test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

The BortasQu' is a fine ship. No, seriously.

sophlogimosophlogimo Member Posts: 6,507 Arc User
edited December 2013 in Klingon Discussion
I wonder why peoiple claim this mighty battlecruiser would be "underperforming". The only thing that might be mildly annoying is its turn rate, but with Dilithium Mine consoles and cruiser commands, that is a non-issue, and for PvE it hardly matters anyway.

Other than the turn rate, what we have here is an extremely durable, mighty battlecruiser with 5 tactical consoles (speaking of the tactical version, which is of course my preferred one). It is STO's true battleship.

And the set is not only cool, but even useful in PvP, much more so than the Oddyssey's or the Andorian Escort's.

Bad PR is, essentially, its only problem.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«134

Comments

  • trek21trek21 Member Posts: 2,246 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    I do agree, personally :) My KDF Engineer has the full set, and it kicks TRIBBLE lol - maybe it doesn't kill as fast as birds-of-prey or raptors, but that hardly matters to me

    The playstyle is just too fun XD
    Was named Trek17.

    Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
  • tlamstriketlamstrike Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Lets see a 5 console cruiser with a cloak, +15 to weapon power, and that can run a conventional double tac skill, AuxtoBatt, or Aux to Photonic build. :eek:

    Yea clearly this is an under powered ship. :D

    Next sale I'm getting at least the tac version if not the 3 pack. :cool:
    My Romulan Liberated Borg character made it to Level 30 and beat the (old) Defense of New Romulus with the skill point bug. :D
  • centersolacecentersolace Member Posts: 11,178 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Plus the ability to teleport any ship right in front of you is amusing. :D
  • atlantraatlantra Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    It's okay. Great for PVE. I heard it had below average sells, leading to no more 3 packs for KDF. I like the Bortasqu, but it needed a little buff. More turn rate yes. I would like to equip other consoles instead of turn rates ones. When compared to a Romulan Scimitar pack-- You no what? Never mind that.

    As for PVP... LOL. You're just a big target. Everything allows a target immune to teleporting. Attack pattern omega, Polarize hull, Scattering field. You mess up and teleport an immune target-- you'll have to wait a full 5 minutes to try again. It's better to just use the jump console that teleports you.

    About the BOP pet, again LOL. It doesn't follow me most of time. It just stays 20km away from me. Lastly the Disruptor auto cannon, cool weapon, but I think should fire 24 shots instead of 12. Cryptic can lower the damage per second of those 24 shots to match the DPS of 12 shots. Shooting more makes it cooler.

    To be clearly honest I only purchased the Bortasqu pack only because it appears to be a famous 'Battle Cruiser' I used in another game. Big fan of that ship so I'm happy with it. "Battle Cruiser Operational."
    The dress is gold and white. Over 70% people says so. When viewed from a certain screen angle it appears blue and black. The dress displayed on amazon is a blue and black dress, but it's not the same dress in the picture. If you're seeing blue & black you're slightly colored blind. A normal upright screen = white and gold.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • edited November 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • tom61stotom61sto Member Posts: 3,675 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Wow, someone actually likes the thing now. It only took changes to the base mechanics of STO with how Skills and RCS effect turnrate, a buff to it's sets bonus, new multi-purpose Engineering consoles, and cruiser commands bolted on to make it semi-decent. Oh, and probably Warp Cores that boost engine power are helping too.
  • atlantraatlantra Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    tom61sto wrote: »
    Wow, someone actually likes the thing now. It only took changes to the base mechanics of STO with how Skills and RCS effect turnrate, a buff to it's sets bonus, new multi-purpose Engineering consoles, and cruiser commands bolted on to make it semi-decent. Oh, and probably Warp Cores that boost engine power are helping too.

    Look how long it took, and how much stuff needed to be done so it no longer feels like a waste of money. Glad ONE person finally likes it. Semi-decent is right. It's getting there... Still not using in PVP, and I'm very good at PVP.
    The dress is gold and white. Over 70% people says so. When viewed from a certain screen angle it appears blue and black. The dress displayed on amazon is a blue and black dress, but it's not the same dress in the picture. If you're seeing blue & black you're slightly colored blind. A normal upright screen = white and gold.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • edited November 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • trek21trek21 Member Posts: 2,246 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    atlantra wrote: »
    Look how long it took, and how much stuff needed to be done so it no longer feels like a waste of money. Glad ONE person finally likes it. Semi-decent is right. It's getting there... Still not using in PVP, and I'm very good at PVP.
    How long it took?

    I liked it from the start, as I'm sure several others did :P It wasn't a waste of money then, it sure isn't now.

    I like cruiser-style ships just as much as I do escort-styles, probably even better ;) The slow turning just gives you a sense of power and weight, and for me, is greatly reflected in practice.

    The rest is just opinion, including your 'semi-decent' and 'getting there' comment.
    Was named Trek17.

    Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
  • kdfrulzfeddroolzkdfrulzfeddroolz Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    tom61sto wrote: »
    Wow, someone actually likes the thing now. It only took changes to the base mechanics of STO with how Skills and RCS effect turnrate, a buff to it's sets bonus, new multi-purpose Engineering consoles, and cruiser commands bolted on to make it semi-decent. Oh, and probably Warp Cores that boost engine power are helping too.

    Quoted for truth, and if you don't have access to fleet only items or expensive lock box consoles too bad for you. The ship was poorly thought out with a lousy boff layout, and mediocre consoles.. so for my money it's not even in the same league as the Scimitars which get a high end hanger pet to start with, high turn rate, and let's not forget the super cloaking abilities with the uber consoles for the cherry on top.

    The Bortasqu's cloak itself is broken and weak plus it's not even a battle cloak, so for me it's a useless one shot item at the start of a match, that is if you don't get exposed at the outset. Once combat engages you can't cloak again and forget about this slow barge getting enough breathing room to turn it back on, so yea IMO it stinks.

    If you have all the magic consoles you can compensate and make it an ok PvE ship. I wouldn't waste my time in PvP unless you like to be a big target for others to pound on. Cryptic would have to make some major improvements in this 3 pack for me to ever recommend it.
  • edited November 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • atlantraatlantra Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    sophlogimo wrote: »
    Which is probably the BortasQu's only problem: A few people with no clue and loud opinions judged it all too quickly.

    You can go 'zombie' tank with it real good, as for killing in PVP. LOL. You may need Spiral Wave Disruptors to even appear as a threat. Most Klingons are heavy PVP players. Creating a PVE three pack ship is funny. So yes it appears to suck instantly to most Klingon players. Now you know why. At least make the consoles awesome, nope. :rolleyes:

    It's too bad the user interface power tray freezes up when charging up the Auto Cannon. So many problems...
    The dress is gold and white. Over 70% people says so. When viewed from a certain screen angle it appears blue and black. The dress displayed on amazon is a blue and black dress, but it's not the same dress in the picture. If you're seeing blue & black you're slightly colored blind. A normal upright screen = white and gold.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • trek21trek21 Member Posts: 2,246 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    atlantra wrote: »
    You can go 'zombie' tank with it real good, as for killing in PVP. LOL. You may need Spiral Wave Disruptors to even appear as a threat. Most Klingons are heavy PVP players. Creating a PVE three pack ship is funny. So yes it appears to suck instantly to most Klingon players. Now you know why. At least make the consoles awesome, nope. :rolleyes:

    It's too bad the user interface power tray freezes up when charging up the Auto Cannon. So many problems...
    You know, just because it's a fact to you that the Bortasqu' sucks in PvP, doesn't make it a fact to everyone.

    That may not be the case, but that's just the vibe I'm getting from you :/
    Was named Trek17.

    Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
  • ursusmorologusursusmorologus Member Posts: 5,328 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    I have flown it on tribble a couple of times with my Klingon Tac captain, and I am in love with it and want to make it mine, but the price is hard to pay for a single toon (my science captain has no use for it).

    It also continues to be totally outclassed by the Scimitar even after the recent upgrades, and it is kind of pointless to spend money on a ship that is the designated loser in any capital class battle. The thing I would really like to see would be to give it and the Odyssey a single hangar and let them use the special pet as a unique hangar item. That would get them closer to par with other super-heavy ships.
  • this1isavailablethis1isavailable Member Posts: 228 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    It has great firepower for pve but in pvp it's simply the worst t5.5 battlecruiser for multiple reasons :

    -Very low turn rate and horrible inertia.
    -Squishier than other fleet battlecruisers (a little more hull is not worth 10% shields) minus the very frail k'tinga.
    -At best it can mimic existing boff layouts (tor'kaht or negh) but still cannot compete with FAHCR/avenger/galor layouts (no KDF ship can).
    -It's too big.
    -Tact version only have a total of +15 power (sci one is much better imo).

    The ship would be ok in pvp if it didnt have terrible stats but right now there is no reason to pick it over other fleet battlecruisers.
  • atlantraatlantra Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    trek21 wrote: »
    You know, just because it's a fact to you that the Bortasqu' sucks in PvP, doesn't make it a fact to everyone.

    That may not be the case, but that's just the vibe I'm getting from you :/

    Been in Ker'rat system for a very long time. I never saw a Bortasqu really kicking butt left and right, or taking on 2 feds & winning. In real 5v5 Fed versus Klingon match I have never seen a Bortasqu. If you like PVE buy the 3 pack. If you plan on serious PVP fighting, stay away from this ship.

    It's too bad the user interface power tray freezes up when charging up the Subspace snare. Oh, and I'm not lying about any of this. Anyone like consoles that disable the user for 5 seconds? :confused:
    The dress is gold and white. Over 70% people says so. When viewed from a certain screen angle it appears blue and black. The dress displayed on amazon is a blue and black dress, but it's not the same dress in the picture. If you're seeing blue & black you're slightly colored blind. A normal upright screen = white and gold.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • edited November 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • nx15nx15 Member Posts: 27 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    It is a great ship! The BOFF layout is very flexible, allowing you to really do whatever you want in it. TBH, I'm not a huge fan of the Fleet AC's BOFF layout.. Besides, it IS a KDF Battlecruiser, NOT fed. Who cares about turn rate nowadays? Use RCS/Aux2ID! The hull and shield values are perfectly fine to tank, and I've seen some great builds in pvp that are tanky and throw out lots of damage. Sure, maybe a conspicuous buff may make players use it more often, but I like it how it is
  • trek21trek21 Member Posts: 2,246 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    atlantra wrote: »
    Been in Ker'rat system for a very long time. I never saw a Bortasqu really kicking butt left and right, or taking on 2 feds & winning. In real 5v5 Fed versus Klingon match I have never seen a Bortasqu. If you like PVE buy the 3 pack. If you plan on serious PVP fighting, stay away from this ship.

    It's too bad the user interface power tray freezes up when charging up the Subspace snare. Oh, and I'm not lying about any of this. Anyone like consoles that disable the user for 5 seconds? :confused:
    I wouldn't know, because I've used Subspace Snare about 20 times in the last three days, and that never happened...

    Anyway, aren't there many different PvP queues in addition to Ker'rat? Does the PVP community agree with you, or do they have a different view?

    So far I've only heard your view of the situation. It's valid of course, but having the whole pictures could help a lot (and I mean this for your benefit; I have no interest in doing PVP, period)
    Was named Trek17.

    Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
  • edited November 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    sophlogimo wrote: »
    I am saying: It is not "just okay". It is a fine ship.

    And I'm saying it's not just a fine ship, it's the best ship in STO to me! ;)

    I am also being serious. While I do dabble with a lot of awesome KDF ships between my chars. bought to support the Klingon faction, the only way you'll ever see my main out of this ship is if Cryptic shuts down the game or a bus hits me while crossing the street. :D

    And before anyone else says "Sure, now you like it!", it's been my go to ship since her release date in the C-Store. You can check my posts on the forum from the date I joined my account to PWE and you can see me repeatedly stating this about the Bortasqu'. I'm not going to go into details again cause you can compile a novel based on my previous posts regarding why the Bortasqu' doesn't suck and I find it boring atm to do that again here.

    The thing with this ship is - it has a very steep and weird learning curve and takes a lot getting used to, especially if you're in the basic KDF mindset of very fast, very nimble and at the same time powerfull attack ships. This is a ture battleship. For people like me that like big, slow and boosted cruisers it's the best thing.

    OP, congratulations. You're a part of the obviously very unusual group of players that have truly mastered and enjoy the command of the KDF's flagship. Qapla'!

    P.S. I'm going to leave you with a description of the Bortasqu' posted by one other fellow player and Bortas enthusiast - sander223:
    "The Bortas is the Tyrannosaurus Rex of battlecruisers!"
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • atlantraatlantra Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    The ship is not that good, and that's just a fact. Sell numbers, and the reason it's KDF's only three pack is all the proof I need. I listen to the expert players.

    I spent $50 on a ship I don't even use anymore. I'm okay with that. I supported STO by doing so. Wont happen again anytime soon. For those who do like it, yay, but there's way more people who dislike it. That makes it a failure to any company trying to earn a lot of money. Obviously. 50% of 100% is still an "F". It's like buying a $50 game that scored a 5 out of 10. You won't feel too joyful about that. Paying $50 for something that's average.
    trek21 wrote:
    I wouldn't know, because I've used Subspace Snare about 20 times in the last three days, and that never happened...

    I used it over 200 times. Try activating buffs while target is preparing to teleport. You can't use bridge officer powers until current target is teleported. Same with the auto cannon charge up sequence. I'm sure you never noticed because you fight nothing but NPC's. No need to hit buffs constantly there. No pressure at all.
    trek21 wrote:
    Seriously, if you don't know what you are talking about, don't talk.;)

    I actually pay attention very closely, so I know exactly what I'm talking about. ;)
    The dress is gold and white. Over 70% people says so. When viewed from a certain screen angle it appears blue and black. The dress displayed on amazon is a blue and black dress, but it's not the same dress in the picture. If you're seeing blue & black you're slightly colored blind. A normal upright screen = white and gold.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • edited November 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • mimey2mimey2 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    I've been saying this for awhile, that the Bortasqu' is a good ship. I bought it shortly after it came out, been flying it ever since.

    It's not easy to fly. It needs time to learn how it use it.

    I had to learn way before all these fancy fleet consoles started helping with it's turn. But I quickly saw just how much damage it could pump out, which was a LOT. It had 5 tac consoles months before fleet ships came out, so that was something the KDF had which was unique, and also eventually lost.

    Even in PvP, if the pilot is good enough, it can be surprising enough to get kills with, because people underestimate the ship.
    I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
    I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
  • bitemepwebitemepwe Member Posts: 6,760 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    fun for PvE. Lousy for PvP.
    Leonard Nimoy, Spock.....:(

    R.I.P
  • edited November 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • atlantraatlantra Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    sophlogimo wrote: »
    I get that you believe you do know. But as you have trouble defeating targets with a 5-tac-console-ship, I can only conclude that you don't.

    Yes PVP 'Human' targets. Something you clearly know nothing about. Obviously. I do fine in Monbosh Battleship, or other battle cruisers. So yeah, it's not me. If any Bortasqu comes near me in PVP, it will lose. No matter the payer. They will be facing -220 power drain in all sub-systems with no way to counter. 5 Tac consoles don't mean a thing with zero weapon power. Aye, now you learned something. Again, I know what I'm doing, and I don't spend all day fighting mindless NPC's. Only other players.

    You won't last 20 seconds versus me. :cool:
    The dress is gold and white. Over 70% people says so. When viewed from a certain screen angle it appears blue and black. The dress displayed on amazon is a blue and black dress, but it's not the same dress in the picture. If you're seeing blue & black you're slightly colored blind. A normal upright screen = white and gold.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • edited November 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • edited November 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • trek21trek21 Member Posts: 2,246 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    sophlogimo wrote: »
    atlantra in a fleet Varanus brought a drain build, and then a fbp build to the duel, and deployed web mines. Still needed a lot more than 20 seconds to defeat a tactical BortasQu' (sci lt com, sci captain) and didn't dare to use anything that would be considered sensible for a duel. Almost died, despite the fact that BortasQu only used Mk XII green weapons.
    So, who ultimately won? (Sorry, but what you're saying is giving conflicting evidence XD)
    Was named Trek17.

    Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
Sign In or Register to comment.