test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Pure Federation Carrier

13»

Comments

  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited June 2014
    what a day it would be if some KDF jerk wasn't whining about someone wanting a Federation Carrier.

    What a day it would be if someone didn't define everyone who doesn't agree with the assesment that Federation needs a new ship as "KDF-jerk".

    Also what a day it would be if people didn't try to use "KDF" as an insult and/or means to invalidate another poster's opinion because appearently KDF players aren't allowed to have an opinion around here unless it'y agreeing with the more important (=Fed) posters.
  • talonxvtalonxv Member Posts: 4,257 Arc User
    edited June 2014
    phoenicius wrote: »
    now now, the romulans have the same number of 5 tac ships, with the fleet ha'feh, fleet dhelan, fleet ar'kif and scimitar and every single one of them is a great ship, meanwhile the feds have the kumari which is almost unusable due bad boff stations(why so many tacs?), the others are good though(the defiant is a good ganker in PvP but it wastes a slot due to need for cloaking console), also klingons DO have a 5 tac ship, which is the tactical bortasqu, but i agree, klingons IMO should get

    1 - 5 forward weapon BoP with 4 tac consoles
    2 - 5 tac console "escort carrier" raptor(making it the klingon armitage/ar'kif)
    3 - 5 tac console fleet guramba

    As far as number 1, I'd rather that be a Raptor instead of a BoP. I mean BoP already have utility as flankers and with battle cloak. I think the first 5 forward weapon KDF ships deserves to be a Raptor. Along with having a 5 console Fleet Raptor.

    Time for the raptors to get a face lift.
    afMSv4g.jpg
    Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!

    http://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1145998/star-trek-battles-channel-got-canon/p1
  • catliketypingcatliketyping Member Posts: 611
    edited June 2014
    STO is a combat game. Asking players to accept a suboptimal playstyle for the sake of "immersion" or "fluff"is ...well, words escape me. I cannot really say how wrong of a concept that is.

    Then join the Romulans already. The Scimitar is over there. Picard's Enterprise need not be a mirror or copy of Shinzon's war machine. It IS a bad comparison. There is no reasonable way the Galaxy should be like the Scimitar.

    This whole thread is mostly about the Atrox, which is a good carrier, not being a good starfleet ship. Then there is the whole "frigate pet" nonsense about how the Atrox sucks.

    I happen to like the Atrox. I think it is better in its role than the Vo'quv. I guess that makes me a bad player.
    Nessia (KDF Sci)
    IKS Korrasami (Fleet B'rel Bird of Prey Retrofit T5-U)
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited June 2014
    I happen to like the Atrox. I think it is better in its role than the Vo'quv. I guess that makes me a bad player.

    Not only does that make you a bad player, but a bad person, a KDF fanboi, biased and a blatant troll. :rolleyes:

    Don't look at me like that, that's what I got when I said I like the Atrox just fine.
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • wildweasalwildweasal Member Posts: 1,053 Arc User
    edited June 2014
    illisstr8 wrote: »
    Redesign the Atrox to make it look more FEDERATION.
    i think thats what the OP is trying to say he wants a carrier that LOOKS like a federation ship
    3ondby_zpsikszslyx.jpg
  • talonxvtalonxv Member Posts: 4,257 Arc User
    edited June 2014
    wildweasal wrote: »
    i think thats what the OP is trying to say he wants a carrier that LOOKS like a federation ship

    IT IS a federation ship since it's from a federation member and given a USS designation when a player buys it.

    What because it doesn't look like the enterprise or something of that nature it's not federation?

    What a pile of garbage.
    afMSv4g.jpg
    Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!

    http://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1145998/star-trek-battles-channel-got-canon/p1
  • capnmanxcapnmanx Member Posts: 1,452 Arc User
    edited June 2014
    I don't feel we particularly need a Starfleet carrier; but on the other hand, there are so many non-Starfleet options available to Feds already, that there doesn't seem to be any particular reason not to at this point.
  • nobletnoblet Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2014
    The Atrox is a cash carrier that's worse than klink free carrier. And klinks have the awesomeness of the karfi. I'm klink and flies karfi, btw. But it is what it is. So yes, feds need a carrier, and a decent one, not like atrox. :rolleyes:
  • dracounguisdracounguis Member Posts: 5,358 Arc User
    edited June 2014
    I bet Cryptic is holding off a pure Fed carrier until they make one that has 4 hangers. ;)
  • jorantomalakjorantomalak Member Posts: 7,133 Arc User
    edited June 2014
    what a day it would be if some KDF jerk wasn't whining about someone wanting a Federation Carrier.

    What a day when the feddie bears stop wanting everything and an even better day when the devs stop giving the feddie bears what they whine for.

    so much for diversity in a game right?
  • a3001a3001 Member Posts: 1,132 Arc User
    edited June 2014
    nassiris wrote: »
    After looking over the ship lists I feel that The Federation is in need of a "Pure" Federation
    Carrier. The Federation should not have to import alien tech for it's carrier needs.
    Currently we have the Galaxy - X which can launch up to 6 shuttle craft and the Heavy Escort
    light Carrier but they are far from being true carriers.
    We need a pure federation design...

    Stop deadhorsing.
    Rejoice JJ Trek people....

    http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/10052253

    Why are you not rejoicing?
  • mimey2mimey2 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2014
    *chuckles* Y'know, even if they gave the people on these forums who constantly whine for 'more', particularly on the Fed side, I REALLY doubt it'd be enough even then.
    I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
    I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
Sign In or Register to comment.