test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Updating Light Cruisers

ussinterceptussintercept Member Posts: 627 Arc User
In the last year or so Cryptic has taken some serious steps in 'modernizing' the look of the ships that are being released/launched. And to just name a few.

Odyssey Class
Tempest Class
Regent Class
Avenger Class

Granted. Some of these are refits/retrofits but they still accomplish the basic aesthetic look and by doing so bringing them into a more uniform appearance for Federation Starships. And I got to wondering if any of this would flow over into starter ships.

Now I know theres going to be people saying 'you only use those ships for a few levels, so it be a waste'. But considering the fact Cryptic has made moves to standardize the aesthetics of ships coming out now and that theyve standardized the uniform to be a default Odyssey Uniform.

It may be a long shot. But personally Id like to see more modernized Light Cruisers flying about out there along with the traditional Light Cruisers.
Post edited by ussintercept on
«134

Comments

  • aloishammeraloishammer Member Posts: 3,294 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    Now I know theres going to be people saying 'you only use those ships for a few levels, so it be a waste'.

    Not me. I'd say it's a waste because you only use them for a few freaking minutes. -shrug-

    Suffice to say I'd place this somewhere stickied in the last 5 items on the to-do list.
  • orangeitisorangeitis Member Posts: 5,222 Arc User
    edited July 2014
  • ussinterceptussintercept Member Posts: 627 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    Not me. I'd say it's a waste because you only use them for a few freaking minutes. -shrug-

    Suffice to say I'd place this somewhere stickied in the last 5 items on the to-do list.

    Changing a few words doesnt change the point I made.
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    2409+ ships are meant to look like 2409+ ships.

    130+ year old ships are meant to look like 130+ year old ships.
  • ussinterceptussintercept Member Posts: 627 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    2409+ ships are meant to look like 2409+ ships.

    130+ year old ships are meant to look like 130+ year old ships.

    So explain the Regent Class? Or the Venture Class? Both of which are retrofits of the Sovereign Class (2370s) and Galaxy Class (Late 2350s). Both of which are updated to be more inline with the aesthetics of 2409/2410. If the argument is 'old ships should look old'...Why are old ships like the Sovereign and Galaxy receiving updates? They should look old by your logic.
  • aloishammeraloishammer Member Posts: 3,294 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    Changing a few words doesnt change the point I made.

    What point was that? That you want the decrepit old vessels specifically added to be "handed out" to raw recruits replaced with new, state-of-the-art vessels to be "handed out" to raw recruits?

    It's not an accident or oversight that new characters aren't given the latest and greatest. They're handed the most patched-up hand-me-downs for a purpose: to save newer, more vital ships from "new captain error attrition."
  • ashkrik23ashkrik23 Member Posts: 10,809 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    There is no point in this.
    King of Lions rawr! Protect the wildlife of the world. Check out my foundry series Perfection and Scars of the Pride. arcgames.com/en/forums#/discussion/1138650/ashkrik23s-foundry-missions
    ashkrik_by_lindale_ff-d65zc3i.png
  • neoakiraiineoakiraii Member Posts: 7,468 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    They could always update the TOS connie to a "modern version"

    Mwahahahahaa

    *runs away*
    GwaoHAD.png
  • sle1989sle1989 Member Posts: 552 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    While I agree that the old ship models that launched with the game could very definitely use visual updates, the Light Cruiser would be the last ship too be worked on, if it's worked on at all.

    Given the direction the game is going story wise the next vessel too be updated will be the Intrepid and her variants.
    y1arXbh.png

  • aloishammeraloishammer Member Posts: 3,294 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    neoakiraii wrote: »
    They could always update the TOS connie to a "modern version"

    Mwahahahahaa

    *runs away*

    Well played. :D
  • ussinterceptussintercept Member Posts: 627 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    What point was that? That you want the decrepit old vessels specifically added to be "handed out" to raw recruits replaced with new, state-of-the-art vessels to be "handed out" to raw recruits?

    It's not an accident or oversight that new characters aren't given the latest and greatest. They're handed the most patched-up hand-me-downs for a purpose: to save newer, more vital ships from "new captain error attrition."

    If you think youre going to pull me into some circle of arguing over a point you most definitely understood by restating it with a few changed words...Youre mistaken.

    My thread isnt about forcing this to happen. This is a forum where Im allowed to express my opinions as player and paying customer. My opinion is that while I know its not going to happen. I wouldnt mind seeing some light cruisers added with a new aesthetic.

    If your argument is that 'the old ships are of no great loss if a Lt. gets it blown up'....The argument still rings true of a ship with nothing significantly different about it besides a new skin.
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    They should look old by your logic.

    If they weren't updated versions of ships, then that would be true. They are actual new versions of ships. The Venture is an Exploration Refit. The Regent is a Sovereign Refit. It's not just artwork.

    So you want a T1 500 ZEN Miranda Refit?
  • ussinterceptussintercept Member Posts: 627 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    If they weren't updated versions of ships, then that would be true. They are actual new versions of ships. The Venture is an Exploration Refit. The Regent is a Sovereign Refit. It's not just artwork.

    So you want a T1 500 ZEN Miranda Refit?

    What if I did? How would that effect you?
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    What if I did? How would that effect you?

    It's a simple yes or no question...

    "So you want a T1 500 ZEN Miranda Refit?"
  • ussinterceptussintercept Member Posts: 627 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    It's a simple yes or no question...

    "So you want a T1 500 ZEN Miranda Refit?"

    I'll point to my OP...Theres your answer.
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    I'll point to my OP...Theres your answer.

    It's not there in your original post, though. That's the reason for the question. Here is your original post...
    In the last year or so Cryptic has taken some serious steps in 'modernizing' the look of the ships that are being released/launched. And to just name a few.

    Odyssey Class
    Tempest Class
    Regent Class
    Avenger Class

    Granted. Some of these are refits/retrofits but they still accomplish the basic aesthetic look and by doing so bringing them into a more uniform appearance for Federation Starships. And I got to wondering if any of this would flow over into starter ships.

    Now I know theres going to be people saying 'you only use those ships for a few levels, so it be a waste'. But considering the fact Cryptic has made moves to standardize the aesthetics of ships coming out now and that theyve standardized the uniform to be a default Odyssey Uniform.

    It may be a long shot. But personally Id like to see more modernized Light Cruisers flying about out there along with the traditional Light Cruisers.

    ...and there is nothing explicitly stating that you want a T1 500 ZEN Light Cruiser Refit.

    You could be asking for a costume option from the C-Store. You could be asking for a free costume being added to the ships. You could be asking for quite a few things...

    ...so what are you actually asking be done/be made available?

    Stop being so obtuse, defensive, and grow the Hell up...it's a simple freakin' question.
  • aloishammeraloishammer Member Posts: 3,294 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    If you think youre going to pull me into some circle of arguing over a point you most definitely understood by restating it with a few changed words...Youre mistaken.

    Amusing. Vaguely, but amusing.
    Stop being so obtuse, defensive, and grow the Hell up...it's a simple freakin' question.

    I know, right?
  • ussinterceptussintercept Member Posts: 627 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    It's not there in your original post, though. That's the reason for the question. Here is your original post...



    ...and there is nothing explicitly stating that you want a T1 500 ZEN Light Cruiser Refit.

    You could be asking for a costume option from the C-Store. You could be asking for a free costume being added to the ships. You could be asking for quite a few things...

    ...so what are you actually asking be done/be made available?

    At this point. It doesnt matter if you cant make heads or tails of it. It doesnt make a difference if the Devs released the Aesthetic for free or they applied a 500 ZEN price tag to it. That would be their prerogative. My OP was simply expressing something Id wish to see. Whether it has a price tag or not does not matter.
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    Whether it has a price tag or not does not matter.

    There's going to be a lot of work involved for it not to have a price tag. Even then, a T1 price tag for something that will involve the same amount of work as a T5 price tag...is going to be pushing it, no?

    You'd have the kitbash itself. The various components would have to match up with the current kitbash options. You're going to need to make sure that all the current skins (not just from the current kitbashes, but also all the gear visuals) fit all the various customizations and not look goofy. Then you'd have the new skin, that you'd have to make sure doesn't look goofy on the various kitbash customizations involved. All of it will have to work with the FX unless you're going to add in the cost of additional FX customization. You're also going to need to come up with some gimmick console to go along with the ship.

    It's work...it's not waving a magic wand.

    So for the work to be able to be justified and get a place on the schedule, it's going to have to cover the work as well as generate a profit on that work...as would any other work that was done.

    Do they do a T1 Refit at 500 ZEN or do they do another T5 Refit or even a new T5 ship...that's going to go for 2000-2500 ZEN? Where those T5 Refit/Retrofit goodies would also work with a Fleet Version? So folks would be more inclined to make that purchase?

    In the end, perhaps none of that matters to you - and - that's kind of the vibe that you're giving. Just a "I think this would be cool" sort of thing...without worrying about what might be involved.
  • orangeitisorangeitis Member Posts: 5,222 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    2409+ ships are meant to look like 2409+ ships.

    130+ year old ships are meant to look like 130+ year old ships.
    The Exeter-class would like to have a word with you.
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    orangeitis wrote: »
    The Exeter-class would like to have a word with you.

    Why? It knows that it is a Refit...that it is a newer ship. Why don't you?

    I mean, you know...it's kind of a "thing" that Cryptic's got going there.
  • orangeitisorangeitis Member Posts: 5,222 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    Why? It knows that it is a Refit...that it is a newer ship. Why don't you?
    But that's what I was talking about... what were you talking about? o.O
  • ddesjardinsddesjardins Member Posts: 3,056 Media Corps
    edited July 2014
    How about a new class of ships?

    Frigates?

    Escort-Destroyers?

    Mine Layers?

    Picket Ships?

    Trading Vessels?

    Klingon Science Ship? (ok,ok, almost kidding on this one)
  • orangeitisorangeitis Member Posts: 5,222 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    Frigates?
    Want.
    Escort-Destroyers?
    If they're anything like the Aquarius, DO NOT WANT.
    Mine Layers?
    Anyone can be a mine layer at the momemt? Unless we're talking fused aft mines. Be kinda cool.
    Picket Ships?
    wat
    Trading Vessels?
    If STO would get its head out of its aft and expand its main gameplay to include something other than combat. Then hella yeah.
    Klingon Science Ship? (ok,ok, almost kidding on this one)
    DO WANT x10
  • feiqafeiqa Member Posts: 2,410 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    Another entry level C-store ship with a useful console would not be out of the question. You can even tie it in with a c-store light cruiser retrofit with A set bonus for using both consoles.
    Federation learning from the Romulans etc. So Yeah can see it happening and would buy it.

    Originally Posted by pwlaughingtrendy
    Network engineers are not ship designers.
    Nor should they be. Their ships would look weird.
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    orangeitis wrote: »
    But that's what I was talking about... what were you talking about? o.O

    The older ships that look like the older ships would not be the Refits that do not look like older ships...would they?
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    Something else to consider would tap into the various Merian-class discussions...and having an actual T5 ship with styling reminiscent of the Miranda while avoiding the T5 Miranda discussions.

    It would require less work and generate more revenue than doing a T1 Refit.
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    edited July 2014
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • mirrorchaosmirrorchaos Member Posts: 9,844 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    In the last year or so Cryptic has taken some serious steps in 'modernizing' the look of the ships that are being released/launched. And to just name a few.

    Odyssey Class
    Tempest Class
    Regent Class
    Avenger Class

    Granted. Some of these are refits/retrofits but they still accomplish the basic aesthetic look and by doing so bringing them into a more uniform appearance for Federation Starships. And I got to wondering if any of this would flow over into starter ships.

    Now I know theres going to be people saying 'you only use those ships for a few levels, so it be a waste'. But considering the fact Cryptic has made moves to standardize the aesthetics of ships coming out now and that theyve standardized the uniform to be a default Odyssey Uniform.

    It may be a long shot. But personally Id like to see more modernized Light Cruisers flying about out there along with the traditional Light Cruisers.

    t5 miranda ftw! :P

    couldnt resist.
    T6 Miranda Hero Ship FTW.
    Been around since Dec 2010 on STO and bought LTS in Apr 2013 for STO.
  • orangeitisorangeitis Member Posts: 5,222 Arc User
    edited July 2014
    The older ships that look like the older ships would not be the Refits that do not look like older ships...would they?
    Depends on what you mean by "look like". As in, what level of similarity do you consider to count as A looking like B? Some consider the Exeter to look like the Constitution, and it's justified on a certain level. Same basic shape. But if the level of similarity must be higher for you to consider A to look like B, then the Exeter looks nothing like the Connie.

    If you want to discuss what looks the same or not, I'm probably gonna need a good idea on what similarity level you're using to judge what looks like what.

    In either case, I was operating under the assumption that the OP wanted a refit to the Miranda similar to what the Exeter is to the Connie.
Sign In or Register to comment.