test content
Logo
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Howdy, Stranger!
Comments
-
-
Hi Ironzerg, Could you help me to understand How you maximize your Combat Advantage bonus ? I mean, seeing the ACT screenshots that you shared, I can see you have a very high and stable "Flank %" (which is, I suppose, CA, right ?). I have slotted "Nightmare Wizardry" to help on this but still I'm not able to keep such…
-
Dear Ironzerg, I was wondering how you succeed to get the extremely high :) 8% crit in regards to Storm Spell during the run you mentionned above. Here is my ACT capture for a run of eCC last night with my main (CW Renegade with SS+Chilling Presence slotted) and I definitely did only 0% crit for SS as I was expecting after…
-
Good question and I guess we are a lot to wait for a Clear message from Devs on this ... but until now there is nothing clear within the patches notes... What we did with one of my team mates is that we made Tests on Dummies on the preview server and we run ACT to check the difference of the same rotation using a Perfect…
-
Overall, the term "passive" dmg is not really correct because anyway YOU are deciding when to use your encounters, dailies, ... (which are triggering the passive boost that you mentioned). So, these "boosts" from Assailant, Storm Spell are all a consequence of your actions. So, let's say semi-passive, or semi-active, but…
-
ok, ok, I see. Thanks. So, basically having higher AC is like improving the effectiveness of the additional Defense stat vs the additional HP, so moving the break even point higher in case of your chart. :) Cool.
-
Hi Abaddan523, Thanks again for this very valuable work that you did and shared to the NW community. I have a question on the positioning of the blue line (eg: When AC=24 vs AC=10) which seems unintuitive for me. I would have thought that the break even point when AC is higher should be below, not above. If I have AC=10…
-
^^ Thanks. Feedback: Control Wizard Storm Spell and Assailant Changes The changes on Storm Spell (Moving to 30% proc, from 20%, **but** only on crits) and Assailant (To be activated only on Encounters) have a general impact on damage reduction close to 15% overall. Details on this post already listed here :…
-
I do agree. I tried to put some arguments here http://nw-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?773431-Official-Feedback-Thread-Other-Balance-Changes&p=9327641&viewfull=1#post9327641 on the "Official Feedback Thread: Other Balance Changes" but not sure it is even read/considered by Devs and so, I would like to push for…
-
I'm also lost with all the side discussion here (even if very valuable) but not directly linked to this initial Thread purpose. Can we go back to providing our feedbacks on the proposed Mod5 changes using the mechanics as proposed above by Chris to help the Devs ? As example, my 2 cents posted below yesterday, on CW's Mod5…
-
Dear Control Wizards !! I was wondering if we have a specific Discussion Thread to report our comments/suggestions for Mod 5 to Devs (a kind of "CW Class Advocate Feedback" thread) but it seems not. Yesterday I posted this message :…
-
To: Chris “Gentleman_Crush” Meyer Feedback: Control Wizard Storm Spell and Assailant Changes The changes on Storm Spell (Moving to 30% proc, from 20%, **but** only on crits) and Assailant (To be activated only on Encounters) have a general impact on damage reduction close to 15% overall. To measure the proposed changes, I…
-
Hello All, Is it confirmed that "Focused Wizardry" feat is always considering -30% on AoE spells even on the last rank where it should be only -10% ? Abaddon523, I have seen your separate posts on this based on ACT results. Do you think it is still the case or Is it solved ? And even if it still -30% is it worth to take it…