test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

T5 Connie Debate shouldn't hold back Excalibur

ccarmichael07ccarmichael07 Member Posts: 755 Arc User
With a new expansion coming, I think it is time for Cryptic to address one issue in particular that they have been skirting.

We all know where Cryptic stands on the Constitution Class and elevating it to Tier 5.

Now we need an answer on elevating the Excalibur and Vespers to Tier 5. Currently, the other Tier 2 ships have Tier 5 counterparts either through Fleet or Lockbox.

Can you please finally detach the Constitution model from the Excalibur and Vesper and give them the Tier 5 upgrade they deserve?


"You shoot him, I shoot you, I leave both your bodies here and go out for a late night snack.
I'm thinking maybe pancakes." ~ John Casey
Post edited by ccarmichael07 on
«1

Comments

  • anazondaanazonda Member Posts: 8,399 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    I bet:

    2½ hours till Askray discovers this...
    Don't look silly... Don't call it the "Z-Store/Zen Store"...
    Let me put the rumors to rest: it's definitely still the C-Store (Cryptic Store) It just takes ZEN.
    Like Duty Officers? Support effords to gather ideas
  • startrek1234567startrek1234567 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    anazonda wrote: »
    I bet:

    2½ hours till Askray discovers this...

    im gonna bet 2, we will see who wins
  • kjwashingtonkjwashington Member Posts: 2,529 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Only if it can't be upgraded to ~T6. :P
    FaW%20meme_zpsbkzfjonz.jpg
    Support 90 degree arc limitation on BFaW! Save our ships from looking like flying disco balls of dumb!
  • jtoney3448jtoney3448 Member Posts: 642 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Well I for one would at least like to be able to use my Exter model i paid for at T5. The excalibur and vesper are nice ships as well. We already know they can remove specific costume options from ships at different tiers cause they did it on the galaxy.

    This isn't a T5 connie thread, its a T2->T5 cruiser thread minus the connie. Which is perfectly acceptable. If at a later date they get approval for a T5 connie all they would need to do is re-enable the option on the T5 Light cruisers.
  • jam3s1701jam3s1701 Member Posts: 1,825 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Lol everyday i come on the forums i see a connie thread. . .

    It's almost like setting your watch
    JtaDmwW.png
  • jtoney3448jtoney3448 Member Posts: 642 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    jam3s1701 wrote: »
    Lol everyday i come on the forums i see a connie thread. . .

    It's almost like setting your watch

    Try reading **** before commenting
  • orangeitisorangeitis Member Posts: 5,222 Arc User
    edited August 2014
  • anazondaanazonda Member Posts: 8,399 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    jtoney3448 wrote: »
    Try reading **** before commenting

    Well right now, a T5 Excalibur discussions, is essentially a T5 Connie thread...
    Don't look silly... Don't call it the "Z-Store/Zen Store"...
    Let me put the rumors to rest: it's definitely still the C-Store (Cryptic Store) It just takes ZEN.
    Like Duty Officers? Support effords to gather ideas
  • kjwashingtonkjwashington Member Posts: 2,529 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    orangeitis wrote: »
    This should've been a T6 Connie thread.

    Don't give them ideas. :mad:
    FaW%20meme_zpsbkzfjonz.jpg
    Support 90 degree arc limitation on BFaW! Save our ships from looking like flying disco balls of dumb!
  • ccarmichael07ccarmichael07 Member Posts: 755 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    jam3s1701 wrote: »
    Lol everyday i come on the forums i see a connie thread. . .

    It's almost like setting your watch

    The Excalibur / Vesper are NOT the Connie.

    Therefore, how is this a Connie thread, especially since the 2nd sentence into the OP, it clearly acknowledges what Cryptic has said about the Connie?

    But there is a 200+ year disconnect between the Connie and the Excalibur/Vesper, which makes it a valid question to ask, why the Nova (2370's) and the Saber Class (2370's) can be retrofitted, but a ship from the 2400's can't.

    Therefore...NOT a Connie thread.


    "You shoot him, I shoot you, I leave both your bodies here and go out for a late night snack.
    I'm thinking maybe pancakes." ~ John Casey
  • cbrjwrrcbrjwrr Member Posts: 2,782 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    anazonda wrote: »
    Well right now, a T5 Excalibur discussions, is essentially a T5 Connie thread...

    No it isn't, its asking for a T5 Retrofit of the T2 Cruiser Class, just like T5 Retrofits of T2 Escort and Science Vessels (Both of whom have T5, Mirror T5, and Fleet versions of)

    Not asking for a T5 or T6 Connie.
  • anazondaanazonda Member Posts: 8,399 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    cbrjwrr wrote: »
    No it isn't, its asking for a T5 Retrofit of the T2 Cruiser Class, just like T5 Retrofits of T2 Escort and Science Vessels (Both of whom have T5, Mirror T5, and Fleet versions of)

    Not asking for a T5 or T6 Connie.

    They are the same ship, with different dresses... Untill cryptic decides to break them apart (never), it's the same thing... stomping the ground won't change that.
    Don't look silly... Don't call it the "Z-Store/Zen Store"...
    Let me put the rumors to rest: it's definitely still the C-Store (Cryptic Store) It just takes ZEN.
    Like Duty Officers? Support effords to gather ideas
  • thecosmic1thecosmic1 Member Posts: 9,365 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    cbrjwrr wrote: »
    No it isn't, its asking for a T5 Retrofit of the T2 Cruiser Class, just like T5 Retrofits of T2 Escort and Science Vessels (Both of whom have T5, Mirror T5, and Fleet versions of)

    Not asking for a T5 or T6 Connie.
    And the answer to the issue is simple: T2 cruisers use the Connie-based skins. The only way they would do it is if they added a new skin that looked nothing like the Connie. That way people would not be able to have end-game Enterprise-types in the game - which is what CBS seems to want.
    STO is about my Liberated Borg Federation Captain with his Breen 1st Officer, Jem'Hadar Tactical Officer, Liberated Borg Engineering Officer, Android Ops Officer, Photonic Science Officer, Gorn Science Officer, and Reman Medical Officer jumping into their Jem'Hadar Carrier and flying off to do missions for the new Romulan Empire. But for some players allowing a T5 Connie to be used breaks the canon in the game.
  • ccarmichael07ccarmichael07 Member Posts: 755 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    anazonda wrote: »
    They are the same ship, with different dresses... Untill cryptic decides to break them apart (never), it's the same thing... stomping the ground won't change that.

    They are not the same ship, and it's time for Cryptic to acknowledge that.

    When creating a T5 version, it wouldn't be difficult at all to remove the link to the Connie, therefore it's not a T5 Connie issue.

    If they believe this is a T5 Connie issue, then it would suggest that Cryptic failed in explaining the differences in the ships to CBS, and that should be remedied.

    Hence this thread. For Cryptic to specifically address the Excalibur and Vesper classes, how the ships fit into their lore, and if they see them as being the same as the Connie.


    "You shoot him, I shoot you, I leave both your bodies here and go out for a late night snack.
    I'm thinking maybe pancakes." ~ John Casey
  • anazondaanazonda Member Posts: 8,399 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    They are not the same ship, and it's time for Cryptic to acknowledge that.

    When creating a T5 version, it wouldn't be difficult at all to remove the link to the Connie, therefore it's not a T5 Connie issue.

    If they believe this is a T5 Connie issue, then it would suggest that Cryptic failed in explaining the differences in the ships to CBS, and that should be remedied.

    Hence this thread. For Cryptic to specifically address the Excalibur and Vesper classes, how the ships fit into their lore, and if they see them as being the same as the Connie.

    Look buddy... I am not against you.. If you are for a T5 vesper, fine... But it IS the same ship game wise... Yelling and screaming is not gonna make cryptic change that.

    Best to Deal with it and move on.
    Don't look silly... Don't call it the "Z-Store/Zen Store"...
    Let me put the rumors to rest: it's definitely still the C-Store (Cryptic Store) It just takes ZEN.
    Like Duty Officers? Support effords to gather ideas
  • ccarmichael07ccarmichael07 Member Posts: 755 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    anazonda wrote: »
    Look buddy... I am not against you.. If you are for a T5 vesper, fine... But it IS the same ship game wise... Yelling and screaming is not gonna make cryptic change that.

    Best to Deal with it and move on.

    I'd like Cryptic to tell me that, thank you.

    That's all I need. For Cryptic to come in here, and specifically say there is zero difference between the 3 ships, which is why they have skirted the issue for 2 years.


    "You shoot him, I shoot you, I leave both your bodies here and go out for a late night snack.
    I'm thinking maybe pancakes." ~ John Casey
  • anazondaanazonda Member Posts: 8,399 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    I'd like Cryptic to tell me that, thank you.

    They already have... The 1000 times or so that they've shut down similar threads...

    OR... the fact that they didn use what you are suggesting to bring said ships in as T5...

    People just refuse to see it.
    Don't look silly... Don't call it the "Z-Store/Zen Store"...
    Let me put the rumors to rest: it's definitely still the C-Store (Cryptic Store) It just takes ZEN.
    Like Duty Officers? Support effords to gather ideas
  • edited August 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • leethorogoodleethorogood Member Posts: 302 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Before this thread gets locked (for no good reason if you ask me) I would just like to say that I would love to have an end game version of the Exeter/Excalibur/Vesper, until then I will continue flying my T2 Exeter at end game (take that CBS! :P) including PUGs!
  • edited August 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • adwynythadwynyth Member Posts: 369 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    anazonda wrote: »
    They are the same ship, with different dresses... Untill cryptic decides to break them apart (never), it's the same thing... stomping the ground won't change that.

    Well, that one "dress" is the only thing CBS had an objection to appearing at endgsme, and with good reason: it's a 150+ year old ship.

    The Excalibur, Vesper, Exeter (if they resurrect the model) are NOT 150+ year old ships, nor are they iconic in the same way as the Connie.

    If Askray closes this thread, I think it's without cause. The OP is *NOT* asking for an endgame Connie in any way, shape, or form.

    Disable that costume on it. Given all the "(x) costume doesn't work on (y) variant of (z) ship" threads, it doesn't appear that it would be hard.
  • leethorogoodleethorogood Member Posts: 302 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    skollulfr wrote: »
    fair enough, faw exeter can pull 2.4k dps conduit runs.
    thats higher than a lot of people in t4 & t5 ships do.
    I run cannons/turrets and Tactical Team for the JJ Prise look.
  • peetapipmacpeetapipmac Member Posts: 2,131 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Oh my God people! Seriously?


    Dead horse, dead horse. Stop flogging it.
    It's not my fault if you feel trolled by my Disco ball... Sorry'boutit.



    R.I.P. Leonard Nimoy
  • ccarmichael07ccarmichael07 Member Posts: 755 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    adwynyth wrote: »
    Well, that one "dress" is the only thing CBS had an objection to appearing at endgsme, and with good reason: it's a 150+ year old ship.

    The Excalibur, Vesper, Exeter (if they resurrect the model) are NOT 150+ year old ships, nor are they iconic in the same way as the Connie.

    If Askray closes this thread, I think it's without cause. The OP is *NOT* asking for an endgame Connie in any way, shape, or form.

    Disable that costume on it. Given all the "(x) costume doesn't work on (y) variant of (z) ship" threads, it doesn't appear that it would be hard.

    ^ This right here, exactly.


    "You shoot him, I shoot you, I leave both your bodies here and go out for a late night snack.
    I'm thinking maybe pancakes." ~ John Casey
  • anazondaanazonda Member Posts: 8,399 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    adwynyth wrote: »
    Well, that one "dress" is the only thing CBS had an objection to appearing at endgsme, and with good reason: it's a 150+ year old ship.

    The Excalibur, Vesper, Exeter (if they resurrect the model) are NOT 150+ year old ships, nor are they iconic in the same way as the Connie.

    If Askray closes this thread, I think it's without cause. The OP is *NOT* asking for an endgame Connie in any way, shape, or form.

    Disable that costume on it. Given all the "(x) costume doesn't work on (y) variant of (z) ship" threads, it doesn't appear that it would be hard.

    Again, I am NOT against a T5 vesper... or Exeter... or Excalibur...

    But the fact remains, that in the game those ships are also the connie... One ship... It's simply dancing in shiny clothes, and cryptic has been specific on them being the same... Not only by not introducing T5 ships of those, but by treating them the same in the forums.
    Don't look silly... Don't call it the "Z-Store/Zen Store"...
    Let me put the rumors to rest: it's definitely still the C-Store (Cryptic Store) It just takes ZEN.
    Like Duty Officers? Support effords to gather ideas
  • ccarmichael07ccarmichael07 Member Posts: 755 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    anazonda wrote: »
    Again, I am NOT against a T5 vesper... or Exeter... or Excalibur...

    But the fact remains, that in the game those ships are also the connie... One ship... It's simply dancing in shiny clothes, and cryptic has been specific on them being the same... Not only by not introducing T5 ships of those, but by treating them the same in the forums.

    And with the Excelsior, they proved that is not the case.

    The T3 Excelsior is locked out from the Refit skin that is available for the T5.

    Therefore, they simply reverse the process, so the Connie skin is locked out on the T5 version of the Excalibur, and wahlaa, problem solved.


    "You shoot him, I shoot you, I leave both your bodies here and go out for a late night snack.
    I'm thinking maybe pancakes." ~ John Casey
  • cbrjwrrcbrjwrr Member Posts: 2,782 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    thecosmic1 wrote: »
    And the answer to the issue is simple: T2 cruisers use the Connie-based skins. The only way they would do it is if they added a new skin that looked nothing like the Connie. That way people would not be able to have end-game Enterprise-types in the game - which is what CBS seems to want.

    They did, its called the Exeter, a futuristic yet homage paying 25th Century design. Or the Excalibur, or Vesper. The thing is, the Exeter/Excalibur/Vesper role as a ship type remains a valid one - hence why those 3 are new designs, more recent than the sabre+ and Nova+ groups of classes. All of whom are perfectly valid at T5.

    In fact, you might argue superior to the likes of the Defiant and Intrepid respectively, as the T5 Sabres don't have an Ens Tac slot that has no useful skill you haven't already got to put in it, and the Nova features an extra Tac Boff slot in both prime versions over the Intrepid, and an extra Eng for the Mirror version.


    It also would not be difficult to make the proposed T5 Cruiser Retrofit be unable to use the Connie skin.
  • anazondaanazonda Member Posts: 8,399 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    And with the Excelsior, they proved that is not the case.

    The T3 Excelsior is locked out from the Refit skin that is available for the T5.

    Therefore, they simply reverse the process, so the Connie skin is locked out on the T5 version of the Excalibur, and wahlaa, problem solved.

    Oh well...

    Someone once told me that the internet caused people to lose reason. I am starting to agree with them...

    I'll just nom my popcorn and wait for Askray or another mod to close this down.
    Don't look silly... Don't call it the "Z-Store/Zen Store"...
    Let me put the rumors to rest: it's definitely still the C-Store (Cryptic Store) It just takes ZEN.
    Like Duty Officers? Support effords to gather ideas
  • sunfranckssunfrancks Member Posts: 3,925 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    It will always hold it back. It is better for the devs to just not make any T5 version of the T2 cruisers.

    It saves any undue hassle that would most certainly occur if they did.
    Fed: Eng Lib Borg (Five) Tac Andorian (Shen) Sci Alien/Klingon (Maelrock) KDF:Tac Romulan KDF (Sasha) Tac Klingon (K'dopis)
    Founder, member and former leader to Pride Of The Federation Fleet.
    What I feel after I hear about every decision made since Andre "Mobile Games Generalisimo" Emerson arrived...
    3oz8xC9gn8Fh4DK9Q4.gif





  • ussinterceptussintercept Member Posts: 627 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    For people claiming to not be against it...You sure are doing a bang up job of trying to knock the thread off topic with accusations that its a T5 Connie Thread in disguise...Even with the explicit comment from the OP that its not.

    People did the same thing to my T1 Miranda Refit suggestion that had nothing to do with a T5 discussion..They love to turn the thread into a topic they can smash and kick and scream about.
This discussion has been closed.