test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

D'deridex a warbird not a cruiser

mirrorshatnermirrorshatner Member Posts: 149 Arc User
edited December 2013 in Romulan Discussion
As above, yes that's always been the case, but with the DD having a turning circle the size of a planetary orbit. Cruisers have shared that problem - but not anymore - cruisers get cruiser commands and can buff their own turn rate.

Fair? Well cruisers don't have singularity powers, but now they can increase their own turn rate.
Leaves the DD as the worst turning ship in the game.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Post edited by mirrorshatner on
«1

Comments

  • reginamala78reginamala78 Member Posts: 4,593 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    DD can battlecloak, is durable enough to do so even when under fire (or use sing powers or its special console to ignore that fire outright), and solve any turning problems once cloaked. I love my DD, but I recognize how its so much better than my Fed or KDF cruisers, and am glad the cruiser commands are something Rom ships do not have.
  • mustafatennickmustafatennick Member Posts: 868 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    For gods sake you don't buy a dd to turn

    With beam weapons enjoying a resurgence to power you really just need to adjust how you play and stop moaning

    Sing powers are much more valuable and OP than a measly 3 at best increase in turn rate and let's face it if your using something other than the weapon boost on the cruiser powers your a noob and need your head looking at
    ----=====This is my opinion you don't have to listen and no one else has to read them these "OPINIONS" are based on my exploits and my learning other people will have their opinions and that's fine just don't knock my way of doing things thanks=====---- :cool:
  • eisenw0lfeisenw0lf Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    The only problem I see with the D'D is that it can't field an effective Aux2Bat build (only possible if you use the valuable LtC Eng slot) and therefore can't jump into the awesome-beamboat-FAW-Aux2Bat-DEM3-Iwin-crowd.
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    eisenw0lf wrote: »
    The only problem I see with the D'D is that it can't field an effective Aux2Bat build (only possible if you use the valuable LtC Eng slot) and therefore can't jump into the awesome-beamboat-FAW-Aux2Bat-DEM3-Iwin-crowd.
    Really? I think mine is pretty good. But I don't PvP, so....

    BEHOLD!
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • latiasracerlatiasracer Member Posts: 680 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    I love the D'd and it's perfectly viable to build it with a cannon/beam combination. It's a unique experience alright but you can get around it's monstrous turn rate by using even the Mk X Enhanced RCS consoles


    You can't fly it as an escort, I have found the most efficient tactic is decloak at 3km, Pop rapid fire/EptW/Beta/Tacteam/Tractor beam and just blow the target to bits. Then either rotate if your next target is left/right of you or cloak/subspace jump if they are behind you.


    Here's my build, I'm more than happy with how it preforms in PvE's (Can just about hold it's own in kerrat too!)

    http://skillplanner.stoacademy.com/?build=rrwsajuuk_0
    warp plasma can't melt neutronium beams
  • eisenw0lfeisenw0lf Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    skollulfr wrote: »
    you shouldnt have to cheese out a build in order to be competitive, that a sign the game is borked at a foundational level.
    as is the advantage you get from cheesing out like that.

    a2b should be an option out of many other competitive setups, not "do this or take a self imposed penalty".

    I completely agree with you, but this is just not how STO mechanics work. There is always this one build which far exceeds all other options. The sad thing about the D'D is that it would only need ONE more Lt Eng station and you'd see it everywhere in PvP. Even if it would loose its LtC Sci station in exchange for that it would be so much more powerful in comparison. But since this is not the case it remains a pure vanity PvE ship, just like the Fed Galaxy.
  • alopenalopen Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    eisenw0lf wrote: »
    I completely agree with you, but this is just not how STO mechanics work. There is always this one build which far exceeds all other options. The sad thing about the D'D is that it would only need ONE more Lt Eng station and you'd see it everywhere in PvP. Even if it would loose its LtC Sci station in exchange for that it would be so much more powerful in comparison. But since this is not the case it remains a pure vanity PvE ship, just like the Fed Galaxy.

    Go fly the haakona, leave my D'd alone.
  • tlamstriketlamstrike Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    I love the D'd and it's perfectly viable to build it with a cannon/beam combination. It's a unique experience alright but you can get around it's monstrous turn rate by using even the Mk X Enhanced RCS consoles
    Once to mess around back when LoR just launched and everyone was complaining about the turn rate (nice to see some things never change lol) I decided to mess around. I put some common RCS on the D'D, the two C-Store consoles and used Aux to Damp, EPtE, Omega and Evasive Maneuvers all while cloaked. I had that monster doing doughnuts around New Romulus with a triple digit turn rate. I got quite a few tells that day.

    So if you really want to make that D'D turn there are ways. :D
    My Romulan Liberated Borg character made it to Level 30 and beat the (old) Defense of New Romulus with the skill point bug. :D
  • eisenw0lfeisenw0lf Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    alopen wrote: »
    Go fly the haakona, leave my D'd alone.

    *pat pat* shhh ... it's alright. No one is gonna take your D'Derpidex. :rolleyes:
  • cidevantcidevant Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    The only ships in the game that is better than a D'Deridex are the Scimitar and Recluse.
  • mirrorshatnermirrorshatner Member Posts: 149 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    So it is deliberate and by design
    Romulans do not have Cruisers

    Federation and Klingons do
    Here is the link

    http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=890841

    Cruisers
    Ships that fall into this category receive all four Cruiser Commands. Below is a list of ships that are classified as Cruisers:
    Federation

    Battle Cruisers
    Ships that fall into this category receive three Cruiser Commands: Command - Strategic Maneuvering, Command - Shield Frequency Modulation and Command - Weapon System Efficiency. Below is a list of ships that are classified as Battle Cruisers:
    Federation
    Klingon Empire
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    For as overpowered as Romulan Warbirds are, they are the last things in the game that need more gaming boosts.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    edited October 2013
    Im not sure which blows my mind more... that there are people that like the D'deridex or that there are people whining that romulans need cruiser powers
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • mirrorshatnermirrorshatner Member Posts: 149 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    For as overpowered as Romulan Warbirds are, they are the last things in the game that need more gaming boosts.

    You seem to be applying the same brush to all Romulan warbirds, when there are only a couple that have the traditional "cruiser" characteristics. The D'deridex is one of them.
    The only others are Ha'apax and Haakona.

    http://sto.gamepedia.com/Romulan_playable_starship

    Also, not every cruiser on Federation and Klingon got the same amount of powers. The TOS 1966 Constitution got all four powers (!), the D7/K'tinga only got 3 of them.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • robby0321robby0321 Member Posts: 74 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    tlamstrike wrote: »
    Once to mess around back when LoR just launched and everyone was complaining about the turn rate (nice to see some things never change lol) I decided to mess around. I put some common RCS on the D'D, the two C-Store consoles and used Aux to Damp, EPtE, Omega and Evasive Maneuvers all while cloaked. I had that monster doing doughnuts around New Romulus with a triple digit turn rate. I got quite a few tells that day.

    So if you really want to make that D'D turn there are ways. :D

    This post answers your question if you want that big ship to turn u are gonna have to give up some tankiness to make it happean. Which is a fair trade off keeps the game balanced also another person hit the nail on the head it's a big ship it's not made to fly like an escort if you had a ship that could tank and do great dps there would be no point In having other ships in game now would they.
  • erhardgrunderhardgrund Member Posts: 167 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    eisenw0lf wrote: »
    The only problem I see with the D'D is that it can't field an effective Aux2Bat build (only possible if you use the valuable LtC Eng slot) and therefore can't jump into the awesome-beamboat-FAW-Aux2Bat-DEM3-Iwin-crowd.


    Well, running 1 atb instead of 2 is good enough for most pvp engagements cmobined with decloack and the allmighty crth crthd buff romulan boffs come with youll have plenty of firepower to end the engagement. If it takes much longer than that youre allready in a situation where disengaging is the best thing to do. At least most times.
    tactical initiative plus singulrity overload can go a long way to compensate for the loss of the secont atb.
    Cruisers ftw!
  • ridddickxxxridddickxxx Member Posts: 479 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    D'deridex not an cruiser?

    Ok, than the Bird Of Prey is not an escort, it is a Bird Of Prey.
    Raptors are not heavy escort, they are raptors.

    It is called:
    D'deridex Warbird Battle Cruiser, which makes it battle cruiser
    2nhfgxf.jpg
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    D'deridex not an cruiser?

    Ok, than the Bird Of Prey is not an escort, it is a Bird Of Prey.
    Raptors are not heavy escort, they are raptors.

    It is called:
    D'deridex Warbird Battle Cruiser, which makes it battle cruiser

    Go to the shipyard and uncheck the "Warbird" category.
    Can you still find the D'D in the list of purchaseable ships? No?
    That's because it's a Warbird.
  • alopenalopen Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    D'deridex not an cruiser?

    Ok, than the Bird Of Prey is not an escort, it is a Bird Of Prey.
    Raptors are not heavy escort, they are raptors.

    It is called:
    D'deridex Warbird Battle Cruiser, which makes it battle cruiser

    STO term battlecruiser genearlly refers to a engineer type ship that can equip dhcs and has enough manuverability to use them. Until recently, that was the KDF's claim to fame. The Avneger provides that kind of gameplay to the feds, now. The Romulans don't have anything in this ball park. They have warbirds that turn like cruisers but can use dhcs for decloaking alphas. They (D'D, Ha'pax, and Hakona) are poorly equipped to dog fight with dhcs without cloaking. Bear in mind that no battlcruiser to date has battlecloak. 100% fair trade off.
  • suavekssuaveks Member Posts: 1,736 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    I still think both the D'deridex and the Ha'apax should receive their own set of Comm Array Abilities.

    All the "Romulans are OP" talk aside, both ships are the slowest Romulan vessels there are, they don't have any unique abilities that would differentiate them from the Scimitar for example, they can barely turn and are generally underwhelming compared to other ships available.

    For example, the Tal Shiar Battle Cruiser has better turn rate, can cloak, has sensor analysis and a set of three Comm Array commands. The D'deridex has worse turn rate, no special abilities other than singularity stuff (at the expense of -40 power) and no comm array powers. It only has battle cloak, to its advantage.

    Yes, Romulans as a whole need to be balanced. Their traits are ridiculous, certain ships are overpowered and so on. Still, I just think that giving the older ships something to make them more in line with the rest is in order. It's a similar issue like the one with the Galaxy. Just give the D'deridex and the Ha'apax at least two Comm Array abilities to at least lessen the gap between them and the Scimitar everyone's flying now.

    I vote for Strategic Maneuvering and Attract Fire to be added to the D'deri and the Ha'apax. I mean, if the Ha'nom can use sensor analysis and subsystem targeting, like a proper science vessel, then romulan battlecruisers should receive cruiser powers as well.
    PyKDqad.jpg
  • ursusmorologusursusmorologus Member Posts: 5,328 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    D'Deridex does not need cruiser comm arrays, it is quite capable without them
  • suavekssuaveks Member Posts: 1,736 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    D'Deridex does not need cruiser comm arrays, it is quite capable without them
    The same could have been said about the Tal Shiar Battle Cruiser, yet that didn't stop it from receiving the comm array powers.
    PyKDqad.jpg
  • kapla1755kapla1755 Member Posts: 1,249
    edited October 2013
    suaveks wrote: »
    The same could have been said about the Tal Shiar Battle Cruiser, yet that didn't stop it from receiving the comm array powers.

    The Tal Shiar battlecruiser is also not a warbird and thus has no singularly powers, Romulan battle cloak gives you a better turn boost than the comm arrays already.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • trhrangerxmltrhrangerxml Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    kapla1755 wrote: »
    The Tal Shiar battlecruiser is also not a warbird and thus has no singularly powers, Romulan battle cloak gives you a better turn boost than the comm arrays already.

    Technically it is a D'D, but with a Warp Core rather than a Singularity core, thus it looses its Singularity powers. The Adapted Battlecruiser with the adapted set, the borg set and the borg tech set, along with Comm Array is darn near indestructible.
    Hi, my name is: Elim Garak, Former Cardassian Oppressor

    LTS, here since...when did this game launch again? :D
  • mirrorshatnermirrorshatner Member Posts: 149 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    suaveks wrote: »
    I still think both the D'deridex and the Ha'apax should receive their own set of Comm Array Abilities.

    All the "Romulans are OP" talk aside, both ships are the slowest Romulan vessels there are, they don't have any unique abilities that would differentiate them from the Scimitar for example, they can barely turn and are generally underwhelming compared to other ships available.

    I vote for Strategic Maneuvering and Attract Fire to be added to the D'deri and the Ha'apax. I mean, if the Ha'nom can use sensor analysis and subsystem targeting, like a proper science vessel, then romulan battlecruisers should receive cruiser powers as well.

    That's exactly what I was thinking.

    If the D'deridex *only* got the "increase threat" ATTRACT FIRE command - would that make it more OP?
    If the D'deridex *only* got the "increase turn" STRATEGIC MANEUVERING - would that make it more OP?
    Until now, the Sovereign started with a turn rate of 7 - which is already 2 points higher than the D'deridex. Now with the Aura it can add +3 which puts it even further ahead.

    Battlecloak turn doesn't make up for that, and it's not "always on"
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • kapla1755kapla1755 Member Posts: 1,249
    edited November 2013
    Technically it is a D'D, but with a Warp Core rather than a Singularity core, thus it looses its Singularity powers. The Adapted Battlecruiser with the adapted set, the borg set and the borg tech set, along with Comm Array is darn near indestructible.

    and the TS adapted battle cruiser is not a warbird = no singularly powers. :D
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • tehepicpwnzertehepicpwnzer Member Posts: 23 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    You seem to be applying the same brush to all Romulan warbirds, when there are only a couple that have the traditional "cruiser" characteristics. The D'deridex is one of them.
    The only others are Ha'apax and Haakona.

    http://sto.gamepedia.com/Romulan_playable_starship

    Also, not every cruiser on Federation and Klingon got the same amount of powers. The TOS 1966 Constitution got all four powers (!), the D7/K'tinga only got 3 of them.

    '66 Constitution qualified as Heavy Cruiser in it's day. Now it's a light CRUISER small but tough.
    Star Wars next?

    26th Fleet
  • ridddickxxxridddickxxx Member Posts: 479 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Technically it is a D'D, but with a Warp Core rather than a Singularity core, thus it looses its Singularity powers. The Adapted Battlecruiser with the adapted set, the borg set and the borg tech set, along with Comm Array is darn near indestructible.

    O yes, i just bought Tal Shiar Battle Cruiser (90 mil EC) and already had Destroyer so i completed the set.
    Before the comm array in was around 70 mil.
    This thing now is indestructible tank with so much firepower.
    2nhfgxf.jpg
  • cptshephardcptshephard Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Sooo I haven't played around with an actual cruiser-cruiser in a long time so I've not tried out the comm array powers, but I really haven't seen anything that makes me wish I had them on my D'deridex. It seems to turn just fine like I have it and I get a certain amount of glee at engaging the battlecloak, spinning like a top, decloaking and opening fire. Makes me feel like I'm in an episode of Trek. Heh.

    And once in a while I'll equip quad disruptors on it just for fun. I know it's probably a detriment.. buuuuuuut.. I love how it looks when that beast of a warbird swoops in while decloaking and those things start firing.

    I'm easily amused.
  • bluegrassgeekbluegrassgeek Member Posts: 360 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Yeah, I don't get all the hate on the DD. Gorgeous ship, the turn rate really isn't as bad as people are making it out to be. I think part of the problem is just the sheer size of the model, making it "feel" more sluggish than it really is.

    There used to be a similar outcry about Tauren in classic WoW. The model was so big, its run animation moved slower... but the actual character had the same run speed as every other race. People kept complaining that the Tauren were slower than other races, but they weren't. The animation was just slower because of how tall the Tauren were.
    ____
    Keep calm, and continue firing photon torpedoes.
Sign In or Register to comment.