Vote for the next PWI Forum Mod!
Comments
-
Cocobelle - Sanctuary wrote: »They're all furries and venos. b:shocked
Holy **** that's true!
I smell race favoritism!
Voted for Kritty[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
I personally am voting for Fuzzy (oh look im on RT and voting for Fuzzy, big woop!).
I see a lot of butthurt ppl complaining about the way Fuzzy speaks. I'd like to point out, he never stole this from anyone. A lot of people tend to do this, not just Hamsta.
Just as well, its impossible to rally a whole server to vote for one person, especially the newer servers such as RT and Archo, seeing as a lot of those players came from other servers who know other candidates. Just as much, have you seen some of the people saying they are voting for Fuzzy? or any candidate for that matter, they are choosing from various servers, not just their home server.
If you havent noticed by now, you can read their apps. It's possible people are making choices based on these ppls applications. pls be considerate. Frankie did mention that this was not to be for flaming. is it so hard to actually listen?
It's true some peoples votes may be biased to an extent, even mine is (and im not talking about because im on the same server, so drop it). But I will say this, if you have problems with any of the nominations, it should only be posted if it is relevant to what their performance as a mod would be, not something trivial like the way they type on the forums.
now for any of you who are actually still listening at this point, I picked Fuzzy based on personal experience with him in a leadership position. If it wasnt for that, then I may have picked Kritty, cause honestly, I found those two apps to be most appealing to me, it just came down to personal experience in the end.
That is all, thank you.0 -
frankieraye wrote: »That option is actually your browser's "back" button.
Oh snap, Frankie is starting to....
b:shocked
But to be on topic, I'm voting for Krisnda for several reasons.
For one, Kris is known all through the forums, not just one section.
He's nice, tolerant, etc.
I'm sorry Fuzzy, you're from my server yes.
But I do not believe you have the qualities of being a moderator.
Having a "cool" signature and talking in a specific manner should not give you a position as mod.
Its about the honesty, the way you treat people, etc.
And thats my two cents on this topic.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Hiatus from April 20110 -
I have to agree on this one, I could never take someone in a position of power seriously when they choose to speak in an immature and cutesy way. It's a shame too because from what I have read Fuzzy does to try to make valid points and to be supportive of many of the issues that we players have. I just have to personally tune him out after a few of his words.
I might propose that he would agree ahead of time to handle the potential Moderator position in adult and proffesional terms and speech and then feel free to use his regular talk when posting his own personal opinions, I for one could live with that.0 -
Azura - Lost City wrote: »eww, I can't believe Zoe is nominated, that would be the most stupid mod ever if she was elected.
based on the actions and attitudes of past mods. the one w/ the biggest power trip and ablity to answer posts in the most non productive way while making the op look stupid is the one they feel would be best.
just saying.0 -
Michael_Dark - Lost City wrote: »
I guess Fuzzy gets the default win because the forum is full of idiots.
That's a nice comment to the community you choose to participate in.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Fuzzyyy O.o yes yes i vote for Fuzzy_Wuzzy - Raging Time0
-
I choose you!!! .. . . . . Fuzzy_Wuzzy!!!
Don't know you but I like that name. Yes, its the dumbest reason to vote for someone but, I know no one and I don't really care who is a mod since they all do the same things, close threads and try to agree with players however no actions are taken, so there it is.
b:bye
- edit -
Forgot other point, "deal with drama queens"
ktybye. WTB> -12% channeling BELT or RING pm me with link or mail me ingame HT server, ty.0 -
As many people have posted here, I voted for Fuzzy...hopefully we can put an end to the multiple accounts voting conspiracy theory.
As for posts along these lines;Michael_Dark - Lost City wrote: »I agree we need friendlier mods, but not people with serious psychological issues. Talking about yourself in 3rd person is borderline psychotic.
You honestly believe that yourself? Hmm..we're all here for Perfect World, the GAME, this is supposed to be FUN, is it not? I would welcome a more light-hearted, yet sensible, moderation on these forums - it would be a breath of fresh air - and I believe Fuzzy is easily capable of providing us with just that!Its about the honesty, the way you treat people, etc.
As for this...being on the same server as Fuzzy, I've had a few dealings with him and I can honestly say that he has always been fair and honest.0 -
Ah, looks like Fuzzy is watching. Once again, I voted for Kritty cuz he's a cool, helpful guy; and once again, if you come out the winner of this voting, Fuzzy, DROP the third person vernacular. So very, very, very annoying. I cannot take you seriously when you speak like that, no matter how sound your logic. Plus, it makes you excessively wordy to have to use your name over and over in that manner, which reduces the effectiveness of what you have to say.
Fact is, I bet most people find it annoying as well (why not ask the people here what they think about that?) If my suspicions are correct and many others dislike it, then were you to become a moderator, I think it would be highly beneficial to discontinue speaking in third person.
Azzazin[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Setting of the twilight moon; a late evening rendezvous from atop the
city's lonely heights. With the dawn the city below springs into bustling
activity, and I don my morning apparel. From on high, I watch the world.0 -
Azzazin - Dreamweaver wrote: »Ah, looks like Fuzzy is watching. Once again, I voted for Kritty cuz he's a cool, helpful guy; and once again, if you come out the winner of this voting, Fuzzy, DROP the third person vernacular. So very, very, very annoying. I cannot take you seriously when you speak like that, no matter how sound your logic. Plus, it makes you excessively wordy to have to use your name over and over in that manner, which reduces the effectiveness of what you have to say.
Fact is, I bet most people find it annoying as well (why not ask the people here what they think about that?) If my suspicions are correct and many others dislike it, then were you to become a moderator, I think it would be highly beneficial to discontinue speaking in third person.
Azzazin
I know right ._.
Imagine Martin Luther King Jr. giving he's famous speech "I Have a Dream" in third person.
"Martin has a dream... that one day he..."
Would anyone had taken him seriously?[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
To be or not to be.
Current Goals: none.0 -
Cun - Lost City wrote: »I know right ._.
Imagine Martin Luther King Jr. giving he's famous speech "I Have a Dream" in third person.
"Martin has a dream... that one day he..."
Would anyone had taken him seriously?
Imagine the US constitution written in 1st person..
"I the president..." instead of "We the people..."
Same argument yes?[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Fuzzy_Wuzzy - Raging Tide wrote: »Imagine the US constitution written in 1st person..
"I the president..." instead of "We the people..."
Same argument yes?
Technically the US Constitution is written in first person.
"We" is the plural of a first person -.-
So no, not the same argument.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
To be or not to be.
Current Goals: none.0 -
Cun - Lost City wrote: »Technically the US Constitution is written in first person.
"We" is the plural of a first person -.-
So no, not the same argument.
Did you disregard what it says because it doesn't start with "I"? b:puzzled[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Fuzzy_Wuzzy - Raging Tide wrote: »Did you disregard what it says because it doesn't start with "I"? b:puzzled
Your not getting my point...
wait... Fuzzy isn't getting my point.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
To be or not to be.
Current Goals: none.0 -
BeingHope - Raging Tide wrote: »Oh snap, Frankie is starting to....
Oh yes, I was shocked/pleased/amazed ...0 -
Uhm, since when people care so much IN A GAME FORUM about grammar where 13 y/o kids are playing?, give me a break.
1F Y0U D0N7 L1K3 7H15 K1ND 0F TYP1NG TH3N D0N7 V1517 7H3 F0RUM5 :]
Not everyone is oldie to type in a proper manner, its not the place, time, section, NOR forum to do so.
ijs <- lol :]
I mean, everyone has their own style to type, let them be themselves, and shut up drama queens.WTB> -12% channeling BELT or RING pm me with link or mail me ingame HT server, ty.0 -
Yamiino - Heavens Tear wrote: »Uhm, since when people care so much IN A GAME FORUM about grammar where 13 y/o kids are playing?, give me a break.
1F Y0U D0N7 L1K3 7H15 K1ND 0F TYP1NG TH3N D0N7 V1517 7H3 F0RUM5 :]
Not everyone is oldie to type in a proper manner, its not the place, time, section, NOR forum to do so.
ijs <- lol :]
I mean, everyone has their own style to type, let them be themselves, and shut up drama queens.
Your not seeing the bigger picture here.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
To be or not to be.
Current Goals: none.0 -
Cun - Lost City wrote: »Your not seeing the bigger picture here.
Which is? Convince me.WTB> -12% channeling BELT or RING pm me with link or mail me ingame HT server, ty.0 -
Yamiino - Heavens Tear wrote: »Which is? Convince me.
Are you really that close-minded?
Anyways off to be
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
To be or not to be.
Current Goals: none.0 -
Cun - Lost City wrote: »Are you really that close-minded?
Anyways off to be
Close-minded? wait... I was the one that posted about letting everyone have their own style and now you tell me I'm close-minded? lol, you don't really know what you're typing about do you.
Anyways I'm off, not the time nor mood to keep this nonsense posting about a mod.
The poll will decide, like it or not. Life is not always fair
so deal with it.
Cya
b:byeWTB> -12% channeling BELT or RING pm me with link or mail me ingame HT server, ty.0 -
Yamiino - Heavens Tear wrote: »Close-minded? wait... I was the one that posted about letting everyone have their own style and now you tell me I'm close-minded? lol, you don't really know what you're typing about do you.
Anyways I'm off, not the time nor mood to keep this nonsense posting about a mod.
The poll will decide, like it or not. Life is not always fair so deal with it.
Cya
b:bye
Nope, I'm typing gibberish, sakdjkdnkjdnajsdhasjnasjfncjkas see?[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
To be or not to be.
Current Goals: none.0 -
Fuzzy comparing Fuzzy's speach to the US Constitution? ...
You lost me there, man. Your 'argument' is not relevant anyhow....
Read what Cun said again...[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
You are taking a non-event a little.. ok, way too seriously. This is just over a person who moves and locks threads. As long as they move and lock threads in a reasonable fashion, who cares. I don't get why people turn this kind of thing into some internet conspiracy theory or protrude an ex-girlfriend attitude about something so trivial.Michael_Dark - Lost City wrote: »To me... it's more creepy than having a conversation with someone who won't look you directly in the eyes... or someone who stands way too close to you when you're talking. lol0 -
=Airyll - Dreamweaver;10879302]Fuzzy's posts tend to make a lot of sense, but the third person speak is annoying and really removes any sort of seriousness from any post he's ever made. I can't take a guy seriously if he can't refer to himself properly and use proper speech and grammar; I'm not about to sit and take a moderator who does that seriously.
I'd treat Shelly and Grim with more seriousness and respect then Fuzzy would ever see from me, all because he doesn't possess the ability to actually post properly, because he thinks it's 1337 to be a Hamsta gimmick.
That's the thing... A lot of the time I see him post, I don't agree... he's often not much different than Zoe, in my opinion, except that he talks in 3rd person which just annoys me. He seems to confuse opinion with fact too much for my liking. The 3rd person-speak is just my proverbial icing.... that alone doesn't bother me. Perhaps he would make a good mod, I don't know. I'm against it, but not vehemently. Perhaps I'm subconsciously trolling a bit as well, not sure, haven't given it any thought. I just know my instinctive reaction is just NO.Fuzzy_Wuzzy - Raging Tide wrote: »That's a nice comment to the community you choose to participate in.
I like the game. I like helping people. I'm not going to alter what I like to do just because someone or a group of people bother me and it's not going to stop me from voicing my opinions either.Purge - Raging Tide wrote: »As for this...being on the same server as Fuzzy, I've had a few dealings with him and I can honestly say that he has always been fair and honest.
Perhaps you're right and I won't argue that.JanusZeal - Heavens Tear wrote: »You are taking a non-event a little.. ok, way too seriously. This is just over a person who moves and locks threads. As long as they move and lock threads in a reasonable fashion, who cares. I don't get why people turn this kind of thing into some internet conspiracy theory or protrude an ex-girlfriend attitude about something so trivial.
Ex-girlfriend attitude? Umm... what? So, are you trying to tell me when you voice your own opinion that there are deeper psychological issues at work? Yes, I believe you. Maybe you should seek some therapy. lolI post in forums. This one and others. That's why I post.0 -
Well, no, more like.. such a non-event doesn't necessitate such an exaggerated and overly analytical waste of time because it's not that big of a deal. Of course, noting that you think that everyone who disagrees with you needs therapy or has social problems, well.. that speaks for itself. I will put that in the same reverse psychological method of self-confession that politicians employ when speaking out against *** marriage and other issues that one excessively looks at as a way to blame others for problems one has their own self -- look up "projection bias" for a better example, or keep blaming others for your own problems.Michael_Dark - Lost City wrote: »Ex-girlfriend attitude? Umm... what? So, are you trying to tell me when you voice your own opinion that there are deeper psychological issues at work? Yes, I believe you. Maybe you should seek some therapy. lol0 -
JanusZeal - Heavens Tear wrote: »Well, no, more like.. such a non-event doesn't necessitate such an exaggerated and overly analytical waste of time because it's not that big of a deal. Of course, noting that you think that everyone who disagrees with you needs therapy or has social problems, well.. that speaks for itself. I will put that in the same reverse psychological method of self-confession that politicians employ when speaking out against *** marriage and other issues that one excessively looks at as a way to blame others for problems one has their own self -- look up "projection bias" for a better example, or keep blaming others for your own problems.
You really don't get it... I saw your attempt at a veiled insult and threw it right back at you. Directing me to a page on projection when I was accusing you of the same thing? lol That's just brilliant. Apparently you subconsciously understood me because you're trying to lead it down that path when I'm already one step ahead of you. Good job. I guess you 'cwutididthar', at least on some level. Congrats. lol
As for being a non-issue, I agree, that doesn't mean I won't say that it bugs me. As to your perception of that? It doesn't matter, nor do you.
b:byeI post in forums. This one and others. That's why I post.0 -
You obviously did not read the link, otherwise you would have understood the reason for it.Michael_Dark - Lost City wrote: »You really don't get it... I saw your attempt at a veiled insult and threw it right back at you. Directing me to a page on projection when I was accusing you of the same thing? lol That's just brilliant. Apparently you subconsciously understood me because you're trying to lead it down that path when I'm already one step ahead of you.
Now you can /facedesk.Good job. I guess you 'cwutididthar', at least on some level. Congrats.
It's a non-issue, yet it bugs you and you feel the need to constantly comment on something that is a non-issue. That link can't possibly be any more descriptive, to the T.As for being a non-issue, I agree, that doesn't mean I won't say that it bugs me. As to your perception of that? It doesn't matter, nor do you.
Hey guise, I want a mod to "look me in the eye" even through we're on the internet and obviously lack the ability to do so, yet I feel the need to comment on someone's social standing who is, for fun, roleplaying a character on a forum talking in 3rd person.Michael_Dark - Lost City wrote: »I agree we need friendlier mods, but not people with serious psychological issues. Talking about yourself in 3rd person is borderline psychotic.Michael_Dark - Lost City wrote: »To me... it's more creepy than having a conversation with someone who won't look you directly in the eyes... or someone who stands way too close to you when you're talking. lol
^-- self confession.0 -
JanusZeal - Heavens Tear wrote: »You obviously did not read the link, otherwise you would have understood the reason for it.
Now you can /facedesk.
It's a non-issue, yet it bugs you and you feel the need to constantly comment on something that is a non-issue. That link can't possibly be any more descriptive, to the T.
Hey guise, I want a mod to "look me in the eye" even through we're on the internet and obviously lack the ability to do so, yet I feel the need to comment on someone's social standing who is, for fun, roleplaying a character on a forum talking in 3rd person.
^-- self confession.
Aww, faulty logic... but I'm not projecting on anyone....or protrude an ex-girlfriend attitude ...
So ittle baby is frustrated from having ex-girlfriend issues and wants to pick a fight with me... how cute. Maybe you should talk to mommy and ask for a hug so you can feel better. b:pleased
b:byeI post in forums. This one and others. That's why I post.0 -
Michael_Dark - Lost City wrote: »Aww, faulty logic... but I'm not projecting on anyone.
So ittle baby is frustrated from having ex-girlfriend issues and wants to pick a fight with me... how cute. Trolling at it's finest b:laughMaybe you should talk to mommy and ask for a hug so you can feel better. b:pleased
b:bye
Just because someone doesn't think the same way as you, doesn't mean they are wrong. That is what makes us unique individuals. Also, yeah that statement is projecting. ._.
__
Third person is just a style of talking. You need to read more ... try a Dark-Hunter Novel. ^-^
The Keliska insist that you do. b:angry
See it can be threating Venomancers/Clerics rock![SIGPIC]http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs43/f/2009/110/1/5/Schrodinger_plz_by_McMonster_Ridgeback.gif[/SIGPIC]
Alt main: Traydor_Styx - RT - 960
![http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs43/f/2009/110/1/5/Schrodinger_plz_by_McMonster_Ridgeback.gif[/SIGPIC]](http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs43/f/2009/110/1/5/Schrodinger_plz_by_McMonster_Ridgeback.gif[/SIGPIC]){kind=link}
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 699 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61.1K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk