test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

EXP 2 ship concept art here! Get your concept art!

1356

Comments

  • heckgoblinheckgoblin Member Posts: 685
    edited August 2014
    The Romulan bird reminds me of a Forerunner combat skin from Halo. Very stealth-fightery. Cool.

    Klank ship's a klank ship.

    Gonna have to see some more angles of the Fed ship, but interesting engine design.
    I AM WAR.
  • centersolacecentersolace Member Posts: 11,178 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    I just brushed it off, realizing that the Galaxy Quest ship looks way better than the Fed ship in this concept art. :(

    Just because it looks worse doesn't mean it ain't lawyer bait.
  • kjwashingtonkjwashington Member Posts: 2,529 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    artemisa0k wrote: »
    klingon .... it reminds me of a termite for some reason, would be cool if they squashed the hull inwards making it a bit bulkier looking stole some of the forward downswept wings starting closer to the middle of the hull and changed the front saucer section's armor? to kinda wrap around the front and curve down forming something like fang's, also could be a bit thinner. Would give it a kinda fanged helm look from the front with the space between the wing curves making eye holes and such.

    I'll agree to all of this except the downward-swept wings. They should be upward swept. (It looks cooler.) I've always hated that the BoPs would look cool out of combat, but once in-combat they look meh.
    FaW%20meme_zpsbkzfjonz.jpg
    Support 90 degree arc limitation on BFaW! Save our ships from looking like flying disco balls of dumb!
  • azurianstarazurianstar Member Posts: 6,985 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    z3ndor99 wrote: »
    Have posted this in the " delta rising " thread but, here they are for everyone to see, enjoy...

    http://stonewallvanguard.com/forums/the-stonewall-lounge/73230-new-sto-expansion-delta-rising

    P.s. thanks to stonewall vanguard for this.

    ( please keep in mind these are concepts not final )

    Romulan ship looks like an armored Valdore. I know it's concept art, but it's lacking the Romulan smoothness and curviness of canonical Romulan designs. (I.E. its too blocky).


    The Klingon Raptor doesn't look like a Raptor at all. It looks like a Mogh Refit or a modernized Vor'cha, than a Raptor. And it feels more like it's from the distant future than 25th Century.



    The Federation Ship - a flying shovel. :P

    Seriously, it doesn't feel like a Federation starship at all. Or at least a Modern one. It gives me the feeling like it's from the 40th Century Starfleet than the 25th. Not even the Enterprise J was so futuristic.






    Really, I am disappointed in these new Tier 6 designs.
  • ltdata96ltdata96 Member Posts: 15 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    I'll be honest:

    The Jupiter class being in the game for so many years now, looks better than the "federation" concept art on that link. To me at least.

    Pls, Devs, bring the Jupiter and the Typhoon as well, some players are really wanting them (just as i am).
  • yreodredyreodred Member Posts: 3,527 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    vladdie wrote: »
    Star Trek Online Forum Users: Liberal enough to demand progression from the norm, conservative enough to damn those changes as too progressive.

    Fed ship reminds me of the Typhon Class. Which is NEVER a bad thing.
    If you mean the Typhoon battleship NPC in STO, then i don't see any resemblance.

    Who was demanding progression from the norm, when it comes to Starfleet ships?!?
    The thing is Cryptic ship designers never create Starfleet ships that look just good. There always has to be some detail that makes a design look either stupid or totally goofy. It's almost like they didn't want people to like them.

    The problem i see here is that Cryptics ship designers either hate to do Starfleet ship designs, or they try to reinvent the wheel all the time (and fail miserably).
    Why not just create good looking Starfleet ships for a change, instead of doing experiments all the time?

    As i said before, there are so many gifted people out there who are able to create gorgeous Starfleet ships, but Cryptics emplyees don't seem to be able to create a simple concept design that looks good.
    "...'With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured...the first thought forbidden...the first freedom denied--chains us all irrevocably.' ... The first time any man's freedom is trodden on, we're all damaged. I fear that today--" - (TNG) Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie

    A tale of two Picards
    (also applies to Star Trek in general)
  • blassreiterusblassreiterus Member Posts: 1,294 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    yreodred wrote: »
    If you mean the Typhoon battleship NPC in STO, then i don't see any resemblance.

    Who was demanding progression from the norm, when it comes to Starfleet ships?!?
    The thing is Cryptic ship designers never create Starfleet ships that look just good. There always has to be some detail that makes a design look either stupid or totally goofy. It's almost like they didn't want people to like them.

    The problem i see here is that Cryptics ship designers either hate to do Starfleet ship designs, or they try to reinvent the wheel all the time (and fail miserably).
    Why not just create good looking Starfleet ships for a change, instead of doing experiments all the time?

    As i said before, there are so many gifted people out there who are able to create gorgeous Starfleet ships, but Cryptics emplyees don't seem to be able to create a simple concept design that looks good.
    What you think looks good may not be the same for another person.
    Star Trek Online LTS player.
  • coupaholiccoupaholic Member Posts: 2,188 Arc User
    edited August 2014

    The Federation Ship - a flying shovel. :P

    As opposed to a massive flying frying pan all the other Federation ships are? Or the huge bathtub the Jupiter is....and the massive squashed frying pan the Galaxy is?

    Just saying :P
  • azurianstarazurianstar Member Posts: 6,985 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    coupaholic wrote: »
    As opposed to a massive flying frying pan all the other Federation ships are? Or the huge bathtub the Jupiter is....and the massive squashed frying pan the Galaxy is?

    Just saying :P

    I prefer the canonical frypan to Cryptic's frankenstiens. :rolleyes:
  • thescottybthescottyb Member Posts: 71 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    I just brushed it off, realizing that the Galaxy Quest ship looks way better than the Fed ship in this concept art. :(
    A parody ship looks more like it belongs in Starfleet than that... that... thing! (Somewhat joking.)

    But more seriously:

    The general direction would probably actually work, but it needs a more sleek, dagger-like profile. There's too many fat angles. Thinner, tapered nacelles, with longer pylons to hold them further from the rest of the ship, would do wonders for this design to make it look more like a futuristic Stargazer and less like one of the ships from TRON: Legacy.

    It'd be cool to see a few different hull materials in addition to the reflective timeship one, too. That would really highlight how bad the nacelles are as-is, or how well the design could work with my suggestions.
    Unofficial Skill Planner v0.8 last updated 6 May 2016
  • centersolacecentersolace Member Posts: 11,178 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    coupaholic wrote: »
    As opposed to a massive flying frying pan all the other Federation ships are? Or the huge bathtub the Jupiter is....and the massive squashed frying pan the Galaxy is?

    Just saying :P

    I'd rather have a Frying Pan than a Squid.
  • ltdata96ltdata96 Member Posts: 15 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    coupaholic wrote: »
    As opposed to a massive flying frying pan all the other Federation ships are? Or the huge bathtub the Jupiter is....and the massive squashed frying paun the Galaxy is?

    Just saying :P

    Nvm, misread the sarcasm in this post.
  • assimilatedktarassimilatedktar Member Posts: 1,708 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    yreodred wrote: »
    The problem i see here is that Cryptics ship designers either hate to do Starfleet ship designs, or they try to reinvent the wheel all the time (and fail miserably).
    Why not just create good looking Starfleet ships for a change, instead of doing experiments all the time?

    As i said before, there are so many gifted people out there who are able to create gorgeous Starfleet ships, but Cryptics emplyees don't seem to be able to create a simple concept design that looks good.

    Let's be fair. Since the initial release of the game and the first set of ship skins (which where aside from a few exceptions (Dervish, Excalibur) horrible they have massively improved. (Aventine, Venture etc.)
    FKA K-Tar, grumpy Klingon/El-Aurian hybrid. Now assimilated by PWE.
    Sometimes, if you want to bury the hatchet with a Klingon, it has to be in his skull. - Captain K'Tar of the USS Danu about J'mpok.
  • truemalevolencetruemalevolence Member Posts: 44 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    From the underside angle I think the Fed ship is the new Jupiter model, 4 nacelles, big deflector on the front
  • thomaselkinsthomaselkins Member Posts: 575 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    I'm really digging that Romulan ship and I look forward to seeing her specs. Depending how good she is, I may have to hold off on getting a Scimitar.

    I've seen some people complain about her looks, saying she's too angular and not as sleek as some of the other Romulans ships, but what if that's the point? When the Romulan Republic was in its infancy they took and used whatever they could get their hands on. Even your player character started off with an old busted 23rd century bird of prey. Now that it's been a year and they've had tremendous support from both the Federation and the Klingon Empire, this design could be the first original Republic ship produced. The angular design could have been on purpose, in order to move away from the old Imperial look of old.

    Of course not everyone must like this new design direction. Looks are subjective after all and people's opinions will differ. Personally I like this design and I want to see more of it.
  • szimszim Member Posts: 2,503 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    They really make GREAT looking ships for Romulans and Klingons. Fed ships in contrast.. I can't say I particulary liked the looks of any of the pure Cryptic designs. Avenger, Regent, Tempest and this new concept art... they are not terrible but also nothing special.
  • annahannah Member Posts: 201 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    That romulan ship made me moist... please have stats to go with the looks :o
  • beerxhyperbeerxhyper Member Posts: 676 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    szim wrote: »
    They really make GREAT looking ships for Romulans and Klingons. Fed ships in contrast.. I can't say I particulary liked the looks of any of the pure Cryptic designs. Avenger, Regent, Tempest and this new concept art... they are not terrible but also nothing special.

    in my opinion i love the way the avenger looks


  • dabelgravedabelgrave Member Posts: 979 Arc User
    edited August 2014
  • yreodredyreodred Member Posts: 3,527 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Let's be fair. Since the initial release of the game and the first set of ship skins (which where aside from a few exceptions (Dervish, Excalibur) horrible they have massively improved. (Aventine, Venture etc.)

    That's true.
    However there are some fall backs from time to time, as you can see.

    I woudln't have reacted so harsh, if this would only have been one ship amongs many others.
    But this is a concept art, which means it doesn't even have to go live, but the general idea of this design will reflect to many other future ships in STO. And that is far more concerning IMO.
    "...'With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured...the first thought forbidden...the first freedom denied--chains us all irrevocably.' ... The first time any man's freedom is trodden on, we're all damaged. I fear that today--" - (TNG) Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie

    A tale of two Picards
    (also applies to Star Trek in general)
  • ussinterceptussintercept Member Posts: 627 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    What the hell was that Starfleet Ship supposed to be? I thought the idea was we were supposed to be moving in the direction of the Ent-J?

    I like Romulan and Klingon ships....But seriously...If the Starfleet Starship is what we're getting....Im not sure how I feel about it.
  • gaevsmangaevsman Member Posts: 3,190 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Actually, if you know about that shor lived proyect for the new star trek animated series, the ship descriptions were kind of in that style..

    Sharp edges, armed to the teeth, anyway, interesting concept, the Defiant type, i love it.. the Cruiser Retrofit, its in an odd angle, not ugly, lets see more :)
    The forces of darkness are upon us!
  • ussinterceptussintercept Member Posts: 627 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    coupaholic wrote: »
    As opposed to a massive flying frying pan all the other Federation ships are? Or the huge bathtub the Jupiter is....and the massive squashed frying pan the Galaxy is?

    Just saying :P

    You do know the Jupiter is a Cryptic design right?
  • atomictikiatomictiki Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    What's with the low poly count aesthetic? This isn't the 90's. /notimpressed
    Leave nerfing to the professionals.
  • jaturnleyjaturnley Member Posts: 1,218 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    What the hell was that Starfleet Ship supposed to be? I thought the idea was we were supposed to be moving in the direction of the Ent-J?
    They are moving towards it. The Ent-J is so big, everything in the universe is being pulled towards it. In fact, time wasn't linear before they built it, and time itself is being pulled in by it due to its mass. After they built it, the universe itself eventually collapses, the ship explodes, and the result is a new big bang and a new universe that expands until they build it again, and it starts all over.
  • jaturnleyjaturnley Member Posts: 1,218 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    atomictiki wrote: »
    What's with the low poly count aesthetic? This isn't the 90's. /notimpressed

    You DO realize that almost all of Voyager was *made* in the 90's, right?
  • dongemaharudongemaharu Member Posts: 544 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    If that Fed ship wasn't so ugly, it would simply be boring. Wow, here's hoping Cryptic has some better ideas for the other ones. Honestly, the only good Fed designs I've seen are from fan art.
  • jonsillsjonsills Member Posts: 10,459 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    z3ndor99 wrote: »
    Have posted this in the " delta rising " thread but, here they are for everyone to see, enjoy...

    http://stonewallvanguard.com/forums/the-stonewall-lounge/73230-new-sto-expansion-delta-rising

    P.s. thanks to stonewall vanguard for this.

    ( please keep in mind these are concepts not final )
    As best I can tell, those designs are for Tier 6 Romulan, Tier 6 Klingon, and Tier 6 Master Control Program. Does it come with a Lightcycle pet?

    Nice to see there's going to be more races. I'm guessing the Kazon are strictly NPC, filling the role of interstellar annoyance that the Gorn fill in Fed space.
    Lorna-Wing-sig.png
  • ddesjardinsddesjardins Member Posts: 3,056 Media Corps
    edited August 2014
    OK - I'll be a voice of dissention.

    I like the Fed model,, and if it looks like what I think it will, this will be a nasty (as in good nasty) ship.

    4 Nacelles.

    So any ideas what might be the special abilities?
  • chiyoumikuchiyoumiku Member Posts: 1,028 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    That Fed ship looks like something from Total Eclipse: Turbo on the PSX it's nice but has no business in the Trek-verse.
    Sekhmet_Banner.jpg
    Defending The Galaxy By Breaking One Starfleet Regulation After The Next.
Sign In or Register to comment.