test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Yet another Typhoon thread.

2

Comments

  • thay8472thay8472 Member Posts: 6,149 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Typhoon please... so much better than the vesta
    2gdi5w4mrudm.png
    Typhoon Class please!
  • ltdata96ltdata96 Member Posts: 15 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    I agree! I would love to see Typhoon and Jupiter class vessels playable ingame, every faction has it's hugest and most impressing ships playable (Vo'Quv, Scimitar), so why not fed (and don't argue with the oddy, it's tiny).
    The ship you suggest is a bit over powered. I personally would like to see it as a fed battle carrier.

    P.S. The Typhoon isn't ugly and why would cryptic not like to make it playable?
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    edited July 2013
    Just asking again.
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • baelogventurebaelogventure Member Posts: 1,002 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Of course it's overpowered, it's a Battleship in a game of Gun Cruisers and Battlecruisers. =3
  • thelethalvectorthelethalvector Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    i would enjoy the typhoon battleship.. and i know this would never happen but it would be epic if it could have 10 weapon slots.. 5 in front and 5 in the rear. i would enjoy having the typhoon as well because the dreadnought cruiser is disappointing in some manners and typhoons as a bolster for it would be a great addition..
  • chance74chance74 Member Posts: 51 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    The STO wiki says that the Typhoon is a "refit of the Majestic-class Cruiser was upgraded with state-of-the-art systems and equipment."

    It seems to me that they should offer this as an unlock skin/model for use with the ACR or FACR.

    My 0.02EC
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    edited August 2013
    chance74 wrote: »
    The STO wiki says that the Typhoon is a "refit of the Majestic-class Cruiser was upgraded with state-of-the-art systems and equipment."

    It seems to me that they should offer this as an unlock skin/model for use with the ACR or FACR.

    My 0.02EC
    Sounds like fanfic. The Typhoon is about 1200 metres long, the Majestic is around 800 metres, certainly not a variant of the AC.
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • madmoparmadmopar Member Posts: 234 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    What they should do is add the typhoon as a giant battleship for the feds and a klingon version of the vesta or reconnaissance science vessel(maybe with enhanced battle cloak). It would show the two sides adopting new tactics.
  • orangeitisorangeitis Member Posts: 5,222 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    skollulfr wrote: »
    this is because the prime universe feds are a lot of brainwashed drank their own coolade commie wannabe soviets.
    Looks like someone's mad because the Feds portrays a post-scarcity utopia in a positive light.

    Go back to your war-ridden home dimension, Terran. ;)
  • dsarisdsaris Member Posts: 373 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Making the Typhoon should be simple. Use the same layout and stats as the D'Dex retrofit. Could do plenty of damage, tank extremely well, and have some science in its back pocket (we've ALL been pushed around by those Repulsors).

    Why we haven't been given it yet I have no clue.
  • adverberoadverbero Member Posts: 2,045 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    chance74 wrote: »
    The STO wiki says that the Typhoon is a "refit of the Majestic-class Cruiser was upgraded with state-of-the-art systems and equipment."

    It seems to me that they should offer this as an unlock skin/model for use with the ACR or FACR.

    My 0.02EC

    It definatly shares some of the design

    But examining the model ( not great TBH, but its an older one ) its clear that a lot of the ships structure IF built out of a majestic, Is a rebuild rather than a retro fit

    The ammount of extra Mass is significant, the deflector is increased in size and the engineering hull is much larger as well

    Though it does appear to have the same or similar pylon structures and Saucer section



    My personal opinion is it is much more what the Nebula is to the Galaxy, Similar, But not a Refit , or at least not a simple one
    solar_approach_by_chaos_sandwhich-d74kjft.png


    These are the Voyages on the STO forum, the final frontier. Our continuing mission: to explore Pretentious Posts, to seek out new Overreactions and Misinformation , to boldly experience Cynicism like no man has before.......
  • lordkasulordkasu Member Posts: 118 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    orangeitis wrote: »
    Looks like someone's mad because the Feds portrays a post-scarcity utopia in a positive light.

    Go back to your war-ridden home dimension, Terran. ;)

    They try, but fail.
  • starhoundstarhound Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Any thoughts on a built-in, tractor beam repulsor as its special console? I suggest this because anytime I see it in combat that seems to be its first, go-to move. :D
    We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful God, who creates faulty Humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes. - Gene Roddenberry
  • oldravenman3025oldravenman3025 Member Posts: 1,892 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    madmopar wrote: »
    What they should do is add the typhoon as a giant battleship for the feds and a klingon version of the vesta or reconnaissance science vessel(maybe with enhanced battle cloak). It would show the two sides adopting new tactics.


    I like this idea. It adds variety.
  • theraven2378theraven2378 Member Posts: 6,007 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Might be good as a battleship/heavy carrier, it looks like it has the space for 2 hangers with the firepower of a assault cruiser. Here's my take on the Typhoon.

    5 fore weapons slots, 5 aft, because the firepower has to be in line with that of a battleship.
    2 hanger decks for fighters or support craft depending on player's choice

    5 engineering console slots
    2 science console slots
    3 tactical console slots

    boff arrangement
    1 lt cmd tactical
    cmd engineering, lt cmd engineering
    lt science

    hull points 45000
    shield multiplier 2
    turn rate 7
    +10 power to weapons
    crew 3000
    unique warp core
    NMXb2ph.png
      "The meaning of victory is not to merely defeat your enemy but to destroy him, to completely eradicate him from living memory, to leave no remnant of his endeavours, to crush utterly his achievement and remove from all record his every trace of existence. From that defeat no enemy can ever recover. That is the meaning of victory."
      -Lord Commander Solar Macharius
    • adverberoadverbero Member Posts: 2,045 Arc User
      edited August 2013
      starhound wrote: »
      Any thoughts on a built-in, tractor beam repulsor as its special console? I suggest this because anytime I see it in combat that seems to be its first, go-to move. :D

      Yeah i noticed that too
      solar_approach_by_chaos_sandwhich-d74kjft.png


      These are the Voyages on the STO forum, the final frontier. Our continuing mission: to explore Pretentious Posts, to seek out new Overreactions and Misinformation , to boldly experience Cynicism like no man has before.......
    • twoblindmonkstwoblindmonks Member Posts: 255
      edited August 2013
      And no, I don't care that it IS another Typhoon thread. I want this dang ship.

      My proposed set up for it.

      Typhoon-class, with alternate Hurricane and Cyclone skins.

      SNIP

      Oh, you want these ships:

      Typhoon

      Hurricane

      Cyclone

      The STO Typhoon is the ugliest kit bash I have ever seen. I hope it never becomes playable. Or if it does, I hope I can censor it from my screen.
      ____________________________________________________
      Pay no attention to the dates and titles under my name at the left! I am a Career Officer, Lifetime Sub since launch, was in the Beta. Having problems with my forum account.
    • admiralq1732admiralq1732 Member Posts: 1,561 Arc User
      edited August 2013
      Oh, you want these ships:

      Typhoon

      Hurricane

      Cyclone

      The STO Typhoon is the ugliest kit bash I have ever seen. I hope it never becomes playable. Or if it does, I hope I can censor it from my screen.

      It will be redesigned if it becomes playable
    • hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
      edited August 2013
      Oh, you want these ships:

      Typhoon

      Hurricane

      Cyclone

      The STO Typhoon is the ugliest kit bash I have ever seen. I hope it never becomes playable. Or if it does, I hope I can censor it from my screen.

      You also picked the ugliest possible shot of the typhoon.
      It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
    • psycoticvulcanpsycoticvulcan Member Posts: 4,160 Arc User
      edited August 2013
      You also picked the ugliest possible shot of the typhoon.

      Can you provide a good one? :D
      NJ9oXSO.png
      "Critics who say that the optimistic utopia Star Trek depicted is now outmoded forget the cultural context that gave birth to it: Star Trek was not a manifestation of optimism when optimism was easy. Star Trek declared a hope for a future that nobody stuck in the present could believe in. For all our struggles today, we haven’t outgrown the need for stories like Star Trek. We need tales of optimism, of heroes, of courage and goodness now as much as we’ve ever needed them."
      -Thomas Marrone
    • adverberoadverbero Member Posts: 2,045 Arc User
      edited August 2013
      Oh, you want these ships:

      Typhoon

      Hurricane

      Cyclone

      The STO Typhoon is the ugliest kit bash I have ever seen. I hope it never becomes playable. Or if it does, I hope I can censor it from my screen.

      I like the typhoon personally, its a battleship its not supposed to look nice

      But aside from that Where are those three images from , I'm intrigued
      solar_approach_by_chaos_sandwhich-d74kjft.png


      These are the Voyages on the STO forum, the final frontier. Our continuing mission: to explore Pretentious Posts, to seek out new Overreactions and Misinformation , to boldly experience Cynicism like no man has before.......
    • baelogventurebaelogventure Member Posts: 1,002 Arc User
      edited August 2013
      Might be good as a battleship/heavy carrier, it looks like it has the space for 2 hangers with the firepower of a assault cruiser. Here's my take on the Typhoon.

      5 fore weapons slots, 5 aft, because the firepower has to be in line with that of a battleship.
      2 hanger decks for fighters or support craft depending on player's choice

      5 engineering console slots
      2 science console slots
      3 tactical console slots

      boff arrangement
      1 lt cmd tactical
      cmd engineering, lt cmd engineering
      lt science

      hull points 45000
      shield multiplier 2
      turn rate 7
      +10 power to weapons
      crew 3000
      unique warp core

      Bleech, it's a Battleship, not a Carrier.

      It should have a class of weapons larger then the Cruisers, not hangars.
    • adverberoadverbero Member Posts: 2,045 Arc User
      edited August 2013
      Bleech, it's a Battleship, not a Carrier.

      It should have a class of weapons larger then the Cruisers, not hangars.

      i don't know about that

      Look at the hanger sizes of all the canon Cruisers/battleship, They could easily be fitted for flightdeck ops
      solar_approach_by_chaos_sandwhich-d74kjft.png


      These are the Voyages on the STO forum, the final frontier. Our continuing mission: to explore Pretentious Posts, to seek out new Overreactions and Misinformation , to boldly experience Cynicism like no man has before.......
    • oldravenman3025oldravenman3025 Member Posts: 1,892 Arc User
      edited August 2013
      Oh, you want these ships:

      Typhoon

      Hurricane

      Cyclone

      The STO Typhoon is the ugliest kit bash I have ever seen. I hope it never becomes playable. Or if it does, I hope I can censor it from my screen.



      There are already (playable) vessels in this game that make the Typhoon and Jupiter look like Miss America. Two more are not going to hurt.
    • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
      edited August 2013
      I would want to see it. The ship looks nice as well. Be nice to see different skin variations as well. Like saucer looks, nacelles, pylons, stardrive. So you can make your own as well.

      I like the idea of the names. Call each variation by storm. Typhoon, Hurricane, and Cyclone.
      Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

      USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
      Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
    • nilorawrnilorawr Member Posts: 3 Arc User
      edited August 2013
      Might be good as a battleship/heavy carrier, it looks like it has the space for 2 hangers with the firepower of a assault cruiser. Here's my take on the Typhoon.

      5 fore weapons slots, 5 aft, because the firepower has to be in line with that of a battleship.
      2 hanger decks for fighters or support craft depending on player's choice

      5 engineering console slots
      2 science console slots
      3 tactical console slots

      boff arrangement
      1 lt cmd tactical
      cmd engineering, lt cmd engineering
      lt science

      hull points 45000
      shield multiplier 2
      turn rate 7
      +10 power to weapons
      crew 3000
      unique warp core

      In this form, it will never get in the game. Having 2 more weapons slots, huge shield mod of 2? Even fleet sci ships only go as far as 1.43. And the turnrate is way too high for a that kind of ship. 5 would be more appropriate. And the drop the hangers.
      That unique warpcore should be capable of taking the strain of running it full beam, otherwise, it is doomed.
    • madmoparmadmopar Member Posts: 234 Arc User
      edited August 2013
      Might be good as a battleship/heavy carrier, it looks like it has the space for 2 hangers with the firepower of a assault cruiser. Here's my take on the Typhoon.

      5 fore weapons slots, 5 aft, because the firepower has to be in line with that of a battleship.
      2 hanger decks for fighters or support craft depending on player's choice

      5 engineering console slots
      2 science console slots
      3 tactical console slots

      boff arrangement
      1 lt cmd tactical
      cmd engineering, lt cmd engineering
      lt science

      hull points 45000
      shield multiplier 2
      turn rate 7
      +10 power to weapons
      crew 3000
      unique warp core

      Needs at least 4 tac consoles to be a purpose built battleship. If its built for war then sci should be kept to a min. I would say 5 tac 1 sci 4 eng. Needs a more tac heavy boff set up as well otherwise it's just an oversized galaxy.
    • mwhitakermwhitaker Member Posts: 131 Arc User
      edited August 2013
      4:50 THIS is a Stellar Carrier/Dreadnought: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=UqA_zRXDWvQ&t=290

      And here's what you do about the typhoon: give it a COMPLETE reskin, perhaps, something leaning more towards the design of the cold war era Soviet Typhoon class nuclear submarine, sort of like how they based the Akira and the NX-01 off of a more submarine-like style, as the production team says. Create something, like every ship should be, that has "formidable opponent" written all over it, while still having an entirely possible means of defeating said death-bringer, like the TRIBBLE' Bismarck and Tirpitz. THOSE were true battleships.

      What would make this ship more plausible is to give it an entirely unique, much more strategically-oriented playstyle, such as, having an extended ship-exclusive arsenal of beam array abilities, similar to the integrated subsystem targeting powers demonstrated by most science vessels. And these abilities could be tethered to a unique console, or three, to suit a three-pack of ships, if necessary (just make a Klingon equivalent for God's sake, we beg of you). But a ship like this would truly need to be limited in it's maneuverability, with no "+2 turnrate" bonuses like the Scimitar or the D'Dex. And for crying out loud, Hurricane, Cyclone class? Pffft. Monsoon and Tempest sound ASTRONOMICALLY (<- it's a space joke you're all obliged to laugh) more official than "Hurricane or Cyclone". And both are still storms.

      Consider the above with care, and bare in mind, I'm not a massive fan of this ship as most feddies, being that I am a full-time loyal Warrior of the Empire. As if the feds need a more powerful cruiser, considering most things unique to the KDF either get given away or outmatched by a federation counterpart. Just because we get the Tor'Kaht does not mean you socialists deserve the same or better. Enjoy your Excelsiors.
      [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
      "The Borg - party-poopers of the galaxy" ~ The Doctor
    • ukcaptain420ukcaptain420 Member Posts: 345 Arc User
      edited October 2013
      And no, I don't care that it IS another Typhoon thread. I want this dang ship.

      My proposed set up for it.

      Typhoon-class, with alternate Hurricane and Cyclone skins.

      Designation - Battleship (No, NOT Cruiser)

      Innate Make this the console but have a -20% Acc As well- +100% Beam Weapon Damage (Which would be 50% for MMO math)

      Special Console - None. If needed, Dedicated Tractor Beam Array. Allows for use of Tractor Beam or Tractor Beam Repulsors on a console cooldown

      Special Weapon - 4x Heavy Phaser Beam Arrays. 280narrow the firing arc but have them side mounted,infact perhaps have all the weapons side mounted Base Damage (Compared to Accx2 and Dmgx2 Advanced Fleet Weapons on a ground map that have a 240 damage for a special beam base damage listing) -12 Weapon Drain, 2x Acc 3x Dmg modsChange this to DMGx4, Battleship Only, may only have 4 total equipped.

      Hull Strength - 50,000

      Shield Mod - 1.15

      Turn - 5.5imo this needs to be lower

      Bonus Power - +10 Weapons, +10 Shields

      Console Layout - 5 Engi, 1 Sci, 4 Tac

      BOff layout - Cmd Engi, LTC Tac, Lt Tac, Ens Sci, Lt Engi/Uni


      And, yeah, I really don't care what people say, if they say anything...I STILL want a Typhoon.



      Changes in RED

      But the main jist of what i have to say is, fair enough make it powerful, but make it slow moving, and less accurate
      SCM - Infected(S) - DMG Out: 11,776,567 DPS: 114,224.70 (28.7% of Team) - Pinky@ukcaptain420
      I reserve the right to have a completely different standpoint depending on my mood.
    • sevmragesevmrage Member Posts: 0 Arc User
      edited October 2013
      If you make that Turn rate any lower, it'll be a Starbase.

      Even the Galaxy has 6, same with the Oddy, and those two are HUEG.
      Weyland-Yutani Joint Space Venture - Always open to new members!
      [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
      My name is Rage, and I too support a revised Galaxy family.
      khayuung wrote: »
      Firstly, be proud! You're part of the few, the stubborn, the Federation Dreadnought Captains.
    Sign In or Register to comment.