Comments
-
To all those people that say they "farmed" their rank 9 - even if anyone believes you, note that you probably did so when medals were in the DQ rewards (and did it with illegal bots, no doubt). Notice, that they took that away too. Not to mention when gold was still dropping occasionally between (500k and 1m as opposed to…
-
+1 This ^ And I have full rank 9. Putting in there so some people have it and the majority do not, makes it so the vast majority of players start out KNOWING they will never be able to catch up unless they pay 2.5-4 times the amount of money the people with the benefit of the sale had to spend. And thats assuming that rep…
-
I predict less people putting a nickle into the game at these higher prices. Less gold in game means higher gold prices. Of course, if people just give up on buying anything from the cash shop at all, maybe demand for gold will drop just as much. So 100k gold, but 4 people logged into the server playing the game. And…
-
Define "taking down"?
-
This is what I am hoping was really the problem with the +12 orbs - duplicating them. Even if the duplicated item carries the same id "signature", once an orb is consumed, theoretically it couldn't be traced the same way? That's what I am hoping anyway - that the +12 orbs will return when the dupe glitch is fixed.
-
People said that cheap r8 would be "game-breaking" too. "Oh dear", the game is still here. What is game breaking in my opinion is allowing some people to jump on +12 orbs then removing them before others have an opportunity to purchase them, and give those people that got them basically a monopoly on +12 refines…
-
Go tell the people who are making up out of whole cloth the conclusion that they were removed due to pricing issues. Tell them to send a pm. Given that there are already 100s of posts containing this speculation, I provided an easy means to invite them to eliminate that speculation. But as I suspected, people like you…
-
Oh no, not another one. That is neither logical, nor an answer. I don't expect them to tell me "when" - that is silly. That would require them to know when they will "fix" whatever problem required them to remove the orbs. They never do that - and possibly can't. However, it should be easy for them to say that they WILL…
-
Why is my face relevant? And no, it was absolutely NOT a response to me. Again, I didn't ask what caused the crash. Just because you SHOULD be afraid to show your face next to what you post, don't assume I AM afraid to show mine next to what I post. My face is not relevant. Your failure to recognize the point of this…
-
I am not debating whether there is or is not a crash, or whether the orbs did or did not cause it. They apparently said the orbs were removed for one reason. Everyone on these forums assumes they were removed for another. It should be very easy for them to do away with that assumption. Unfortunately, this forum seems to be…
-
That answers the question "why were they removed?" Thats not my question. My question - "in case you missed it" - is this: "Will they return at some point at the same prices?" If they answer that "yes", then we know that all the people's speculation that they were removed due to some price glitch is unwarranted. You know,…
-
no, you do. You just choose to believe the trolls on the forums instead of wait for a response from the people that could provide an actual answer. So, yes, you do accept garbage with your mouth open. From people who have no idea what or why anything was done, let alone (more to the point of my post, in case you hadn't…
-
In order to "accept the loss" as you've said, I will have to accept that they are lying to us. You might be such a cynical b*tch as to do that, but I am not. Thank you.