bad looking Fed ship, not bad the other ones.
    60$ all of them?

    ...lol just got Tomb Raider for 4$. Sorry back to downloading it :P
  • maddog316uk#5668 maddog316uk Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    Would be great if you could Equip the Console - Universal - Clocking Device to it says you can but the game says no you cant.
  • xraiderv1xraiderv1 Member Posts: 487 Arc User
    for the fleet version, how many skins are available for the federation battle cruiser?
    Murphy's laws:
    1- Murphy’s Law tells us that anything that can go wrong will go wrong.
    2- And anything that does go wrong will get progressively worse.
    3- And if you survive the first two laws it’s time to panic.
  • zeatrexzeatrex Member Posts: 212 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    jexsamx wrote: »
    The sheer irony of complaining about ugly ships yet wanting the Typhoon is incredibly humorous to me.
    yreodred wrote: »
    I just wanted to write something similar.  ;)
    At least it looks far better then all this TRIBBLE being tossed out repeatedly, I prefer a Typhoon to finally be added then things that I will never use at all. But you probably like all the stupid looking KDF legoblock battlecruisers and such, the only irony is your blindness.
    yreodred wrote: »
    A Fed ship don't have to have a big saucer to look good. I use a few that don't. Like some of the escorts and Sci ships. But these latest just looks epic horrible.
    Can't think of a KDF ship that actually looks nice, since almost every single one looks the same. And the only ships that do look good in the FED side are the ones without a saucer on it.
    yreodred wrote: »
    It is coming...
    Yeah, in season 9000.
  • fonjo78fonjo78 Member Posts: 5 Arc User
    A quick question. Purchasing the c-store version of any of the ships will unlock the fleet module discount on the fleet version of the ship, won't it? Guess it applies to all c-store ships, but wanted to make sure before spending any cash :persevere:
  • xraiderv1xraiderv1 Member Posts: 487 Arc User
    xraiderv1 wrote: »
    for the fleet version, how many skins are available for the federation battle cruiser?

    I ask as I want to know if the arbiter skin is available when purchasing the fleet version period, without having purchased the c-store version.
    Murphy's laws:
    1- Murphy’s Law tells us that anything that can go wrong will go wrong.
    2- And anything that does go wrong will get progressively worse.
    3- And if you survive the first two laws it’s time to panic.
  • bughunter357bughunter357 Member Posts: 588 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    At least it looks far better then all this **** being tossed out repeatedly, I prefer a Typhoon to finally be added then things that I will never use at all. But you probably like all the stupid looking KDF legoblock battlecruisers and such, the only irony is your blindness.
    the devs have stated several times that the typhoon will never be playable so don't count on it. and since when do the Klingons care about looks as long as the enemy goes boom they are happy.


    the cloaking device console does not equip to the fed BC even tho the blog states that it does so I put in a bug report figure in a few weeks time this will get fix but just letting every one know about this now.
  • aot86aot86 Member Posts: 8 Arc User
    I'm a tad confused... Is the kurak ship the one you have to buy to get the t6 fleet mogh discount?
  • sunfranckssunfrancks Member Posts: 3,925 Arc User
    Would be great if you could Equip the Console - Universal - Clocking Device to it says you can but the game says no you cant.

    This!

    Currently cannot use the cloaking console on the Arbiter..

    Fed: Eng Lib Borg (Five) Tac Andorian (Shen) Sci Alien/Klingon (Maelrock) KDF:Tac Romulan KDF (Sasha) Tac Klingon (K'dopis)
    Founder, member and former leader to Pride Of The Federation Fleet.
    What I feel after I hear about every decision made since Andre "Mobile Games Generalisimo" Emerson arrived...
    3oz8xC9gn8Fh4DK9Q4.gif





  • dondaddyddondaddyd Member Posts: 50 Arc User
    Few Questions:

    If you have a Tier 5-U Avenger, is it worth paying 2500 Zen for the Arbiter. Or 20,000 and 5 ship modules for the Tier 6 Fleet Avenger?


    If you buy the Arbiter, is the Tier 6 Fleet Avenger discounted to one ship module?
  • yreodredyreodred Member Posts: 3,527 Arc User
    Intel went to Pathfinder and the Ambassador/Galaxy hybrid the Guardian, so two major reasons why they could not double-up. One of the big 3 iconic ships was already given Intel, and there was already a Galaxy-equivalent in the Guardian. And naturally, with the Command Specialization that recently came out, Command would fit better, especially with how most everyone in the Galaxy threads where demanding it as Galaxies were used as Command vessels in a number of episodes (and for that matter, so was the Negh and D'D).
    It's true that ppl where wanting the GCS to become a "Command" themed ship. But that was before Cryptic released their command abilities which where just a big disappointment imo. I'm sure no one of those ppl (including me) wanted to have exclusively useless team oriented powers, especially since the Ent-D was basicly 8 seasons flying alone without a fleet to command. But of course 30 seconds of DS9 FX counts more. ;)



    Idk if it fits into this thread, but my ship has got a big hull breach obvioulsy:
    5f01b272-95a5-4a3d-aedc-ab69914f2d3e_zpswvus4hqs.jpg Hopefully some dev finds the time to seal it. ;)




    hyperionx09:

    nice signature!
    (don't care about JJ haters, lol.)


    "...'With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured...the first thought forbidden...the first freedom denied--chains us all irrevocably.' ... The first time any man's freedom is trodden on, we're all damaged. I fear that today--" - (TNG) Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie

    A tale of two Picards
    (also applies to Star Trek in general)
Sign In or Register to comment.