STO is a combat game. Asking players to accept a suboptimal playstyle for the sake of "immersion" or "fluff"is ...well, words escape me. I cannot really say how wrong of a concept that is.
Then join the Romulans already. The Scimitar is over there. Picard's Enterprise need not be a mirror or copy of Shinzon's war machine. It IS a bad comparison. There is no reasonable way the Galaxy should be like the Scimitar.
This whole thread is mostly about the Atrox, which is a good carrier, not being a good starfleet ship. Then there is the whole "frigate pet" nonsense about how the Atrox sucks.
I happen to like the Atrox. I think it is better in its role than the Vo'quv. I guess that makes me a bad player.
i think thats what the OP is trying to say he wants a carrier that LOOKS like a federation ship
IT IS a federation ship since it's from a federation member and given a USS designation when a player buys it.
What because it doesn't look like the enterprise or something of that nature it's not federation?
What a pile of garbage.
Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!
I don't feel we particularly need a Starfleet carrier; but on the other hand, there are so many non-Starfleet options available to Feds already, that there doesn't seem to be any particular reason not to at this point.
The Atrox is a cash carrier that's worse than klink free carrier. And klinks have the awesomeness of the karfi. I'm klink and flies karfi, btw. But it is what it is. So yes, feds need a carrier, and a decent one, not like atrox. :rolleyes:
After looking over the ship lists I feel that The Federation is in need of a "Pure" Federation
Carrier. The Federation should not have to import alien tech for it's carrier needs.
Currently we have the Galaxy - X which can launch up to 6 shuttle craft and the Heavy Escort
light Carrier but they are far from being true carriers.
We need a pure federation design...
*chuckles* Y'know, even if they gave the people on these forums who constantly whine for 'more', particularly on the Fed side, I REALLY doubt it'd be enough even then.
I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
Comments
Then join the Romulans already. The Scimitar is over there. Picard's Enterprise need not be a mirror or copy of Shinzon's war machine. It IS a bad comparison. There is no reasonable way the Galaxy should be like the Scimitar.
This whole thread is mostly about the Atrox, which is a good carrier, not being a good starfleet ship. Then there is the whole "frigate pet" nonsense about how the Atrox sucks.
I happen to like the Atrox. I think it is better in its role than the Vo'quv. I guess that makes me a bad player.
IKS Korrasami (Fleet B'rel Bird of Prey Retrofit T5-U)
Not only does that make you a bad player, but a bad person, a KDF fanboi, biased and a blatant troll. :rolleyes:
Don't look at me like that, that's what I got when I said I like the Atrox just fine.
IT IS a federation ship since it's from a federation member and given a USS designation when a player buys it.
What because it doesn't look like the enterprise or something of that nature it's not federation?
What a pile of garbage.
Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!
http://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1145998/star-trek-battles-channel-got-canon/p1
What a day when the feddie bears stop wanting everything and an even better day when the devs stop giving the feddie bears what they whine for.
so much for diversity in a game right?
Stop deadhorsing.
http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/10052253
Why are you not rejoicing?